Nemra

@JoshB, ok. That's what I noticed, that some people think that way. I was mainly talking about others' internal experience being imaginary relative to one's own experience. One time I was in a radically higher state, wherein my experience was revealed as total hallucination and changing limitations were possible. In my ordinary state that's unimaginable.

Don't Stop Believing.

Gangsta's Paradise.

Without Me.

@JoshB, you mean deny when people tell you the truth?

I don't get what you mean.

If you deconstruct your experience, you will understand how your experience, whatever that is, being the only one is not a limitation. You can view my previous posts to understand what I mean.

In the end, I won't really care what it's called as long as I understand what I'm talking about. I think if I don't break the logic, I still can use it and say that others aren't using solipsism correctly, like the word "God". If I break the logic, then I should either not use it or tell people my redefinition. Doesn't that say that the issue comes from people assuming that their ego is absolute? I agree with you in that solipsism doesn't go far enough to say what the mind means. Materialism establishes what matter is by making assumptions. Different types of materialism stick to the common assumption of what matter is, but different types of solipsism stick to the logic that there isn't stuff outside of the mind or that external minds cannot be proven, even if they disagree on what the mind is.

What movie have you recently watched, or are you now watching? I have yet to finish watching the movie "The Irishmen".

Because materialism is a bottom-up approach, you broke it when you equated matter to God. You can break it, but materialism won't stay as materialism. People would break the logic if they based solipsism on the ego. It would turn into some sort of narcissistic pseudo-solipsism. By that logic, "God" is not the best choice of word to use as well, as people have biases and dogmas about it.

@Carl-Richard, you redefined materialism by breaking the logic, but you wouldn't break the logic of solipsism when you refer to God or anything as the mind, as long as it doesn't imply independent existence to anything outside of it.

If that were truly the foundational claim, it wouldn't be an issue. Even if people conceived of matter differently, I would disregard that and define it as you did. In this case, I'm free to disregard others' conceptions of the mind and apply solipsism in my own way.

The problem is that materialism assumes it could describe reality by the interactions of matter, which makes God an emergent thing. It defines matter as an indirect, invisible thing that is beyond sensory experience and yet tries to find inside it, dividing the experience into subjective and objective. If you want to describe them as materialism, you would have to change what materialism is. Solipsism starts from the claim that only your own mind is certain to exist.

@Carl-Richard, for people, God is personal and biased towards their own culture and traditions. I think what's more powerful and dangerous is to have a biased idea of God. People already view God through an egoic lens. I don't think solipsism based on ego would survive on a large scale. Even though people are always in some sort of an ego-solipsistic bubble as long as they want to have a life. People can come to a solipsistic conclusion based on direct experience or could experience God, but their ego will try to hijack those.

No problem.

I purchased from there:

If you don't take too much, I think you can manage it by yourself. However, I would do it alone no matter how much I took. Considering where you live there, I think taking a low amount for the first time makes sense. You can take more after a few days.

Yes. I purchased the 15 grams. You might react to it differently and also the psilocin/psilocybin can vary. I ate all of it without following any ingestion method, but I would recommend you to follow one.

Sure, but I wanted to say that if people think solipsism is ineffective, then they should throw out the word "God" as well from their vocabulary, knowing how people have been using that word.

@Leo Gura, Christians view meditation and yoga as demonic too. Even when some of them don't demonize it that much, they will use the tools as long as the tools don't make them stray away from their dogma. For them, dogma is above awakening and direct experience, because they treat their dogma as absolute. They are so afraid that they will be lured by the devil if they don't follow their dogma, not knowing that they already failed by being close-minded and dogmatic.

The first time I was there I took Psilocybe Tampanensis truffles. I thought it would be light, but I had the most crazy trip.

Couldn't agree more. It's the true Satanism, because they use the idea of Satan to cast judgment onto others which ironically makes them not self-reflective and blinds themselves from realizing that like everyone, they have been the Satan (ego) as well. Their lack of self-awareness about being Satan makes them satanic. I've said this weeks ago.

Another time I became an infinite field of rhythmic mechanical patterns on psilocin. It was analogous to the following: There were rhythmic sounds of mechanical movements that are like in the video below:

I have identified with the thing in the image below on DMT: That's not an exact depiction. I have used AI to create it. It was hyper-dimensional. It was way beautiful and detailed.

What a great talk!