Kksd74628

@Yarco I have said many times in this forum that you should only do things that you want to do. If you want to have healthy life you should also like these things that lead to it. So my opinion is that you should find things that you want to do and do them and whenever you want to do something else then do that. Goals are something that come as bonus for your action. So don't try to aim anywhere, but just do things that you think will be helpful for you. If you say that eating junk food is right thing for you NOW then I would say that okay go and after that you have realized that doing all junk things make you feel horrible then do something that is your new idea for life. Only way to really have life you want is to try all things in some degree. There is a reason why you feel sleepy and powerless immendiately after consuming lot of sugar and fat. I agree that you shouldn't wait to be happy until your last years of your life and this is not what this is about, but just to optimize your life happiness over your whole life. One thing that helps you to be extremely happy is to start meditating regularly and enjoying present moment as it is. Point of life is to be happy and happiness is accepting present moment as it is. Ta - da : ) -joNi-

@WokeBloke How could you find plastic bottle from its surroundings if you didn't know which "part" of that which you see is plastic bottle? For that you need word that divides the whole to something which is it and which is not. To tell someone what is plastic bottle you need to explain the definition of the word to the listener. There is no problem as long as you both agree on the definition and NOW you can have working conversation about the plastic bottle. How could you point towards the thing that is everything? For example that which is "I" + "other" is something you can't talk about, because any word you try to give to it is dualistic already. So you could understand this sentence you need to know what these words mean and to know that you need to know what they don't. Otherwise it would look like "everything everything everything everything everything everything" and you wouldn't get any information from it. So nature of word is that it cuts reality and when you want to talk about that which is not cutted how could you use word that cuts it to explain it? Anyways dualistic nature of language is not the biggest problem, but that you can't ever explain your experience to someone without them to experience it, because otherwise you would just give mind picture to them that is more or less like the actual thing.

@soos_mite_ah You pretty much answered to yourself on your first post. As much as you feel like doing that does not interrupt other parts of your life, but I would still mention that you should see writing your blog as your life, because your life is that which you do. Also one side tip is to write something that is important for you and what you are thinking, because your blog is only for you. Point of having blog is to organize your thoughts and that is the very reason you don't even need anyone to read your blog. They say that you should be constant or something, but NOW take this message and stop caring about the people who are supposedly going to read it. Write whenever you like. Eat whenever you like. Party whenever you like. It's your life so you decide how you want it to unfold. Remember that only point of life is to be happy which just means to accept present moment as it is. Learn to generate happiness within you and not from outside of you and by that I mean that you should be happy just by writing the post and publishing it. If you are only happy when you have high traffic on your blog then I would say that your thinking needs to change in order you to be as happy as possible. I believe that the best way to have great success in anything is just to love doing the damn thing so much that the great outcome that you have always wanted comes as bonus for you and at this point you don't even need it, because you are happy whatever the case is : ) Love and happiness to you <3 -joNi-

Day 6 In theoretical level I am starting to understand how shuffling works. You need 3 main things which are fluidity of moves, good vibe and the dance moves itself. Fluidity of moves basically means that you try to be as light as possible and "flow" in the air and that also saves your stamina, because you don't need to jump too high. Good vibe means that you have fun, give 100 % of yourself and don't suppress yourself. And you need dance moves so you have enough things to play with. In couple of days I will be paying extremely amount of attention to just that fluidity, because I would say that this is the most important thing in any dancing and body activity. I may buy dancing shoes soon only, because I think that it is important to get used to wearing shoes and especially the ones I will use for a long time. I am feeling ultimately confident in claiming that I will someday be extremely talented shuffle dancer and that is the self-confidence everyone should have in whatever they do. If you don't feel yourself as fabulous cool, you have lot of work to do, because you need to realize yourself as best person in the Universe and that no one can challenge you. This is not being egoistical, but just having ultimate power of self-confidende. That is the art, beautifulness, love and point of life - TO BE HAPPY. Time danced: 3 hours Dance moves learned: 18

I actually found some super cool moves!

Day 5 Today I only learned some variations to running man so there is more things to play with. I will still call those as individual dance moves for the sake of counting them. I also need to take better care of drinking enough water and eating enough food, because now whole dancing experience didn't feel good, but I did it for the sake of progress. Here is video for running man variations. Time danced: 2,5 hours Dance moves learned: 15

@Salvijus That is what I mean by "destroying" it. It is same as you think about pink table and you need to "destroy" that thought in order to see that it was not real. Basically you need to stop thinking about it and it does stop existing. This is when you realize there was no "I" to begin with.

