Natasha Tori Maru

Leo selects. I don't know his criteria other than maturity and development. People also change - which convolutes the process...

Stop doing this. I am being serious and you make moves to try to undermine what is going on by turning me into a sexual fantasy. I have to genuinely wonder if you are okay or going through something serious on your end. Either way, please try to understand.

No. You just refuse to listen.

@yetineti They refuse to see how upsetting the way women have been framed a several times in the discussion. Continual, deliberate strawmanning and avoiding their negative emotions by claiming fun. Notice they judge you to block feeling the authenticity of emotion inside them that knows "I have done wrong" and won't claim it. If it was really felt and allowed, and apologies were earnest, this continued dialogue would have ended long ago It is extremely dissappointing to me, to see it here of all places. Do better, I say.

Declined. I don't need to.

He doesnt need to be an arbiter of truth to express an opinion and argue a case. You don't appear able to stick to arguements though. Your avoiding addressing concerns by challenging some perceived sense of authority.

Jesus this isn't a debate thread.

This thread is now sad and full of poor quality arguments. Can't refute the arguement so we attack personal behaviour and presumed dating success. Learn to seperate intent from outcome.

@questionreality what do you think I am disagreeing with? The thread itself? No.

I think using AI like this is so good for finding holes where we aren't hitting macro and micronutrients. I do similar to get an idea of what I need to balance energy against my heavy cycling training. For myself though, it's with the aim of NOT losing weight. I have trouble with underfueling more than over. The only issue I have with it is quantifying oil in food. That's a hard one AI can miss. And considering fats are 7cal per g (as opposed to 4g per carb/protein) it can rather insidiously let calories creep in (not bad for me necessarily ☺️). I tend to focus on fats as this are key for my general well-being more than any other macro. Thanks for sharing !

Sometimes that kind of thinking can be a comfortable hopelessness. A sort of denial of the possibility of any other explanation to avoid feeling the despair of ones situation. Just one possibility. But I think a much fairer take would be it simply isn't true. We could look at the need for food, water etc as things men might care more about. I think within the context of the thread we would approach these two things as taken care of. Men care about lots of things. Not just sex. A stronger claim would be "men care more about sex than anything else". But this doesn't accommodate people who are asexual - just as one example.

@something_else bias errywhere 😅

Pulled the move I was making in my head from the start as a retort here! "I wonder if they would appreciate being reduced to a wallet in terms of use? Or a high maintenance automated teller machine?" To be honest though, that type of thinking is reprehensible to me. Anathema to connection and love. I feel gross even writing it!

Therefor you don't need to behave properly?

You're not listening or understanding.