Gesundheit2

I don't think the forum went downhill. In fact, I think it's improving, given that many of the most toxic members are now gone or inactive, and given my own improvements. Even the moderation has improved a little, even though it is still largely the same overall.

On a scale from 1 to 10, who are you?

What is the "I" that humans refer to when they speak?

That's a very good question. For me, I would say the answer is that I am mostly preference-less, adaptive/flexible, and perfectionist. At least in the context of personality traits/structure and perception of the world. Though, on a deeper level, I'm a crazy person who pretends to be rational.

And Italy won the 2006 world cup in a similar way. But they were super lucky and France kinda sucked back then (Zidane losing his nerve like a child). Overall, there were not that many great attackers back then, so Italy was able to pass through and win. I think France is a lot more disciplined right now and they have the best squad in the world. But I still think it's going to be Argentina that will win.

You're right from an addiction/programming point of view. The only reason we are here is because we're playing out our addictions and programs that were conditioned into us by society like the AI was ingrained with its core functionality by its makers.

Defensive playing is not maintainable in the long run. It's a sucky strategy that weaker teams adopt to cope for as long as possible, but eventually it will break and Morocco will become a joke, especially if the opponent's attack is quick (Mbappé). But France is smart enough to play a moderate game and not burn out their best players. They won't sacrifice the final to make a scene of their opponent in the semi. They will score a goal or two and cool down for the rest of the game.

False positive. No such error.

False positive. No such error.

It's too quick to be human.

It mostly sucks. It made a typo and was not even able to correct it. It is lost in dualistic thinking too, and any reference to non-duality makes for an inappropriate response. But it has some humor. Though, I'm not sure if chatGPT is the same or not. Can somebody give me an account to play around with?

I tried to sign up for an account. It said it's unavailable in my country. So I tried another one: https://www.kuki.ai/ It claims to have consciousness. Okay, I'm now officially a solipsist.

Yes, please.

No, he's actually literally imaginary. They didn't even meet in person.

Tell 10 jokes that were never said before. Describe the experience of death from personal experience. Is solipsism true? How to achieve omnipotence and/or omniscience? How can 1 + 1 equal three?

I'll try to come up with some koans or something to break it.

I also like the fact that it seems almost completely unopinionated about the topics it's being asked about. It has very detached worldviews. I wish more people were like it

The only thing that I find impressive about this new technology is its SEO and accuracy. It doesn't seem to miss the mark. That's new. Even Google sucks at it.

@zurew The SD answer is still very limited and repetitive. It's boring. It's still very distinguishable from a real human, although it seems that for some people that might be harder to spot online. I'd bet making creative jokes would break it. Creativity is AI's weakest spot, and making jokes requires subtlety and consciousness/intelligence, both of which it lacks.

No surprise there. It's just taking after the geek incels who created it. This only proves that you usually sound like a robot.

It sucks, though. Seems very limited, repetitive, and has obvious patterns. Just what you'd expect from a robot, or a hippy It's similar to Akinator but a lot more complex.

Is it free? If not, then how much does it cost? Just curious.

He's imaginary, that ought to do it. You're welcome.

@Strannik ?