Natasha Tori Maru

@Hojo extrapolating a conclusion based on limited experience isn't really going to be accurate. I've met all types. And I work with 99% men. I have 3 brothers. Feel free to operate on a limited belief

No, not all women make decisions based only on emotions or preserving harmony. This is just bias.

This is Bryan's reddit: Bryan Johnson In case anyone is interested / a fan

@Hojo No. Men are just as emotional. It manifests differently is all. They may be less likely to make emotion based decisions - but I struggle with this. Violent crime is a good example. The claim only works, as I raised, if you only term some feelings/emotions as feelings/emotions, and others not.

And stop plugging responses into AI to try to moderate or bring nuance to points. It is obvious.

If we think men aren't subject to external social norms and social layering we have bias. Both sexes capitulate. Both sexes play the game of context. Women often appear more likely to preserve social harmony or protect feelings in communication. Men often appear more willing to tolerate interpersonal friction in pursuit of directness. But both tendencies exist in both sexes, and determining how much of the observed difference is biological versus social remains an open question. And if I hear men claim they are less emotional that women one more time I will scream! (Not directed at OP 😃). Men are just as emotional and make just as many emotional decisions. Look at violent crime. Look at anger. Impulsive decisions etc. The claim only works when you have crazy arse categories for what emotions are, and aren't able to understand and feel them properly.

But of course - you have to really be biased to take a phrase like "Girl Power" to be absolute and irrevocably true all the time. It flattens out all the different types of people and reactions they have to various situations. Removes all nuance. I'm not proving your point, because your point lacks all nuance and I don't support absolutes like this. Girl Power can be taken to stupid, blind extremes. Just like Bros before Hoes. The common factor is - people - not gender.

No, but men support each other in similar ways. Just without the label. Bros before Hoes is a similar phrase and idea. It's not gendered. Again I think it's a you problem - you are interpreting 'Girl Power' without applying any nuance. But applying nuance in other ways to other things. It appears as bias.

One of my girlfriends was so pissed one morning, her hubbie didn't wake to feed their newborn. So she got up, attended to baby, made coffee for them both. Her husband's only comment after a sip was 'Did you add some extra sweetener?' ...she had revenge pumped breastmilk into his coffee.... Do you think this goes against veganism? 😂😂😂 She consented - he didn't. Hahahaha

@enchanted https://www.actualized.org/forum/topic/113591-disclosure-day-trailer-2026-spielberg/

Yep but you extrapolated that girl power was a lie. You came in with absolute statements and judgements about others being losers and now you are backtracking. It appears like you made a hasty, snap judgement and then backtracked adding nuance. A well thought out idea about mechanisms probably would have added the above in the first place. Points to emotional offloading rather than a proper point. So is girl power a lie? Or are do some PEOPLE suffer from envy? Why is this topic gendered? It applies to men and women.

Thanks for the post - triggered good insights for me, also

This a you problem. What you think of someone's appearance is interfering with your interpretation of interactions. Just because someone is good looking does not mean their interactions are disingenuous.

If you want to do the things you need to do, but find issues being motivated or consistent: stop doing the things you want to do. Stop doing the things that are fun, entertaining & that you look forward to. You will eventually do the things you must or need to do.

I'll give these a go - cheers!! Appreciate the thought that went into this reply