@VeganAwake That's what "I" am saying. And second point is that as long as you have any sense of solidity left you will project that to this which you are experiencing. This is completely same thing that happened with this body and its mind and I don't want this to happen with infinity as well so you better first destroy any sense of solidity and sense of self.

@Someone here "I" don't sense any boundaries between "I" and "universe" and the "universe" itself has no boundaries. Easy way to understand this is to first feel this present moment and everything that is HERE and NOW. After that try to feel that which is not HERE. As you can see, anything that is not HERE can't be feeled and if it could then it would be HERE. So become conscious that you can't experience NOW that which is not experienced. Where could be that line between experience and no experience be, because without anything outside of something there couldn't be line that separates "inside" from the "outside".

@Someone here Yeah if world means the "exprerience" which is the thing that happens NOW and HERE. As there are no boundaries between anything, everything is just content of this very present moment which can be called with any name you want.

@Judy2 Agree, because no word is it.

@Judy2 Exactly!`It is just itself that which is itself is not I still. There is no one to seek or find or to be found and therefore only thing that is, is this, NOW.

@Leo Gura You just told that something exist and if "someone" would understand that it would die. But again there is no "I" to be killed even . What is this thing that dies, because as I have tried to say many times there is no "I" to even be killed. @Judy2 That's the exact reason I always put "experience" inside of apostrophes. Is being something that can be found from direct experience - if yes - then it is part of the movie - if no - then there wouldn't be it. Either way it wouldn't be "I". @Leo Gura You always say this when you can't advance with your explanation. I don't say this to hate, but it is pretty weird way to handle things.

@Judy2 That is also something that is "perceived" and if not it wouldn't exist in this moment. You can't bypass that, because everything that is HERE and NOW must be content of "experience" and if not then it wouldn't be in the experience. Either way that wouldn't be the subject, because it couldn't, ever.

@Leo Gura To be honest I don't know which "you" are pointing to be I, because there is nothing like I to be found at this "experience" HERE and NOW. Everything that is in your experience is something that is "perceiced" and if it is not then it wouldn't be in the experience simply. If you are talking about the "I AMNESS" then this is also something that is "perceived" not something that is "perceiving". Give brief pointer to my experience right NOW which would be the "I" and if that cannot be pointed then there wouldn't be it and it would just be another thought. If you decide to say that everything in this experience is "I" then I wouldn't understand what you are pointing, because as I said that I agree that this moment is all there is, but there is no "I" that is everything, but there is just everything that is everything. period.

@Leo Gura I agree that there are no "others", but as there is no "I" neither that you can point out, wouldn't it be better just to call it ____ instead of thing that does not exist? Calling it BIG SELF feels like everything is subject and that is not the case, because subject is something that cannot be perceived and if it would be all subject then there wouldn't be any experience to be had. Better way to say is that everything in your "experience" right NOW is "object" without any perceiver. So the thing which exist right NOW is neither object nor subject and it has no name at all. Actually saying that "you" are alone as god is misleading, because as there is no even you, there is no one per se to be alone, but this movie, GOD or thing with no name. That is no entity and if it feels like entity then there is little sense of self left and if not, why to call it "I" or "SELF"? Phrase "I am GOD" is like saying house is red colored when the house does not exist to begin with. I agree that the end part red colored or GOD, MOVIE, INFINITY is real. When saying I am GOD then there is something which is something else and if it would be that I and GOD means same thing wouldn't it better to say that GOD is GOD or just not to say whole thing, because there is no new information to be communicated if they are synonyms to begin with.

I had insight that I don't want to restrict myself to one dance style so I will introduce Hip-Hop moves aswell to have more things to play with. Like Bruce Lee said he can't teach self-expression, because teaching implies to method that implies to style and if you want to express yourself fully you cannot practise style, because otherwise you have "limits". So here are some Hip-Hop tutorials.

