Karmadhi

Member
  • Content count

    2,874
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Karmadhi

  1. Again, I said it many times and you are not giving me an answer. Why arent Azerbajan or Israel for stealing land banned in anything? Azerbajan took land in 2022 and Israel is taking slowly land in the West Bank since decades now UK supplied Israel, they give data and help to Israel. They have not pushed for any sanctions in Israel and they hosted the Israeli president who has made genocidal statements. If not complicit they are pretty indifferent and not caring to it. It is ONLY because of the massive outrage from British citizens than the government actually bothered to recently recognize Palestine (and it was the left wing government). If you think UK is not biased towards Israel look at this It is pretty clear from this clip UK is not an objective player whose value is truth and human rights and international law regarding the Israel Palestine conflict.
  2. It is a very populat conspiracy theory Personally I do not think it is intentional but simply a side effect of globalization and liberal/progressive policies when it comes to borders
  3. I am aware of all the bad things Russia has done since the war started However until March 2022 I do not think Russia was problematic in that way I do not support the Russian government nor endorse their actions I am not their friend nor apologiest I wish Russia had a more progressive liberal government instead of the current nationalistic one So lets clear this out please to avoid missunderstandings Regarding war crimes. I totally agree Russia has behaved in many cruel war crimes. However, all the things you said about tanks shooting at civilians, worthshipping war criminals etc Israel has done 10x more (way more civilienas and kids dead in Gaza than Ukraine per capita) yet UK hosted Herzgog as a friend. The same Herzog who said "there are no uninvolved in Gaza", a place where 50% are under 18. Not only that, but Uk has done 0 sanctions on Israel Which goes against all their principles and norms as defenders of human rights and international law UK is technically complicit in genocide both Labour and Tories parties. Many human rights groups have said so unfortunately. I am happy the general British public is pretty angry and protesting all the time about this. It shows ordinary Brits have heart. I respect them. But the politicans all seem either bought or deeply biased. When i say "UK" i am talking mostly about the government not the people. I think they are pretty sensible about this entire issue. I am not offending average Brits. UN and basically every reputable Human rights organization called it a genocide. For Ukraine they have said tons of war crimes but no genocide. Genocide is worse than war crimes. Which is why to me Israel is worse than Russia. Since Russia is not a friend, neither should Israel be. If Western countries want to actually be seen as supporters of international law they should not ally themselves which countries that basically break them 24/7. Not to mention Israel has murdered European citizens, detained them illegally as well and also spied in Europe using their software and mendleded in elections. I would somehow understand it if Israel had a lot of raw minerals or oil which is needed by countries to function. Like they are somewhat in good terms with Saudi Arabia which is not much better than Russia to me, however I get their POV. However Israel does not have rare earth. You can cut them out and be fine. Russia has way more resources yet they were cut out which shows that principles can indeed topple economical interests when they want. Since they cut out Russia, Israel would not be an issue at all. They re pretty small factor. I am not saying to cut them out forever or anything like that. If the country reforms and stops the illegal occupation and expansions they can become allies again. Germany went from an enemy to an ally. So things can change with time. I already made a threat a long time ago about why the West does not cut out Israel and I did not get a non racist, non supremaciest response. The only sensible major politican is Jeremy Corbyn, its a shame he was kicked out (not suprised though), he treated Israel as they deserved. Starmer is a pro Israeli shill unfortunately. There are of course MPs or leaders of smaller parties like the Green party that was recently interviewed by Piers Morgan but they are not major players. Let me not even get started on Tories or Reform...
  4. But Israel and Azerbajan for taking land from others are apparanetly not bad which is why they are not banned from anything It is bad when Russia does not but not when others do it Which is the whole purpose of this thread
  5. What about Azerbajan doing the same thing to Armenia in 2022? What bout Israel doing the same in West bank for decades now? Where is the ban for Azerbajan or Israel? Double standards much?
