Nemra

Is your sole mission to confuse people with cheap tricks and make them agree with you? I'm starting to understand what Leo felt when he came up with "epistemic scoundrel".

They are different. That does not mean the absolute depends on the relative. E.g., if someone tells you something that gives another context to a situation, does that understanding or situation depend on that person? Of course, it does not. I'm saying that if those are opposites, then they are not absolutes or one of them is absolute.

Relative must depend on the absolute. The opposite would mean that the absolute is not absolute in the first place. I'm saying that selectively using the terms "feminine" or "masculine", which are relative, to describe absolute things is pointless and even confusing if you can't or don't care to distinguish relative from absolute.

One of them is relative and the other is absolute. Also, notice that the terms "feminine" and "masculine" are not tautological.

There are no sides absolutely speaking, as the coin is what it is. There are 2 sides relatively speaking, as those sides are opposites.

Polarity is relative. Polarity implies contradiction.

Well, I am saying that there is no point in considering absolute stuff as masculine or feminine.

Now you are saying that love or creation is feminine? What are you saying? Well, you said, "The masculine quality of primordial awareness". What is the use of saying "masculine quality"? I'm saying there's neither a masculine nor a feminine quality for that.

If you think I am misunderstanding you, then, kindly, define "primordial awareness"; otherwise, I would say that there is no primordial awareness. It is just awareness that men and women have.

The fact that a person would label "primordial awareness" as masculine is the problem. People love to label everything as feminine or masculine and gaslight themselves. It is cringe.

Quantity isn't equal to quality.

Ahh, yes, women are getting pregnant lonely and demanding abortions here and there. The men are just innocent babies living their lives.

Don't forget about fathers. Caring could also mean having an abortion when knowing that you cannot raise the child.

Do you really want a child to suffer by being raised by a mother who won't be able to give enough attention to her child for whatever reason it is?

Women aren't getting excited thinking about having an abortion.

It was totally unexpected. I never heard you speak like that.

You can take responsibility for your life without joining the military unless you are extremely lazy or you want to be told what to do like a robot.

I think that Leo is more himself on the forum than in videos. I prefer forum version of him.

I thought he was actually mad in the end. I didn't expect him to do that. He ruined it when he said it's a performance. But his cry is genuine and infectious.

I sometimes feel afraid that I wouldn't be able to get deep enough in time before I lose my ability to think well.

@Leo Gura, do you think that there is an age limit to do epistemology and metaphysics?

What a profound episode! I understand that an object can be described with its property, but I haven't thought about infinity that way. If I find that one part of reality is infinite, then reality must be infinite; otherwise, reality wouldn't be infinite. That was brilliant. It wasn't obvious to me. Although I have been conscious of the infinite resolution of space, and I don't understand how scientists could believe in the idea of a fundamental particle.

The whole thing is cringe.