MuadDib

"And God imagined itself as a young man, who bathed in silence..."

20-hour sit 24-hour sit

Participating in this work (29 of 29) https://youtu.be/aC8pEggJC-k?si=sHx69vTmB7HELpgs Further engagement with Ralston's teachings: Ralston offers week-long workshops and intensives at the center for individuals wanting to deepen their practice. Information on workshops: Interested individuals can visit PeterRalston.com to get details on Ralston's work and workshops. Mobile-friendly resources: For better accessibility on mobile devices, https://chenghsin.com/ has been created. Alternative learning materials: Ralston provides e-courses, books, and specialized courses on contemplation for a variety of learning preferences. Fidelius Charm

What is distinction (28 of 29) https://youtu.be/rqHC0CCEw6Y?si=UThqYrCJ0bEYjRq5 Special nature of distinctions: Distinctions are not merely thoughts; they are the essence of everything we perceive within the relative domain. Thought as a form of distinction: Every single thought is an example of making a distinction, underlining its ubiquity. Insight into 'The Genius of Being': Ralston's upcoming book, 'The Genius of Being', will extensively explore the concept of distinctions, completing his trilogy on the subject. Distinctions in perception and existence: All perceived and existent entities in the relative domain are constituted by distinctions, differentiating them from the absolute. Absolute versus relative: The absolute itself is not a distinction; however, the differentiation between the absolute and the relative is a form of distinction. Finite Incantatem

Is there anything beyond absolute (27 of 29) https://youtu.be/jhiIdOT12rk?si=qz49qRs0aOBrCm97 Philosophical inclination towards thought experiments: Leo describes their tendency to engage in philosophical thought experiments, questioning the finality of enlightenment similar to the transition from dreaming to waking. Questioning Absolute Truth within human limits: Leo wonders if what we perceive as Absolute Truth or spiritual awakening could still be confined within an unrecognized paradigm due to human cognitive limitations. Absolute and infinity as ultimate states: Ralston refutes Leo's speculation by affirming that everything is relative except for the concepts of absolute and infinity, which represent the ultimate states that cannot be transcended. Infinite creative potential of consciousness: Ralston posits that while infinity cannot be surpassed, within the relative domain there is an endless potential for learning and creating distinctions, embodying the infinite nature of consciousness. Dismissal of conceptually transcending infinity: Unexpectedly, a possibility is briefly entertained that current understanding of infinity and absoluteness might be incorrect, but this notion is quickly dismissed as not a true possibility. Conscious equates to existence: Ralston summarily states the principle that everything is a manifestation of consciousness, with the liberty to use any terminology for its description. Humorous take on descriptive terminology: Despite the open approach to descriptive terms, Ralston humorously advises against using nonsensical words such as 'raspberry' to describe consciousness, indicating a limit to the flexibility in terminology. Glisseo

What happens in deep sleep? (26 of 29) https://youtu.be/bt90l6S-xbE?si=S_3iTqTxsEcIbiEl Explanation of deep sleep: Deep sleep involves no dreams or consciousness, and it gives the sensation of non-existence as if one has never been. Clarification about enlightenment vs. deep sleep: Enlightenment is distinct from deep sleep; the latter is a state of ignorance lacking awareness, not representative of one's true enlightened nature. The illusory sensation of non-existence: The feeling of non-existence in deep sleep may be mistaken for 'nothingness', but it is different from the 'nothingness' associated with one's true nature. The role of deep sleep for the body: Deep sleep, where the mind and self cease activity, is biologically essential, demonstrating the necessity for the mind to rest for the body's survival. Relation of deep sleep to true nature: Ramana Maharshi views deep sleep as the closest state to our true nature due to its characteristic 'not knowing', but this is not the same as the awareness in enlightenment. Mistaking ignorance for true nature: Although deep sleep is a state of complete ignorance, this ‘not knowing' aspect resembles the closest approximation to one's true nature if not enlightened. Ascendio

