Natasha Tori Maru

Topic adjacent? It doesn't answer your question directly 🪺

Fucking sweet, please announce when it's released 🥰

@Monster Energy either your initial point is convoluted and unrefined - and you are now clarifying. Or you are doing what you appear to do all over the forum and engaging in the scripted motte-and-bailey fallacy. This is your standard script. If I were to really try to dig into this disingenuous feeling conversation, I would simply claim you haven't established any link between a trait having an evolutionary function to that trait being, therefore, deceptive. You can claim that you're “observing” rather than making a moral judgment, but that doesn't resolve the problem. Calling something “nature's disguise,” describing love as a “lie,” and saying that deception is “baked into the code” are not neutral observations. They are interpretations that require sound argument if you want to paddle them as truth. How about you try this on Hardmode - don't use AI to answer and do the standard paste remixed slop in reply

@aurum have your observations and interactions on the forum contributed material for your work ( book ). I am quite interested 🙂

@Joshe cool please do, I was following along.

@Joshe are you asking @LordFall to reverse engineer / derive your arguement from the conclusion you stated?

@LordFall Fucken DAPPER

Do you repeat outfits? Exact same several days in a row? Find one or two that work and repeat? Or do you have a style that has essential basics but you rotate accessories? Or do you find something that works and purchase multiple of that item in differing colours? TELL ME! I am a chronic outfit repeater; I find a couple of items that work as a basic template and alternate one or two small elements. I am completely unbothered repeating an outfit 3 days in a row, exactly the same (provided it is clean). I don't want to think too much. Just slap something on I know works and go. I dislike shopping for clothes. I wear a lot of black. Special occasions I deviate. But day to day I don't give a shit if it's the same all week INTJ if that factors in

Majestic creatures ⚡ I've done equine therapy twice. There's an amazing connection horses have to humans. I feel tethered to them in an unusual way. Similar to dogs.

Rofl my god. I used to spend every summer on a farm until 16. Horse cock up close is no joke. I reckon that would perforate me 😅

Framing deceitfulness as inherently part of the female nature, as opposed to just HUMAN nature ... Is really hurtful. Why?

If this "biological need to spread the seed" were a real proven thing, wouldn't men be more frequently and enthusiastically skeeting into cups and donating to sperm banks? 🙃

Orthodox Jewish Conformity @Vynce thanks for the share ! @Leo Gura conformity is your enemy is it? I try to keep my relationship with conformity strictly professional: the fucker keeps trying to manage me, and I keep submitting variations 😈😈😈 Thanks for the blog post

Hmmm, this discussion seems to be presenting a distinction between authenticity and competence. I can see that simply being genuine doesn't automatically make the way you express yourself socially effective. You can authentically express insecurity, neediness, avoidance, poor boundaries, or social cluelessness. A la @Olaf's angle. But I also agree with the argument that consciously learning a skill doesn't necessarily mean you're being fake. A beginner musician might consciously think about technique; an expert eventually embodies it and no longer experiences it as technique.

@Emerald cheers. To be clear I do not disagree with you, this is more questions surrounding your model. I think subjective access and empirical generalisability are two different things I note you use the phrase "tactics" - but what if you replaced that with "expertise". One could easily phrase it in another way to be more palatable to women. So instead of "he used tactics to increase attraction" it becomes "he used expertise to increase attraction". Because eventually, using methods and frames for attraction, the aim would be to accumulate enough wisdom for expertise to be reached via the frame "training wheels". And the purpose of applying the tactics would be to reach expertise. The frame / method being discarded later.