something_else

Where are you finding this rubbish?

Gonna need some links for that one mate

I've seen you talk about having sex before. And you have a journal where you talk about it. Why the facade? Either you had sex and want to pretend to be a virgin, or you're a virgin who talks about having sex. Why? They aren't the best kind of woman unless you've been brainwashed into that. If anything they're kinda inexperienced and don't know what they're doing (both sexually and in terms of relationship dynamics) which isn't ideal for you. I can understand wanting to be with a virgin for your first time if you've also never had sex. That's fair enough. After that it's probably not something you need to be too concerned with.

I see you’re in the UK on your profile. Me too. Our psychs are usually shipped through Royal Mail. Nothing shipped through them is really inspected as long as you are ordering something that originates from within the UK, which means the risk is really low. I’m assuming you’re ordering via dark web, in which case you will be fine as long as you follow basic security. Some safety tips without going into enough detail (hopefully) as to be considered sourcing: Use markets, NOT individual onion sites selling stuff You want stuff that originates from within the UK PGP encrypt anything sensitive you send to anyone (i.e your address) Ideally use Tails OS as well if you are technical enough, for good measure Don’t order insane amounts at once If you do this you’re almost certainly never going to get in trouble. Literal worst case scenario you say you have no idea why it showed up at your door If you want more info or if this is considered sourcing and I have to remove some details, feel free to PM me for more help

This is just more shit you read online. You can’t possibly know or verify this.

Oh mate I’m sorry. You’re too far gone, it’s not even worth discussing this with you

The default assumption when someone tells you some new information is that they are telling the truth. If you didn’t hold this assumption you could not live your life. When your boss tells you information you need for work you don’t immediately assume he is lying and go and ask your other superiors if he is telling the truth. Because he typically has nothing to gain by lying to you. If a girl makes an accusation it should be investigated. Because she rarely has a reason to lie and it is a common occurrence for women to actually be sexually abused. No, the man should not be sentenced without investigation of course. But you should take the girl seriously and investigate nonetheless. That is the reasonable and decent approach. It isn’t necessarily blindly believing, it’s simply taking a woman seriously when she makes an accusation.

Most decent humans are going to take a girl seriously when she makes a reasonable sounding accusation of rape or sexual assault. It's just the decent thing to do. Most aren't doing it to be a white knight and get some sex. I know guys like that exist but they're not especially common. Not as common as right-wing internet culture would lead you to believe. Same goes for "white-knight soy-boy cucks". Those are all terms adopted from right-wing internet culture. There are some people who you can tell get all their ideas about other people and groups from the internet.

It was a reasonable point tbf, minus the weird part, lol

Ehh. Idk, I suppose I get what you're saying. However I tend to find that I get much better results with girls when I write whatever comes to mind in the moment. I've noticed (especially online since it's where I have the most experience texting, in person I tend to skip that part) that whenever I end up spending a while not knowing what to say or thinking about an opener too much it doesn't tend to land. Girls can sniff out try-hards

This is pretty much what I was saying. But if you look hard enough you'll find girls who like everything. I've met a few girls who were into longer form texting, mostly online. They were all very introverted students, which tracks

Because I can't understand why you'd need more than a few seconds to a minute to come up with a 4 word response. So when you say 'spend a long time coming up with a response' I just assumed you meant writing long responses.

Because the only part you listened to was that this isn't a good strategy. You never paid attention to the alterative approach: university culture, build up a social circle, go to parties, go to clubs, go to bars If you start doing these things you can approach girls much more organically rather than having to force it by hunting for girls around university campus

My friend, less time on the internet, more time in the real world That is what you need

I agree with you on writing as a whole, but with girls it doesn't work that well to have long form discussion over text. Sending a long paragraph of text to a girl will get you ghosted immediately in like 90% of cases. There are girls out there who will want that and I encourage you to go find them if that's what you want too, but as general advice it isn't a good idea to spend a lot of time thinking about and writing responses to girls you barely know. You can actually communicate a lot more energy, emotionality and personality in short punchy messages than you can in long-form. And girls are typically going to get attached to your energy and personality, not your political views or deep thoughts, or whatever else you might communicate in long-form writing.

I don't think that many people demand it. It just tends to be what people do. It makes conversations a bit more like real life. In real life conversation you respond immediately after you hear what the person has to say. Thinking of a response right after hearing what someone has to say is the natural mode of conversation. A mode of conversation where you think of a response in more than a second is almost a modern invention. Writing has only been a thing for the last 5-6k years. Before that all communication was instant response. It isn't that unreasonable of a thing.

Uhh, yes?

Mate, I'm a guy And you sound very bitter about something And yes, for the most part you want conversations with girls to be light-hearted and playful. You don't wanna be spending like two hours thinking about what to reply. And you don't want to be too intense or serious.

With, girls pretty much. I've found the more thought I put into messages the less interesting girls find me over text. Texting with girls should be fun and light-hearted, not serious. If I'm discussing philosophy or spirituality or something with a friend, talking with work colleagues, or talking on a forum I put a bit more thought in.

I don't require it. It doesn't bother me if they take longer to reply. But, as a general rule the kind of conversations I'm having with girls are not ones where I'm putting more than a few seconds thought into each message, and it's the same from the girl.

Girls don't do this. If she doesn't reply for two days it means she probably isn't that interested, unless she has some like legit actual excuse. Most of the time I've found that girls that are interested and that I end up meeting will usually reply in like an hour or two MAX. I can't really think of any time a girl has waited two days in between texts and then wanted things to go any further. This is pretty demanding/needy for a girl who you're not that serious with. I don't think this will work in your favour. As a general rule anything intense like this turns girls off. You usually want to keep a light-hearted and playful vibe. What you did is kinda like saying "it's annoying me that you're not giving me attention, give me attention"

I actually agree with you. I don’t think it’s ideal either. I was really just playing a bit of devils advocate as to why it could be considered a reasonable opinion. And the Epstein example also came to me and I felt like sharing it too

Dude I never did that shit. Calm the mother F down.

??? I don’t understand the point you are making. Being in the background of Epstein’s selfie in the middle of a city is different from a photo explicitly taken by Epstein with you and him in it together, which is what we were discussing. If you are close enough with someone to where you and them are joyfully and willingly taking selfies together you probably share a lot in common with each other A better point for you to have made would be that based on my argument a photo Epstein forcibly took of you and him without your consent is grounds for being cancelled, which of course it isn’t but that might be harder to prove.

Those values are then just learnt at higher levels of abstraction. And they’re open to more people. What you are doing is literally just gatekeeping, I’m sorry. There’s no other way to put it. ”Those AI artists making better art than me with less effort aren’t real artists”