Natasha Tori Maru

@something_else 🎯

This dude is the cringiest shit I have encountered in a while. IM OUT https://www.instagram.com/reel/C-LtUx-tk2s/?exln=dm1udDQxNGFhamc2

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOTlejqCLFT/?cplk=MWNjYTRuMXNsY2Ixbw== 🤢🤮

100% Thats two decades later. I can understand wanting justice and attempting to prevent future harm by revealing the truth. It is hard to understand the psychology of trauma sufferers. Regaining the feeling of safety isn't on a timeline we can understand.

@enchanted I think you know what you are doing here. And why it could easily be perceived as subtly dismissive.

As a woman I wouldn't want to risk falsely accusing someone of rape. The repercussions/blowback for that would be terrible. I understand why women don't come forward, go to the police or medical professionals, straight after. Shame is very, very powerful. Confusion after is common. Many woman cannot resolve responsibility appropriately. It's easy to think we might fight back or resist, but often the amygdala paralyzes you. It takes over "freeze" so you survive. That signal is irresistible. I also understand this is very difficult to understand when there is a power advantage altering perspective.

Woohoo thanks for this

@Wilhelm44 you might enjoy this:

I'm sorta sad about this topic. There was so much interest being generated. It's just been floating in the background while humans do their human drama. Killing each other. Stealing. Raping. Shitting on the environment. Sigh.

I had some influence! The journalist normally does true crime so this was a deviation in his content.

@LoneWonderer haha your cookin' PREACH

Yes, the gentleman interviewed isn't flash or in for clicks. Just an experiencer with a tale. I am glad you enjoyed 💫

I tend to only be interested in what constitutes sufficient evidence for someone to believe a claim, because many times "sufficient proof" of NHI or UAP for sceptics is almost impossible outside of direct experience (which is reasonable given governments have demonstrably engaged in secrecy and disinformation) which I'll note isn't the only reasonable evidentiary standard. The disinformation, misinformation, cover ups & deliberate twisting of so much information really renders discussion moot in some ways. Which also why debate isn't worth it. Plus - to charitably debate there needs to be a genuine interest, which usually also means a lot of background research and preparation. "It doesn't make sense" isn't enough in a serious debate. I suppose it's the difference between healthy scepticism and unfalsifiable scepticism.

I am a social creature - just in smaller doses than most. And with the right people

Imagine having no context and seeing humans as a species atom bomb each other, rape, steal, assault & squabble. Fundamentally, out actions speak zero recognition of connection, unity or oneness.