Natasha Tori Maru

Ftfy

You'll have to actually argue a case for this. Otherwise, no. Not simple.

Speckled white Mitsubishi's, single 4k hz constant pure tone from the speakers, saucer eyes staring at a white felt tip pen to manifest pure zen state ^n! Where n=1,2,3.... No sense to be had 🫪🫪🫪

It depends on how it transpires, I suppose. By my instincts tell me my dog. Reflexive no-brain action in the moment. But it's impossible to know. Anyone who has faced these sorts of situations knows it almost feels as if there is no decision. Just action.

Holy shit so much ignorance around therapy in this thread. Talking to someone about issues is NOT complaining. MY GOD.

Mad cow has been a thing since I was a chicklet

Love it. thanks for the share. Guy seems highly intelligent.

Never said one trait is better. Never said sex is everything. Every statement I make is something I embody. Yes this is a spiritual forum - but your views arent in the name of spirituality. Yes looks mean nothing. So you shouldn't discriminate in that case ☺️ You said it 'looks mean fuck all'. So by that, no action ever needs to be taken by you in arrogance, to try to tell another what looks mean. If looks mean fuck all, why do you act and say otherwise? You're just making more of a case for your cognitive dissonance.

Don't do it. Huge mistake.

My half brother reports the same - he was the one who pasted this meme to me (he is diagnosed with ADHD). He dropped out of high school (much to my anger, but Mum was okay with it) due to his inability to focus. He is in a trade apprenticeship as a steel worker now. He refuses meds.

It's funny. The range of GLP1 peptides, and their success in producing weight loss, sort of proves.... It's excess calories. Put down the fork. Who would have known LOL

Actualized Quote #537 Video game studios / software development are good examples of this push/pull juxtaposition of fine balance.

@Breakingthewall repeating the same thing in different words does not adequately get around the mistake of equating lack of perceived difference with no experience.

The argument works as a model explaining how complexity, life, and symbolic processing build structured consciousness, but it mistakenly equates lack of perceived difference with absence of experience. It overreaches by tying duality and consciousness too tightly to life and symbolism. Duality isn't exclusively tied to life. 'life is required for duality'??? Hot. Cold. Particle/particle. Life enables functional duality (self vs environment) not duality itself. It ultimately explains how consciousness is organized and expressed, but doesn’t resolve why subjective experience exists at all, leaving the core issue identified by David Chalmers (hard problem of consciousness) still unanswered.