Natasha Tori Maru

Moderator
  • Content count

    5,762
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Natasha Tori Maru

Personal Information

  • Location
    Melbourne, Australia
  • Gender
    Female

Recent Profile Visitors

19,798 profile views
  1. It's for his marketing (the bragging). He openly states it's all about crafting a narrative for the hook. He changed his company name to "Immortal Care" if I am not mistaken. From "Don't Die". He also takes Cialis and was patching Test. Stopped the test I believe. He hid the hrt for a while also.
  2. You don't have to take it. You don't have to read it πŸ™‚
  3. The Alpha Dog Method that Cesar uses has been shown as an incorrect interpretation and application of dominance theory & hierarchies in wolves and dogs. Even the original scientist Dave Mech has renegged on much of the original work done in the field: https://davemech.org/wolf-news-and-information/ Cesar Millan's methods heavily traumitise dogs and lead to deactivation / freeze response - which can appear like a correction of behaviour. But the dogs revert and end up worse after they are removed from the activating circumstances. Both of my vets were heavily against his methods.
  4. Cesar Millan's training methods were debunked by animal behaviourists.
  5. There's definitely some circulation problems going on. His eyes look manky as fuck. Red, irritated and swollen all the time in reels. I believe he also has some sort of issue with the veins running to his brain - internal jugular vein stenosis - so his body has a bunch of latent conditions (also has Hashimoto's) which make it hard to claim top in a lot of metrics. Not for lack of trying, just latent conditions.
  6. Dis u bro? https://www.reddit.com/r/Biohackers/comments/1uphzkb/has_anybody_noticed_since_covid_many_have_been/
  7. I swear I see topics from Reddit replicated here 🀣
  8. I hope you mean in general. Lots of your statements here are phrased to speak for all men.
  9. There is so much mixed messaging from Leo around this, I am not surprised the continued repetition has worn some users rationality down. Treating someone as β€œspecial” or above normal standards contradicts the very message that person teaches. We should not elevate a person above the principles they promote. Judge the ideas, behaviour, and evidence. Not the status of the individual.
  10. I don't need to, I have total control over my eyes, what they read and where they go.
  11. Right. So, don't open the notification? Don't open the thread?
  12. @Elliott Just close the eyes. No read. Participation is not mandatory πŸ™‚
  13. Exactly. I've noticed people therapizing fucking NORMAL shit. No, wanting to feel connected to your partner is not an attachment issue. No, having an open calm discussion about issues repeatedly coming up is not "activating my trauma" Not every uncomfortable emotion is a disorder. Not every disagreement is abuse. Not every boundary is avoidant. Sometimes relationships simply require vulnerability, accountability, compromise, and difficult conversations! Therapy has incredible value when used properly, and with accurate language. Online use of therapy language is corrupting the whole thing.
  14. What is your definition of "turn on" or "betraying" Leo (I may be mistakenly assuming you are using these two terms/phrases synonymously)? I do not think you would be able to recognise the potential of what "betrayal" would look like, from a users perspective. I think how I would use the term "betrayal" would look very different to how a user would consider the term applicable.