Breakingthewall

Imo it's better forget if things are good or bad and fight with everything. This game is not a joke, there is no place for too many mistakes, there is only one wise direction and is the one of openess, anything else is madness. Human mind is a dense labyrinth of molasses. If your actions and your focus do not constantly tend toward clarity, you will end up like a fly in honey, trapping yourself further while believing you are freeing yourself.

If I think: oh I'm a loser, all my friends are millionaires and I only have 4 millions, then I feel a lot of anxiety. Is this an illusion? Why? It's a reality. A fluctuation, a wave, appears in the reality, or the reality took the form of a wave that manifest as: oh I'm a shit+anxiety and closure. It's absolutely real, same real as a galaxy or an universe For you maybe a supernova is more real than a neurotic thought, but both are equally real, are the reality appearing as that structure, and the complexity and synchrony that involves that thought is exactly the same than the one of the big bang, it's the unlimited appearing, existing If you break down that thought at a quantum level, all the way to the foundations of reality, its complexity is that of the universe. That thought is the product of reality's fields interacting, and these fields come from dimensions we cannot even fathom. Any event in reality is perfect synchronicity; there are no levels, there is only one level and it is the total level. Existence exists, this, right now, is that.

Yeah, your vision is clear. People enter life paths driven by a need for validation without perceiving it, and once inside, getting out is difficult. How can you choose something like having children if not through direct contact with the source of life, perceiving that what you are doing is an act of expansion, openness, and life, seeing it in all its depth? Doing it just because otherwise you're a failure, or for ego-driven reasons, pushes you into a forced life of chronic anxiety, sadness masked by stimuli, a path that grows narrower and narrower. Not smart choice.

You could taste the whole flavour anytime, you don't need different experiences, you need being open to this one. That's why some mystics become statics, because they don't want any closure, any wave that blurrs the perfect transparency of this exact moment

Enlightenment is not a new identification, is that you were closed in the darkness and you open yourself to the absolute light, that's why the name "enlightenment". It's because the closed state is dark, because the closure prevents the source of this exact moment manifests, be perceived, because it's closed in the shell of the ego, the survival system, but if the openess happens, the unlimited nature of existence is totally perceived and the perceptor and the perception are not different.

There is existence existing right? You could call it no self or as you want but existence exist and that is what you are. It's not an identification, it's a reality happening now.

Well, there is a human that exists and can die right? It's a really, so that idea is the representation of a reality that's happening . If there is a recognition of anything there is a processor that does that recognition, a system that qualifies reality in categories, so you could say that you are that system, because without it "illusion" or "real" wouldn't mean anything

Exactly, well said, everyone lives like that, and it's a pretty sad way to live. Remember when you were a child and reality was alive, but at a certain point, without knowing exactly how, everything turned into evaluation, judgment, calculation, the need to fit in, to succeed, and then reality was no longer alive, it was an Excel spreadsheet with chronic anxiety, looking toward a future where everything would be good if a series of requirements are met. That path is a disaster; the only sensible way is to open up to the living source maintaining the necessary planificación of the adult. achieving it is a difficult equation, but possible.

@Yeah Yeah In my opinion, all of that is made up, but even if it were true, that human existence develops in different dimensions simultaneously with the goal of evolving, from a broader perspective, it would still simply be existence appearing, entirely lacking in meaning from an unlimited perspective; it simply exists. For a human ego, this is unacceptable and a higher reason must be found, and perhaps there is one. But if you keep scaling levels, you will eventually reach the absolute level, where what appears does so because nothing prevents it, and what happens is as it is because it is a possible possibility, and nothing more.

Who does that introspection? That introspection is so precise that after doing it you know that the self is an illusion? How? Because you did that introspection and you arrive to the conclusion, suggested by the non dualistic, that there is not a self? Maybe it's just an opinion don't you think so? In your opinion the self is illusory because you did an inspection and you didn't find any self. What did you expect to find? A self saying hello? Where? I think that's obvious that the label "illusory" is just a personal label, maybe the idea of self is different for you than for other people, then what exactly is an illusion? Forget the world "self", imagine that you never thought about that term, what exactly is an illusion? The idea that arises that you are a human?

Who is having that illusion? An illusion is an appearance that is not real. For an appearance that seems real exist, must be a subject who is deceived by that appearance, then realize that this was false and another thing is true. Who's saying that the self is an illusion?

