Natasha Tori Maru

It appears you have come to the conclusion I can be of no assistance to you. I recind my questions.

Why would this question lead anywhere? How you answer is part of how you interpret it. And what you find pertinent to mention. I suspect you don't think I come in good faith.

@Asayake Bryan Johnson is the very last person I would take any sort of health advice from.

Farmers. Big portion. I SEEN some chit man. Veterinarian friend. People do some fucked up sexual shit to animals that vets see.

The problem is that influence is monetised attention, while health requires epistemic restraint, uncertainty, and independence from commercial incentives. Health + influencer. Water and oil. In before stage orange rant etc etc

@Miguel1 do you trust yourself?

@LordFall I'm not interested. I know when to pick my battles and I've said my piece.

Do you suspect this is how I view relationships?

Same. When you try to ignore and the gut punch happens though. DAMN universe why 😄

Yes. I notice what you call synchronicities frequently. I note when it occurs. A pattern. I deliberately do not look for, make or seek meaning in them. I understand I create my own meaning, so seeking to find understanding or meaning appears to be a gateway to belief. And therefore, delusion. My mind is slippery as fuck 😬

The nature of the question seems to point toward what @Lyubov illustrates as uninspected belief. Your words just appear to be so loaded with judgement and attachment to outcome. And a dislike of the experience of searching. Genuine dislike. The process is where it's at. I could be totally wrong. It just appears this way from the language you use.

Yes and for me I cannot exclude that there isn't a link due to the nebulous nature of thought. I don't know what a thought is. Where it is. I don't even know I think. Thoughts arrive. I feel like I have no control. My issue is with the mechanics behind the phenomenon and not the phenomenon itself, I think... Ha! I think! Ha! Fuck this whole topic 🙃

That's totally valid to me. I don't have a mind made up for or against. It feels inherently unfalsafiable with my view, which is problematic and indicates the frame could dictate truth. Hence a perspective, hence a falsehood. So I flop back into the phenomenon not being real. And I am irritated to no end when I experience the shit again. If that makes sense.

Killed it. Like murdered it. First degree. Guilty. Charged. 20 warning points 😃

It's perfectly fine to have emotions and being reactive provided it is not directional or attacking. It doesn't detract from any validity. It doesn't always mean someone is compromised. A lot of the time passion and charge translates into something else on the receivers end over text. It's not the best rhetorically if you want to remain neutral, but it's not inherently bad. ALSO PSYCHIC SHIT IS REAL COME AT ME WITH THE PITCHFORKS I even experience it with Leo and what he writes as I am thinking it. Often. I just don't raise it. In fact I don't believe half my throughts are even mine to be claimed. No centre. Just thoughts arriving with no control and I can't source who or what generated them. Can't control thoughts. I have no evidence they originate from me.