Breakingthewall

Btw, god is not "infinite", the numbers are infinite, god is unlimited. Unlimited is not big, finite or infinite, is dimensionless, you can't think about it, you can be open to it, to the absolute abyss that implies absolute life, saying it poetically

It has name: god. A name is a word that we put is something that we perceive. No because being is an affirmative property of God. God is being you, but God is let's say the absolute potential that makes possible the fact of being. Being is a fact, anything that is is happening, what is not happening isn't. God is prior to being, the absolute potential don't "is", being is a dimension, a possibility. This idea opens your mind to the unfathomable, to the breaking of the difference between consciousness and unconsciousness, something or nothing. God is nothing, but being nothing, is everything. This is not a paradox or a mystical mysterious quote, it is an inevitable relationship. What god is is limitlessness, and limitlessness doesn't "is", but manifest being

That's not the point. For example when I said that god is not being, but that god is, because being is an affirmative property, how god manifests, I'm pointing a key for the real openess. I know exactly what I'm talking about. If you don't see it, that's ok, but my objective is not the discussion but pointing the closures

Same. Well, same than most of spiritual people. They feel threatened if their ideas are challenging because their ideas are part of their identity and also a grip for their balance. That's why they are rigid

That's because you are too egoic for the challenge

Some smart assing, if you allow me: You could say that being is how god manifest, but being is an affirmative property, not God itself, God would be what is. You could say that, but really pleasure, evilness, etc, are expressions of reality, God itself would be the source, and the source is not perfect or imperfect, because those adjectives born in the form, can't define what is prior to form "Where" would be an expression of the reality, the source is dimensionless, dimensions are possibilities. God wouldn't know nothing, because it would be limitless, then something would be just something, just a possibility being possible. God would be the source and the manifestation, there is no source without manifestation or manifestation without source. The source is the unfathomable, the manifestation is the limited. Two faces of the reality. God wouldn't do nothing, it just would be because it would be inevitable, since it couldn't be limited to not being. God would create an universe in the same way that you create shit after eating, because it's your nature. In fact, you are god, expressed as an human You also could say that god contains nothing but it's the unlimited potential for everything. Sure, the time would be an expression of God, the happening, the relationship cause effect, but the unlimited is only caused by the absence of limits, and that's nothing

I humbly believe you are mistaken in equating nothingness and consciousness in terms of ontological category. Consciousness is merely a structure that integrates various levels, creating what we call experience. There is nothing mystical or sacred called " The Consciousness"; it seems that way to us humans because we value consciousness above all else and equate the lack of consciousness with non-existence. But answer this: if you were in an accident and your memory were reduced to zero, and you could not distinguish one instant from another, and you were an alien living for hundreds of billions of years, even all of eternity, yet for you everything were the same non-time, no process, no happening, just a static now without differentiation in which a million years and a second were exactly the same, and there was no difference between anything, would you be conscious? Of course, a Buddhist would answer: exactly!!! This alien would reach the perfect consciousness, the rigpa, sunyatta, pure emptiness. Well, if it's really pure, it's exactly unconsciousness. Anesthesia. No time, no process, no registration. When the Buddhist or meditators say that they reached pure emptiness, they are operating from a system that register information, it's just another state of the mind, being conscious of yourself as a human without the chattering of the mind. Then, in this mind without barriers, the revelation of the source could happen, but it's always from the human interface that register the process

That's just anthrophormize the reality. Same than believing in a bearded god that created you. It's not a good starting point, is a final barrier.

Typical mistake of non duality. As they need that the reality is non dual they affirm that the subject doesn't exist. Don't would be more simple admit that the reality can split in many levels, as we can see in everything, and all them are the reality? Ultimately reality is unlimited, external limits are impossible, because would be out of reality. but due this reason relative internal limits are inevitable. Internal limits are form, and form in not an illusion, is how reality manifest itself. It's like saying that a city is an illusion because everything is the earth, there is no city, only earth. Wtf, there are cities in the earth, period. You guys want to understand or narcotize your minds with mental labyrinths?

Imagine that your memory becomes zero and you can't register change. For you there is no time, same than for the perspective of a foton. There is only one instant that doesn't changes. Are you conscious? Think about it. Without process there is no consciousness, because there is nothing to be conscious of. Consciousness is a process. You could say that consciousness is the process where the reality sees itself, because the subject and the object are ultimately the same reality, but consciousness is not the foundation of reality, is a possibility of the reality. I think some mystics like nisgardatta, who went deeper, understood this obvious fact. But you, who read this, are going to feel attacked in your dogma, because you need to be enlightened, believe in Jesus of anything, and you won't open yourself to the absolute never. That's life. No hindrance for knowing is bigger than believing that you already know, because you need it emotionally to feel safe. Human behaviour.

You can't realize that consciousness is absolute because it's relative. If you erase any relation, consciousness disappear. You are the only non believer in this conversation. Well, and me. All others have adopted a dogma, the absolute consciousness, and they believe that they realised it. That's how the human mind works.

Anyway, respect for the creator of actualized, no argues.

Don't be passive aggressive, I didn't make it personal, I just asked you to explain how consciousness is the truth. Ok, you explained, you are awake and I'm not. Understood.

