yetineti

@Ulax Do you see a use in keeping some things ‘fun’ and other things ‘not?’

@Ulax Do you find different kinds of fun in everything you do or is there something you do regularly that you wouldn’t really consider fun conventionally speaking?

@Ulax Do you feel although certain forms of fun you partake in are more or less fulfilling or do you find you don’t like to compare?

@Ulax Not what I was getting at but sure. What do you do to have fun, outside of the forum? What is your situation like?

@Ulax Do you have anywhere you can seriously go to hang out or have fun?

@Ulax Such a cat like response.

@EdgeGod900 Of course it can coexist. A lot of comedy is predicated on sincerity. I also don’t contest your post was meant to be funny. But are you claiming to have sincerely admitted to this fetish? Just keep it respectful and within context. @Ulax Have you ever choked someone unconscious?

Are you asking me to mind read you? I don’t know. Could be projection or some odd attachment you have to Leo yourself. Odd thing to say, though. What is it about what I asked that has led you to this? Seems fake and performative. I feel it is too. I know it’s at least fake. May not be performative. I don’t need you to care, stop insulting me, understand or agree. Have fun. I just request you don’t waste too much of your own energy in the process or delude yourself too much. Nobody has to be high and mighty. Have I really asked for that much? @EdgeGod900

@EdgeGod900 Exact look I had reading this

I don’t know how to engage with this anymore. Every point I make you tear apart with some addition of how you interpret the previous interpretation. It feels weak and ill. I’ll need you to go back to the beginning, really to address any of this. If you have no interest in that, I just ask that you consider I really don’t know where this ‘gorilla’ stuff is coming from or means. I think I’ve been entirely logical. If you would like to address that, feel free. But attacking me or my character will end up saying more about you than it does me. I’m sure you are a just fine human being. I couldn’t probably gauge if you are ‘above’ or ‘below’ me, if I tried. @Schizophonia

@EdgeGod900 Try to contribute with some seriousness and respect. I’ll admit your trolling is more sophisticated. That doesn’t change the low quality of the post. Just cut it out.

Freezer good fridge bad edit: also 2023?

@Schizophonia How do you distinguish between actually understanding someone’s psychology and just believing your own interpretation of it? I’m sorry if my initial callout was condescending. I didn’t mean to lump everyone together. I find the jokes genuinely tiresome on the forum.

You’re inventing a motive and calling it hidden. That doesn’t make it evidence. I criticized a juvenile routine. You’ve turned that into a theory about my entire relationship to you. My wording was condescending, sure. That doesn’t establish your theory. Then you’re describing your own status concerns. You haven’t established mine. You barely know me. This is an insult dressed up as an explanation. If your intelligence is relevant, use it to address what I actually said. You’re using one unsupported claim to prop up another: I’m supposedly inadequate, so my criticism must be compensation. Where’s the evidence for either? You started this round. That’s why I included you. Monster Energy is the more persistent example. There’s no mystery here requiring psychological dissection. He participated too. Posting rarely doesn’t exempt that particular post from criticism. Calling this “further proof” doesn’t make it proof. That doesn’t answer whether calling him sadistic or paranoid was justified. Enjoying it doesn’t mean you’re good at it. An explanation still needs evidence. Exactly. You’re skipping the part where you establish that your explanation fits. @Schizophonia Your comments about crying show the same issue. You called it “hurting yourself” and said it means “you can’t leave yourself alone.” Sincerity then explained that he was listening to what came up, letting it out, and continuing with his day. That’s a different account from the one you assigned him. Meanwhile, you explained your own lack of crying by saying “there is nothing that needs to be released.” How did you establish that? You described shielding yourself from things that bring up sadness, but not bringing something up doesn’t establish that there’s nothing there. You’re asking us to trust your understanding of your own emotional life while dismissing someone else’s account of theirs. If you can misread what Sincerity is plainly describing, why treat your explanation of yourself as beyond question? You eventually said, “I totally get it it’s happened to me too,” but still called these experiences “games.” That makes the dismissal harder to understand. You recognized the experience yourself, yet continued framing it negatively. I’m not saying you need to cry more or that I know what’s happening underneath your approach. I’m saying you haven’t justified treating your lack of tears as evidence that nothing needs processing, while treating someone else’s tears as evidence that they’re hurting themselves. That’s also what you’re doing with me. Your insults get explained as “defending your turf,” while my criticism gets explained as intellectual inadequacy and a hidden desire for power. You acknowledge the joke might have been misplaced, but still insist my objection must come from something wrong with me. You’re giving yourself the benefit of context while treating your negative interpretation of someone else as the explanation. Calling that “dissecting people” doesn’t make it accurate.

@LordFall When an emotional situation does arise, do you have a hard time or how do you determine whose emotions you should be looking into, if you’re otherwise usually detached? I could see how in a relationship someone with this attachment style might default to appeasing themselves or their partner if the emotional capacity isn’t there 100% of the time. But also, I know in my own experience too much emotional capacity is obviously a problem as well.