Natasha Tori Maru

@Joshe don't waste you efforts. I don't have any issues thinking in such ways. I just pointed out you were essentially making up numbers because you didn't actually pull from a source.

@bazera yeah ideally that's a growth mindset match, compatibility wise. I love seeing parters who grow together 🥰 Taking someone on as a project is something else. Reminds me of women who parter up with men and the whole time want to change them. Or fall for potential.

It's can be a big trap to pick someone for potential. Making your partner a project or trying to change someone can backfire in a big way. If someone wants to grow - hell yeah. But making partners a project... Hmmmm.

Regardless of her other content I thought it was accurate regarding Orion. I just wish he dropped the toxic crap so I didn't have to sit through the turd parts of his videos.

I don't quite understand what is being said. Biolabs aren't a secret? I fit one out last year for a hospital. Although it was depressing as shit and stunk.

Wow. Just wow. Wanting to float by in life on some sort of perceived privilege? -1000 pts

My ability serve others, my dog & my blessed health & energy

Teaching metacognition. In particular: Metacognitive knowledge - understanding how our own minds work, what we are good or bad at, learning strategies that work for us, recognising bias etc Metacognitive regulation - managing thinking in real time, planning, monitoring, evaluating etc The above two applied to thinking AND feeling.

@LordFall AI integration being pushed, pulling up lower quality and narrower search results, as well as now having to vet more information, isn't enough? It is like citing Wikipedia as a source. I don't think you are using search engines in the same way I do. If you are using them for surface general stuff, and you actually use AI spat out from them, I do not think you are using them as the tool I am. It's like I'm reaching for a nailgun, and suddenly I am being given a hammer and told its the same thing. Notice I didn't add some mild and weird hominem attack you to try to make a point. You took my critique as some sort of overall statement regarding AI (which I use, and think is great, just not when it is forced or supplants something else IE Google search - which generally tells me you just reacted without really thinking). In addition - please don't feed my image into AI generators. I would appreciate you not doing that. It. Is. Forced. Slop. The. End. Good. Day.

It has. I've probably been using google a lot longer than you. Stop trying to push your anti AI agenda rhetoric on me in place of actually thinking about the question. I'm not anti AI. I don't run around accusing you of being obsessed with AI. Or implying it's blinding you etc.

@LordFall how has it changed?

Like a true chameleon 😎

I consider myself an ambivert.

Possibly to expand on the above definition to encapsulate more: "Intelligence is the capacity to build accurate models of reality, and use those models to achieve goals across set of diverse domains" Which is sort of all the parts of my deconstructed and simplified definition above is getting at.

@StaraX I've never thought on it. I suppose I would define intelligence as the ability to learn, understand, reason, adapt, and solve problems across a wide range of situations (not limited to this). I don't believe IQ is a good measure of intelligence (or a measure of it in it's totality, at all). If that is Jordan Peterson's definition and conclusions regarding IQ / intelligence I would not adopt it, personally. It sounds like a limiting frame. I generally think emotional health, relationships, and meaning are much stronger determinants of a happy life. Intelligence would have a much weaker positive correlation comparitively - I personally haven't seen it, or been able to detect it. How about yourself?