@Giulio Bevilacqua As you said yourself, you need need to surrender and remember that surrending is not bad thing. Many people have hidden assumption that surrending means lose, but actually that belief comes, because people only surrender when they have to. For example when you listen good music you could surrender to its beauty and that is completely positive thing, you see? If you think for example that I am stealing something from you when I am close to you - when in reality I am not stealing - you will always suffer from thinking that you need to defend yourself. Same goes to kundalini awakening, you need to let the belief that something bad is happening go away and then you can enjoy the eupforia that it gives to you. You have theories that what could happen when you let go, but do you actually know what would happen. Maybe the joke is that nothing would happen, who knows? How can I enjoy life anymore when I am constantly in extacy when I relax my body? What type of question is that I would advice you just NOW go and let go fully, relax and take assumptions that something bad will happen away. After that come HERE to tell me what happened. Remember that this which you suppress will grow. It's like man who wants to come inside and you don't open the door and he will just knock the door stronger, because after all his message is so loving that he wants to show you. Don't expect that he gets bored waiting, because that will never happen, before you take the message and he can leave, because his job is done. -joNi-

@Leo Gura OPENING I must ask this question from you, because either it is the language that you use that does not "click" or then you just miss one simple thing (obviously it would be hard to believe). MAIN TEXT Whatever happens NOW in the movie is all there is. I guess you agree at least on this. Next thing. Anything that is HERE and NOW cannot be the one that "perceives", because if it would be found it would just be another thing in the movie. VINK VINK that "I AMNESS" you talk about is another thing that is "object" and if it wouldn't then it wouldn't exist in the movie right NOW. If you would be silent with no thoughts and don't believe that something right NOW is perceived then only thing that remains is _______ and the best analogy I have for this would be movie without watcher or content. No self nor other. Thing is not like if other is being taken away self remains, because definition of self is that there is opposite. So it doesn't matter do you kill other or self, because either way you kill 2 birds with one stone per se. So basically saying that everything is self or everything is other both mean that separation of these dualities have collapsed, but still calling the outcome of this collapsing self or other alone would be misleading - at least if you ask me - because then you would just change definition of the word (in this case it needs opposite to live) so it works to your own analogy and that confuces people even more. We need solid words to point out things, because otherwise you would always need to think what the other one tries to tell you. CONCLUSION So agreement in definitions of words (dualities and pointers) helps information to travel. You agree? ps. you can't turn gaze there where you are gazing, because at the same time you would be gazing from "somewhere else" and that which you gaze is another thing that is "perceived". So that which you gaze towards becomes thing that is gazed from the thing that is gazing. -joNi-

Day 4 Today I learned another 3 dance moves (step 5, step 6 and reverse running man) and the insight of the day was that you will get very exhausted, if you don't know how to save energy while dancing. By that I mean that you should simply reduce intensity and pace, if you are out of breath. I wouldn't take breaks, if you only dance a half our, because you need to gain necessary condition for dancing. Maybe I should start running again, hmm. There is a difference in learning move and making it stick to your deep memory. If you can focus on moving your hands and making different upper body "moves" while dancing through that dance move then I would call that you really have it. Those dance moves I have learned I almost can do that, but sometimes I need little bit concentrating to my legs and then my hands will not keep up with legs. Time danced: 2 hours Dance moves learned: 12

@Kamo Not even close to the thing that was tried to be communicated Thing just is that try to see thoughts as one sense and thing that happen in the movie which is called NOW and HERE and not as something that "someone" does or even that "someone" perceives.

@Raptorsin7 You might find reasons why some people believe to them, but you should take into account that this which you believe slightly - that is possible - convinces you more and doing so is like rabbit hole that feeds itself. You will start to connect things in your thoughts and you may accidently start believing to something that you made up from your mind. I don't deny nor accept those theories, but I would be extremely caution when researching them. Video below shows potentiality of stupidity

@Seeker_of_truth You can't ever make picture of moon from your finger, but you can obviously point towards it. It's up to you what words you want to use as pointers, but I think that using more precise pointers is benefical. For example how I like to present this thing is as movie that there is nothing behind (other or material) and nothing front of it (I or perceiver). Thought that something is perceived at this very moment is also a thought. Without something being perceived there wouldn't be perceiver so what is function of this "I" in this pattern? Only thing that it could be is that whole movie itself, but it does not look like "I", but rather movie. @Gili Trawangan @Mason Riggle Right! bros

@Mason Riggle Yeah and that's one of the reason spirituality needs to be talked very technically, because otherwise people could get pretty confused and fall into every trap that is possible. Also I am huge fan of self-expression and that should be feature of everyone talking spirituality verbally. It's completely same as brain surgeon needs precision in his/her job.

@Gili Trawangan Exactly! And one thing more is that I wouldn't call it a SELF or ENTITY neither, because those are too similar to ego and one could accidently take that decreased sense of self and project it to the _______ and that is also a trap. That's the main reason I wouldn't use "I" at all in spiritual explanations, because even "I am God" implies that something is something else and this first part "I" or "I AMNESS" - which basically tries to point out that there would be sense of solidity or sense of self left - is misleading if you ask me.