thisintegrated

Member
  • Content count

    2,747
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by thisintegrated

  1. Like I said, too ambitious. Far too many variables to take into account here. If I'm politically in the centre, what can you determine about my beliefs and morals? Be careful not to assume "left = selfless, right = selfish" or anything like that. There's no simple algorithm to determine what brings someone to a certain political stance.
  2. Green can be healthy or unhealthy. But, in general, Greens are more advanced than Oranges, and so are typically among the most advanced people in the world. Even Blues are, usually, good people, so finding a seriously racist Green is rare.
  3. Agreed. This one has got to be the most useless one I've come across in a while. Though, it is correct, can't really fault it. It's just too ambitious, too reliant on examples, too messy, and clearly not designed with any actual purpose in mind.
  4. "originally" there was no internet and you couldn't even research this stuff properly. Now you can input your date/place of birth and get the exact details you need. Well then you might wanna look into your moon and planets too to see if they all match you. Just need to know your location and time of birth. What's unclear is whether the specifics of the claims are accurate/reliable. Yes, everything's connected, but that's not enough to suggest that "Leos are the most arrogant", for example.
  5. Manifestation, and conscious intent being able to affect future probability are common knowledge here. I think it's more the origins of your attitudes, motivation, desires, etc. that Astrology tries to explain. E.g. your future wealth isn't a fixed thing, you can manifest it if you want as long there's uncertainty about the future. But you're not going to manifest a disinterest in wealth as that's not in alignment with your desires. imo, based on my ~1 hour of research, this is what Astrology tries to address: The constants that define you as an individual. Horoscopes, though, are mostly BS, imo, that rely too heavily on one's own interpretation of things. I'm sure they can be accurate, but from what I could find there exists no service that gives you anything reliable/accurate, just generalizations. It's the signs that seem to hold most of the information, ime.
  6. Maybe Leo gives special treatment to the people keeping the forum alive? btw you disrespectfully misspelled her name. Won't be surprised if you get banned for this.. A ban for being rude on one occasion is excessive, however you look at it. You never know all the details. Maybe Pretty insulted him a month ago or something, you never know. Don't try to justify insta-bans like this. Actually.. just checked. He didn't "delete him" from the forum. Just a suspension. Faith in Leo restored? Maybe? lol. Can't see the deleted posts now so we'll never know if he deserved it.
  7. Can you give a brief summary?
  8. So these psychics with superhuman intuition are telling people to drop astrology and just "try harder"?
  9. It's a possible reason. But I think it's more than likely there are plenty of intelligent people who are into astrology because they've found some real value in it, besides emotional. Do a test, including your hour and location of birth, and see if the descriptions of your results are likely to fit everyone equally.
  10. I am intrigued. Will look into this more deeply. Aquarius moon does seem to match me. Ascendant virgo too. Sagittarius in mercury was dead wrong in one description, but accurate in others. How am I an "open-minded, unique, innovative thinker" while also being someone who thinks in "black and white"???. Venus in capricorn seems pretty accurate. Life Path 8 also accurate, me being an enneagram 7w8.. Libra in mars is very accurate in some descriptions, while completely wrong in others. Apparently they're often passive aggressive and like to avoid controversy (I love controversy). Does this sign get altered because of the influence of Life Path 8 or what? Still, I'm impressed. Does seem to be above chance. Finally something worth my time researching?
  11. Truth. However.. It takes a lot of time and effort to learn. How is it different to other types of energy work? How is this any different to prana breathing or something? Cum 10 times in a row, and do 10 "mindful" breaths or something to make up for the """energy loss""". No evidence of "actual energy" increases. "Elevated Prana levels" (lol) are kinda useless for 99% of the population. If Leo learned this through years of penis/testicle exercises or whatever.. how would that benefit anyone?? He wouldn't make a video on this.
