Natasha Tori Maru

I think this answer is all you need to know the statement came from some authenticy / honest place.

All of these pills are just limiting paradigms.

Ouch that most recent link from Naftali - hard no. He is unintegrated. Just knows the words and that's it.

What are you basing this on? I ask because I like to read up on oceanography and climate science as a hobby (It was part of my bachelor's). I cannot find anything that backs up a 5 year trajectory. Scientists just don't predict a simultaneous global systemic collapse within five years. If you have some rock solid shit you have come across certainly fling it my way - I'd be really keen to dig into it! I do think this El Nino event will be disruptive. But I also think you are falling into blackpill / doom & gloom thinking....

If she had said, "Okay, I agree. Goodbye," would you have genuinely been at peace with that?

I don't know what you are talking about or who you are responding to here. It has nothing to do with anything I raised.

You described your use of it. And it's quite obvious where it is used in your posts on this page alone.

@LordFall your compulsion to reply and grasp at the nearest source available is susceptible to recency bias that you are complicent in. Just the rapidity of your AI replies illustrates this is a reasonable inference. Unfortunately just stating Doesn't mean you understood anything I said. And based on your reply, you didn't. You have no idea even, how the AI you use, is programmed guardrail wise. It has its own bias built in by those people who created it. And you reply so quickly, it is obvious you aren't deeply checking what it reports. Yes I am inferring that. But it is perfecting reasonable when the gap between posts is several minutes to an hour on rapid fire succession.

If you use AI to argue here I implore you not to do so. Are we arguing just to win? To be correct? There is no correct in these sorts of discussions. Don't use AI to outsource critical thinking. Brainstorm on your own. Don't use AI to argue against each other! It is antithetical to this forum! You aren't generating your own insights. You probably won't even recall what you wrote here in two days.... We want to debate each other. Not AI. You are one of one in all your brilliance! We want to see that, raw and true. Not through AI. You can disagree. But heed my words! You need to be okay with being wrong! Sit with that as a personal development tool.

Can you choose both? The dichotomy is odd to me... I choose growth, and I am comfortable in that space of expansion and challenge Many people these days drive for comfort. Tap out of the money matrix by earning enough to retire early. Stay in the jammies and order in. Stick with shows they know. Music they have heard a million times. Repeat. Comfort, predictability. Certainty. Once we have many needs satisfied, we tend to find problems where there existed none. What a bunch of malcontents! People dislike the pain of chaotic and uncertain challenge that might stimulate growth. In truth, we want to pick the challenges we face in life. But sometimes what we choose isn't what is best for us. tl:dr I refuse the question! Thanks for the share

It is your rhetoric that is poor. Yeah, I am personally assessing your ability to communicate. It's lacking. I am engaging with what you said - your rhetorical slamming of the OP (you just chose to try to avoid it and change the subject, then proceed to try to apply this claim above which hits like a soggy, deflated balloon . And any other points raised were founded on uncharitable assumptions about the OP's level of development - including whether or not I wonder if people are "tired of my schtick". NB I don't ever wonder, but you clearly are being worn down by said schtick 🥳 ). As perfectly illustrated in your own words: Hmmm - doesn't seem like you are doing what you claim below: Ha ha ha! Total self ownage - I don't even need to do anything here! But do carry on with your sperging

Yeah - but I think it would be classed as polyfidelity. Four people in a closed group (me, two men and another woman). It was a while ago now - I have since been in monogamous relationships that have only steered into threesomes, but nothing verging on an actual poly relationship. I am monogamous now - and I prefer it.

@enchanted huehuehue I better not play with people too much Stupid games stupid prizes something something

(❁´◡`❁) ----------- 🎯 Add a dash of trusting yourself and self-knowledge and we bussin

Here's the assumption again Me telling you isn't going to provoke a genuine insight. And your intellect appears to tell you something else.