Natasha Tori Maru

Do we expect poo?

@LordFall imo you missed removed all context from @Valach's posts and, as a result, misunderstood.

I simply cannot see a tier 2 thinker aiming for high bodycount as any sort of valid goal. There is nothing progressive about attaching to a concept like bodycount. No one has supplied a good argument for this. Bodycount is totally meaningless.

I get you. Apologies for the confusion - the trauma comment was just an example of how each of us go through things, but some never reach higher states of consciousness or learn the lesson present. Sometimes we learn different things due to conclusions we draw and meanings we make. Confusing example

It's very hard to commit to medication, but for the best. My stepdad has bpd and schizophrenia. Non-compliance with medication has been an issue for him. As soon as he was regular with meds and therapy be made leaps and bounds in functionality. He struggled for a long time hurting himself and those close to him. The best apology is a change in behaviour.

Hahaha is a female breastmilk squirt equivalent to a mans skeet skeet? WHERE IS THIS THREAD GOING NO WHERE GOOD

I think you are assuming about @Valach. From his history he has been quite successful. It's possible others have been through similar experience to yourself and come out with totally different thoughts and conclusions. This is the same mechanism behind some people experiencing bad circumstances and one becoming traumatised, and another person, not.

If I could bullseye, hole-in-one, checkmate and slam dunk this in one single emoji, I would.

Peace. Prosperity. Health/homeostasis. Peace is so up there.

"No." is a complete sentence - "Every complete sentence requires both (a noun and verb)" It lies!!! 😅😅😅

@Wilhelm44 do you think Trump would suspect he was being possessed by a demon? Hahaha Empathy so foreign to him, he attends to it as if it as a foreign entity afflicting him

If body count is your main metric, one consequence could be trading variety for depth and resilience. Obviously not always - but there are tradeoffs to everything in life. I personally think it is a stupid materialist and egoic attachment.

ROFL thanks, I HATE IT Need a couple more em-dashes. A sprinkle more "it's this, not that" while we quietly smuggle in how we are noticing what others miss You got crazy weird jukes my man

I think you argue just to reply sometimes. Even when there is no disagreement 🤣 S'like the 4/5th time I've seen it happen

Maybe you don't understand the points AI is making for you 🤔🤔

@Hojo extrapolating a conclusion based on limited experience isn't really going to be accurate. I've met all types. And I work with 99% men. I have 3 brothers. Feel free to operate on a limited belief

No, not all women make decisions based only on emotions or preserving harmony. This is just bias.

This is Bryan's reddit: Bryan Johnson In case anyone is interested / a fan

@Hojo No. Men are just as emotional. It manifests differently is all. They may be less likely to make emotion based decisions - but I struggle with this. Violent crime is a good example. The claim only works, as I raised, if you only term some feelings/emotions as feelings/emotions, and others not.

And stop plugging responses into AI to try to moderate or bring nuance to points. It is obvious.

If we think men aren't subject to external social norms and social layering we have bias. Both sexes capitulate. Both sexes play the game of context. Women often appear more likely to preserve social harmony or protect feelings in communication. Men often appear more willing to tolerate interpersonal friction in pursuit of directness. But both tendencies exist in both sexes, and determining how much of the observed difference is biological versus social remains an open question. And if I hear men claim they are less emotional that women one more time I will scream! (Not directed at OP 😃). Men are just as emotional and make just as many emotional decisions. Look at violent crime. Look at anger. Impulsive decisions etc. The claim only works when you have crazy arse categories for what emotions are, and aren't able to understand and feel them properly.

But of course - you have to really be biased to take a phrase like "Girl Power" to be absolute and irrevocably true all the time. It flattens out all the different types of people and reactions they have to various situations. Removes all nuance. I'm not proving your point, because your point lacks all nuance and I don't support absolutes like this. Girl Power can be taken to stupid, blind extremes. Just like Bros before Hoes. The common factor is - people - not gender.

No, but men support each other in similar ways. Just without the label. Bros before Hoes is a similar phrase and idea. It's not gendered. Again I think it's a you problem - you are interpreting 'Girl Power' without applying any nuance. But applying nuance in other ways to other things. It appears as bias.

One of my girlfriends was so pissed one morning, her hubbie didn't wake to feed their newborn. So she got up, attended to baby, made coffee for them both. Her husband's only comment after a sip was 'Did you add some extra sweetener?' ...she had revenge pumped breastmilk into his coffee.... Do you think this goes against veganism? 😂😂😂 She consented - he didn't. Hahahaha

@enchanted https://www.actualized.org/forum/topic/113591-disclosure-day-trailer-2026-spielberg/