Natasha Tori Maru

We also have these magpies that can fuck your shit: https://youtu.be/yvtWswhO3Hk?si=iwRJEd49anU8FjRO Funny fact; my nickname is Magpie girl irl

@Leo Gura nah mate 😂 No shit the dialogue in that clip is accurate - only it could be used as a friendly greeting in any other context. I learned the hard way Americans take the word cu** waaaayyy more seriously than Aussies

Well, I mean. That solves the self problem that needs the help in the first place... ? So we win win yeah? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣💀

@Leo Gura rofl I should have thrown a crickey! or two in there Too busy hating on oldmate 🤢🤮🤣

Ha ha ha WEEEEIIIIIINSTEIN I thought the Aussie accent really destroyed it 😈

He's some trash Aussie accent in the theme of hating on Weinstein and aliens 😁 Alien dogs

Might it be the side effect of spirituality effectively helps the self? Gets inevitably corrupted due to the teacher needing to sustain themselves to actually teach. Survival always comes up. Unless we just speak truth to the wall and care not about food. Water. Living. A fine line to walk. Maybe the purest teacher does not teach at all.

I strongly dislike Eric Weinstein. Even listening to him rn is making me want to punch my tv screen. Dunno how the guys speaking to him can choke down that arrogance. Fucken hoity toity dickhead lol

Should probably be clear about what we are talking about. Personality disorders are different beasts to bog standard mental illness - although they are both under the 'mental illness' umbrella. Prognosis for personality disorders is generally worse.

I think it would only work when desperation is reached; where the value of money is low due to abundance, and young people being born and entering the economic engine become the commodity. And even then, it may be an option that will never work. By the time a policy like that is a necessity we may be beyond the point of recoup and collapse may be inevitable. At the heart of it I think there needs to be some form of incentive to have kids. Whether an external incentive structure is good solution is up for debate. It just so happens external incentive structures are usually the most effective at facilitating behaviour change. Let's just hope robots get good enough to look after is while there are no new babies lol

Ohhhh I got a day off from work, waiting for a new fridge to be delivered; plenty of time to waste on these vids! Thank you all! Best topic on the forum 😈😁

Many people collapse compassion and tolerance onto one thing. But laying down a boundary with someone who has mental health issues is the most honest form of compassion there is. It is not a lack of empathy. Compassion : how you see them. Boundaries : how you protect yourself. Easy to confuse healthy boundaries and compassion with judgement and rejection. If you make this mistake it points to unhealthy boundaries within you. Leo isn't judging or rejecting those with mental health issues.

@Alexop yep. Some of the issues when the balance goes out. I am not anti-feminist, but I do see some mother's raising men and teaching them that men are bad or wrong. Masculine is bad or wrong. Couple that with broken families where father's are absent (no healthy masculine figure), it can be made to look like (to the young boy) that the father treated the mother poorly. And mothers can play into this with their sons and daughters. You end up with men hating their masculinity. Self hate and dysphoria. Cucked soy boys who are capitulating and soft. And overly dominent woman. So it's men with un-integrated masculine, and women with un-integrated feminine. Basically they end up with either a masculine or feminine shadow. This is just one of many dynamics that can happen. Not saying it is the only one or the most common.

@darkspring001 if you are going to have a relationship with this person - romantic or otherwise - you will have to be extremely confident, healthy and candid. Excellent boundaries. Often this simply will not work because those with mental illness reject healthy boundaries as they do not recognise them as love. They receive it as rejection. In reality a good boundary is about saying 'I need this, so I can give you the love you deserve'. My ex developed schizophrenia and my stepdad is a sufferer, also. You will have to come to terms with being more than just a friend or lover - but a carer also. It is what it is when dealing with severe mental health issues. Often the carer role can run up against the lover role. Really difficult to continually lay down hard boundaries and provide care and also maintain desire. 🤍🙏

@Alexop I think men in today's climate suffer from un-integrated MASCULINE believe it or not. The younger men who are in more trouble I mean. The ones falling behind ☹️

In the context of the discussion men who have mastery of both axis of power (social manipulation + brute strength). But in a wider sense it shows up as a man who can defend without needing to dominate, admit when wrong, express affection openly, lead without ego fragility & creates psychological safety around him. I think of it as power + restraint, action + awareness, strength + sensitivity. It's not about submissiveness, being soft or passive.

Yeah I spent my summers growing up on a farm and in the Blue Mountains national park. The Riverina farming lands of Australia. Your feet can be bare to an extent, the callousness gets insane. A think barrier helps. It's the padding in the shoes that is generally needed for concrete/asphalt. Youth will carry you somewhat. But back, hip, ankle, knee shit come from the shitting urban environments and turd footwear.

I never said it was a solution without issues. I never even said it was a sufficient solution. I just proposed it as an idea that I had not seen implemented. Careful heh heh heh - those scary thoughts!

A man who knows the social game in and out sorta scares me a bit! It's always the men with a fully integrated feminine side that present the most 'threat'. Not that threat is even the right word. Present with the most power, I should say.

Yep, the fixation on which sex is in power being some magical juju that will fix everything isn't it.

I agree. I think a solution isn't going to entail men or women in power - it's always about balance. Both. It's not like it is just men who are violent. Women are as well. A man in power with fully integrated feminine is what I want to see.

The logic of blaming anyone else for our own reaction/conduct doesn't stand. Equally you cannot hold a woman responsible for giving birth to xxx type of evil/bad/whathaveyou. Genetics from both sides loades the gun. Environment pulls the trigger. Women are forced into an awakening to unity through the birthing process. Many integrate it as Love in recognition - and many often reject it. There may not be the same intellectual breakdown of that truth as it is reached through feeling. Typically I see it heavier on the integration side over intellectual understanding. Both are needed though. I think, Leo, your points regarding raw power are valid. But consider this is a problem (needing to fight wars) born of the solution of men in power (who are used to using force to achieve). Raw power might not even be needed without the problem that created it. I'll add that there is a bit of naivety here. Women are absolutely ruthless social manipulators. If raw power is the man's game, the woman's is a subtle game of manipulation behind the scenes. And women had to learn to do this because they were stripped of sovereignty - it was the only way to survive. Social manipulation.

We ain't designed to walk on concrete/asphalt. Barefoot may be better but not in an urbanised environment.

@AtmanIsBrahman what do you consider the most truthful teaching? Your average person will only care about truth insofar as it can be utilised in some way.

🎯 I might add we are all corrupt on different levels, across different domains. Some are more aware of it. I would generalise and claim truth seekers might be less so. But I have been bloody surprised before!