Natasha Tori Maru

Moderator
  • Content count

    5,772
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Natasha Tori Maru

  1. The AI Bubble BuT lEo iTs ImPoSsIbLe fOR tHe Ai BuBBle to pOP u Can'T cHaNgE mY mINd
  2. https://youtu.be/BotmAfOIM2E?si=n3epYQKYERNe9314
  3. @Leo Gura Yo same. But his audience laps it up without that sort of critical thinking applied.
  4. Hmmm yes - and do we think the doubt is about the limits of measurement...ignorance of the measurement method... or twisty twisty data 'interpretation' to feed a narrative of some sort...
  5. CT Scans are one of those diagnostics that you wouldn't go get willy-nilly. I would consider how necessary a scan like that is prior to pumping myself full of radiation. There's a trade-off. That brain dude, what's his name? Daniel Amen? Heavily advocates for his 'SPECT' scans to look at 'brain health', without really acknowledging the radiation exposure. Overall diagnostics need to be looked at critically, as the risk of exposure (in the case of radiation) needs to be weighted against the potential benefit of the procedure. Same shit with meds etc. Is the cost of radiation exposure worth the potential information you may obtain regarding your ear drum? What are the chances there are inconclusive results etc?
  6. He 100% claimed it: https://www.reddit.com/r/blueprint_/comments/1tag1j9/i_have_no_microplastics_in_my_balls/ That is his real reddit account. I don't think he understands "below the level of detection" =/= zero. Or, he does. And it is his marketing narrative being used to twist/hypersensationalize shit, as per his usual MO.
  7. @NewKidOnTheBlock The volume of people I interact with having issues with their dogs are a result of a lot of what you illustrate - wrong breed for the circumstances. Fucking Border Collies or Kelpies in small apartments getting walked once a day for 30 minutes and left alone the rest of the time? I mean what the fuck? Some people malfunction in general. I've owned working breeds and they need to be given tasks. Their training is tailored. The female we had would literally sit and stare at you, waiting be be assigned a task... loved that dog Some dogs do have rage and psychological issues. And they can be traumatised, ending up reactive. You speak sense many just... don't have.
  8. 🀦🏻🀦🏻🀦🏻
  9. @Hojo fuck no lol Disagree. Won't change my mind. Owned 6 dogs. Not saying all Cesars shit is wrong, but the core of what he does is. Traumatizing an animal to train it is fucked. Dogs respond to discipline but his methods are fucked. He's just an entertainer - and he fell back in that when he was in that German court case.
  10. It's for his marketing (the bragging). He openly states it's all about crafting a narrative for the hook. He changed his company name to "Immortal Care" if I am not mistaken. From "Don't Die". He also takes Cialis and was patching Test. Stopped the test I believe. He hid the hrt for a while also.
  11. You don't have to take it. You don't have to read it πŸ™‚
  12. The Alpha Dog Method that Cesar uses has been shown as an incorrect interpretation and application of dominance theory & hierarchies in wolves and dogs. Even the original scientist Dave Mech has renegged on much of the original work done in the field: https://davemech.org/wolf-news-and-information/ Cesar Millan's methods heavily traumitise dogs and lead to deactivation / freeze response - which can appear like a correction of behaviour. But the dogs revert and end up worse after they are removed from the activating circumstances. Both of my vets were heavily against his methods.
  13. Cesar Millan's training methods were debunked by animal behaviourists.
  14. There's definitely some circulation problems going on. His eyes look manky as fuck. Red, irritated and swollen all the time in reels. I believe he also has some sort of issue with the veins running to his brain - internal jugular vein stenosis - so his body has a bunch of latent conditions (also has Hashimoto's) which make it hard to claim top in a lot of metrics. Not for lack of trying, just latent conditions.
  15. Dis u bro? https://www.reddit.com/r/Biohackers/comments/1uphzkb/has_anybody_noticed_since_covid_many_have_been/
  16. I swear I see topics from Reddit replicated here 🀣
  17. I hope you mean in general. Lots of your statements here are phrased to speak for all men.
  18. There is so much mixed messaging from Leo around this, I am not surprised the continued repetition has worn some users rationality down. Treating someone as β€œspecial” or above normal standards contradicts the very message that person teaches. We should not elevate a person above the principles they promote. Judge the ideas, behaviour, and evidence. Not the status of the individual.
  19. I don't need to, I have total control over my eyes, what they read and where they go.
  20. Right. So, don't open the notification? Don't open the thread?
  21. @Elliott Just close the eyes. No read. Participation is not mandatory πŸ™‚
  22. Exactly. I've noticed people therapizing fucking NORMAL shit. No, wanting to feel connected to your partner is not an attachment issue. No, having an open calm discussion about issues repeatedly coming up is not "activating my trauma" Not every uncomfortable emotion is a disorder. Not every disagreement is abuse. Not every boundary is avoidant. Sometimes relationships simply require vulnerability, accountability, compromise, and difficult conversations! Therapy has incredible value when used properly, and with accurate language. Online use of therapy language is corrupting the whole thing.
  23. What is your definition of "turn on" or "betraying" Leo (I may be mistakenly assuming you are using these two terms/phrases synonymously)? I do not think you would be able to recognise the potential of what "betrayal" would look like, from a users perspective. I think how I would use the term "betrayal" would look very different to how a user would consider the term applicable.