Nemra

@vinc3nc, is making realistic gifs your full time job?

Psilocybin Medical Trial:

The Psychedelic Frontier:

Nepalese Honey That Makes People Hallucinate:

5-MeO-DMT Live Experience:

The Toad Venom That's Stronger Than DMT:

U.S. veterans with PTSD take a psychedelic journey in Mexico:

Tracking the Supply of LSD:

Saying "unconscious thing" is already problematic, because there isn't a thing existing separate from your experience.

We should consider that there is only one's experience in which logic can be understood, which means that logic does not exist independently in the world, waiting to be discovered outside of one's experience.

You do not understand how seriously ironic you have been. 🥲

For you, of course.

You could say that if you imagine 300-ness, then you cannot include not-300-ness within 300-ness because 300-ness isn't everything. But oneness can, because when we account for everything, then the everything can be viewed as one.

You are too humble and thoughtful.

Is your sole mission to confuse people with cheap tricks and make them agree with you? I'm starting to understand what Leo felt when he came up with "epistemic scoundrel".

They are different. That does not mean the absolute depends on the relative. E.g., if someone tells you something that gives another context to a situation, does that understanding or situation depend on that person? Of course, it does not. I'm saying that if those are opposites, then they are not absolutes or one of them is absolute.

Relative must depend on the absolute. The opposite would mean that the absolute is not absolute in the first place. I'm saying that selectively using the terms "feminine" or "masculine", which are relative, to describe absolute things is pointless and even confusing if you can't or don't care to distinguish relative from absolute.

One of them is relative and the other is absolute. Also, notice that the terms "feminine" and "masculine" are not tautological.

There are no sides absolutely speaking, as the coin is what it is. There are 2 sides relatively speaking, as those sides are opposites.

Polarity is relative. Polarity implies contradiction.

Well, I am saying that there is no point in considering absolute stuff as masculine or feminine.

Now you are saying that love or creation is feminine? What are you saying? Well, you said, "The masculine quality of primordial awareness". What is the use of saying "masculine quality"? I'm saying there's neither a masculine nor a feminine quality for that.