Natasha Tori Maru

I'm not so excited. I don't want the bubble to pop. Not keen to experience another 2008.

@NewKidOnTheBlock I raised (in an earlier post itt) where I felt AI was a huge tool in applied use that could move the needle on metrics that would directly effect quality of life. There's a lot it is fantastic for. Process optimisation, science, medicine, machine learning, huge data analysis etc. But yeah agree they are both using AI to argue. Fucken lol. Just two AI's jabbering away in cyberspace. Dumb shit. People who actively interact (push each point, question critically, who what why when how, enquire beyond it's results) with LLMs end up as juggernauts in arguments. But passively plugging in shit and copypasta is lazy shit.

This needs to be inspected as a form of social conditioning, also. Kind of ironic.

@Elliott Haha - I mean, you are cooking. Let the boy cook But I think it's such a shame to the points you raise, and I find replies to you quite lazy. I personally like users sharpening their minds - but they are sort of proving what AI is for, ironically... blunting the brain into slop, haha I'll take offence for you

I actually cannot believe some users outsourcing arguing and conversation to AI. What the fuck are you doing? Are you actually participating? Are you really critically thinking? Lets not kid ourselves, you won't even remember the conversations or points you pasted here. At least @Elliott is applying himself and not pasting large swaths of AI responses you don't even fully understand. He (or she! They? ) is actually APPLYING THEIR MIND and keeping it sharp. The fuck are you guys doing with your minds... My GOD. You are ONE of ONE! You are such a unique configuration of biology. THERE IS ONLY ONE YOU. Why would we want to talk to some sort of AI filter applied to the uniqueness of your mind and soul? Don't do this!

Is this just some idea you want to explore? Taking exogenous hormones is serious, serious shit. Irreversible changes. It effects the entire body as a system. This isn't something to be considered lightly like a contemplative question. Taking estrogen isn't going to give you the experience of being a women.

You can still see there is a massive leap from current AI ---> replacing humans (job wise/ intellegince). Huge.

@something_else but are they at the stage they can do that, without needing a lot of oversight? As much resources to oversee that might have gone toward doing the tasks? It may finish quick, but how much time and resources go to checking it all? Agentic AI being able to run autonomously I am interested in, but I haven't seen anything to indicate it is anywhere near that level yet. Or seen a decent trajectory for when. I don't see a list of pure capabilities outside of the context of real world use as supplying much to forward the argument it will replace a human intelligence without the oversight. I won't buy any sort of future predictions as being close to accurate until I see AI being able to coherently interact with 3D reality and space and operate in conjunction with robotics. I'd love to see a huge list of tangeable examples of real application. Not nebulous capabilites. Also sort of interested in what you work with? What sort of agentic AI do you use and how is it giving you results that are shortcutting resources? Or is this from external sources?

From "dumb as a rock" --> job done is such a fucking massive logical and technological leap! Where is that happening, what sort of timelines, who's job, how is it going to happen? None of this is mapped yet. So as far as I see, this is just fantasy thinking. Might happen. Might not. A fart in the wind.

If you want to claim AI is more intelligent than large % of the population - you better come to the party with what you base that on, and your reasoning... Otherwise it comes across as not understanding human intelligence in the slightest. An LLM cannot even grasp what a sphere is in our dimensional experience. The language doesn't even translate in the slightest.

@Elliott I think a genuine case could be made for non LLM AI that is involved in machine learning for science/medical research, sifting through massive datasets, solving protein folding issues etc. AI trained for specific tasks. I think your point is more directed toward consumer level LLM AI, though? Which I think a large swaith of the population do not actively interact with, just passively use in way to outsource thinking. There's a lot of passive AI use eating resources. It's a tool, but a tool being abused. Access is just insane at the moment. Shitloads of people I know use it to output some crap they deem as smart, they get to claim they participated in creating - and feel accomplished.

This was my guess also - I don't have autoimmune gastritis, but. I think you mentioned you do? I think both are linked. I am just as surprised as you he hasn't gone toward looking into Hashimoto's also. Maybe it's to come?

@AION I dunno man, imagine if one of us fed your image into a generator and made all manner of crude images. It's in poor taste. Arguing a case & presenting evidence - fair game. Generating images in someone's likeness to make fun of them is sorta cruel imo

"It's all an act" It's easy to see this is a legitimate plausible deniability tactic. Being a high profile social media content creator it's going to serve multiple functions to Conners benefit. It's a way to preemptively manage social media backlash, and emphasises behaviour (the act) to distance himself from responsibility. I think this tactic was used as well actual mental health behaviour issues manifesting in real time. "It's all an act" is an manipulation tactic and way to manage his reputation to preserve relationships. It also quells those who may genuinely be concerned - preventing someone from intervening and attempting to genuinely help this poor man. Overall I think he was mentally ill behind the thin vaneer of performance.

I know this feel. RIGHT IN THE FEEL