Miguel1

Moderator
  • Content count

    2,133
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Miguel1


  1. It’s been 2-3 days since I’ve been here. I skimmed through the responses since then.

    My conclusion is that it’s way too easy to troll and give low quality responses here. Too much nonsense, useless fighting and drama. Too much bullshits that are not held accountable, too much rambling, and too much defense mechanisms being activated, that are not checked.

    I had a deep discussion with Zenterus in private about my situation, as he also has massive experince in PUA, and my situation is very clear to me now. We also came to the conclusion that this place is oftentimes a huge distraction from the real work.

    If you are actually serious about understanding my situation, feel free to reach out to me via IG. My link is in my signature. We can call and I’ll explain everything, and you can ask any question.

    But only if you are actually serious, please.

    As for now, I will continue my break from here.

    The blog has really all you need.

    Thank you.


  2. 15 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

    If you are so developed and conscious, why don't you learn to love a fat chick?

    I got a long way before I am conscious enough to want to have sex with an overly obese girl. Love them and accept them I can.

    People love to project ideas onto me.

    I had a monent of loneliness and opened up here. No more. No less. Who doesn’t experience loneliness when they are on this journey?

    Isn’t it allowed?

    This conversation doesn’t need to be 20 pages long, and I have communicated it multiple times.

    I am in the process of letting go of dating and potentially transcending it. Isn’t the work about facing the hard truths, and griefing the loss of beautiful illusions, and finally accepting the hard truths?

    I was expecting some emotional support for my griefing process, as one of the main reason this community was made, was for that.

    But I kinda regret expecting that.

    This conversation can be done, as far as I am concerned. It doesn’t really need to be pushed further.


  3. @Lyubov Thank you for the well-thought message.

    My question for you is this:

    How many people do you think does the work we do here? What about the amount of people that actually does it seriously? 

    It’s not enough to be scientifically gifted.

    And I am not expecting the girl to be anywhere near as conscious as Leo, as I am not either. I don’t even expect her to be as conscious as I am. But relatively conscious.

    Now ask yourself, how many of them are 25-30 years olds? And finally, ask yourself: how many of them are physically attractive in Miguel’s standards? The boy who is used to the best.

    Also ask yourself, for a really attractive girl in her youth, what are her incentives to doing this work? In general.. this work already is more suited to men, as we care more about truth, and girls care more about feelings.


  4. 4 minutes ago, Valach said:

    I mean this is hard to elaborate. Since it is mostly based on intuation (at lest for me) when we point it out. What kind of reasons do you expect us to provide?

    It's the same way when you provided feedback to @Olaf in another thread. You can just read between the lines.

    I give Olaf real arguments for why his approach is not working.

    What are your arguments for my position here? What could I do better for me not to have a spiritual ego, that is based on truth?


  5. 2 minutes ago, questionreality said:

    The fact that you take it as people "accusing" you of having a spiritual ego speaks for itself. Perhaps in some years you will look back and realize what you were told, but at this point nothing more can be said to you.

    Obviously I didn’t take it as such in the beginning. And I have been accused of it for a long time already, I have been very patient. This thread wasn’t the first time.

    But since I see no real arguments that has any value, it gets tiring real fast.

    I also see no interest in people accusing me to inquire where their accusations are coming from. Perhaps, are they themselves lacking? Really contemplate it, the way I’ve done extensively when I’ve been challenged.

    It might not be so obvious and clear that you are on the right and I’m on the wrong.


  6. 5 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

    Having said that, the craving for human intimacy does sometimes crop up now and again, but the capacity for restraint has developed to such a high degree that resistance is no longer futile, rather, it has become my second nature. 

    If it is genuinely like this and you have really exhausted the desire for it out of your system, then very good.

    But if it is done via repression, then it will backfire eventually.

    I am not at this point fully yet but way closer than 5 years ago. 


