Nemra

At least I could be right. 😁

Or we can be objective about another system but not to ours', which means that we are observing another system from the outside but inside our system. But I don't think that, in this case, being objective is actually objective. Or maybe I'm wrong what he meant.

I think maybe he means being objective could make you outside the system from inside the system.

I think he could mean that we can imagine a unicorn like we are imagining a horse. But our imagination of a unicorn in our current level isn't equal to the imagination of a horse.

@Husseinisdoingfine, it's oxymoronic.

I would say that anyone who uses the term "God", especially public intellectuals, is sus.

Thanks to all of you for sharing your perspective on this matter.

The "Western masculinity crisis" is a term used to describe the perceived dislocation, transformation, or confusion regarding traditional masculine roles and identities in contemporary Western societies. This phenomenon has emerged as a result of significant cultural, economic, and social changes over the last few decades, which have challenged long-established ideas about what it means to be a man. This perceived crisis is multifaceted, involving shifts in gender roles, economic restructuring, cultural changes, mental health challenges, and shifting expectations within personal and professional relationships. 1. Changing Gender Roles and Expectations One of the key aspects of the masculinity crisis in the West is the transformation of gender roles. Over the past several decades, the feminist movement, growing gender equality, and greater societal acceptance of diverse gender identities have significantly altered the roles traditionally assigned to men and women. Feminism and Gender Equality: Since the rise of second-wave feminism in the 1960s and 1970s, Western societies have experienced profound shifts in gender dynamics. Women have gained more rights, entered the workforce in large numbers, and increasingly share responsibilities for earning income and managing households. This has challenged the traditional male role as the primary breadwinner, leading some men to question their place in society and their personal relationships. Evolving Masculine Expectations: Traditional masculine traits such as toughness, stoicism, dominance, and emotional restraint are increasingly seen as restrictive or harmful, both to men and society at large. As gender equality has advanced, new expectations have emerged for men to be emotionally open, nurturing, and collaborative. Many men have struggled with these new expectations, especially when they contradict traditional gender norms they were raised with. Erosion of Traditional Male Dominance: In many Western societies, men no longer enjoy the same unchallenged dominance in the political, economic, and social arenas. While some men have embraced these changes and adapted to more egalitarian gender roles, others feel displaced, unsure of their value or their role in a world that no longer centers their experiences and perspectives. 2. Economic Changes and the Decline of Traditional Male-Dominated Industries The Western masculinity crisis is closely tied to the economic restructuring that has taken place over the past several decades, particularly the decline of manufacturing and other traditionally male-dominated industries. Deindustrialization and Job Loss: One of the major drivers of the masculinity crisis is the loss of manufacturing jobs and the decline of other traditionally male-dominated industries, such as mining, construction, and transportation. These jobs provided economic security and a clear social role for many working-class men, especially in industrialized regions of the U.S., the U.K., and Western Europe. Globalization, automation, and the transition to a service- and knowledge-based economy have reduced the number of well-paid, stable blue-collar jobs, leaving many men economically insecure and uncertain about their future. Shift to Service and Knowledge Economies: The rise of the service and knowledge economies has favored skills such as communication, collaboration, and emotional intelligence, which are not always aligned with traditional masculine values of physical strength and independence. As women have entered the workforce and excelled in these fields, men who were once dominant in the labor market may feel left behind or unable to compete in the new economy. This shift has led to a significant sense of loss for many men whose identities were closely tied to their jobs and their role as providers. Economic Insecurity: The financial pressures and insecurities that many men face as a result of these economic changes contribute to the broader masculinity crisis. Men who were raised with the expectation that they would be the primary breadwinners often struggle to redefine their roles in families where both partners may work, or where a woman may out-earn her male partner. 