Natasha Tori Maru

Moderator
  • Content count

    6,170
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Natasha Tori Maru

  • Rank
    - - -
  • Birthday 12/01/1986

Personal Information

  • Location
    Melbourne, Australia
  • Gender
    Female

Recent Profile Visitors

21,306 profile views
  1. Juries out on that
  2. ... Let's contemplate this one It might require second inspection to work out if we are using this thread to try to subtly put down others for disagreeing with a viral, conformist trend.
  3. @Willy Phallicus I just called it like I saw it - muah! 😘
  4. @Jirh getting hard isn't a reliable indicator of attraction. Bodies can respond in ways that don't match our desires, preferences and orientation.
  5. Holyfuckballs! A rhetorical put down instead of genuine question?! How will this go over, I wonder? Let's come in and attack the value of the person posting! That'll be a GREAT quality contribution!!!
  6. AI
  7. 100% arming up with lawyers
  8. https://youtu.be/_dJPsS6R7u8?si=H5FYFJyS_JETrGXv
  9. @Emerald thank you, Emerald ❤️‍🔥
  10. Ha ha ha! How you are getting I think you are monster from what I said is crazy! Read. Ralstons. Books.
  11. Definitely no feelings involved - but nice try attempting to imply I am somehow being swayed by feelings. You aren't analysing. You are being disingenuous. If you like, I can post all the forum history where you staunchly refused to go to the source (which would indicate a more genuine approach to analysing what Ralston is saying, the fact you continually refuse to do so and insist on others translating it is telling enough despite you insisting otherwise). But even this is probably beyond the time I am willing to put into this, because if you are this deluded to your own intentions / motivations it's not going to be worth it in the slightest. Simply put - you come across as totally inauthentic in your attempt to truly understand because your words do not even slightly match your actions (IE insisting it is "analysing" while simultaneously refusing to go to the source - Ralston's books - to actually critically analyse and grasp, repeatedly). It is beyond reasonable to infer you are settled in your opinion and want to simply have it reinforced or simply prove a point by taking down users interpretations/strawmans of Ralston. Read his books. Do the work. Otherwise this is all for naught.
  12. Depends how deep you want to go. Basics: drink water, sleep well. Biggest most direct visual effects. Sunscreen/moisturizer + cleanser. Might need to work out your skin type oily/dry/combination to find one that suits. Go a level higher? Vitamin C serum - brightens, firms, protects from free radicals & UV rays. Lactic acid (chemical exfoliation don't scrub your face). Retinol (biggest effect) - fine lines, clearing clogged pores, and evening out skin tone. It increases cell turnover and collagen production. This one had a very noticeable effect on me. NB beware! Start slow with retinol or it will burn your fucking face off and cause more redness. Additionally NO retinol or lactic acid within 4/5hrs of sun exposure. You will cause damage. Always at night. I have no fine lines or sagging at 40 (this will change from now, can't stop aging and it hits women around this age with perimenopause). Sunscreen every day since 12. Hat + sunglasses. Fear of the incineration capabilities of the Australian sun - skin being good was a side effect.
  13. Fuck Rolex - I do not rate. Enicar sherpa graph all the way - muah!
  14. He is my spirit animal