How should we change our culture? (25 of 29) https://youtu.be/u9CmXb6cpYk?si=bXYbO8xe9v9ALtCS The necessity for cultural values promoting enlightenment: If cultural values emphasized real honesty and genuine questioning, enlightenment could become more widespread, as these traits are currently rare in society. Impedimenta

What motivated you? (24 of 29) https://youtu.be/aoJA8sAFwxg?si=wnxTOn8i35EcXCcw Personal fascination with truth: Ralston acknowledges a deep-seated passion for truth and existence as an obvious and vital interest, appearing innate rather than developed. Ease of early enlightenment experiences: After initial spiritual awakenings, Ralston speculated whether the ease of these experiences might indicate a reattainment of a level of understanding from a past life, with the real work starting after reaching this point. Skepticism about genetic predisposition: While recognizing that some individuals might have a natural inclination towards certain disciplines or investigations due to character or upbringing, Ralston expresses skepticism towards the idea that genetics predetermine an individual's propensity for truth or spiritual development. Flagrate

How much work did it take? (23 of 29) https://youtu.be/b8qL9hqZMvo?si=np268TcOsAnkODH1 Lifetime dedication: Ralston indicates that his enlightenment work was a continuous, lifelong process, essentially taking place 24/7. No obligatory workload: He reiterates that there is no obligatory amount of effort or time investment for becoming conscious; enlightenment can happen in any moment. Uneven depth of understanding: He observes disparities among individuals' progress in contemplation, with some grasping concepts deeply with little effort and others taking much longer with less profound understanding. Personal relentless investigation: Ralston reflects on his own constant, in-depth investigation and realizes it is an exceptionally grueling process not commonly undertaken by others. Enlightenment is idiosyncratic: Highlighting Ramana Maharshi's experience, he explains that deep enlightenment can happen very quickly and at a young age, reinforcing the non-uniformity of enlightenment experiences. Descendo

Love vs compassion (22 of 29) https://youtu.be/ZkfV8PtWoGA?si=KtranCUiR3XchIoP Relative nature of love: Ralston conveys that love is often felt as a relative emotion and not the absolute truth of the experience. Love as an enticement: Ralston notes that love, peace, and harmony may serve as enticements for people to join communities or follow teachings, which he chooses to avoid to prevent misconceptions. Conscious avoidance of planting expectations: Ralston deliberately refrains from framing enlightenment with terms like 'love' to avoid setting specific expectations within the minds of those working towards enlightenment. Love as a byproduct of enlightenment: The love resulting from enlightenment, according to Ralston, is not emotional or personal but is rather a kind of universal connection with others. Enlightenment expressed as service: Ralston sees the post-enlightenment expression of love mainly as a commitment to assist others in their journey to understanding, which aligns with his notion of compassion over the traditional idea of love. Love not being negative: Despite not focusing on love in his teachings, Ralston clarifies that love is not negative; it simply isn't the centerpiece of his work on enlightenment. Descendo

Is a rock sentient (21 of 29) https://youtu.be/Zwrxz2uv1tE?si=EzQ2z3PIkUQ3frTR Consciousness as the fabric of reality: Leo reiterates the enlightenment perspective that all of reality is consciousness, questioning whether specific objects like rocks possess consciousness or sentience. Enlightenment and understanding objects: Ralston affirms that enlightenment does not grant insights into the consciousness of objects unless one directly experiences what consciousness or a rock fundamentally is. Distinctions of sentience: Ralston posits that the notion of sentience is a distinction made by humans, who have already categorized objects like rocks as non-sentient based on personal experience. Questioning human distinctions: While Leo remains open to the possibility of objects such as rocks being sentient, Ralston challenges the validity of such distinctions, suggesting that there might be no true difference between sentience and a rock. Relative nature of distinctions: According to Ralston, the distinction between a rock and sentience or consciousness is inherently relative and not grounded in an absolute understanding of either. Scientific inquiry into sentience: Leo inquires about the potential for future scientific discoveries to reveal sentience in traditionally non-sentient objects, and Ralston acknowledges the uncertainty and openness of scientific exploration, emphasizing the relativity of all such concepts. Accio