3. Cultural Shifts and the Erosion of Traditional Masculinity In Western societies, there has been a cultural shift away from traditional masculine ideals, which are increasingly critiqued as limiting or harmful. This has given rise to concepts such as "toxic masculinity" and has led to an evolving understanding of gender roles and expectations. Toxic Masculinity: The term "toxic masculinity" has become a central part of discussions surrounding the masculinity crisis. It refers to a cultural ideal of manhood that emphasizes aggressive, emotionally stunted, and sometimes violent behavior, while discouraging vulnerability and emotional expression. Although the term is meant to critique damaging behaviors that harm both men and society, some men perceive it as an attack on masculinity itself, leading to confusion, resentment, or resistance. Redefining Masculinity: As society shifts towards more progressive views on gender, traditional masculine ideals are being questioned and redefined. There is a growing recognition that men, like women, can embrace a broader range of traits, such as sensitivity, empathy, and vulnerability. However, many men who were socialized to conform to more rigid masculine ideals may find it difficult to reconcile these changes with their sense of identity. Media Representation and Popular Culture: Media and popular culture have also played a role in the masculinity crisis. While older portrayals of masculinity often glorified strength, stoicism, and dominance, more recent representations have offered alternative models, including more emotionally complex or vulnerable male characters. This has created a more diverse landscape of male identity in media, but also confusion for some men who see these newer representations as conflicting with their internalized views of masculinity. 4. Mental Health and Emotional Well-Being The masculinity crisis has significant implications for men’s mental health. As traditional masculine norms discourage emotional expression, many men face challenges when dealing with feelings of inadequacy, loss, or vulnerability. Emotional Isolation: Traditional masculine norms often dictate that men should be stoic, self-reliant, and emotionally restrained. This emotional isolation can make it difficult for men to express their feelings, seek help when they are struggling, or form deep emotional connections with others. As societal expectations around emotional openness change, some men may struggle to adjust to the new norm, feeling alienated or confused about how to express their emotions in a healthy way. Depression, Anxiety, and Suicide: Mental health issues are particularly acute in the context of the masculinity crisis. Men are statistically less likely to seek help for mental health problems and are more likely to suffer from depression and anxiety. In many Western countries, men are significantly more likely to die by suicide than women. The masculinity crisis exacerbates this issue, as men may feel unable to express vulnerability or access support networks due to the pressures of conforming to traditional masculine ideals. Substance Abuse and Self-Destructive Behavior: As a result of unaddressed emotional issues and economic pressures, many men turn to unhealthy coping mechanisms such as alcohol, drugs, or other forms of self-destructive behavior. These behaviors can further compound the sense of crisis and reinforce a cycle of isolation and emotional suppression. 5. Shifting Dynamics in Relationships and Family Life One of the key areas where the masculinity crisis manifests is in personal relationships and family life. As gender roles evolve, so do expectations within marriages, partnerships, and parenting. Changing Family Structures: The traditional nuclear family, where the man is the primary breadwinner and the woman is the homemaker, has become less common in many Western societies. Men are increasingly expected to participate in domestic labor and childcare, which contrasts with the traditional masculine ideal of being a provider. Many men are learning to navigate these new roles, but some struggle to adapt, feeling that their masculinity is undermined by these changing expectations. Egalitarian Relationships: In many modern relationships, women expect to be equal partners, both financially and emotionally. This shift has created tension for some men who were raised with more traditional gender expectations. The pressure to balance new responsibilities at home while maintaining traditional masculine traits, such as emotional stoicism and career success, can create confusion and stress in relationships. Decline in Marriage Rates: There has also been a decline in marriage rates and an increase in the average age of marriage in many Western countries. Some men feel disconnected from modern dating dynamics and struggle to form stable relationships, which can compound feelings of inadequacy or failure in a society that still often ties male success to family life. 6. Backlash Movements and Resistance to Change In response to these profound societal changes, some men have organized around movements that resist these shifts and seek to reassert traditional masculine values. These movements can be seen as part of a broader backlash against feminism and gender equality. Men’s Rights Movement (MRM): The men’s rights movement is an example of a backlash movement that argues men have been unfairly marginalized by modern gender politics. MRM activists often focus on issues such as family law (particularly child custody), male mental health, and what they see as societal double standards that disadvantage men. Some segments of the movement adopt anti-feminist and reactionary stances, framing feminism as responsible for the perceived devaluation of men and masculinity. Red Pill Communities: The "Red Pill" subculture, which takes its name from a metaphor in the movie The Matrix, claims to reveal the "truth" about gender relations and female behavior. Red Pill ideology is often associated with toxic masculinity and anti-feminism, advocating for a return to traditional gender roles and male dominance. Many men who identify with Red Pill communities feel alienated from modern society and seek validation in reaffirming traditional masculine power dynamics. Incel Movement: The "involuntary celibate" (incel) movement is an extreme manifestation of the masculinity crisis. Incels are men who feel rejected by women and blame feminism and societal changes for their inability to form sexual or romantic relationships. Some incels express their frustration through misogynistic rhetoric or even violence.

