Natasha Tori Maru

Do we expect poo?

@sholomar The topic is AI slop - not the good kind of AI

@sholomar There's that saying: You're not ugly, just poor.

Don't get me any more hyped than I already am. Full bussin

@Somaya

Do you think maybe he's an experiencer? It would track way back to Close Encounters of the Third Kind

That is your own personal judgement call.

His teeth don't help the uncanny feeling. I love real teeth, so sad when people do the caps or veneers / whitening

I've been really considering where the gap is between AI and humans in terms of wisdom and intellect. A big one is being able to upgrade AI to be able to sense - light, smell, touch, hearing etc. I reckon they will make a huge leap forward when we advance to that stage

Even the original premise too - that also needs inspection. Less it become a limiting belief.

@AerisVahnEphelia LLMs have no lived phenomenology

@James123 there's a function that lets you ignore users. It's much easier that trying to moderate with words. Boundaries work on what we allow, not in controlling others.

@AerisVahnEphelia I'm talking about when users reply by pasting into AI, and posting on the forum using arguments they don't understand and didn't come up with themselves.

@Schizophonia welcome back ! I think she did, or took a prolonged break. Loved her expression on the forum

@Breakingthewall he thinks he doesn't HAVE a viewpoint 😂😂😂

No, AI ADDs a layer of abstraction over the authentic expression of the person. You are adding AI. You aren't removing anything. You are literally adding onto expression by using it. Literally.

I didn't express a perspective relating to that topic, so there is nothing to judge against the moderation position. I merely called attention to your behaviour.

🎯 🫠

It might be worth inspecting this perspective as a limiting view.

Don't worry about it too much. James isn't going to shift frame, so he's unlikely to ever truly understand your perspective. As a result, his focus remains on correcting rather than understanding. His intention doesn't seem to be exploring anyone else's unique point of view. He appears more interested in telling his own story than hearing anyone else's.

You're pretty much describing misandry - which is heavily feminism adjacent in online rhetoric and ideology. It's sad, the corruption, that is being served to young women 😢

Brah no - I like you popping in and out Just own it - I do. User: 'You are such an aggressive mod' 'You make so many mistakes' Me: 'Yeah, I can be aggressive. I was aggressive there. Direct' 'Yep, I make shitloads of mistakes, so what? My bad. The best apology is a change in behavior' People go back and forth on decisions all the time. The most mature people understand and don't care. Those who fixate on the errors or inconsistency of others are either inexperienced, insecure, or more interested in scoring points than understanding people.

Let the hype train roolllllllll At great risk of overhyping - but anticipation is half the fun!

I've tried to point to this in similar topics before - I think there is a LOT of misandry cloaked in the virtue of feminism in the 4th wave movement. It's not true feminism.

To me this argument centres around 4th wave feminism. You apply some fixes to cracked glass, patch them up. Gradually you come up with "policy" to mend all the cracks so everything is good again. But after a while, once we get to the stage of all cracks mended and we are polishing the surface - there's only so far you can go before you grind away the thickness of the glass, only to have it collapse and crack again until it's own weight. Generating a whole explosion of new issues - cracks. First waves of feminism - cheers, did good. Online feminism and 4th wave? No.