Gesundheit2

His advice and position are worlds apart. In fact, they are almost contradictory. On the one hand, he is saying that it's all a survival game, and yet on the other hand, he's not demonizing the game or trying to ignore or bypass it. He's actually being very transparent about this whole thing. He is loving the game and embracing it. And he's being very conscious, ethical, responsible, and respectful towards women with his advice. Honestly, you just seem to be bothered by his transparency. You want sex and relationships to be viewed in the light of innocence and spontaneity rather than survival and gaming. You don't want the truth to ruin this fantasy for you. But that's not quite how it works for us, men. We don't think of sex and relationships as something that happens spontaneously, or naturally. Even relationships that start from social circles, they all have a gaming component, from initial eye contact, to approaching, to talking, to escalating, to sex. Even the most advanced guys perceive dating as a game. But of course they don't tell you that. They're good at hiding that from you, they're smooth, which is precisely what makes them advanced. I am a guy, and I have countless guy friends. I have incel friends and player friends, and others somewhere in the middle. All of them perceive dating similarly. This is reality. It's not an ideology or a way of framing things. When I told my ex that, she told me that she felt afraid and shocked because she didn't imagine men to be that way. But, well, we are. That's the brutal truth. There's no such thing as innocent mating. Innocence is just something women imagine because they're on the receiving end. Try imagining what it might be like to be on the other end.

@Etherial Cat That's not what I was asking. You seem to be disagreeing with Leo on two different things: his advice and his position. I don't care about his position one bit, it's his personal opinion. But I do care about improving myself. What do you think is wrong with his advice?

You can't recognize the value of consciousness vs survival anywhere, since such recognition would be part of your survival (because value = survival). It's not like we are choosing between two paths, where either of them leads to higher consciousness and death, and the other to low consciousness and survival. Consciousness and survival are two separate parameters. High consciousness and survival are not opposites, and they do not contradict each other. Survival can be pursued consciously or unconsciously depending on the person doing the pursuing and their levels of consciousness. The opposite of high consciousness is low consciousness. And the opposite of survival is death, or in other contexts ego-death. Pickup, like any other activity, can be done consciously or unconsciously. Avoiding pickup will not increase consciousness, nor will doing it decrease consciousness. What is the problem with Leo's advice? Can you point your finger exactly to what you think is harmful and should be corrected or removed from his advice? I have been wrong about things you were right about in the past, and I am all ears and ready to accept your perspective. Can you state clearly where you think the problem is?

I slipped and let some idiots enter my mind and tell me how great Attack On Titan is. It's silly. Super boring. Absolute shit. I couldn't even complete the first season. I just I don't understand how people work anymore. How could anyone be thrilled by such low quality productions?! The only thing that was remarkable about it is the depiction of the human ego portrayed as the giants. That's how the ego actually looks like. Other than that, nope. Idiots.

Yes, because God cannot fit inside of a shampoo bottle. Besides, women love dirty men, anyway.

Most socially-accepted people are, without a doubt, arrogant. It doesn't necessarily have to be related to intelligence or success per se. It can be anything. Like wealthy people from inheritance, good-looking people, basically anything that makes a human feel more special than the ones around him/her. Even spiritually advanced people can be arrogant, and are most of the times stuck in their spiritual ego. I know because I am one.

For all the gold-diggers out there haha

My favorite part: "All days of we life we praisin' Jah My faith, my focus stays in Jah We a burn Indica we brain stays intact What I'm sayin is jack wisdom we nuh lack We nuh lame,we nuh wuk,we nuh play all that Full jackal pon track dem a look fi we drop Dem a look fi we flop, dem a launch and attack We a tell dem we ain't goin' out like that Stop that!" P.S. Jah is the Rastafarian name for God.

While we're at it, brushing your teeth is inauthentic. The toothpaste and the toothbrush are inauthentic. Ooh, ooh. And girls waxing their legs for you is also inauthentic. Do you know what's really authentic? Not wearing clothes. Farting unapologetically in front of other people. Welcome to the jungle. The world is your toilet

Agreed. But also, technically speaking, authenticity is an objective thing. But it's in the opposite direction of just staying lazy and not doing anything when your needs aren't being met. Being lazy is objectively inauthentic and unnatural, and it leads to disease and poor functionality in general. Authenticity is constant self-improvement and self-maintenance. When I see someone saying that X thing is inauthentic, I immediately assume that they're unconscious and just parroting something they heard someone else saying. Ironically, somehow that makes them the least authentic of all, haha.

It's similar to when the sperm fertilizes the egg. The only difference is that there's not millions of sperms fighting for only one egg. There's billions of sperms and billions of eggs, shuffling and matching up all the time. Remember, you were the alpha sperm one day. You've beaten millions of other sperms and made it here, effortlessly.

?‍♂️

I'm like Son Goku in many ways. One of these ways is the fact that I tend to go and disappear in solitude for some time, and then return a hundred times better and stronger. This has been proved over and over again in the past 5 years. If you think I'm bad now or that I haven't changed or evolved much, that's because you don't know how ridiculously worse and underdeveloped I was before. Bye for now.

I'm not that deep ?

"You have no idea what true no-mind is until you approach a 10." -- Adyashanti

"Highly conscious people don't have sex. They undergo mitosis." -- Buddha

I got error 500 the whole day yesterday. Now, it's working fine.

Does either selfishness or selflessness actually increase or decrease? Or do they only change forms? Or is it both? In my purest and most selfless moments, I still could experience a selfish core in my being. It's becoming hard for me to say that at a certain moment I was more selfless/less selfish than at another moment. I would describe selflessness merely as a more focused sense of self and identity compared to the regular egoic sense of self. Although, the opposite description might be correct, too. The selfish core is always still there, even though it feels less apparent at times. A more down to earth example would be the following question: Is a compassionate person actually more selfless/less selfish than a person who is conventionally labeled "selfish"? After all, the compassionate person is only being compassionate because that's what feels best for them. If it didn't feel good, I doubt they would still remain that way. And the same applies to the "selfish" person. They are only being selfish because that's what feels best for them. At least that's probably what they think. Can we reduce everything down to these simple variables? Are there more things going on under the hood?

"Mindset is everything". "Don't be a victim". "You are not awake".

Women aren't tough enough to kill. They're selfish and ruthless, but in subtler ways than men.

Both of them are highly dogmatic, but there is an energetic difference. An atheist is mainly coming from an arrogant place, while a Muslim is mainly coming from a fearful one.

Muslims don't even accept positive criticism of their religion. If you go to a modern Muslim "scholar" and tell them that this part of Islam might need an improvement in order to fit in today's world, 99.9% of the times, you will be called an infidel. Even if you are a faithful Muslim scholar yourself, the same will happen to you and all your credentials will be dismissed. They will accuse you of hypocrisy and bad intentions and conspiracy against Islam and all the Muslims in the world. And then they will cast their curses upon you and pray that may Allah protects Islam.

This has to be the most materialistic argument for idealism, or the most idealistic argument for materialism. I'm not sure which one it is.