Natasha Tori Maru

Nice try Not a subject I'll go into on the forums

ThE ScIeNtIfIC ReAsON wHy wOmEN stOP gIViNg hEaD More cope slop. Analyse, explain mechanisms of women instead of just relate to the fucking person.

This is like their default move, my god. It is played like an UNO reverse card. It isn't the gotcha they think it is. Well said.

I am not applying my statement to any context here - more pointing toward all this explaining and overthinking stops dudes from just talking and relating to chicks

No. You know what it means. You know the context. You know what I mean. You are trying to wiggle your way out of owning your behaviour by redefining words. Not gonna play that game. Peace.

@Jirh @Joshe Half the dating advice on the internet is literally mechanistic overly analysed cope used to replace failed relational connection.

Yes so, uncharitable. This is uncharitable. You're making my point. It appears like bias.

@Carl-Richard It is still an inference. You didn't even ask further questions to qualify this inference. Hence, uncharitable.

@Carl-Richard But then you went on to infer this was an attempt to dick wave? Obviously each case is context dependant. I take it your argument then, is that your interpretation was charitable?

Jesus strike that, get rid of them all! Disintegrated meaning through infinity of division/differentiation 🤣

@integral we need a new pill 😄 Green pill. Pill created by men AND women.

@AION I'm not talking about dating. These are just my observations from your posts. Notice that you had to default to interpretation rather than facts. I wish you luck dating. I can see my words of advice are wasted. Peace.

Agree wholeheartedly. It sets all these young guys up for distinctional relationship patterns that attract the exact thing they detest. Your point around it being a misuse of focus is 🎯

@AION I haven't seen any demonstration or reference you have the ability to relationally connect to women to form a healthy, long term deep bond. Your words and post history on @AION and @StarStruck demonstrate this. Red pill has truth in observations - but it fundamentally overreactes in how it explains these observations, how they play out mechanistically and how to use the information. I do think you have more work to do ridding yourself of some of the poor inferences and preemptive conclusions of red pill. Many of which actually result in the opposite of what you want relationally. Even the fact you can't understand (and more so that you won't even try) me, shows how paradigm locked you are. In previous interactions you constantly try to force some strange frame of understanding on me that falls flat. You default to devaluing women. You fall prey to the just cause fallacy. This is leftover red pill poop.

@Carl-Richard rate of change has no vector It's like the differentiation between speed & velocity.

@AION how you think attraction works isn't it. Proof is in the pudding. As you gain more experience you will learn. You are a bit young is all. It probably doesn't help you always link dating advice from poor sods who are desperately trying to explain women's behaviour as a form of cope.

@integral can you summarise your understanding of @something_else's points? I agree with his take but I don't understand your responses

Lock them in young is code for "I need to attribute value to your age and imply some expirey to put you down and devalue you" Total turnoff for all high consciousness and high value women. 🤮🤢

I don't think so. He never came out and announced it as a skit or bit. Furthermore a joke like that is in such poor taste and would offend many Christians. Even my family said it looked bad (they are Christian) for someone new to the faith. ---- Russell really shows poor critical thinking in that interview. He sounds like Jordan Peterson; lots of nice long words adding needless complexity while saying nothing.

What are you referencing?

Interesting listening to his words here. 6 months back. I wonder if he stands by this now. Incidentally, this is also the interview where Piers let Russell hang himself scrambling through the Bible for a "relevant passage for you?"

So you conclude he based nothing on experience?

@Carl-Richard I think this is a bit of an uncharitable interpret of OP 🤔

@integral he has dead, emotionless and controlled eyes. I suppose he is happy for us to "infer his innocence" from his eyes, but not infer shit from the trial evidence. It's a whole lot of whataboutism. Deflection. There are issues with the UK legal system for sure. For example, women cannot be convicted of rape due to the legal definition of rape. But this is just Russell playing distraction games. My mother's side are all hardcore Christian. It's crazy to hear the mental gymnastics arguing for little to no punishment because converting from "filthy new age satanism" to Christianity shows his good nature. All the concessions are given by joining the club.

I am referring to outcome.