Natasha Tori Maru

This is judgement

16 year old looksmaxxer abuses arda, fucks his shit You can't tell me this isn't pathological behaviour born of this movement.

This alone is what makes this topic so difficult for me - there is as much disinformation as potential legitimate information floating around. As old Trumply boy said "The only way to deal with them, is to flood the zone with shit (information)". He wasn't referring to the UFO / UAP phenomenon per se - but it applies. I think we should also distinguish between UFO / UAP and aliens / NHI. The two topics are being mixed together when we are talking epistemology. Equivocating UAP / NHI is a domain/category error - as there are varying levels of evidence for each. And while the phenomenon's appear (or could) be linked, mixing the two when we debate epistemology is not assisting with clarity on the matter. The only reason I come from more conclusive certainty than yourself (and others here) is because of my unique experiences (as spoken about previously in this thread). Anyway - thanks for the shares on the topic I still think this topic brings in all the most open minded, charitable and interesting characters on the forum !!

Marked up in red is not necessarily universally true - and if we are to really probe into this, we will find this is not an honest investigation of the matter. The claim has hidden assumptions about what knowledge is for. There are at least three major positions that could come to mind via brainstorming behind what we use knowledge for. Pragmatism - which would be searching for knowledge as it is valuable to guide action. Then, there is embarking on a search for truth for its own sake. A much more Leo-esc / INTP sort of position. Third would be virtue epistemology - the aim is intellectual excellence. I am sure there are more, these are just a few I can think of on the spot. The overall point is that you make a big assumption which covers over a weakness in the above argument. Case in point - it is my understanding Leo's search for truth is itself a terminal value. This is an example of an epistemology that isn't centred around seeking just for application. And while people embark on epistemic rigor for any combination of the above (application, virtue or just intellectual excellent etc) at seperete times, in different ways: Do you think users here want to understand the UFO topic to apply the knowledge in application, or because of truth for its own sake? tl;dr truth and utility are related, but not identical Rounding back to "not knowing" - investigating if you earnestly understand the true meaning of the concept and being honest with yourself is key. It appears to remain a conceptual understanding if it is reduced to "it is needed provisionally to find some truth for action". Although, perhaps you are purely approaching it in this way to make a point - which isn't very sound as it is based on the assumptions (hence, weaknesses in the claim) above. I highly recommend this book: Peter Ralston - The Book of Not Knowing It is an excellent way to truly deconstruct knowing, beliefs - and - as a byproduct, where we are filling in gaps to match patterns and narratives we are identified with. It will assist with assumptions, inferences and facilitate a deep self honesty through connection to what is unlimited.

https://www.actualized.org/forum/topic/97531-ufos-are-here/?do=findComment&comment=1665402 I don't think he cares about what evidence is out there as much as sticking with the narrative that doesn't want to be countered by anything substantial.

@AION don't be condescending. You are hurt. You aren't being denigrated for thinking humans are shallow. It's your own cognitive bias to have. Work on that attitude more. As you rightly claim you will.

@OBEler for me it seems to be a genetic thing. Early morning upon waking does it. But it is very, very mild at present time as I have reached a beautiful state of life where I am in flow a lot. I accept it, surrender. I'm not fearing it. It passes quickly this way. Going down into it gets me out. For the above reason, I always do hard cardio in the morning. Zone 5/6. I find it is almost a charged overabundance of energy. The dawn light and movement help.

@Miguel1 yes, you describe it very well. I don't know why, but I have always been this way. It is like some wicked cosmic joke to wake from the bliss of sleep. Once I have momentum for the day I am fine, I don't think and body just does it's thing. If I am suffering from a hardship, the morning is much worse. Waking from a nap also sometimes. Very discombobulating which compounds the overall malaise.

@Leo Gura (⁠◍⁠•⁠ᴗ⁠•⁠◍⁠)⁠❤

Maybe morning time is difficult for you when enduring bad feelings and emotions. Most people have a time of day they feel pain and suffering more keenly. My lowest mood time if day is always morning. Just natural to me. When I am depressed, mornings are just the worst. The rest of the day, once I get through the morning, is much easier. Gentle. In contrast my brother has low mood around 3pm. Perhaps it follows your hormonal rhythms? I am sorry to hear of your suffering - my heart goes out to you 💜 At least, once the morning is over, there is some small measure of repreave for you

Suffering also appears to follow a pattern of association with awakening. Or, enlightenment.

This whole dialogue is low consciousness, reactive and a poor contribution. @Miguel1does not deserve your disparaging judgements. You need to keep that sort of stuff to yourself. You need to ask yourself what you are getting out of this. Why are you even on the forums, if this is how you feel?

Oh wow the grift is in full force: Bryan's rebranded website "Immortals", changed from "Don't Die" selling GLP1s

Ah, so I looked into what he is doing with this new announcement. As per usual, it is a sensationalist disingenuous headline to generate outrage and clicks. Any publicity is good publicity I guess, right? It's not a clone. It's not a zygote. It's cells taken from different areas of his body and treated to revert to an earlier state. These cells are then analysed for a response to more experimental (higher risk) treatments. It is a clump of adult cells that have been reprogrammed to act like embryonic pluripotent stem cells.

But even this isn't the truth, despite the backpedaling. Not all humans are shallow.