  6. I am not saying Sarkozi pushed Gadaffi to do bad things to his people, I am saying that the reason he took him out is because Gadaffi illegally financed his campaign. By article 5 i mean if NATO attacks a country like France did with Libya, the rest of NATO is forced to join in for support. Perhaps Gadaffi was a bad person and deserved to die, I will not defend his morality. However, you need to look into what lead to it A rump state and tend of thousnads dead from civil wars that followed God knows how many dying from poverty or lack of good health care which was free under Gadaffi If you add these losses it is easily over 100.000 people Much more than Gadaffi killed I am not saying the West did horrible things in the process of taking him out, I am saying taking him out lead to far more deaths and the destruction of Libya Sometimes a devil is needed to keep a place together from becoming even a worse hell Which is why dictators exist. To keep a fragmented society from falling into civil wars and total anarchy and chaos. Their brutality keeps people at bay As horrible as dictatorships are , civil wars and chaos are worse Libya is a stage purple to red society, it needs a strong dictator to keep it together Do not confuse it with orange countries where they can maintain democracy Compare Libya today with Libya in 2010 and tell me which is better
  7. I agree with Serbia but disagree with Gadaffi. You need to look at the alternative The alternative if they had not bombed Serbia would be genocide and ethnic cleansing. The bombing stopped that. Gadaffi was awful, sure. But taking him out was a disaster. That person held Libya together and kept order. As Leo has brilliantly said in his video about Understanding Democracy and Authoritarism, a tyrant is given power to protect the people from anarchy and chaos. Now that Gadaffi is gone, civil wars emerged and the country basically got screwed. They went from the best economy and standard of living (free oil, energy, health care etc) to a failed state. Far far more have died from this than would have died from Gadaffi if he had remained in power. Hence by taking him out they saved dozens but killed hundreds in the result. To me that is a mistake Sometimes a devil is better than anarchy and no government at all. The real reason he got taken out is because the corrupt French president Sarkozi had taken bribes from him to finance his elections and took him out to save his neck from corruption charges. France illegally attacked Syria and NATO joined in because of article 5. An example of aggression. Additionally USA had interested in wanting him gone because not only he was very pro Palestine but also he wanted to unite Arab states with a single currency which would go against USA interests. What did it lead to? Tens of thousnads dead and an entire country destroyed with no future It is funny that people use the same logic about taking out Saddam was a mistake when Saddam was worse than Gadaffi and Iraq has better state building prospects than Libya has. Today Iraq is not doing bad at all. Libya is a total disaster.
  8. I never heard such a claim, they simply want their sphere of influence, never heard them wanting to murder Europe. If they say it now, it is irrelevant because they got banned since 2022. What did they say before 2022? Are you British by any means? I have noticed that British are the most anti Russian people in Europe, much more than the French or German or Italian and I wonder why Lastly, Israel has murdered Europan kitchen aid staff, has arrested and detained dozens of European citizens in their flotillas in an illegal act of piracy yet no ban for Israel. FIFA some days ago said "We wont ban Israel because we dont solve geopolitical problems". Well apparently to FIFA invading a country and taking 20% of a country is worse than a genocide. What about Azerbajan taking land from Armenia in 2022. No bans for them. Armenia is as European as Ukraine is It seems to me they are stuck in a cold war mindset where Russia=Bad and whatever Russia does is much worse than when other countries do similar things (like USA or Israel or Azerbajan). This pushes Russia to become more nationalistic as well. Never forget Putin wanted to join NATO in early 2000s and was rejected. Then turned towards nationalism and started seeing Europe and the West in general as an adversary. Now it is too late but they should have made Russia an ally in early 2000s
  9. To be honest I have heard conflicting terms on this Some say Ukraine was treating Russian speakers in Donbass like shit, banning their language and religion and some say they were not I cannot say something for sure But in either case the Kiev government is not as bad as Saddam thats for sure
  10. I think invading soveirgn countries and killing a bunch of people in them is equally bad whether Ukraine or Iraq are invaded Law is law.
  11. You can make an arguemnt that Eastern Ukraine has ties to Russia historically. I do not know the history to say with confidence. Many Russians see it that way. Just like Israelis see the West Bank as Israeli land, Azerbajan sees Karabakh as Azeri land etc. Yet nobody seems to complain much when they also illegally annex land there. Land claims never end. Countries need to respect their borders and stop taking more land. Which is why I do not support Russia on their war. My whole thread was about the fact that other countries do the same (I gave 2 exmaples) yet only Russia is punished properly. It is as if 4 people are speding in a highway and only 1 gets a proper fine. Does he deserve the fine? Totally. Did the other 3 deserve it but didnt get it? Yup.
  12. International organizations. They are banned from FIFA, from Eurovision, from Olympics, most firms left Russia and they got kicked from SWIFT The victims of the invasion were ordinary Iraqis who died in the thousands, not just Saddam USA basically put a puppet Iraqi state which is not different from what Russia intended to do to Ukraine if Ukraine had not resisted You can NATO is not a threat to Russia, well Russia does not see it that way. They see how they started bombing other countries and they see them as a threat. To ask you again: Would USA tolerate Mexico or Canada join a pro Russian anti American alliance? USA literally invaded Cuba when they created an alliance with the Soviet Union. I am 1000% sure USA would do the same thing if they were in Russia's place given their track record.
  13. What wrong did the thousands of Iraqi civilians do to be killed by USA bombing of Iraq?
  14. Russia at first did not make it clear they wanted to annex Ukraine, they simply wanted to remove the Zelensky government with a pro Russian one Similar to what USA did to Iraq They were banning Russia from everything before any land annexation took place, it literally happened in the first week of the invasion You can make the argument today but not on the first week Also even if Russia wins, Ukraine will still exist. They simply want the Eastern part of Ukraine that is mostly Russian and Russia believes its theirs. Whether it is true or not, the point is that they do not want all of Ukraine, at least not when the war started Russia invaded Georgia in 2008 under similar excuses and Georgia today still exists as a seperate state. I think if Ukraine had surrendered they would have had a similar fate. Their resistance caused Russia to double down and become more and more radical since now there is a huge sunk cost to the invasion. And talking about annexation, Azerbajan invaded Armenia in 2022 and literally annexed land from them Israel is slowly annexing and talking land in the West Bank Where is the outrage there? I do not see Israel or Azerbajan banned from anything Not to mention Turkey that basically occupies Cyprus for decades We have tons of examples of such actions but only Russia is being banned from everything It is like that cop that sees 4 people speeding in the highway and decides to enforce the law only on 1 of them
  15. You dont seem to share the same sentiment for Ukraine though, you want them to keep fighting instead of capitulating to Russia Double standards much?