I'm thinking in spiritual masters like tolle, adyashanti, Ralston, or Ramakrishna, Maharashi, Tagore, and I think that spending time with them maybe they could transmit some special calm, maybe some special understanding. Tagore probably would be someone special, powerful , genius, Ramakrishna probably would like to go on party with MDMA, then he would admit that he's very gay😅

Imagine that your emotional structure is a barrier that keeps your perceptual field focused in one direction, on a specific frequency. This doesn't happen because we are foolish or because it's an error of the ego; rather, it is the structure created over millions of years of evolution, from the first cells to the minds that recreate the universe as an interface between the organism and the environment. These structures are solid and very real, but they can be dissolved. In some cases, like Ramana Maharshi's, or perhaps yours, those structures are fainter and easier to dissolve, but it always requires a long and dedicated process. What is sought is not to understand reality, but to perceive the nature of reality, what reality is. This is not impossible, since the perceiving system, the mind, is reality taking the form of a mind that perceives in a dual mode with recording and prediction. A stone is reality in stone mode, it does not perceive. Reality is not perception; rather, perception is a mode of reality, and we are that mode. In other words, we are essentially the reality and formally perception. What reality is can be fully perceived; your mind can perceive itself as the absolute that it is. It is rediscovering what you have always been and what anyone is: the absence of limits that exists because it has no boundaries. And that absence of limits of total life has a self: You. Any self is the self of the absolute, because obviously there is a self, and obviously that self is an expression of the absolute, there is no mystery, it is something completely simple and direct. So if the limits of perception break, the total manifests, and the eye that sees it is at the same time the object that is being seen. But openness is not about knowing that you are the absolute, but rather opening yourself up to the self-perception of the limitless, which is recognized as something obvious yet forgotten. It is the totality that exists, possessing an absolutely clear quality: total being, the absence of limits, unrestricted possibility, absolute freedom, and the inexhaustible power that emanates from limitlessness.

But iit s full of organs or are also imaginary? For example, the brain is real? Or really the scull is empty?

So you say that the barrier is the self, but doesn't exist. Then there is a barrier, but can't be dissolved because doesn't exist. Emoticon now?

Existence manifest in something so incredibly perfect and deep like a human. Seeing a baby is seeing the absolute in it's expression. The creative power without restriction.

Empty of what? Reality is, fullness or emptiness are just relative aspects of existing. And enlightenment is being open to the absolute. It's the absence of barriers. You could say that it's an achievement because barriers exist, and must be dissolved

Much better being real and face the challenges with humility, that's the only way to find the courage that is inherent to life.

Nobody, it's obvious, I see it right now.

Your emoticon are very convincing, but even that solid argument, I'd say that "you" is the self, and the self is the structure that reality takes when a living being created a model of reality where exchange of information between inside and outside happens, then the perceptor appears, and this perceptor exist, same that anything else than appear

If god were a superior mode of living would be a god, not God. God is the life itself, the fact of existing, or if you prefer the unlimited. Are synonyms

In my opinion this vision is a mistake because is closed. Implies that god is an entity who chooses and it chooses creating itself for a reason, love. That's relative and ultimately God must be absolute. Absolute means that it's not relative to anything, for example it's desire of love. God is the existence, the absolute being, and the only thing that you could say about god is that God is, because being and God are one, and you are that. You are the absolute being existing. Being open to this unfathomable reality is enlightenment, nothing else.

That song is seemingly an empowerment anthem, but if you listen to it closely, you'll see it's a rather tragic cry from someone very scared, trying to look powerful while feeling broken inside. It's a very sad song of helplessness, loneliness, sorrow, and the need to lie in order to survive in the world.

God doesn't want, God is. Wanting implies election, then it's relative. Being is not an election, it's inevitable, it's the synonym of unlimited. God doesn't need to love itself because existence itself and so called absolute love are not different. There is no graduation, it's total. The only point is that we are closed to it due out human structure by default

There is no true self and ego, there is fear that creates closure and absence of fear that allows the openess. You can't tell the fear to go, you just can look at it directly, be humble enough to allow the essential fear to manifest in the surface until you integrate it and there is no fear anymore, it's just survival instinct, a facet of you, not something external to you that encloses you. Then you see the obvious, that what you are can't die because what you are is the life appearing as you, not you with a life inside that can die.