Natasha Tori Maru

The UAP disclosure movement is a classic shift in the Overton window - if I am being more charitable (I have a personal strong dislike & feeling of irritation when misinformation and bullshit is deliberate). They can't just shove such a truth up the arse of society without furthering the range of ideas and topics that the public and political institutions consider legitimate to discuss.

Have you got any links to support these claims? Specifically what the medical medium info is based on - not medical medium as a source.

🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

Do we have one? Rolling. Post that shit. Shorts, reels, tick-tock turds. Do your worst short format. Boomer cringe. I love the spittle on the guys mouth 🤮🤢 https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS45V1Enf/

What emotions / feelings come up for you? Sympathy, heartbreak, disgust, sadness, pity etc So you feel compelled to action?

Yes - I've been with a human when they pass. It is like watching a no-self awakening in front of you. Real time. All the wonder and awe. All distinction falls away. Only raw sensation remains. Powerful experience. I recommend witnessing for everyone - as macabre as that sounds.

It is more the type of video that would suit the blog (like the old conversational/stream-of-consciousness/rap ones that occasionally populated the blog).

Every scene the Jesus is in from The Big Lebowski. Fucking unhinged cringe feeling.

First! We must polish the surface of the head to a pristine finish, to reflect & intensify the divine rays of light and cleanse all falsehood!

Gonna binge Star Trek + X-men tonight in this gentleman's honour! He gave us the infinity facepalm meme. He gave us joy. I love his silky rich voice. Like cherries and creme brule!

My grandmother is in the early stages of Alzheimer's. It erodes the personality. She doesn't know who myself or my mother are anymore. When we try to care for her, she often becomes adversarial. It is a very sad end. All reason dissolves. A child remains in an adult body with much less emotional regulation than normal.

Isn't this an odd line of reasoning, though? Genuinely appears you are using the limitations of communication as a reason to avoid the responsibilities of communicating. Users are trying to engage with your claims. Trying to understand & question for clarity. But as soon as they do so, you dismiss the medium of language as inadequate? Then you elevate some deeper form of communication (reaching the heart) as above the ordinary requirements of being understood? Language is limited, yes (especially because it is formed by the very distinctions we are trying to escape through spirituality), but that doesn't mean that communication is impossible. Ironically, perhaps the very evil "discipline" you're arguing against is not what is required here: the willingness to stop, listen, understand what's being asked, examine your own thinking and make the effort to articulate/reformulate more precisely is. The absence of discipline is causing a gap in understanding. Moving away from unity, connection, love - the very things we are all trying achieve.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DX7Q4YKpTgf/?rpxt=MXAybjk3bDIzM29neQ== Academy award

Shits gonna' fuck - Or - Shit better fuck @UnbornTao I know you are about this

@vibv thanks for trying. Repeating the lecture isn't making anything clearer. Just obfuscates further.

Doesn't answer the question. My apologies - I misunderstood. I thought you wanted a contemplative discussion 🙏

https://www.reuters.com/business/anthropic-recorded-net-loss-over-80-billion-first-half-this-year-wsj-reports-2026-10-20/ https://www.reuters.com/business/musks-warning-hits-neocloud-stocks-debt-concerns-mount-2026-10-26/ https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-ai-bubble-has-already-burst-2026-10-26/

NHI - I won't speak to this. UAP - exist. They are extensively tracked by governments & NASA (noting NASA is a government agency, just one many inherently trust more, although they have no reason to). Governments have these craft. Aerial, subsea, or space-based craft that cannot be immediately identified or explained by standard analysis. You need to concentrate on the bolded part when researching.

I think your argument says more about the value system you are attributing to discipline, than anything inherently evil about discipline itself. Why should the impulse that requires the least resistance be considered more authentically you than the value you deliberately choose to live by?

What question explicitly? Do UAP exist? NHI? Are they ours? etc

Do you think he had something to prove, or was defending himself? What was the context prior to his uncalibrated behaviour?

Informed criticism requires understanding the relevant evidence and arguments.

I just want to make you aware (because you keep stating you are simply observing) that the above marked up in red is not an observation. They are interpretations, generalisations, explanations of a proposed mechanism, and psychological inferences. This distinction matters, because these are the parts of your reasoning where you are moving beyond what you directly observed, then assigning meaning, motives and causality to it. This is the part of your reasoning you have direct influence over, and where cognitive biases can enter.

One of the markers of maturity for me - and one of the biggest factors for stable, healthy long term relationships in general - is in our ability to repair. Disagreement, fights... these are not so bad in my opinion. It is our ability to repair after that really illustrates maturity, compassion and understanding. We can verbally apologise. One method. But the best apology is a change in behaviour. We must have integrity. Words must align with actions. We fall out of congruancy with others when we betray our own integrity by saying one thing - apologising - but continuing with the poor behaviour. We cannot just apologise and continue the poor behaviour, expecting forgiveness. We need to work on changing he behaviour that necessitated the apology. Necessitated the forgiveness. In long term relationship and repair, a provisional time must also be accepted where the person manifesting poor behaviour attempts to change. So we have to be willing to give grace for this period, accepting they may transgress while they try to recalibrate. Many people cannot accept this period when people try to change and cut ties at this point - and it comes down to our own personal boundaries with regard to what we will or will not tolerate. If someone is earnestly trying to change their behaviours (and usually beliefs are being changed simultaneously). I think it's important to distinguish between a setback during a genuine attempt to change and a repeated pattern in which apologies are made without meaningful progress. Online rhetoric is becoming considerably intolerant to this phase of relationship. Repair needs more work and emphasis in our culture - we aren't learning these skills or being taught them. Too often people have a zero sum mindset. I appreciate your comments @Rafael Thundercat - you speak on topics not attended to as frequently on the forum

I don't think it's one or the other. There is a balance to be found between our unique rhetorical style and accurate expression. Maybe you haven't found that part of your voice/expression yet? It comes with time and practice. Adding flamboyant or interesting and unusual combinations of words to express a concept or idea generates added interest through imagery. You could have a bias to more formality and maybe you prefer that from others?