yetineti

Men are truly gratified the same way, through the same relationship patterns and same passionate sex as women. It couldn’t be any other way. Everything else is a game.

@Emerald You’re missing the point that - yes, while men fall into the pattern you describe: 1. Not healthy for them. 2. Not a choice or preference. 3. Is a product of getting less sex on average than the average woman.

@Emerald Leo beat me to the punch. But I’ll still give my 2¢ as someone who has been quite intrigued by this matter myself. First, I must say, your description of sex is almost exactly how I feel about it. I have felt my take is more feminine, for a man, however. Then again, most men do not look into their minds and emotions as much as some of us here. So many men do not even understand what they want. I think they want what you described as well. Like Leo said, there’s levels of itch. But I’d say there’s just levels of emotional capacity for men. Almost every guy I’ve met that has slept around a lot is playing a role. One they are almost never happy with. They usually had some dysfunctional family and/or idea of what love is. Also, women get pursued. Men have to pursue. If we stop pursuing it is hard to resume. So, many men, getting results, convince themselves of anything to not stop pursuing. It is like a drug or how people with lots of money feel they need more. Except it’s guys acting like they aren’t lonely or not knowing they are lonely, because they’re having sex with lots of women and ‘shouldn’t be’ lonely. But also the number of people having sex, especially for men, has gone down substantially. If that isn’t a sign men want more than scooby doo sex than nothing is.

@Adam M Everyone has heard about your celery juice enough. You begged Leo to admit he didn’t know what he was talking about. Turns out he has read the books and tried what you speak of. Responding the way you have is delusional. Maybe your juice works. For Leo and most people it doesn’t - get over it or call us all liars already. Your disrespect practically has already.

Also, there is no metaphysical bottom of reality.

Physics is practically the opposite of metaphysics. Physics will actually get in the way of metaphysics.

Why are we trying to solve a problem for kids that shouldn’t be on these media platforms anyways? Seems to me just not allowing the kids to be on there in the first place makes a lot more sense and is easier.

It’s just as amazing in the other direction. I could just say ‘a true and honest liberal would be concerned about the inability to express information spread in society.’

@Yimpa I actually had my definitions mixed up- it’s not negative reinforcement, it’s not positive reinforcement and it certainly isn’t both lol. It is just punishment to censor.

@Buck Edwards I get that… censoring people is not positive reinforcement, it is negative reinforcement.

The problem is, the people propagating the views that should be censored do not understand censorship is not a serious danger. How does poking and prodding them with censorship help them at all? Doesn’t it just radicalize them more?

And by that time we wouldn’t be able to have this conversation

@Dodo A few years ago, I became the devil. I took responsibility for all of this rape and suffering people are speaking of. I had terrible dreams of doing things I could’ve never imagined. Things I never have and never will do. I cried that whole day. I just remembered this day. It took so long to integrate it into my life, to forgive myself. But there I was crying that day. With months of confusion to come. I was perhaps 17 or 18, taking responsibility for killing, wars, lies, deception. Clear as day, I saw how it was all done and I could see myself doing it. Like you could understand a white lie from someone. My mental health was terrible. I knew I didn’t do these things personally but I knew even deeper that in some sense or another it was still my responsibility. So I took responsibility.

@Keryo Koffa I like you Keryo. You opened my mind a bit. I like how seriously I take this forum but every now and then something like this comes along 😂

@Dodo Oh I get it now. You think you’re separate from the evil and animals and you just want it to all go away 😂. You’re evil! Face it!

@Javfly33 So if God doesn’t decide everything in your view, what does? Conventionally, God controls everything. By definition, typically, as well.

@ICURBlessings No Leo isn’t suggesting he would have sex with a 12 year old. But he is suggesting that you would’ve 500 years ago and you would’ve liked and needed it and no one would’ve batted an eye. Animals still rape. They eat their young. Do you like animals? They need to do those things. Cost-benefit. The benefits of having sex with a minor are so absolutely low and the cost is so high. Most people would be going against their sexual preferences, what attracts them, the law, morals, etc. to have sex with a minor now. 500 years ago you had sex with your 12 year old sister and if you didn’t the kingdom was thrown over. You needed a bloodline lineage and you needed it fast. Don’t do that, you die. People are attracted to what keeps them alive, in more ways than one.

@Javfly33 Yeah but God decided not to be awake.

@Keryo Koffa That is a great idea, with the quotes. My last point here: In person, I am extremely patient. You don’t have to believe me. I’ve worked with special needs, the elderly, disabled, kids, etc. blah blah blah. I’m very good with them all. This is an intellectual forum. I’m not babying anyone.

@Keryo Koffa This for instance. Is this a coherent read for you? This is an intellectual forum. I make no attacks on character, however, grammar is in the guidelines of this forum. Grammar aside, does this passage resonate with you? I can hardly make sense of it. I have even ran this conversation through AI to try and correct some of the errors or understand where they’re coming from. It’s nonsensical and some kid is going to join the forum and waste his time on it and become more confused.

@Keryo Koffa Did you change my quote lol? Or is your OS not in English? It could’ve just translated interestingly. Either way, that quote was not what I said. But it was a pretty good summary, I suppose. ——— I see your point about this. I understand how this can be taken personally. But there is really nothing to discuss. I have the ability to point out falsehoods. I cannot show anyone the Truth. Anyone at anytime can fix their grammatical errors or attempt to clarify their point to me. But often times they do not. They have no idea what they’re talking about and I’ve pointed that out, oops. I can’t lead people to Truth, but I can clear the road for those to come.

😂😂😂

@Keryo KoffaThis conversation didn’t just fall out of a coconut tree. The context was their nonsense and poor grammar. Respectfully, their posts are hard to read and conflate ideas. And people seem to go along with them because they’ve built up a strong defense. I haven’t been able to critique at all without getting stuff like “that’s your ego bud, did I strike a nerve :)” And then others rush to their defense because they see that and thinking I’m being mean - when in reality this is the most cut and dry example of deflection and projection.

@Keryo Koffa The first quote is true. The second was in response to @Ishanga smiling at potentially striking a nerve with me. You’re not being fair. Am I being hateful towards you now?

Pointing out grammatical errors and incoherence is not hateful or a personal attack.