Relative vs Absolute (20 of 29) https://youtu.be/kuTk3XZ3fpo?si=RQuVXsAl8ijdEaMp Absolute vs. Relative Truth: Ralston stresses that concepts like gravity and mathematical truths, often seen as absolute, are actually relative because they are based on interrelationships rather than being infinite or existing in all contexts. Nature of Absolute Truth: According to Ralston, absolute truth cannot be relative; it is synonymous with infinity and the true essence of existence, without any comparison, duality, or relativity. Existence Equated with Truth: Ralston accepts the notion that existence and truth are equivalent, with the implication that whatever exists is inherently true, as existence is the state of what is. Ferula

Rules of reality (19 of 29) https://youtu.be/duUcR7ci-lk?si=pSjwjXOhBWvu8klC Boundless nature of existence: Ralston explains that enlightenment reveals reality to be without rules or stipulations, suggesting an infinite array of possibilities. Consciousness as the ultimate discovery: Enlightenment uncovers that consciousness itself is the fundamental realization, emphasizing its significance. Positive interpretation of life's absence of meaning: Ralston contends that the inherent meaninglessness of life should not be viewed negatively but as an inherent aspect of reality. Intrinsic nature of creation: What appears as human fabrication is actually a reflection of the essential way reality operates, with invention and creation being natural processes. Duality of perceived reality: While the shared, observable world appears rule-bound, the true essence of existence or reality has no structure, presence, or rules. Diffindo

Truth and Morality (18 of 29) https://youtu.be/uEKO26m9520?si=PPht0a5ITdwL4N5Z Truth realization versus morality: Enlightenment reveals the morally neutral nature of reality, while morality is a human-made construct that invites examination of its purposes and efficacy. Perceived morality in enlightenment: Enlightened individuals may seem more moral because operating from falsehoods becomes patently absurd to them. Lying and deceit are recognized as dysfunctional and irrelevant. Honesty as personal alignment with truth: Enlightened people strive for honesty not as a moral imperative but as a personal mandate to remain consistent with truth across all levels, including factual details. Freedom from self and societal motives: Enlightenment bestows freedom from selfish motivations, leading to behavior that appears moral. However, this is really an expression of authentic humanity unburdened by deceptive or selfish impulses. Flipendo

What is emotion (17 of 29) https://youtu.be/hMfhWZXcRO4?si=XLyrpGXdl-r0OeCi Practical consequences of raised consciousness: Despite seeming philosophical, deeper understanding and grasping of the truth directly affect real-world experiences and actions, paradoxically changing nothing and yet everything at the same time. Misconceptions about enlightenment: Enlightenment is not about gaining something or achieving a goal; it is simply becoming aware of what is already true, regardless of prior ignorance. Improved effectiveness in various professions: An awareness of the truth can enhance performance in any field by reducing resistance and difficulties, making the practice of one's profession smoother and more efficient. Changed relationship with emotions: Knowledge of the truth alters one's relationship with emotions, leading to an inquisitive approach toward understanding feelings like fear, anger, and love. Deep investigation of emotions post-enlightenment: After enlightenment, individuals gain the capability to question the nature and purpose of their emotions more deeply, understanding their origin and why they are created. Impedimenta

