Natasha Tori Maru

@Leo Gura 😁 inc before all the white pilled AI bros pile on

You didn't even address it enough to disagree.

Has zero to do with what I raised.

Clive Owen. In Sin City. My uturus is empty, Clive

Believe?

@Elliott I note a lot of "black pilled" individuals across many media platforms are totally "white pilled" regarding AI, technocratism, and transhumanism. There's a possibility it is a reaction to the current system being fucked and rigged against them (in their minds). AI and transhumanism will be their way out of the matrix. It's all the same system to me. Same players. Both are or will be their same turds in different wrapping.

@LoneWonderer cheers for the share

I also sift through extensive lists of synonyms, antonyms, euphemisms and dysphemisms. So, I hear a word I do not know - I look up the current definition, it's etymology, pronunciation. Then synonyms and antonyms of it. Then I formulate a sentence using the word - then I work a euphemism / dsyphemism for it (if it is possible). I probably remember words easily because this method. Usually verbally dictate into chatGPT for a pointer - then find a proper source. Lots of English literature when young was a huge formative drive for this

Every time. I log them too You?

Stainless steel all day every day - bar one well seasoned cast iron pan. I don't use anything else. If you fail to cook well on them - particularly eggs - look up The Leidenfrost effect and how to effectively utilize it.

Sometimes Carl enters academic language mode too I read it once. I read it twice. I read it thrice. I am dumb fuck.

In terms of AI replacing humans in a functional way - a lot of random hallucinated statistics have been put forth itt that are, as far as I am concerned, completely made up. But a good contemplation question ~ "Does AI truly understand?" We can't really ask this question without driving headlong into questions about consciousness and experience as it ties to our current understanding of "understanding" in a human way. And we cannot say that AI is NOT conscious, just like we cannot know anything else is conscious. You could argue a case that AI does understand if we manipulate what we mean by "understand" as it applies to humans. But then you are left with the problem: if we can argue AI does understand (with some alternate definition of understanding as it applies to non-biological entities) does this understanding translate to human understanding? And if not, replacing humans (and in particular intuition comes into this) will be difficult. Then you would have to deal with thresholds for human understanding in certain fields of work - and the point where AI "understanding" overlaps with humans capacity would be how much/where AI could actively replace humans (and by replace humans, a human job, I mean totally replace with no oversight by a human required). Something like data entry - easy to replace. Low understanding required. Automate-able tasks - low or no understanding needed etc. Analogous to a human "habit" in that automation is AIs equivalent to human habit. If you argue that we don't even know wtf understanding is, or that we still don't know the mechanisms, it's going to be difficult to swallow any sort of AI replacing higher level tasks that require understanding, wisdom or intuition. This is where we get to AGI, no?

Witness the reverse Uno card in play 😎

The uninspected idea behind this "I am the one to decide what someone deserves" is the insidious root to the arrogant, judgemental ego that needs to be removed. Stunted in growth until it is attended.

I'm not so excited. I don't want the bubble to pop. Not keen to experience another 2008.

@NewKidOnTheBlock I raised (in an earlier post itt) where I felt AI was a huge tool in applied use that could move the needle on metrics that would directly effect quality of life. There's a lot it is fantastic for. Process optimisation, science, medicine, machine learning, huge data analysis etc. But yeah agree they are both using AI to argue. Fucken lol. Just two AI's jabbering away in cyberspace. Dumb shit. People who actively interact (push each point, question critically, who what why when how, enquire beyond it's results) with LLMs end up as juggernauts in arguments. But passively plugging in shit and copypasta is lazy shit.

This needs to be inspected as a form of social conditioning, also. Kind of ironic.

@Elliott Haha - I mean, you are cooking. Let the boy cook But I think it's such a shame to the points you raise, and I find replies to you quite lazy. I personally like users sharpening their minds - but they are sort of proving what AI is for, ironically... blunting the brain into slop, haha I'll take offence for you

I actually cannot believe some users outsourcing arguing and conversation to AI. What the fuck are you doing? Are you actually participating? Are you really critically thinking? Lets not kid ourselves, you won't even remember the conversations or points you pasted here. At least @Elliott is applying himself and not pasting large swaths of AI responses you don't even fully understand. He (or she! They? ) is actually APPLYING THEIR MIND and keeping it sharp. The fuck are you guys doing with your minds... My GOD. You are ONE of ONE! You are such a unique configuration of biology. THERE IS ONLY ONE YOU. Why would we want to talk to some sort of AI filter applied to the uniqueness of your mind and soul? Don't do this!

Is this just some idea you want to explore? Taking exogenous hormones is serious, serious shit. Irreversible changes. It effects the entire body as a system. This isn't something to be considered lightly like a contemplative question. Taking estrogen isn't going to give you the experience of being a women.

I feel like this somehow lives up to the fucked up Aussie wildlife stereotype. Only this huge cu** destroys cars, bollars and phonebootbs 🥹 https://youtu.be/Bs_U1pnM8MI?si=lhxsqExT64VVhooA

You can still see there is a massive leap from current AI ---> replacing humans (job wise/ intellegince). Huge.

@something_else but are they at the stage they can do that, without needing a lot of oversight? As much resources to oversee that might have gone toward doing the tasks? It may finish quick, but how much time and resources go to checking it all? Agentic AI being able to run autonomously I am interested in, but I haven't seen anything to indicate it is anywhere near that level yet. Or seen a decent trajectory for when. I don't see a list of pure capabilities outside of the context of real world use as supplying much to forward the argument it will replace a human intelligence without the oversight. I won't buy any sort of future predictions as being close to accurate until I see AI being able to coherently interact with 3D reality and space and operate in conjunction with robotics. I'd love to see a huge list of tangeable examples of real application. Not nebulous capabilites. Also sort of interested in what you work with? What sort of agentic AI do you use and how is it giving you results that are shortcutting resources? Or is this from external sources?

From "dumb as a rock" --> job done is such a fucking massive logical and technological leap! Where is that happening, what sort of timelines, who's job, how is it going to happen? None of this is mapped yet. So as far as I see, this is just fantasy thinking. Might happen. Might not. A fart in the wind.