Miguel1

Moderator
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    1,586

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Miguel1

  1. Posted

    5 hours ago, aurum said:

    There's probably a realistic middle.

    Little bit of fuckboy isn't bad. Especially in the beginning.

    That makes sense.

    I definitely still have a bunch of fuckboyness in me that oftentimes comes out.

    What do you think about this concept:

    If a girl is confused about whether you are a fuckboy or a bf material, it is a problem in itself.

    ——-

    And mom game, I love it xD

    I just love meeting these girls with their family, only good stuff comes out of it

  3. Posted

    6 hours ago, aurum said:

    I don't even want to sleep with her if I don't see long-term potential at this point.

    The more I mature the more I agree with this.

    The problem with most girls is that it’s better to go the fuckboy route with them first until sex, then bring up relatioship qualities in you.

    But the truth is, you probably don’t want a relationship with these girls who needs fuckboy route first, anyways. They are probably more unstable and immature, in general.

    ———

    I wanted to share this new insight I got lately somewhere but I didn’t have a place for it. But this is a good one.

    So lately, my new favourite ”targets” are girls who are with their moms. Man, if a girl has a good relationship with her mother, and the mother likes me (the easy part), these are two extremely good signs of it going somewhere really good with the girl.

  5. Posted

    2 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

    Indirect is more effective but requires more skill to pull off.

    Direcrt is good so guys don't overthink it or make excuses to not approach at all. Direct is better than zero.

    Indirect is good to learn once you have the basics of direct approach learned.

    Indirect during daygame, stopping someone when they are walking full speed is the problem.

    At most, ”a half indirect” can work.

  9. Posted

    3 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

    @Miguel1   I don't like the Patriarchy ruse. 

     

    In practice, every man has to learn social skills and charisma now. Which is good in a way.

    It’s almost like society has to face its own brutal nature and come up with honest ways to deal with it, rather than depend on  clutches.

    That being said, if it’s too much at once, then it can also collapse society.

  10. Posted · Edited by Miguel1

    Ironically, in my game development, I have come full circle.

    At this point I am mostly myself. I have my goofy side and I have my more serious side. I show both depending on the envinronment and the situation.

    I am mostly myself, with social calibration. The only thing I hold back is my philosophical side (which to be fair is a huge part of me, but I am talking about my personality here), that is something I will virtually never bring up.

    And I don’t care if it’s a hot girl or an ugly girl, if they don’t vibe with me, or don’t like me, then it’s see ya.

    I text mostly what I want, and don’t have any hard rules for texting.

    If she don’t vibe with me, then I will meet the next girl within 10 seconds.

    My results are better than ever, especially with the better looking ladies.

  11. Posted

    7 minutes ago, AION said:

    The fall of the patriarchy has benefitted the alpha men the most. They get the fuck around without commitment. 

    The group that lost the most with the fall of the patriarchy is the low tier men and even the average men. I have friends who have a good career and lifestyle but they can't find a women to save their lives. Because just having those things is not enough to get a women anymore,one needs game too. And although they are university degree smart they can't figure out game.

    Another group that lost with the fall of the patriarchy is the average women. They all have this anthem "I won't settle for less" in other words I'm an average women and I won't settle for an average men. That kind of egocentrism will bite these women so hard in the ass. It will cause a demographic collapse very soon. Therapy, cats and cat food prices will skyrocket though.

     

    Well said.

  17. Posted

    1 hour ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

    I must admit, it is obvious which users are uncharitable or not approaching in good faith. It also reveals users bias.

    I think this thread says more about each user stands personally, than it does about Leo.

    Yes. Hard conversations are extremely important to have, but can we have them in a respectful, civil manner?

    This is really what it all comes down to.

    If there is no maturity and consciousness involved in the conversation, it will spiral downwards to hell.

  23. Posted

    2 minutes ago, Valach said:

    How would you map development and maturity on trauma?

    I feel like it is hard to differentiate between this for me because a person might be relatively mature (self aware, conscious etc.), yet at the same time many of his/hers desires and preferences will be stemming from unresolved trauma. I wouldn't say that makes the person immature but that person might look like that.

    Maturity is facing and healing your traumas.

  24. Posted

    On 27/06/2026 at 2:51 PM, integral said:

    Maturity is a separate axis from values.

    A person could be stage red and mature. But because the center of our culture is mostly Orange they'll have a hard time in that environment because they adapted to red values when they should have adapted to be orange as that's the least resistance to culture and Society.

    Hmm. With maturity, comes higher level of values.

    An immature person might value money and sex, while a mature person will likely value empathy and integrity.

    A healthy stage green person is generally more psychologically mature than an orange.