Natasha Tori Maru

Do you think you have to have all of these needs fulfilled from one person?

Oh my gosh I had forgotten about him until now 🤮🤢

I always feel like simps are.... The male equivalent to sluts. I feel bad for this thought 😬

Oh shit! Thanks for sharing that one @Leo Gura Trivializing Spirituality When I originally came across it, I thought she was a good example for the deconstructing rationality series. While she pokes some series holes in channelling in the video, she has some huge drawbacks in the base assumptions she works from that lead to many of her questions failing due to poor framing. She alos has a serious bias toward explaining everything from a psychological lense. She is so allergic to religion from being an ex Mormon, she has ended up nestled so far up the arsehole of rationality she has looped into a weird failure mode of endless lack of closure. Unless of course it's a psychological analysis - then it's all explained neatly! Brit is a fantastic case of deep, deep self deception. But very sophisticated in that deception. The more interesting ones are the sophisticated thinkers as the steel trap of the mind is so elaborate and well crafted. SNAP I enjoyed your breakdown

In really enriched, healthy long term relationships: It's fucken normal to have a life purpose AND want to make your partners day awesome. It's not one or the other. Half the time it ends up being as simple as finding something to do from them in their love language. Both partners do this for each other... It comes from a place of abundance. It almost feels like some users haven't experienced this. Or don't know this is a thing. The issue with doing shit for your partner to make their day better creeps in when it comes from a place of lack, unclear commitment or shitty transactional tallying where you think you are owed something for the gesture. If there is balance. Secure commitment. It is enriching.

Locked. This is just a distraction from the work.

With George Knapp - I think he is a good investigative journalist following the UFO movement also

@Leo Gura I don't know why, but I find him more credible than anyone recently in the movement. I think he did stupid young boy shit when younger, and he doesn't deny this. People do this shit. And it's never as simple as someone being 100% credible or not. We all have shady crap. But I haven't picked up on any huge inconsistencies. He always reads as earnest. He is worth listening to and considering.

Grusch from the Rogan podcast: While he was in the USAF a foreign government surveilled him The USG was actively planning to kill him as recent as early 2020s due to “how much he knew”; Rep Burlson staff was aware NHI have been fighting one another in earth’s atmosphere Russia, China and the US have crash retrieval programs; other countries do as well but he can’t discuss them due to national security. The President of the United States is really the only person who can vindicate Dave - and that vindication will come by 2028. Grusch is a self described “Alpha Male”. Based on Grusch’s own statements, he is one of the most important individuals in the history of humanity - if he is telling the truth. No evidence revealed.

Earnestly mean it. I was in a bit of a fantasy cocoon for a long time, and in retrospect I can see areas I was underdeveloped. Just as one clean example - if I was at your level of development at 31 I myself would probably have been more discerning in those 3 relationships. But overall I needed to move through them. I find being in relationship with men accelerates my spiritual process. Romantic relationships have a way of brutally mirroring your ego and shit back at you. Subconscious shit comes up in a way that never really does when alone. You patterns are on display in an intimate way. For some relationships are a distraction. For me, they aid in my process. Especially as I have moved closer to integration and working on conditioning. Less seeking for me now. More revealing what is already within me. Men help me with that 🙂 Trouble arises when your partner blocks your spirituality or inhibits process.

I think this is a needless drama thread at this point. Considering closing it unless there is more genuine, constructive discussion.

Gotcha I know this is a big sticky spot for you, as you are self aware enough to know you are extraverted and this is a strong need. 31, to me, is still young. I had 3 long term relationships through my 30s. All were happen chance with no intention. Lovely chaps! The main difference is that you are more spiritually advanced than I was at that age. So this is an additional sorting factor if you need this sort of development from a partner.

@AION I picked up on, and responded to, the assumptions behind your post.

It's a nice psychoanalysis. Just rooted in misunderstanding. I think we have discussed this at length - I operate so far outside your paradigm you are just confused by me. And obsessed. Probably becuase you can't explain me. Let alone understand. Being a mod is a job. I don't take it as some status game. If I could be a mod and have no greentext I would prefer that. You enjoy the drama and engage in it. You are never far. So I think you are included in your statements

I don't have a need to act on every emotion or feeling I experience. I can sit with them, feel them totally, and process, without an action that extraverts them. It doesn't mean I feel any less or suppress. Some people require action to be able to move emotions. There are other methods of genuinely feeling and processing a feeling that don't require it to acted upon. I was not always able to sit with feelings. I used to have to express them to move them 😊

I appreciate this, thank you !

@Joseph Maynor it didn't

You are always my biggest, most obsessed stalker

100% Grusch even reinforces this in the podcast. "I was very careful to check the videos weren't AI or fabricated, in this day and age" "I sat on it for years" Fuck off. Epistemology based on time spend thinking about it. LOL. He could have at least touched on how he verified it. I think this podcast is the first time he has spoken about about seeing "long haired bodies with light blue skin". He did not sound genuine, either.

Might help to differentiate my role from me. Sorry you feel that way

It's fine to disagree. But the rhetoric employed determines how well the dish can be digested.

I've just finished the Rogan podcast in full. Grusch is full of shit. Listen to him as he describes what he has seen. I detect lies. Change in tone. Intonation, pace and type of language used when Rogan prompts for details. I get the impression he is coming up with answers on the fly and hasn't done his narrative rehearsals. Unlike Elizondo, who is much more rehersed and crafted. Elizondo is also, full. Of. Shit I call bullshit.

Withdrawal I suppose.

I don't care what you think you believe about what I believe. But that's perfectly fine for you to think words aren't crap.

The type of receipt we are crying for - now they need to supply the rest