Hulia

You are so egoistic. You use my powerfull emotions and passion to acquire new spiritual techniques. Techniques, techniques, techniques! Why haven´t I become a lesbian? I could! Women are so much better.

Can you check once more? It was a terrible mistake, I am sure

Are you serious? I don´t want this future! What? "powerful emotions, passion, growth, and suffering" what? "new spiritual techniques and paths of mastery" I don´t want it! I want a small car and 3 bikes and maybe a small house at the end of the street. And a pond not far away. I hate you, Zero.

What answer are you expecting from me? That the PU methods rocked my world? ? Something special was about his mind - the volume, the clarity, the penetrability (so what?). I am sure that these qualities of mind he didn´t acquire via PU courses and PA books. And the heart, as big as the mind. But alcoholic ? No perfection in this world! I don´t know what you mean by caricature in my mind

@Hello from Russia @Harlen Kelly Guy, do you hear, what I am saying??? I have been approached by PU-ers. Empirically! Isnt it much better than theoretical stuff? Ask me , why I rejected. But well you are not interested to know. Go to your coaches and books ?

I am not crazy to waste my time by studying the rubbish. But I have experienced it

As a means to an end, hehe But not as the process per se. Not that makes fun not only for a girl but also for a guy, like ping- pong. No matter what comes or comes not at the end You know this spiritual saying: not the destination, but the way.

Maybe you should change your living place? Maybe it´s just Las Vegas girls, who are not turned on by smart guys? Move to Harvard?

And where are such important for the 21st centuriy properties like intelligence and smartness? They should be at the beginning of the list.

I despise status and authority, I am also suspicios towards charisma. Strength is a pretty blurred belief, as much as success, and perishable. Confidence, boldness, charm, wit and humour are ok.

Of course, I have. I am a very sensitive person, luckily for me. Because smart guy would know, that we fit and would want relationship with me. So for what should I beg him on my knees?

Begging on my knees???? You confuse me with someone else. Never! On this point I agree with Leo, I prefer guys who know exactly, whom and what they want in their life. If it is Jackie, than let it be Jackie. Not especially smart, but not my business. And another reason not to beg on my knees btw. I like smart guys.

You have no idea! What made me feel the deepest emotions was a complete melting into each other. Plus I suppose he was bipolar, and since we were melted, his highs (=very deep emotions) were my highs. The same was with another guy, who was also bipolar, I suppose, and who, by the way, didn´t speak my language to apply the PU tactics. I know, it´s complicated ?

Are you kidding? I don´t fall in love because of "main principles of ''PU tactics''". Seriously? But it turns me on, yes.. when applied by someone I love.

Bingo! This is what we are telling you, guys, the whole time. We need emotional connection. And your PU tactics are as anti-emotional as fuck. They are rational, they aim directly into pussies, avoiding our emotions. And then you wonder, why they dont work. If you ask me 1 success out of 20, it´s a miserable rate, showing that they don´t work either.

I can remember that @Preety_India fell in love with a homeless guy, well he was not a hunchback but a charming pragmatic Italian, but still! Me too, I tried to love rich guys more (since it makes more sense), but I failed. It´s not that simple.

haha.. the distinction is clear: Pragmatists are all men of this forum inhabitants of Fantasyland are all women of this forum Because the men will rather listen to another men, what attracts women than to the women themselves. And who of us is from fantasyland?

Even if he had skin like you, it still wouldn´t contain billions of nerve endings, like your skin or my skin.

:))) It would cause people quite a lot discomfort OK.. Let´s beging from the start Your initial question was: I just answered what is different. But yes, they both are real

ok, Johny Bravo is as real as a chair, but not as real as an entity capable of reaction and change while being interacted

Yes. Johnny Bravo IS interacting with you. But you ARE NOT interacting with him. One-way-interaction.

No, you are not. It´s a half-ineraction. One-way interaction. You cannot through a stone and see the circles on the water. Johnny Bravo is a dead image.

Interaction. Interaction makes a difference

Glad for you! Have you become a liitle more needier now? ??

I am not interested in average guys (I mean a mindset).