Vibroverse

Yeah, but it is a very very very deep seated belief that you, highly highly probably, won't be able to stop believing it, so far so that it will appear to you to be something that is just outside of you, just something that is "objectively" true.

It is not the same with everything in life, for instance when you are thirsty, you wanna drink water, and you go drink it. You don't need to stop wanting to drink water to be able to drink it. You know, if we are talking about if everything is the same, then clearly not everything is the same. But what you said might work about things about which you have doubts and worries, you see. The key is the absence of resistance, really.

The reason the Sun will, highly probably, rise again tomorrow is your belief that it, highly probably, will rise again tomorrow. This is what Hume missed and believed that there is a pattern just in itself with no guarantees.

Well, that's basically Hume's criticism of causality, but he didn't see that it is consciousness that is responsible for the consistency, and Kant, as I understand him to say, kinda understood it, but not fully.

Logic is not the highest level of understanding, there is a level of being that is beyond logic, where we can say that both statements that say there is an outside world and there is not an outside world are true.

Yep. And in addition to Ibn Arabi, you may also wanna study Rumi, Suhrawardi and Mulla Sadra, they are pretty, relatively, awakened beings.

Feeling is your "guidance" from your inner nonphysical intelligence.

Don't think too much. Relax and meditate, and receive your answers from your inner intelligence that is far wiser and knowledgeable than your physical ego personality.

It might be telepathy, or it might be you, somehow, resonating with each other in some frequency level.

Everyone says something, there are endless beliefs and "knowings" going on, so you need to, finally, get the joke.

All these answers come to you from the universe, it is all the universe giving you answers, and as you can see, they are all saying something different. And I'd say that universe is guiding you in a nonphysical sense, therefore it is an inner guidance that you're feeling.

Old thread.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://andphilosophy.com/2022/06/14/doctor-strange-and-professor-hegel-in-the-multiverse-of-madness/&ved=2ahUKEwiUsrj4_7z6AhWcRvEDHUxRCNkQFnoECAQQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1-fTi_squF-X-931pX1Bzw

Well, if it will make you feel better, we can say that many philosophers, like Descartes and Fichte, took consciousness, the I, as the foundation of knowledge.

Well, I can say complicated intellectual things about that also, but won't it all come down to consciousness at the ultimate level? All the concepts will be known by your consciousness and justified, or not, at the ultimate level by your consciousness. Anyways though, yeah, there are many mind games to be played, I understand.

I is the rockbottom and the substance, and everything. Everything ultimately refers to I and receives justification from I.

To be honest, you're just running away from the question, consciously or unconsciously, but maybe what you're doing is good, maybe I should do that also, haha.

Why? It is a perfectly valid statement, it very well refers to something and makes a truth claim. Don't jump to the conclusions many other thinkers have come to to run away from this problem, creating patches to run away from this question. Because, then, it is like creating and using calculus and limits to run away the paradoxes of Zeno, while, in fact, it is the very idea of the infinitesimal that Zeno was criticizing. Likewise, the liar paradox itself is designed to criticize and question your very solutions to it.

Look at this statement: "Everything I say is a lie". If it is a lie, then I'm telling you the truth. Then if it is the truth, then I'm lying to you for everything that I say is a lie. If it is true then it is not true then it is true then it is not true, ad infinitum. In short, how will you reconcile the law of noncontradiction with this?

What about a universe where a is not equal to a, does it also exist?

No matter what I told you about why something exists rather than nothing would itself be something that, therefore, would beg the same question. So that question obviously cannot be answered through a form, language, that itself is another something.

I think the absolute is the point where a is not equal to a, so it is absolute transcendence, but it, in a weird way, is distilling itself to be able to become knowable and perceivable and make sense able by us.

Everything everything.

No, you should take psychedelics, because blah blah blah, aka choose, or think, your own why.