  16. Is that the default governance of a stage orange or is America the case of toxic orange? Can you have a healthy orange democracy that is not an oligarchy or stage orange eventually by design will lead to an oligarchy?
  17. Noted! Thing is that I do understand it intellectually, but still emotionally I tend to see it as bad or unevolved in a way. Like I assign a value to it. Your videos have helped a lot. What angers me the most are double standards and hypocrisy I agree with you on that. I told even others who were shitting on Biden about that, that Trump will be way worse. I think not voting for Kamala and choosing Trump is not even being too green, it is just stupid. Trump is cryptonite to Green.
  18. They resonate to me a lot How do I grow out of it? I live in a pretty green place and if there is no green, it is orange and blue Yellow is hard to get to Your content is possibly the only yellow I have in my life and even in this forum most do not seem yellow to me I must confes when I started watching your content 5 years ago (during first lockdown) I was pretty orange with some green and a bit of blue. But an orange center of gravity. Now I would say my center of gravity is green with some orange and veryyyy little blue I really find Spiral dynamics and all these models interesting so that is the yellow in me However it is hard for me to apply it in real life outside simply putting people in categories And even then sometimes a blue/orange actor can trigger me more than a red or blue actor which is fundamentally still green mindset with yellow knowldege
  19. What do you think of Mehdi Hasan? To me he is the best out of the leftist people in terms of articulation, debating skills and overall moral development Also pretty relaxed compared to Cenk or Destiny that get super emotional and childish He is definetly stage green but I have not seen from him a lot of the toxic components of Green which you can see in some other commentators He seem pretty grounded, healthy Green The Jubilee debate where he argued against 20 far right Americans showed it Crazy restraint from him considering how insulted he got on his face
  20. I have seen critizing Israel is becoming more and more legally problematic in the USA since Trump came back so I am not sure you guys have proper freedom of speech either. During Biden it was better.
  21. They were not "casualities of war". They were part of a systemic genocidal campaign to rid Eastern Europe from Slavs and populate it with Ethnic Germans. Belarus lost 25% of its population and 95% of those civilians died AFTER the country was already occupied. 600 villages with all their inhabitants were destroyed. Similar things in Russia and Ukraine. Overall close to 15 million Soviet civilians died during the Second World War (if we exclude all the Jewish). Most of them were killed in genocidal attacks similar to the Holocaust. If you research, many people who died in the concentration camps were not Jewish but Polish, Russian, Gay, Romani etc What people forget is that the Jewish people were not the only group the Nazis wanted to exterminate. It also included Romanis, LGBT, Slavs etc It is offensive to call such things "casualities of war" Google Generalplan Ost
  22. I think the job of loud lefiests like Cenk is to increase awareness and create some sort of moral revolt in people that can help tackle unfairness in the world Centrists are better in finding solutions once people become aware and willing to discuss solutions First you need to get people up which leftiests do very well Also Leo I am pretty centrist on a lot of topics like taxes, sexuality, Ukraine and immigration It is mostly on Gaza where i become full blown leftie
  23. I never said it is a bad thing. I simply stated that Destiny to me seems more centrist than a leftie. That is how the conversation started So we somewhat agree on this Also thank you for your responses, it is quite lucky of us to have someone as Wise as you openly discuss with us.
  24. They are pretty good at making sense of Israeli terrorism so. To me it is just an anti Muslim and anti Arab bias that when they do bad things it is terrorism and when the rest do bad things it is "complicated". Double standards. I notice Americans are conditioned in this way since 9/11 to associate anything bad Arabs or Muslims do with terrorism and when other entities do similar or worse actions they use different terms for it. Pure bias. It is the trademark of a leftie to empathize with low developmetn societies Which makes me think Destiny is more centrist than leftist.
  25. I dont think Hamas is still relevant to this conversation It is about ethnic cleansing/genocide at this point You could make the "Hamas" argument in the first year or so They wont rule Gaza anymore anyway, also all their top leadership has already been killed Also defending the side that has Smotrich and Ben Gvir is not easy either Do you see what they say? A clip for you: The 1 for every 50 btw came from Nazi Germany that had such a tactic to supress partisan attacks on the Eastern Front "The number of hostages to be shot was calculated based on a ratio of 100 hostages executed for every German soldier killed and 50 hostages executed for every German soldier wounded, a formula devised by Adolf Hitler with the intent of suppressing anti-Nazi resistance in Eastern Europe" The irony This is what Israeli defenders are defending or justifying The Iranian government is also pretty bad yet Israel did not do the same to Iran Hezbollah is also pretty bad and Israel did not do the same to Lebanon Difference