Natasha Tori Maru

Moderator
  • Content count

    6,947
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Natasha Tori Maru

  • Rank
    - - -
  • Birthday 12/01/1986

Personal Information

  • Location
    Melbourne, Australia
  • Gender
    Female

Recent Profile Visitors

24,946 profile views
  1. Crazy alignment there! A fairy - hands down. I'm much too "see through to what's behind it all", curious, a bit mad or mischievous, independent and unconventional to be a queen or a princess. Great question. Good barometer for "essence"
  2. Being one! I love it My favourite part is playing in embodied experience and pulling a man along for the ride. Helping call attention to the nuanced parts of heightened emotional, feeling and sensation experience that he may otherwise miss in mens typical heady, analytical state. Obviously I speak in generalities as many men with strong feminine connection can be in touch like this. Nothing better than sharing an experience and deepening it through my unique expression alongside a man
  3. He's said multiple times what he does is not for women. He has stated he isn't that interested in them. He could be gay. Which is fine. Might alter some "theories" about his pathology.
  4. @JoshB I mean - look at the fucking difference in these two bastards (Red top, Eastern bottom)
  5. I see them most days - and I live inner city Eastern Grey's ...but I am fucking TERRIFIED of Red kangaroos. They are the turbo charged bastards you see with monumental biceps and legs that can gut you with one kick
  6. Yes. I use them as a loose guide. Many times when I self assess, I totally deviate. They are a pseudoscience. There is a lot of misunderstanding around MBTI. It is a descriptor of how we take in information and make decisions. All the silly type descriptions are based on memes at this point. There are some users who ascribe so strongly to their MBTI they take on limiting beliefs.
  7. @LordFall ha ha! A team UNiTe! Just put AI to work solving regrowing human teeth. Bloody hell! Huge problem yet to be solved. The fact we drill and pull and brute force a solution still is crazy!
  8. 100% in particular this podcast very, very deliberately cherry pick these women as easy takedowns.
  9. I personally suspect the requirements of Bryan and Kate is that they are received as complicated, special and unique. They reject a lot of ordinariness. I don't think they can accept they could be mundane. It's probably part of their brand/narrative they spin. Goes into it here with Rich in the second half:
  10. The whatever podcast is absolute trash. I would never lower myself to watching it ever again. Poor quality content
  11. Wonder why it took openAI so long to inform the government this happened.
  12. If you refer to users of the forum - by the volume of posts I read from users psychoanalysing, interpreting and inferring from the most obscure statements, all with the twisted intention to undermine credibility... We have a healthy crop of those who fancy themselves armchair psychologists. Ready for harvest - or to be dusted with the pesticides
  13. We needed another hierarchy, desperately!
  14. Did you think I proposed that question thinking I would be weighted favourably? Wrong. It's just an interesting alternative data point to analyse. But I know you love me, and this is how you continually express it constipated as it may be! You want to be in my most liked club!