I don't know much about Jews, but I have direct experience seeing how people are indoctrinated because of a genocide that happened to their elders a century ago. It deeply affects people's thinking. I often feel like an alien to them and vice versa, as I don't try to depend on them too much, or more like a familiar alien.

By the way, The Paradox Of Knowing Social Systems post was excellent!

Both

The problem is how we define and categorize what is feminine and masculine. Are they energy, behavior, etc.? Does male/female biology determine that we are going to be masculine/feminine?

What would it be called if someone got something from each side of the list? 🤔

@Yimpa, it really is beautiful. Also, conan's podcast is one of the best.

How do you use AIs when you want to think, contemplate, or understand something? Have you found limits for AI for those activities? If you don't mind, could you share those limits? Or maybe share your thoughts about what the AI is actually capable of doing compared to non-AI methods. What is a good way and bad way of using AIs, in your opinion, for those activities?

I felt it. 😁

James McAvoy's voice is very soothing.

The following is generated by ChatGPT. The latest models from OpenAI (ChatGPT-4o) and Anthropic (Claude 3.5 Sonnet) demonstrate significant advancements in their context windows and token limits, making them more suitable for large-scale tasks and long conversations or document analysis. Context Window: Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers an impressive 200,000-token context window, allowing it to handle very large inputs such as entire books or hundreds of pages of documents. This capacity is ideal for analyzing large datasets, complex documents, or maintaining long conversations without losing context. It can manage up to approximately 500 pages of text, which equals about 150,000 words. ChatGPT-4o also has a robust 128,000-token context window, an improvement over previous versions of GPT-4. While smaller than Claude's, this context window can still handle around 300 pages of text, or 90,000 words, making it highly capable of analyzing long-form content and maintaining coherence over extensive interactions. Output Token Limits: Claude 3.5 Sonnet allows a maximum output of 4,096 tokens in most cases, with some beta configurations supporting up to 8,192 tokens. However, even with the high context window, its output per response remains limited to this range, meaning that extremely long outputs would need to be split across multiple responses. ChatGPT-4o offers a similar output range, generating around 4,096 tokens per interaction, though some reports suggest it can go up to 8,192 tokens in certain cases. This makes it suitable for generating complex answers but may require managing outputs in stages for very lengthy responses. Application & Performance: Claude 3.5 Sonnet excels in tasks involving reasoning, long document summarization, and coding, often outperforming GPT-4o in benchmarks related to reasoning and coding accuracy. For example, it achieved a 92% score in the HumanEval benchmark for coding tasks, compared to GPT-4o's 90.2%. Its larger context window is especially useful for maintaining context in extended interactions, making it a strong choice for long documents or intricate conversations. ChatGPT-4o, while not as strong in reasoning over extended contexts, performs better in natural language understanding, math, and visual tasks like diagram interpretation. It is also more feature-rich, offering multimodal capabilities such as image recognition, which Claude 3.5 lacks. In summary, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is highly suitable for users needing extended context and reasoning over long interactions, especially in coding or document-intensive tasks. GPT-4o, while slightly behind in raw context handling, remains a versatile option with superior features for a broader range of applications, including multimodal tasks and faster response times.

The following is generated by Perplexity AI. Context Window Analysis Claude AI Sonnet 3.5's context window of 200,000 tokens allows it to handle extensive documents or long conversations seamlessly. This is particularly advantageous for tasks requiring deep contextual understanding, such as legal document analysis or comprehensive research projects. ChatGPT-4o's context window of 128,000 tokens is substantial and sufficient for many applications, it may require segmentation for very large datasets or prolonged interactions. This can be a limitation in scenarios where maintaining continuity over long exchanges is crucial. Maximum Tokens Analysis The maximum output token limit for Claude AI Sonnet 3.5 can reach up to 8,192 tokens, which is beneficial for generating detailed responses in one go. However, if not configured correctly (using the appropriate header), it defaults to a lower limit of 4,096 tokens, which may necessitate breaking down longer outputs into multiple parts. For ChatGPT-4o, empirical evidence suggests that the output limit varies between 4,096 and 8,192 tokens, depending on the user’s settings and application context. This flexibility allows users to adjust their expectations based on the task at hand but may also lead to confusion regarding the effective limits during usage. Practical Implications Use Cases: Claude AI Sonnet 3.5's high context window makes it ideal for applications requiring extensive data analysis or long-form content generation without losing track of prior interactions. ChatGPT-4o remains effective for many standard tasks but may require chunking for very long content or complex queries. Performance in Conversations: Claude’s ability to maintain context over longer conversations allows it to provide coherent and relevant responses throughout extensive interactions. ChatGPT-4o can manage conversational flow but might struggle with continuity if the interaction exceeds its effective token limits. Development and Coding Tasks: For developers needing rapid code generation or analysis of large codebases, Claude AI Sonnet’s larger context window facilitates better performance by allowing more code or documentation to be processed at once. ChatGPT-4o can still handle coding tasks effectively but may require more management of input sizes due to its comparatively smaller context window. Conclusion The choice between ChatGPT-4o and Claude AI Sonnet 3.5 largely depends on specific use cases: For tasks involving extensive context retention and the need for long-form content generation or complex data analysis, Claude AI Sonnet 3.5 offers a clear advantage with its larger context window and higher token limits. Conversely, ChatGPT-4o provides flexibility suitable for many practical applications but may require careful management of input sizes in contexts where continuity is critical.

@bambi, sorry, but I won't share it with you. It's interesting how you diverged from what we were talking about.

Yeah, with stupid boundaries. The irony is unbearable.

No offense, said the triggered one, lol. And you think you're helping people here? Go breathe some fresh air.

@bambi, dude, calm down. If you think that you'll understand everyone's perspective just by a few posts, then you will be lost in your meaningless, stupid combative mode.

Both of you could be misinterpreting each other. He doesn't like to explain what he means that much, which could be problematic.

Maybe he is only focusing on that because it aligns with his experience and doesn't care to specify what he actually thinks about this stuff.