  12. Depends. If someone has financial problems they're gonna struggle convincing their subconscious mind that some recreational activity is worth doing. What determines what you "want" or "desire" or are "motivated" to do? Your subconscious mind. Most people can't convince themselves they're free. In fact, people refuse to give themselves freedom because they're invested in some goal they've given themselves.
  13. Depends. What do you wanna make? Go and F# (and maybe Rust) are the best. But they're still uncommon, with limited support. If you don't know what you want, do python or JS. Python is easier, for desktop, and is good if you ever wanna go into back-end web development. JS is more useful if you focus on web and front end, but awful to use. It can be used for desktop applications but they're gonna be slow and shitty. C# is great and perhaps the most versatile of all. Great for desktop, mobile, web, and gaming. But OOP, the concept C# is based off, is, arguably, a pointless PITA that causes more problems than it solves. F# is a less annoying version of C#.
  14. I already know my sun, moon, ascendant, MC, etc. What do I do with this information? lol, I entered the same information on another app and suddenly my "moon", "ascendant", and "MC" are different now.. I've also looked into ways of getting information out of these 4 parameters, and the best thing I found was "daily horoscopes" which provide general, non-specific, information about me. No "moon sign is x, therefore y" or anything like that. Just dogma with no way to verify anything or learn any kind of system. With something like MBTI it's all clear e.g. "here's an example of you using Ti and Ne, so I can conclude you're a user of Ti and Ne. Here are the implications of this.." With astrology there's none of that. You can't argue/debate as there's no coherent system you can engage with. You're forced into a position of believing what the authority says in the horoscope, or disbelieving it.
  15. If the signs themselves have any meaning/value whatsoever, they should at least vaguely describe the person. Sure, you can get more specific with more information, but Capricorns should at least match the basic description of "Capricorn", right? On a broad level, everyone should act like their sign says they act.
  16. Here ya go https://imgur.com/a/Dtd3jrn How accurate is this?
  17. "Popular" doesn't exactly say anything meaningful about a person.. like.. at all. Why is this only thing of note about him? All I really saw from the OP was: 1. Plays guitar. 2. Popular. If you're asking if you should pursue a relationship based on those factors alone, I'd say of course not. The fact those are the only things that stood out to you leads me to believe there's nothing more to it than that.
  18. This is very good. But a shame it couldn't save the market. RIP.
  19. This so much. I know this feeling very well. Would make for a fun video. Psychedelics reliably put me in this inquisitive state. Though often it just comes out of nowhere and I just start saying "WTF?!? WTF?!?!? etc."
  20. This is funny??? I don't think Leo has much interest in psychology. He's aware of his type, and of the basic idea of MBTI, but that's it as far as I know.
  21. Yaah, I'm a composer. But artistic expression is nothing but egoic expression. I used to be content with just immersing myself in music, but I'm kinda dying and have no energy for this anymore. I prefer silence over music these days. Yep. There's nothing. Truth. I could've said the same thing a few years back. I just don't care anymore. How many years can you keep entertaining yourself with insights about the world? At first I was fascinated by how everything's the same. How composing music / directing films / writing stories / drawing art / designing software / designing architecture / etc. is all the exact same thing. Expert in one = expert in all. But I just don't care anymore. None of it fascinates me anymore.
  22. So.. like.. gardening? Working at mcdonalds? Obvious sports isn't an option. I'm not at school anymore and I'm not a professional at any sport. Why would any skill be "useful"? Useful in attaining what goal? And I'm already in a relationship.
  23. I said the only worthy goal once a person is ready. 99.9% of people will never be ready and will never care about this. But those on the actualization path, if successful enough, should reach a point where they outgrow the desire for small dopamine hits. For as long as you're satisfied with the games and illusions, you won't have any reason to aim higher.
  24. That's quite a silly thing to suggest. If people die at 120+, that means people are still in their prime in their 80s. Of course you won't have people on the brink of death at 80 somehow managing to not die for another 40+ years.
  25. No difference. Senses are the content of the senses too. Just like how consciousness isn't just an "observer" of reality, but reality itself.