thisintegrated

Good point. What is your opinion of INTJ women? Are they too much like you? Do you prefer more differences?

We don't know. Different types have different brain structures. We know that everyone has different capacities for love, and we know there's some reason for this. Types could account for these differences, or something else.

??? I can understand the quote, it's not wrong. But it's definitely not the best perspective to have.

I think that's INFP. @Loba can correct me if I'm wrong. Yes! Great idea ? Yes.. can we all just agree that ISFJs suck????

I've realized something. Almost every stereotype is accurate about every type. ESFJ: (https://www.personality-database.com/profile?personality=4&category=30) How is that possible? Well think about it. Why are ESFJs considered "likely to have been spoiled as children"? It's not that being a FeSi somehow causes the parents to spoil you. People only become ESFJs when their lives are so easy they have no need to develop logic, no need to develop creativity, no need to be smart, no need to achieve anything as everything's already provided for them. When life doesn't demand anything of you, instead of developing logic/intelligence, you develop a sensitivity to emotion, or sensory experience. This leads to being prone to BPD, mood swings, self-pity, etc. and is why stereotypes are accurate. INTJ: (https://www.personality-database.com/profile?personality=15&category=30) This applies to every other type too. E.g. INTJs are loners, atheists, cat people, independent, dark, likely to hate everyone, unlikely to want kids, unlikely to drink alcohol, unlikely to smile in photos, far less likely to be into anime than INTPs, likely to wear all black, likely to say "I told you so" or "actually, no one asked you, so..." or "..and?" or "irrelevant", or "enough!". See how it's all super specific and is nothing but "stupid stereotypes" ..yet ~90% of INTJs will relate to every single one of these points. INTJs are, typically, just intellectually insecure people who feel a need to prove themselves, be it to themselves or to the world. They are people without a well-defined place in society, who maybe don't fully fit in, and want to prove their worth by developing themselves to the point where they feel no one can look down on them. Society gives them an identity of inferiority, so they try to compensate by becoming superior in some specific area they've deemed [with their Fi] to be of value. Have a look and see if your type's stereotypes are accurate. I think this is actually a very good way of confirming a type. Note: Here's what you want to be selecting:

tfw my type doesn't have a single red???

I think this is likely to affect one's fears, and so make them a more loving/trusting person. Though it's not the same as potential love capacity. Without any challenges / things to fear, e.g. in a meditative state, trauma shouldn't have any real impact?

Zodiac is based on how the stars align. MBTI is based on how your parents/environment treated you, and made you develop.

If you tried beating the love out of me with "Trauma associated with upbringing, family situation, interpersonal relationships, socioeconomic status, culture, health problems etc." any of these things.. it wouldn't work. If I meditated, then, regardless of the trauma and culture, my love capacity would be the same. I'd still be able to feel high on love, even if I was a North Korean in a prison camp or whatever.

Please.. refresh.

Not so sure about that. This would affect outward appearance of love, and communication, but not the love within. Even if I hated my parents, the hate is just love turned negative. The mass of emotion is still the same. And when not thinking about parents, all the love should be there. If I meditate and forget about life, all the love is there.

I really don't know how much I should love everyone. What purpose would loving everyone here serve? Would it be practical? Does it matter? What's an "appropriate" amount to love random strangers on the internet? I could love everyone on the forum to the point that I can't physically take it anymore, if I wanted to. But I don't think others do this, so it would be inappropriate. I really don't know how I should feel. Another Fe user. We'll see if it's a trend. Although I'm much more accepting of others now, I feel like I've always had a high capacity for love. I had to learn to turn it off as a kid.

I'm actually watching it right now?

LOL, rejected??? That's what you get for simping??

The quotes are just general INTJ attitudes. They may or may not say them. Ni's job is to dismiss useless information, so pointing out something to be irrelevant is common for INTJs. Of course it all depends on an INTJ's health, and how deeply they value the appearance of good manners. Inferior Se can often make them "act" in public, as well as use big words, as they're insecure about Se.

It's people's Feelings??

Whatever I enjoy. The more you enjoy something the more love you feel for it. It can be anything.

This isn't going anywhere. I don't feel a need to prove you wrong.

No. I just recognize your overreliance on it and point it out.

Why.. my favorite people just so happen to be Te users?? I don't think I'm anti-Te, or a Te-ist, or functionist??

ENTPs don't use it as a crutch when their arguments are failing??

No.. I know people from many countries, and SD and MBTI work equally well with them all.

TE ALERT! TE ALERT! TE ALERT!

*model working perfectly* Carl: I-It doesn't work!!!

This.