Natasha Tori Maru

@Schizophonia holy fuck this profile picture. The moustache is obscene...

I don't see you claiming to be a teacher - someone else was. In addition - nothing but ego present claiming someone doesn't know wtf he/she is talking about. Cannot be known.

This is just mean. And petty. And a judgement, when it should simply be a discernment. I've always had the personal feelings that the quality and depth of what is learned is reflective of the teacher. So if James fails to teach - is the failure of the teacher, or the student? Either way you are falling into assumption. In addition, if more people learn from Leo - who remains the more exceptional teacher? We speak in terms of your labelling one teacher as more exceptional than another - as you raise. Some big things to think about 🙏 @Galyna I enjoyed your very personal anecdote ❤️

I am generally more intrigued and attracted to odd, offbeat and striking looking people over basic beauty standards .. but this is getting full niche mode. Even for me 🤪 Oh yeah! Like Kintsugi! I forgot about this - I think my relatives have some pieces in their collection. I love the flaws in things ⭐☄️

Really? I didn't know this.... Unusual teeth aesthetics are a thing I never knew about 🥴 😁

Perfectly straight, obsessively whitened teeth. Cosmetic dentistry. This includes cosmetic veneers.

I am not sure how one has a clear understanding of truth and spirituality without some solid philosophy. I can see how philosophy might feel abstract, disconnected and pull one into mistaking cleverness for wisdom - that whole 'circle without landing' effect. They (spirituality/philosophy) have always gone hand in hand for me - a healthy feedback loop. Philosophy sharpens discernment & direct experience tests philosophy. Each keeps the other honest. It keeps one in check from just rolling with 'this feels profound!' and pushes us into 'this actually holds up'. Philosophy does all the unglamorous work clarifying terms, coherence. Helping to separate insight from suggestion and can really help ground our experience into something to be examined. I make no comment on academic philosophy here though I can hear all the spiritual retorts now... 'That is not it!' 'More concepts - throw them away' Philosophy / spirituality in are in relationship for me in my process. Wake up, clean up !

Where my Aussies at? 💔💔 @Ponder @Ramasta9 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-12-14/active-shooter-bondi-beach-sydney-nsw/106141580

Not science - body / mind according to you.

I am quite surprised at the cowardice in refusing to bring clarity to terms! I really thought James was trying to assist...

Sorry to hear that. I would never outsource something like this to chatGPT personally. Understanding your terms and definitions helps us to clearly grasp your words.

But maybe others are wanting to know how YOU define body/mind.

Huh? Is this a joke?

Yeah I actually prefer Kai to Phil, but I think Phil has more of that 'blowup doll' standard proportions the judges look for. Kai's back double bi shits on Phil though - but Phil's arms shit on Kai... both very different. I was hard arsed with the grind. Never went PEDs but was squatting 70kg regularly (I am sub 50kg). My partner at the time was heavily into bodybuilding (he was a part time model so it was for that also) and got me into it. So I almost had a personal trainer when I started as he showed me the ropes. Was so strange being in that scene as a goth/emo sort of chick. I met a lot of the big name bodybuilders around that time

I think some of it was real - but it (just my opinion) it was definitely inflated for the views Yeah, just for fun. Especially as you are into it! But for the layperson I wouldn't think they would be so interested. Kai is definitely more an artist with his approach. And such a contrasting physique to Phil - equally as freaky in his own right. Ah I think yes for putting on size - but the rest of his physique ie muscle bellies, conditioning, skin, tie ins, and overall balance are hardcore lacking. Noting that my assessment is in comparison to the guys with their pro cards. Olympia, 212 etc I used to be really into it, heavily into weight lifting. I had a LOT of muscle for a chick. I couldn't keep up with the food. I just... got so sick of eating! I never looked muscular though (normally that is - flexing I was pretty big + legs and arse had crazy size), just really fit feminine. 2015 ish was when I was hardcore at Doherties Gym.