Consciousness accomplishments (16 of 29) https://youtu.be/sAoyu5iuwdE?si=xvhk_EHajjnYR3sF Enhanced understanding of pain: Ralston discusses that accomplishments such as winning martial arts tournaments and undergoing dental procedures without painkillers are not exclusive to heightened consciousness but also hinge on a deep understanding of pain, a concept that most people do not fully grasp. Consciousness as a lens for insight: He emphasizes that increased consciousness provides a unique perspective, allowing individuals to examine aspects of life differently, leading to profound realizations and advancements in various fields, including martial arts. Pre-enlightenment insights and post-enlightenment growth: Ralston shares that he had significant insights into martial arts principles before enlightenment, which were not exclusive to increased consciousness. However, after enlightenment, his dedication shifted towards using martial arts as a tool for personal growth and mastery of life lessons. Unprecedented discoveries in martial arts: According to Ralston, his post-enlightenment practice led to extraordinary findings regarding the most effective and effortless ways to use the body and principles of human interaction within martial arts, surpassing what he believes anyone has ever achieved in the history of the discipline. Ease of victory in the World Tournament: He recounts that winning the World Tournament was relatively easy because his opponents lacked understanding of the principles he had mastered, leaving them confused and disadvantaged. This disparity in knowledge and application made the competition less challenging for him. Strategic achievement for credibility: Ralston clarifies his intent in winning the World Tournament was tactical; he wanted to ensure that people would take his insights seriously and be more inclined to listen to his teachings and ideas. Ferula

Why Change (15 of 29) https://youtu.be/s3fDhSzWxEs?si=313eBefxpayFBwv7 Post-enlightenment self-improvement motivation: The drive for self-improvement persists after enlightenment due to the recognition of deficiencies in one's character - specifically, in ways of thinking, behaving, or emoting - and the subsequent desire to discard these unhelpful traits. Character development for specific goals: Post-enlightenment, one may also aim to craft a character that's more conducive to certain activities or human endeavors, like improving skills in piano playing or other specific objectives. Colloportus

Transformation (14 of 29) https://youtu.be/5vXBP7aM37s?si=t2vbbK6lr1qcwfJB Impact of truth on transformation: The realization of enlightenment acts as a catalyst for change within the human psyche by reframing the relationship one has with their identity, thoughts, and emotions, hence making personal transformation more attainable. Misconception about transformation: Enlightenment does not eliminate one's humanity or character traits; individuals remain fundamentally human with the same mind and character post-enlightenment. Variability in trait dissolution: Some personal aspects may dissipate immediately following an enlightenment experience without a clear understanding of why, whereas others persist and may require intentional effort to change. Human function persistence: The basic human functions and character remain post-enlightenment, and any changes in these areas must be consciously and deliberately pursued. Individuality in enlightenment: Enlightened individuals preserve their unique personalities and characteristics, showing that enlightenment does not create a uniform personality, but rather it allows one to consciously operate through or modify their character. Enlightenment's gift of understanding: Enlightenment provides the profound understanding that one is not their character, thoughts, emotions, or reactions, which underlies the transformational process. Dissendium

Enlightenment in life (13 of 29) https://youtu.be/nfcDK9d8-Bg?si=wHpeWoRPsAQiU_CN Enlightenment's practical impact: It profoundly changed Ralston's life, particularly in how he related to himself and life but did not alter basic human functions or daily tasks like cooking. Acceleration of personal growth: Following enlightenment, Ralston experienced rapid personal expansion and subsequent enlightenments, leading to a swift change in his career trajectory from medicine to consciousness work. Enlightenment and fear of change: Ralston mentions that individuals often fear enlightenment will force them to change their careers or leave their relationships, but he assures that such fears are unfounded. Choice after enlightenment: Enlightenment allows individuals to choose their paths willingly, rather than imposing changes upon them, and it can enable them to perform their activities better and with a new perspective. Misconception about asceticism: Ralston clarifies that the stereotype of needing to adopt an ascetic lifestyle after enlightenment is a misunderstanding, noting that such practices are tools to reach enlightenment, not the result of it. Amortentia

Deepest Enlightenment (12 of 29) https://youtu.be/kPwzZtyeaHM?si=y9nYxmDtiubFqT70 Profound insights as equal: All insights through consciousness work are deemed equally profound by Ralston, with none standing out as more significant than the others, defying Leo's attempt at relative comparison. Feeling nothing from enlightenment: The first-person feeling of enlightenment was akin to feeling nothing at all; despite profound contemplation and achieving enlightenment, there was no compulsion to act differently by either sharing or hiding the experience. Absence of consideration to share: Even when accompanied by a companion after the enlightenment experience, there was no consideration or thought to share the enlightenment with him; it illustrates the non-normal operation of the mind post-enlightenment where typical cognitive behaviors like sharing didn't occur. Invariably positive outcome: Ralston affirms that the effect of enlightenment on the mind and the individual is consistently positive and liberating, highlighting the universally beneficial impact of such experiences. Furnunculus

