Natasha Tori Maru

Substantial deterioration of representation.

Yes, you have a point - I do agree it could be read like that. And I could have been more sophisticated translating the irony 🫶🏻

@EdgeGod900 because the title is taking the piss at the cope of endless analysis. So they are essentially poking fun at themselves and the entire audience that gets lost in it. Because it's ridiculous in the face of just actually... Connecting with a person relationally. But you do you boo, believe what you like. Whatever makes you feel good

Of course it's clickbait - it isn't even the main topic being discussed. And I agree with you - he is more balanced. He often gets a bad wrap because he is perceived as manosphere adjacent. @EdgeGod900 it's almost like you think this is my first turn about the internet. I expect better from you, as an ex troll to another! You poor sod. Hook line and sinker 😏

I wouldn't be - thats what giving birth and breastfeeding can do

BANANA ANOTOMY! for the learning!

@Ulax I will only state (for the record!!) women are remarkably more complex to deal with. Their value system is much more evenly distributed (aside from safety being no.1, and female/female dynamics really make this point moot), which means it can be more difficult to predict behaviour. Environment alters biology in a way many do not realise; biology is not this fixed thing. And women-women relationships revealed this to me in a big way.

Nice try Not a subject I'll go into on the forums

ThE ScIeNtIfIC ReAsON wHy wOmEN stOP gIViNg hEaD More cope slop. Analyse, explain mechanisms of women instead of just relate to the fucking person.

This is like their default move, my god. It is played like an UNO reverse card. It isn't the gotcha they think it is. Well said.

I am not applying my statement to any context here - more pointing toward all this explaining and overthinking stops dudes from just talking and relating to chicks

No. You know what it means. You know the context. You know what I mean. You are trying to wiggle your way out of owning your behaviour by redefining words. Not gonna play that game. Peace.

@Jirh @Joshe Half the dating advice on the internet is literally mechanistic overly analysed cope used to replace failed relational connection.

Yes so, uncharitable. This is uncharitable. You're making my point. It appears like bias.

@Carl-Richard It is still an inference. You didn't even ask further questions to qualify this inference. Hence, uncharitable.

@Carl-Richard But then you went on to infer this was an attempt to dick wave? Obviously each case is context dependant. I take it your argument then, is that your interpretation was charitable?

Jesus strike that, get rid of them all! Disintegrated meaning through infinity of division/differentiation 🤣

@integral we need a new pill 😄 Green pill. Pill created by men AND women.

@AION I'm not talking about dating. These are just my observations from your posts. Notice that you had to default to interpretation rather than facts. I wish you luck dating. I can see my words of advice are wasted. Peace.

Agree wholeheartedly. It sets all these young guys up for distinctional relationship patterns that attract the exact thing they detest. Your point around it being a misuse of focus is 🎯

@AION I haven't seen any demonstration or reference you have the ability to relationally connect to women to form a healthy, long term deep bond. Your words and post history on @AION and @StarStruck demonstrate this. Red pill has truth in observations - but it fundamentally overreactes in how it explains these observations, how they play out mechanistically and how to use the information. I do think you have more work to do ridding yourself of some of the poor inferences and preemptive conclusions of red pill. Many of which actually result in the opposite of what you want relationally. Even the fact you can't understand (and more so that you won't even try) me, shows how paradigm locked you are. In previous interactions you constantly try to force some strange frame of understanding on me that falls flat. You default to devaluing women. You fall prey to the just cause fallacy. This is leftover red pill poop.

@Carl-Richard rate of change has no vector It's like the differentiation between speed & velocity.

@AION how you think attraction works isn't it. Proof is in the pudding. As you gain more experience you will learn. You are a bit young is all. It probably doesn't help you always link dating advice from poor sods who are desperately trying to explain women's behaviour as a form of cope.

@integral can you summarise your understanding of @something_else's points? I agree with his take but I don't understand your responses

Lock them in young is code for "I need to attribute value to your age and imply some expirey to put you down and devalue you" Total turnoff for all high consciousness and high value women. 🤮🤢