-
Content count
5,657 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About Natasha Tori Maru
-
Rank
- - -
- Birthday 12/01/1986
Personal Information
-
Location
Melbourne, Australia
-
Gender
Female
Recent Profile Visitors
19,026 profile views
-
Explain to us your logic here and how you came to this conclusion?
-
https://isaiprofitable.com/ We are the product. Our data. Our words. Our art. Stolen.
-
Natasha Tori Maru replied to Natasha Tori Maru's topic in Intellectual Stuff: Philosophy, Science, Technology
"Produces" is the inference portion to me. -
@LordFall Gotcha, cheers for the elaboration
-
Agree. It signals to me the person is underdeveloped and immature.
-
@LordFall Do you really think women's standards are why communism doesn't work? How are you accounting for other factors? Wouldn't it be more true to claim "if humans had much weaker status competition, communism would have a better chance at working?" I do not understand what it has to do with women. It is a human issue.
-
Sorry? I don't understand this
-
Natasha Tori Maru replied to Natasha Tori Maru's topic in Intellectual Stuff: Philosophy, Science, Technology
AI cannot answer this. -
I think the surface appearance of the conversation is almost a red herring - as you get down to it, it is more a comment and reflection on each persons life stages and psychology / philosophy.
-
Actually try to understand each other with questions instead of strawmaning (well not strawmaning as I think it is unintentional, so more misunderstanding than anything)
-
Did he state the bolded, or is that your assumption? I just see a lot of assumptions in how you address others points that questioning would reveal could be wrong. I think you tried to understand his perspective from your frame, but didn't openly enquire and seriously consider there may be other valid perspectives. Again, this is just how it looks to me. If you say it is not so, then for you, it is not so.
-
@Leo Gura That is also a solid possibility. Not enough data to avoid simple speculation - could be both explanations.
-
I mean, this comes off as really condescending. You genuinely come across to me as insisting on your worldview while not truly exploring the experience of others to understand them. I could be wrong. Just how it appears.
-
This is not a correct framing. No stages of the spiral are transcended. They are integrated. So there would be no "pretending" or "transension". There would simply be unintegrated elements.
-
Shaving my head was one of the most freeing and changing experiences for me. And while I actively had a choice (IE I knew my hair would grow back, and I wasn't suffering from hairloss), it revealed how deeply attached I was to my appearance. It was key in dissolving that attachment and misplaced self worth. It also stopped me self-objectifying and leveraging off my looks as much as I did previously (not that I am some stunner, but I didn't get shit carded genetics wise). Shaved it at 12, 22 and 31. Got bullied relentlessly for it also. I learned to not give fucks. When I first got diagnosed with Hashimoto's and my thyroid was out of control, I lost most of my eyebrows and suffered a lot of hair thinning. I've since had the worst of it in remission (hence the helmet hair images in the facecard thread where its gown back with a vengeance of babyhairs). Attending too much to appearance has the drawback of potentially increasing attachment and investing our self worth in something that will fade. Immaterial. I feel it can run counter to consciousness work. This is another reason I am not for the looksmaxxing rubbish.