Real Not Knowing! (11 of 29) https://youtu.be/f41KpyYS2cM?si=C_FAi4Ub7o53LyyX Uncommonness of direct experience: Most individuals have never genuinely encountered direct experience, confusing it with their ordinary perception of reality. Misjudgment of consciousness depth: People mistakenly believe they understand consciousness due to familiar experiences, not recognizing the vast gap between those experiences and the actual truth. Essential role of embracing uncertainty: Embracing a state of not knowing is essential for initiating authentic questioning and investigation in consciousness work. The misconception of knowledge as the goal: Individuals spend their lives accumulating knowledge, often missing the fact that true understanding begins with recognizing deep ignorance. Navigating profound ignorance: Genuine consciousness exploration requires confronting and admitting one's own profound ignorance-a step many resist or avoid. Opening the door to questioning: Acknowledging one's own ignorance enables appropriate questioning and wonder, laying the groundwork for pursuing direct consciousness experiences. Cave Inimicum

What is a cup? (10 of 29) https://youtu.be/pPTRxaz-AJ0?si=-ppknA9xdVFyjCTZ Fantastical perception of understanding: The average person struggles with the idea of directly knowing the essence of an object, deeming it too fantastical or philosophical to consider seriously. Myth of leaving the body: Some envision that to understand an object's essence, one might need to leave their body or engage in science fiction-like acts rather than simply grasping the object in a new way. New experiences with the familiar: It's feasible to have a novel experience of a commonplace object, like a cup, which challenges the skepticism around the possibility of grasping its essence. Self-imposed barrier to knowledge: Believing that one already understands what a cup is, for example, eliminates the space for inquiry and blocks the potential for direct understanding of its true nature. Requirement for direct understanding: Recognizing that our current knowledge is insufficient allows one to explore and directly understand what an object truly is, without indirect influences. Direct experience clarified: Experiencing an object is not synonymous with direct understanding; experience can often be indirect, filtered through preconceptions or prior knowledge. Ferula

Direct Consciousness vs Science (9 of 29) https://youtu.be/yTdR2X4iPb8?si=GI5LEZ6OUKkSmQoZ Differentiation between direct insights and scientific knowledge: Ralston emphasizes the vast difference between direct insights and scientific knowledge, stating that knowledge is something that is accumulated and learned, while consciousness is an innate aspect of being that goes beyond mere knowledge. Pervasiveness of scientific and rationalist thinking: Leo acknowledges that scientific and rational thought dominate society to the extent that concepts not fitting the scientific paradigm are often disregarded and not taken seriously in many circles. Historical conflict between science and religion: Ralston recognizes that science had to differentiate itself from religion to survive during its early stages, which led to a general assumption within science that direct consciousness was not possible, favoring indirect knowledge acquired through experimentation. Possibility of direct consciousness: Ralston suggests that while the scientific community has primarily focused on indirect knowledge, it does not invalidate the possibility of direct consciousness, even though it falls outside the traditional scope of experimental science. Nature of direct consciousness with objects: Ralston explains that direct consciousness doesn't involve literally becoming an object, like a cup, but instead involves an understanding or grasp of reality as if one is united with the object in a profound way that changes the conventional perception of the self and object. Episkey

The substance of enlightenment (8 of 29) https://youtu.be/4a1yi8FUoW0?si=ZjHYdDtiTCPKhsUb Nature of consciousness and insight: Insight is not the acquisition of new knowledge; it is the realization of the substance and existence of the matter being examined, especially when the subject is oneself. Illusion of insight as an external event: People mistakenly expect insight to be an experience that arrives externally, like a sudden epiphany or 'aha moment', but in truth, insight is the recognition of one's own being and therefore cannot be separated or gained externally. Expecto Patronum