When he and Phil Heath had that fake competitiveness going - cringe. The movie that came out about him was feral as well lol... But Kai had a lot of creative flair with his posing - in particular, his transitions were always so fluid and animated! Also just saw this - man Mike has a terrible physique for BB and really bad genetics. I dislike a lot of his stuff as I feel it is laced with pathological body dysmorphia. Which is really terrible for young blokes mental health. I can admire he has put in the work, but yeah. Really unfortunate looking in terms of balance, proportion and tie ins.

What's your biggest block? Energy, focus, willpower? They can all be tied. But sometimes the body wont co-operate, other times it is mind activity interferening

Interesting point! My thoughts? I see: Inquiry related spirituality moving toward opening, seeing, understanding and being understood. Looking more closely, curious. Which leads to more complexity before it simplifies. But this can seem cold and destabilizing... VS Regulation oriented spirituality akin to settling, soothing and stabilizing. I see this as moving toward nervous system being and coherence. It feels as if to be moving toward containment and safety, surrender, letting go and reduces activation. Becoming clearer through the calm and not so much contrast. And this can sound evasive and bypassy... I think the clash comes because the two approaches appear to be solving a different problem - or rather - seeing a different problem. Similar words but different intent and energy. But they are just two phases, not opposing teams. I didn't really do the above two descriptions justice with my words. I just attempted to describe this consistent vibe I get from different seekers, and the phases they currently reside in. I think a mature, balanced practice oscillates between the two methods.

I think women are somewhat forced into the flow of life and less likely to resist/use force due to monthly cycles endured. And an interesting point you raise regarding energy stagnating - I have a theory a lot of highly sexed men may be channelling too much of their sexual energy into the chasing and obtainment of sex, when there are other avenues and ways to express this intense energy of creation. Just a theory as I do not experience the same sexual 'flavour' as men, and cannot really ever hope to understand. Yes I love expressing like this also - it is an easy way to merge with object to view all as object, and dissolve the 'subject' or self - all as object object object. Or move the other direction; merge and view all as subject as we merge with air in movement, sound in music etc to dissolve self as all in the opposite way. Subject subject subject all as subject. Object object dissolution or subject subject dissolution.. all is a merge with flow and unity, reaching the same place but from opposite ends

You elaborated better the point I was trying to move toward earlier. I think masturbation has nothing to do with sex, personally. 2 different things, fulfilling totally different needs.

I think while society is built as a patriarchy - it is wrong to blame or think all men are for, or created it. Because in reality the patriarchy was built by an elite group of men. And the typical guy (as you describe) is just as much a victim of it as women can be ! Men as a whole should not be blamed for the patriarchal nature of society. But everyone should be aware of how we play the games it is built on - especially unconscious, damaging social hierarchies that status signal in a negative power seeking way. Yes it is a HUGE point of difference and many women - almost all women I know in my personal life, do not understand it or comprehend how much of a need it is. My respect to the men who can channel and contain this immense desire in a healthy & powerful way that avoids exploitation and enhances connection and creativity

Yes, I understand that. It is the phrasing around the 'getting' that really runs into the icky feeling of it being transactional. Reducing interaction down to a single persons needs being met at the expense of the other (I feel this is the main issue surrounding this dialogue). I think some of this is a function of the extreme and overriding compulsion to obtain sex from men with very high sex drives. Some have appetites so overwhelming, another's wellbeing and needs can be reduced/ignored. Sex is a huge need for men - while for women, I think it is different. The axis is very lopsided

I think that can be true for sure. I think many men do this also, and are totally unaware of it. I think as maturity rises men become more aware of this function of emotional connection through sex. Enhancing bonding and closeness. Some men remain unaware their whole lives. I have had my most real, vulnerable and close conversations from men following making love while just rolling around in bed I find women can connect emotionally through words much more easily than men can. Which is why I think sex is so important for them - especially higher consciousness men

I did not say sex is the only way. But perhaps, it is to be considered as a love language for men, and how they can more easily access emotions and emotional connection with a women. Just as women feel closer and more connected through words etc Sex is an expression of love for me and emotional connection. In a way that words cannot do. Many men also feel this way. This is just another way to view the situation. Many men suffer from alexithymia and sex can help them open to emotions. It can help them express and communicate better as physical intimacy acts as a conduit and clarity enhancing expression for them.