Oppositionless

Member
  • Content count

    665
  • Joined

  • Last visited

4 Followers

About Oppositionless

  • Rank
    - - -

Personal Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

2,225 profile views
  1. I'm sure coming from a wealthy family shaped my view, but money has never mattered much to me. The way I see it, the only purpose of crazy amounts of money is to attract more women, but then I'm not attracting them because of my genuine personality, it's just the money. A friend of mine takes hot women on his boat 4 days a week. I don't care much for Owen's content, I just wanna find a wing, hangout with my cousin and run some game with a wing I meet at the workshop. Also it will be nice to see New Orleans, it's a potential place I would like to move.
  2. Democrats don't have a view of healthy masculinity to replace stage orange toxic masculinity, which they demonize. For democrats to truly "get" men, they're gonna have to transcend green into tier two, and present a vision of integral manhood. imagine if the left created an agenda that starting at age 16, every man will be taught how to date. How to approach, how to be charismatic, funny, witty, how to lead a woman, and the ethics related to such. That would be truly something
  3. Leo did say game was like a nuclear bomb. I haven't upped it to truly hitting on girls , but a month ago I couldn't even approach a stranger. The difference in my self love is night and day.
  4. Maybe try this Get super confident to the point where you can approach any woman , discover your authentic style of game, but rather than use that to have sex with as many women as possible, only have sex with the women you want to date long term and only have sex with one woman at a time the personal development gains come from the approaching , not the sex imo
  5. I'm gonna remember the why of wanting to get better with girls. Its not for the sex, it's for growing into a confident, authentic man. And it's for finding my dream girl who I can grow and self actualize with.
  6. I wanna find a wing and go out the next day or same night
  7. Sounds about right for something free. Still , I'd regret not taking such an easy oppurtunity
  8. Leo mentioned this in one of the other threads. I immediately checked it out and it's crazy how well it's gonna line up I believe it's a sign from God for me to go because: 1.) it's free ($25 refundable at time of event) 2.) I have family in New Orleans 3.) it falls on the day before Thanksgiving, which means I can take the whole week off of work. 4.) I've been focusing on game lately, started doing cold approaches just a couple weeks ago. If anyone has been to the free tour id love to hear about it , im looking to meet one or two good wings, get clarity on my life purpose, and get motivated to quit my addictions!
  9. This seems very promising. Have any of you guys done it?
  10. My game would improve overnight if I was surrounded by edm wooks most of the time
  11. That actually sounds a lot like QBism! There's a theory of everything episode that talks about it.
  12. Did you find that your wing pushed you to do things you wouldn't have done otherwise? Id love to meet someone who can just look me the eye, say "go talk to that girl" and I just do it automatically despite my anxiety
  13. When I first learned about the double slit experiment, I was also getting into spirituality. So to me it made perfect sense that the observer in quantumn mechanics was consciousness. In fact, there is an interpretation of QM called the Von Neumann Wigner interpretation where this is the case. However , this is not popular. Most physicists believe that any classical system can be an observer. They say that the measuring device used in the double slit experiment can be an observer. However I read something from Bernardo Kastrup in his book, Science Ideated, where he stated that the measuring device is not the observer, because until a conscious agent reads the results of the experiment, both the measuring device and the quantumn particle are in a superposition . But I do not think I really understand what that means. I think he means that the result of the experiment is not known and could be affected by conscious observation . I also wonder how any classical system could be considered an observer, because I can't imagine that if that were the case, we would ever be able to observe quantum effects to begin with. After all, the room itself in which the experiments are performed is itself a classical system. As you can tell, I do not have a background in physics. I've been reading independently on this topic for years and don't believe I am any closer to an answer than when I started. if someone with training in physics would like to help, that would be appreciated.
  14. Hell 👏 yes this is what I needed to hear Your comment about in person coaching is also inspiration for me to move to a big city. I live in a small town in the southern United States. One of the worst places to do game, but then again I figure if I can learn do it here I can do it anywhere my buddy recently moved to Denver. He sent me a video from red rocks. That place is absolutely phenomenal.
  15. I'm realizing now that Osho was a pickup guru in his past life, before he was a spiritual guru. Master of enlightenment and master of game.