  7. 11 hours ago, Ulax said:

    Damn. RSD Miguel started roasting everyone xD

    This conversation is going nowhere and I am exhausted at this point, I keep repeating myself 10 times and people don’t listen. And instead just gets defensive and accuse me of nonsense xD

    The ones who got it and are on the same page have already said there words.

    This topic is so clear for me now.This thread just confirmed everything and gave me even more clarity. I also discussed it in-depth with Zenterus in private.

    Thanks everyone for contributing.


  8. 6 hours ago, questionreality said:

    Until you stop dividing people into "higher" and "lower" consciousness categeries etc, nothing good will come out of it. Putting Leo on a pedestal (who is in his 40s single and without kids) and thinking that you are above others are just few symptoms over the bigger issue at play here. Dropping "spirituality" or trying to be "spiritual" is probably the best that you can do, for yourself and for your dating life at this point. Yes you can be spiritual without being "spiritual" , at some time that role will have to be dropped.

    Ridiculous.


  9. 7 hours ago, questionreality said:

    Multiple people already in this thread have clearly pointed out you having a spiritual ego. This is another clear example of it.

    No. This is just me tired of being nice.

    This conversation here has already ended, it doesn’t need to be pushed further.

    I’m getting tired of answering the same questions when people do not listen, and instead, accuse me of having a spiritual ego because it is way easier to do so than to face the reality that is their own short-comings in their journey.

    Case in point, you.


  10. 13 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

    I wouldn't say addicted.  I like sex.  Im 56 and still keep fit and look fairly young.  So looking young has kept me with a young spirit.  But I have been married. And staying with one woman has proven difficult on multiple levels.  Long term relationships are hard but it would be something I desire.  But like you, I can't find the right person that is on the same level intellectually and spiritually , with the physical attraction and the personality I like.  I won't say I've given up., but I realized I'm just fine alone with casual sex. If that is to be my destiny.  If she comes along I'm all for it.  But I've had many failed long term relationships not just my marriage. If anything I can relate to you.

    I respect the honesty man.

    I’m entering my peak years energy wise for my career, so I want to invest them into life purpose rather than casual sex.

    But if you are happy with your career and spiritual growth, then go for sex. What else to do.


  11. Quote

    And anytime I see someone going, "I just can't find someone on my same level of consciousness"... I look at that more as an internal connection issue that's based on polarizing too fair into things like extraordinariness, attractiveness, or "being a high consciousness person."

    @Emerald Most people here should def date normal people for their own growth.

    But to tell Leo to date a complete normie for his own growth, is not the wise choice here. Same for me. And this thread is about me.

    So you are wrong.


  12. 6 hours ago, cistanche_enjoyer said:

    From experience I noticed that "spiritual girls" tend to be also full of subconscious trauma and mental health issues. Which is what got them into spirituality in the first place (though there are exceptions of course).

    This is why I have constantly, throughout this whole thread emphasizes that it’s not enough to be spiritual.

    They cannot be some hardcore hippies or spiritua by-passers.


  13. Fire on Fire - Sam Smith.

    Two straight guys dancing to a song about gay love.

    Warning: might trigger you if you still have shame around your own sexuality, vulnerability and sesuality. 

    Fully improvised (4min):

    Part 1: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DeEbu72MidP/?stkn=MWY4cG9zcmx3Mzl1OA==

    Part: 2:

    https://www.instagram.com/reel/DeEa3SmsdvV/?stkn=MTN6NjNxbGgzMGhnZw==

     


  14. 17 minutes ago, Alexop said:

    Exactly. This was my biggest frustation in life. I could not create that intellectual intimacy with my exes. Few women can meet me there, and many of them are mentally damaged. Because how the hell do you get motivated to spend years learning this shit we know? Motivated by pain.

    Yep.

    The mental damage is huge as well. Rarely you have a young good looking girl who is emotionally and mentally mature and sane. And is not in a relationship already.

    Top it with the fact that intellectual intimacy is a real craving, probably the biggest craving for us.. and the equation doesn’t seem very much in our favour.