Natasha Tori Maru

ROFL thanks, I HATE IT Need a couple more em-dashes. A sprinkle more "it's this, not that" while we quietly smuggle in how we are noticing what others miss You got crazy weird jukes my man

I think you argue just to reply sometimes. Even when there is no disagreement 🤣 S'like the 4/5th time I've seen it happen

Maybe you don't understand the points AI is making for you 🤔🤔

@Hojo extrapolating a conclusion based on limited experience isn't really going to be accurate. I've met all types. And I work with 99% men. I have 3 brothers. Feel free to operate on a limited belief

No, not all women make decisions based only on emotions or preserving harmony. This is just bias.

This is Bryan's reddit: Bryan Johnson In case anyone is interested / a fan

@Hojo No. Men are just as emotional. It manifests differently is all. They may be less likely to make emotion based decisions - but I struggle with this. Violent crime is a good example. The claim only works, as I raised, if you only term some feelings/emotions as feelings/emotions, and others not.

And stop plugging responses into AI to try to moderate or bring nuance to points. It is obvious.

If we think men aren't subject to external social norms and social layering we have bias. Both sexes capitulate. Both sexes play the game of context. Women often appear more likely to preserve social harmony or protect feelings in communication. Men often appear more willing to tolerate interpersonal friction in pursuit of directness. But both tendencies exist in both sexes, and determining how much of the observed difference is biological versus social remains an open question. And if I hear men claim they are less emotional that women one more time I will scream! (Not directed at OP 😃). Men are just as emotional and make just as many emotional decisions. Look at violent crime. Look at anger. Impulsive decisions etc. The claim only works when you have crazy arse categories for what emotions are, and aren't able to understand and feel them properly.

But of course - you have to really be biased to take a phrase like "Girl Power" to be absolute and irrevocably true all the time. It flattens out all the different types of people and reactions they have to various situations. Removes all nuance. I'm not proving your point, because your point lacks all nuance and I don't support absolutes like this. Girl Power can be taken to stupid, blind extremes. Just like Bros before Hoes. The common factor is - people - not gender.

No, but men support each other in similar ways. Just without the label. Bros before Hoes is a similar phrase and idea. It's not gendered. Again I think it's a you problem - you are interpreting 'Girl Power' without applying any nuance. But applying nuance in other ways to other things. It appears as bias.

One of my girlfriends was so pissed one morning, her hubbie didn't wake to feed their newborn. So she got up, attended to baby, made coffee for them both. Her husband's only comment after a sip was 'Did you add some extra sweetener?' ...she had revenge pumped breastmilk into his coffee.... Do you think this goes against veganism? 😂😂😂 She consented - he didn't. Hahahaha

@enchanted https://www.actualized.org/forum/topic/113591-disclosure-day-trailer-2026-spielberg/

Yep but you extrapolated that girl power was a lie. You came in with absolute statements and judgements about others being losers and now you are backtracking. It appears like you made a hasty, snap judgement and then backtracked adding nuance. A well thought out idea about mechanisms probably would have added the above in the first place. Points to emotional offloading rather than a proper point. So is girl power a lie? Or are do some PEOPLE suffer from envy? Why is this topic gendered? It applies to men and women.

Thanks for the post - triggered good insights for me, also

This a you problem. What you think of someone's appearance is interfering with your interpretation of interactions. Just because someone is good looking does not mean their interactions are disingenuous.

Do we expect poo?

If you want to do the things you need to do, but find issues being motivated or consistent: stop doing the things you want to do. Stop doing the things that are fun, entertaining & that you look forward to. You will eventually do the things you must or need to do.

I'll give these a go - cheers!! Appreciate the thought that went into this reply

Is Bryan actually vegan with all the loaded ideology behind it? I got the impression his choice to be vegan wasn't based on loving animals or not harming other beings. I could be wrong, though. I tune out of his rants sometimes. I just go for the psychoanalysis 😃 It would probably be too expensive to transport and sell baby fluid, I would assume it would be dried out and reduced to a powdered form so it can be reused in shakes, ice-cream, baked goods, souffle etc

I'll be more invested once I see it able to estimate and bid on construction plansets. Huge test of methodology, intuition, cross reference and unique ideas needed to bid an accurate price within timeframe limits. I know I keep crapping on about it. I tried bluebeamMAX which is estimating software + Claude bolted on. It was worse than anything I could have expected. So unless they are hiding the top AI, I find it all fantastical fantasy thinking. I feel the whole gig is just scooping up investors money while they can prior to the truth coming out - that it's just not where they report it is yet. I just want to see something used in application that really makes a difference - not just act to make us spectators. Enhance engagement, not reduce. I don't see any point in technology that replaces humans instead of suppliment.

It's plain hubris to think you can understand precesely what another is communicating or meaning with certain terms. We have discussed at length, over multiple threads, that words do not have inherent meaning without context. Words are symbols and not containers. The tension is that words have enough shared meaning to create some overlap between minds.... We essentially communicate in our own language, transmitting the weight of our context and feeling out, and try to be understood. It's why we engage in good faith discussion. But more often than not, nothing is discussed in good faith. The discussion ends as it does because we stop treating language as an attempt to communicate. We start treating it like some kind of evidence for prosecution. Again it's "Not knowing" that has power.

Exhibit A: 2:15 Actualized.org featured

@Mellowmarsh sure, bub. I'll damn up the flow if nothing but shit is coming out.

Stop derailing the thread with pettiness.