The absolute truth is that you are, anyone knows it. The real awakening is the openess to what you are. Can't be thought, it's the unlimited, the absolute potential, the source. It's in you, you are the door that encloses the perception to the source, but same time you are the key to the revelation of the absolute potential that the unlimited implies. Your heart is the key, it's inside your heart, and the door that encloses it is made of fear.

Physical means nothing, there are not categories, everything is the reality. And I'm awaken enough to don't say to the people that I'm right because I'm awake and they aren't, that's very low.

How? What is consciusness without memory? Imagine that your memory is zero. There is no change, no registration. What consciousness would be that? Nothing. Then the truth itself needs registration of change? That's not fundamental. Btw, what is the truth? Is there any falsehood? There is only the reality. The difference being a human that is conscious is in the degrees of closure, but reality is the same if I'm open to it or not.

Why not? Then consciousness is the foundation of reality? How? Consciousness always needs forms, without any form there is no consciousness. Infinite consciousness is unconsciousness. Imagine no form and no time. No, you can't imagine it, because it's the no form. no consciousness could be without process, registration and duality

Consciousness is simply reality organized in a specific way. As you may have observed, reality is organized into interconnected, coherent patterns. For example, if you observe a stone down to its basic structure, at the quantum level, you will find coherent patterns upon coherent patterns, dynamically synchronized, always in motion, in constant change. Life is simply one more phase of that web of possibilities in which reality self-organizes into a pattern that actively self-preserves. Willpower appears; the pattern wants to be. This happens simply because the pattern that perpetuates itself is the one with this characteristic. After quintillions of possible patterns, this one, the one that self-preserves, remains. Evolution begins, and within it, patterns of sufficient complexity appear to develop what we call the mind: a dynamic, stable pattern that creates a model of the information exchange between the organism that wants to persist and the external universe. That interface model is simply reality in a complex, organized pattern, the exact same as a molecule, a star, a galaxy. A possible pattern among the limitless possibilities of reality's inevitable movement. Well, within that pattern, reality becomes conscious of itself, observing itself. For instance, in a star, reality builds itself; in an atom, it organizes itself, to give a few examples. Reality does not do this because it wants to, but because it can. Reality can do anything, since it has no limits, and it wants nothing, since "wanting" is just a possibility within reality, much like consciousness. Seriously, if you truly want to open yourself up to what you really are, you must transcend the idea that reality is consciousness. Reality implies the possibility of being conscious, and you are now the eye of reality, or the reality expressed as an eye. If you really want to open yourself to the unlimited you must abandon the unconscious idea that the unlimited is an entity. You have to erase yourself, then the absolute will open in you, because you are that.

Consciousness is just a form. Same than a stone. For you consciousness is a big thing because you are conscious, but reality is not consciousness, is where consciousness is a possibility. If you want I could explain it, but I doubt that anyone have the mind open enough to understand what Is obvious

Infinity don't create the physical reality, the physical reality, that is, the diferentiation, is the inevitable manifestation of the infinity. As there are not limits, differentiation arises. There are no difference between the unlimited and the limited, the limited and relative is the inevitable expression of the absolute unlimited. Saying that the unlimited is real and the limited a dream is incorrect. The unlimited is not an entity who creates a dream, what you call dream is the unlimited appearing. There is not unlimited without expression, there is no separation between the form and the formless, both are one, then the form is not a dream , is form, period. The difference is crucial, one closes, another opens.

Saying that reality is a hallucination implies a subject, an entity, that is having that hallucination, thereby establishing an absolute duality between subject and object. This is impossible; there is not an absolute subject, because if there were, it would be a limited and relative entity. The absolute is not dreaming, it is reality, not the one who creates reality.

Sure, and being a homeless is being a millionaire disguised as something else No, liberation is when the self that wants freedom manage to break the barriers that keep it imprisoned. The self never dies being a human because it exists. For example, question: ice cream or Apache torture? 5 seconds to choose

I'm not saying that sadhguru is bad, just questioning his motivation. He says too many weird assessments, it's very difficult to interpret him. He's hermetic, an enigma

The ego is just an expression of the reality, is how reality manifests in the form of an human. For example, you don't like to be enjailed in a room alone for 10 years, because that preference have been created by evolution. You can't pretend that for you it's fine because you have not ego, having ego is inevitable, same than having a body.

What about ethnic cleansing, is not God? Then how it's possible that exists? So if you are enjailed in a Nigerian prison at 12 to be gang raped every night for 30 men with aids, you should choose love. Maybe they already did for you Very hippy. What about the purpose of the body when you are enslaved in a plantation? Working? Sure, the ego is a mistake that god did because he's dumb. Or better, God don't like the ego, it's against God. Poor god, sad because the ego What if he says to rape kids? Ah, then it's not the holy spirit. You know that is the holy spirit if he says things aligned with the Bible. The Disney world, where all your wishes become real. Sure, of course you are not responsible of those rapes of kids. Sure, I would celebrate the guy who raped my son with a 1 week session of medieval torture finished with gasoline and a flame dancing around and shouting like a Sioux. That would make me extremely happy. I would record to watch with my family on holiday. That would educate my son about what being human implies. Of course, war is love, but we could call it war, to simplify. Sure. Today is raining and cold and I just saw an African guy who seems schizophrenic laying in the street with plastics to avoid rain . Maybe the universe though he needs just that and you a house and a family. In short: spirituality. A joke