Karmadhi

I have been following this war for a while now, and I feel like at this point Ukraine 's best option is to give in to Russia demands and make a permanent truce By that I mean, allow Russia to annex Crimea and the 4 oblasts they occupy forever, basically give them to Russia In return, they should get a good security guarantee from the West, ensuring that Russia will not invade them again to get more land (very crucial!) In return, Russia's sanctions will be lifted and Europe will return to how it was before the war I know it is not nice, but I feel like Ukraine can either do this or just continue fighting, loosing more land and more people With Trump in the White House I do not see Ukraine getting enough aid to kick Russians out and take back any of their territory They were struggling to stagnate with all Biden's help, I cannot imagine them even stagnating with the reduced Trump's aid and support Not to mention their over growing manpower issue Isnt it better to loose 20% of your land and be able to rebuild while your youth is still alive and able to work? I mean Ukraine is huge, they will be fine even if they loose some land Or is that specific land overly important that it is worth all this hassle? Not to mention most of it is Russian speaking and ethnic Russians so I wonder if those people even see themselves as proper Ukranians

How come Isarelis seem so ridiciously over concerned about 50 or so Israelis yet seem totally indifferent to tens of thousands of civilians killed in Gaza Even those that are mature enough to call them actual civilians (not counting the lunatics that say that everyone in Gaza is guilty) I find it quite staggering Of course you prioritze your own but they do not seem to care at all!!! For example a statement like "Let us end the war so both our hostages can go home and Gazan civilians can stop suffering from the war", a neutral comment like this. Even if they think all the civilian deaths are on Hamas, that statement would seem sensible to me. When USA bombed Hiroshima for example they said that they did this to save both American and Japnese lives (way more would have died from the invasion according to what they said) So even then, they had some sort of basic care for the civilians of their enemy And USA back then was far from being soft Could you explain please? I am very curious

Which one are you?

Just to be clear, I totally understand why Iran having a nuke is a bad idea Issue I have is why Israel can have a nuke while Iran cannot$ You can argue that Israel has bombed its neighbors far more than Iran has, has expanded (Lebanon and Syria which are soverign countries) and does have a religious component to its whole society structure (especially these days with the far right being in power). So, I do not think Iran would be much less mature about its nuke than Israel has been. Keep in mind Iran is an old civilization with a long history of statehood. They are not some African tribe.

Hello I have noticed that many peopel are pretty clear about Iran not getting nuclear weapons. Normally I can agree that the less nuclear armed states the better because they are very dangerous and destructive However, they do not say anything about Israel having ILLEGALLY nuclear weapons and never even admitting to having them I understand the logic that (they are our allies meanwhile Iran is our enemy) but I am talking purely from an objective unbiased perspective.

Most of the world did not support Nazi Germany but was disturbed by it. The only ones who did were countries with the same ideology like Italy or Spain. Meanwhile most of the "Western developed countries" including green countries support Zionism. How come? How does Zionism fuel the survival agendas of Orange/Green countries? Look how France, Germany, UK, Netherlands etc which are Orange/Green countries kiss the ass of Israel to the point where some of them said they will not arrest Bibi from the ICC warrant if he goes to those places although they are signatory to the ICC (outragous violation of international law).

I was having a discussion with a friend of mine about Russia attacking its neighbors like Ukraine and Georgia in the past and the argument he gave me was: "As long as you do not mess with Russia nothing happens. You only get attacked when you are unfriendly to Russia. The solution is easy, be nice and diplomatic to them". How would your respond to this?

It depends on the guest I think. Some are indeed very biased but some although slightly biased are still respected scholars and famous in their line. Jeffery Sachs and John Mearsheimer have good analysis on the Gaza conflict to me. I have not noticed much bias on that personally. When it comes to Ukraine I do notice bias but still within reason. Especially with Mearsheimer. With Sachs I see more bias when it comes to Ukraine war. Keep in mind the pro Ukranians are biased too as well. They are in denial about how corrupt Ukraine is for example or that many people do not want to fight the war and are forced against their will. What is ironic is that Ukraine stepped up their corruption fighting only when the war started and the world started calling them corrupt. From what I researched there was little to no difference between Yanakovic and Timoshenko. Both were corrupt oligarchs. Only difference is that Yanakovic was pro Russian and Timoshenko was Pro Western. If you see the corruption index of Ukraine between 2014-2020 it was not much better than Russia. What helped Ukraine when it comes to corruption and oligarchy was the start of their EU process in 2022 after the war, not kicking out Yanakovic. I think Ukraine is on the right path to become a democratic liberal not corrupt democracy and join the EU eventually but I think it was Russia invading it which kickstarted the whole process in full force. Because people now hate Russia so much and want to become the opposite of Russia. Quite ironic in a way. And i do listen to many channels and sources anyway.

Leo you literally shared with us on your forum "Judge Napolitano" channel which included people like Jeffery Sachs and Mearsheimer, praising it and now you tell us they are biased and bad? Who do you consider objective on this matter? And regarding Ukraine fighting the war, I notice it is usually people that are not fighting that want the war to continue. If people were so in favor of the war they would not try to escape the country or live in their house out of fear of being snatched from the street and put against their will to the front. Ukraine reminds me of Germany in early 1945 where they were desperate for men and would do anything. A truly motivated country has the recruitment stations lined with men, no need to snatch from the street. I support Ukraine but I feel like that war needs to end asap for their own good. Better loose 20% of your land than all your youth which does not even want to fight.

Keep in mind Russia wants all of Novorussia which is 40% of Ukraine, currently they have around 20%. If Russia settles only for what it has it is indeed a compromise. They want Odessa, Kharkiv etc.

And the paid courses? I am looking forward to them

If the legal system is too corrupt to hold them accountable then what other option is there? The rich greedy CEO's need to face the consequences of their actions somehow, otherwise things will not change. Assassinations are a desperate attempt for justice when the legal system fails.

A dictator also is hardworking and has skills few others have. He is not equal to a guy flipping burgers at Mc Donalds. A dictator is responsible for thousands of people. So lets condemn and sentence to death people that try to assassinate dictators

By that logic lets also condemn the people that tried to assassinate Hitler in 1944 These rich CEO's especially ones in health care have the blood of thousands of innocent people in their hands. They have created as much human suffering as some dictators have. Do not confuse a greedy tech guy like Musk with someone who works in industries which have the power of life and death over people. Human health is a fundamental right. If Musk wants to overprice Tesla cars because he is a greedy asshole that is a totally different thing from overpricing health care which results in deaths of thousands in USA every year. People can live without Tesla cars, they cannot live without health care. I do not condone murder but these health care CEO are one of the biggest issues with USA. If USA actually had some basic ethics all of them would be jailed overnight for corruption charges.

Have you tried a pure carnivore diet? A lot of people with bad health issues said it did miracles for them. I know for eg Jordan Peterson only eats steak and salt and nothing else, not even pepper.