Natasha Tori Maru

No amount of explanation is going to mean we will tolerate women being equated to chickens and deserving violence.

Consent isn't a hard concept. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DeCCt7GKL1W/?dlrf=amZhc25xNTltem0y

@Olaf It makes me happy (⁠◍⁠•⁠ᴗ⁠•⁠◍⁠)⁠❤

@integral oh! Massively appreciate your words! Isn't it great when you finally put a face to words? It's a totally different experience 🥰 Doggo is spoilt as hell. It was an hour of ball and running right after I got off the call. I have a shitload going on in life, but all she has is me.

Well fucken said

Thank you 🙏🏻 The understanding & exploration of different perspectives is not the issue. Calling woman animals that deserve violence and equating them to chickens IS the issue. Don't confuse the two things. We already have an issue with women feeling unwelcome, crushing out femininity and feminine expression from the forum. This contributes to that. Statements like the above cause me to hide my own feminine expression here. I can't possibly imagine what it might do to women who aren't as prickly.

@Majed it's not about sophistication. Don't try to justify selfishness in this way. Violating another person's consent is wrong.

@Majed your mixing up relative vs absolute perspectives.

@Majed Yes. I gave you a warning. I stand by it, and you can perform whatever mental gymnastics you like to justify it but the below markup in bold are the false parts of your statement: This is what you need you address in your thinking and deductions.

Sure. I just don't think you are going to convince anyone this way.

What the hell, man. The volume of fallacies in this statement leaves me perplexed. You can do better! Oh assuredly - the overall point is valid. Sometimes the whole "what does this man want from me, am I in danger?" is at the forefront of women's minds when being approached. This can also act as a deterrent for being open to it (or welcoming).

@Breakingthewall it's okay for others to find benefit in teachings we don't resonate with. You don't have to insist on your particular worldview whenever someone doesn't agree. We might think we are helping someone when we see troublesome paths; but we don't know that person and what's best for them. Especially when it comes down to how something is interpreted and there is nothing obviously damning🫶🏻

The gay guy analogy is a false equivalency that ignores the huge power differential.

@something_else 🎯

This dude is the cringiest shit I have encountered in a while. IM OUT https://www.instagram.com/reel/C-LtUx-tk2s/?exln=dm1udDQxNGFhamc2