yetineti

Yes. I remember Leo explaining all of this 10+ years ago. Leo has become quite the wordsmith since. Even more than he was. I find it almost beautiful the way he can use words now.

One of my platonic friends kept running his mouth and saying how words meant nothing. I asked him, randomly, one straight man to the other, ‘Do you want to fuck me?’ His face turned bright red. I said, ‘it’s just words, baby.’ He chooses his words more intelligently now.

@Nilsi You have a lot to say for someone who thinks words are arbitrary.

Frankly I may be more concerned about WWIII than you guys. Which is why I don’t waste my time talking about it.

@BlueOak Editing my quote was awfully shallow.

@BlueOak @Sincerity I didn’t dismiss or disagree or say either of you were wrong at all. You’ve completely missed the point. Doubt my knowledge. I didn’t share any of it. I said this speculation is rampant. Which it is. I said nothing about making predictions, speculations, pattern recognition or anything of the sort, in general. I predict the sun will rise tomorrow. Don’t project on me. Make better predictions about things that matter. Also, find better content providers.

@Sincerity I’m being humble by not engaging with your conspiracies and speculation. And that is a valid form of engagement here. This is a serious matter. Anyone can make guesses and predictions. But can you just sit with that without all your guess work? No.

The speculation in this thread is rampant. If WWIII does start it will be because a bunch of schmucks on the internet convinced you all it already did. Go clean your rooms.

You can tell the low quality of media when they specify who people like Trump or Zelensky are— because the bulk of their audience doesn’t know. The videos are not examples of high level analysis. High-level analysis requires immense work and most people can’t do that; it’s rare. These were far from rare. Much less enlightening. They monger fear, mainly.

You guys are confusing sincerity with clarity. These videos talk about global politics like it’s a football rivalry. Why would Leo waste his time debunking that?

The answer is quite simple. America: Power ✅ Authority ✅ Independence ✅ Community ✅ (Starting to/Smaller pockets) You can run the same list for other countries and compare how much of what they have. SD is not linear, but the stages can and often do build on each other to one extent or another.

Haha! Yes

Ontolila noun /ˈɒn.təʊˌliː.lə/ Origin: Coined from onto- (Greek ontos, “being”) + lila (Sanskrit, “play”) Definition: A post-awakening condition in which a person, having recognized the self-generated or illusory nature of reality, continues to exist and act within that illusion due to the structural continuity of consciousness. Distinct from awakening (the realization itself) and enlightenment (freedom or detachment), ontolila refers to the sustained, involuntary engagement with reality after its deconstruction. It denotes awareness without exit. Example: After realizing the dreamlike nature of reality, he remained within it, fully aware but unable to step outside. This was ontolila. Edit: Yes— I used AI to word this well and help determine the suffix. If that ‘disqualifies me,’ no matter, I like the word.

@PurpleTree U.S. military and tech alone have created more global prosperity than any other system or government ever. Every other country anyone here thinks is ‘better’ was built on the back of U.S. tech and military support. I’m not saying the U.S. doesn’t have unique risks— but at some point an overall judgment has to be made.

@oldhandle Name a better country, overall.