Breakingthewall

Imo Ideas are like anything else, something that happens. Spirituality seems to say: ideas are false, sensations are true, when both are in the same dimension, that of processes, causality, what happens. Perhaps you could say that sensations are more vivid and ideas more subdued, and that they distance you further from the dimension of absolute being. I would say that's true, but at the same time, they are the key to opening up to total absolute being. Without the mental representation that your life is a trap and that you have to make a change in frequency, the necessary action wouldn't occur. The issue isn't that sensations or ideas are maya, or false, or whatever, but that they are the dimension of form. There's no problem with this dimension except that in the human configuration, it leads to an almost total closure to the perception of "substance". Substance is not something, is the fact of being and this fact of being recognizes itself through the self as absolute and immortal. You are not immortal as form, but as the fact of being, and from this perspective, form is perceived as secondary, not as false or illusory, because the perceiver of the form is the form. There is not a witness out of the experience, the experience implies the witness, and It is perceived as what it is: form. But the form is the substance in a form. There are not two, are one, but the form usually gets blind to it's nature, closes itself to it putting the form as essential veiling the essential reality of being. As much as you adapt to the inevitable rules of society, to the need of adaptation, you get more and more veiled, enclosed in a barrier that blinds you totally from what you are. That feels very bad, anxiety and sadness by default The better way (imo)for us, civilized humans trapped in the gray, dull, lifeless ego, is total openness to substance, the complete transcendence of the ego for a few moments as often as you can. This completely changes the frequency of the ego. It gives it life, and by giving it life, it gives it purpose. Its purpose is the same as that of anything else: to exist. The ego, enlightened by the full light of the unlimited fact of being, changes frequency; it ceases to be a line that moves forward and becomes an actual reality that is. The difference is total.

What is the essential truth? What identities are false?

An operative center that arises in an organism, a center that is conscious of itself, that knows that is, and that predict possibilities and choose the best option possible in every moment, processing the past and the present through the filter of its evolutive conditioning to achieve a future with the most optimal conditios possible. I wouldn't call it illusion, just self.

Agree, that's the real point , being open to the reality of what being is. Imo illusion is a misleading term, would be better being trapped in the form. It's not false, it's a dimension of reality. We as self conscious minds are conscious of the process that is happening and of its interactions, but we can also be conscious of the nature of this process. Being conscious of the nature of being is achieved being it without barriers, and that's not easy because this self conscious mind is not designed by evolution for this opening, but it's possible , as you described when Newman says that bodies are empty, maybe he doesn't understand that bodies itself are the reality happening. It's not that they are empty or full, it's that this process that the body is is the reality happening. It's existence existing. The self that appears is a dynamic model of the universe that this process that we call human creates to survive, the mind, that is also the existence existing, and it can realize of its real nature. It's quite simple imo, the question is if Newman have realized that nature. For him it's nothing, then I would say that not, because reality is.

Enlightenment is the openess to what reality is, not a realization about what reality is. You don't need to die or appear like so special and mystic. From a logical perspective, it's extremely simple: What reality is is the fact of being. But being totally open to it is not so simple because the system that a human is is programmed by evolution to close. the fact of being is not an entity, it has no form or limits, it's not exactly infinite, it's unlimited, if we want to express proper concepts . But it's everything, if you are open to it, nothing else is lack. But you can't be totally open to it always, and who wants that? We are humans, then let's play deep. Enlightenment is essential to play as deep as being human deserves.

Yes I mean letting go the mental structures at will for a while, mental structures are necessary. The point is making them transparent as you said

Yes those are the typical traps. Seeing in the dark is useful but this isn't enlightenment, same that remote vision. Nice anyway.

No worries, I know that I'm telling that spirituality that is spread is mistaken in the basis and that sounds like I want to feel superior I guess that it depends of how anyone represent those ideas , but for me are confusing. If I say that reality is nothing and that nothing has ever happened, what do I achieve? I understand the idea; it's about making form transparent, irrelevant, nonexistent, and thus ceasing to be trapped by it. But for me, that doesn't work because form actually traps you completely in different ways. Not only the fear of death, but also, for example, the need to define who you are, what reality is, etc. So, if you deny the existence of the self, it would be like facing an enemy in a duel to the death and repeating: "I'm not afraid, he's nothing, I'm not afraid." All well and good, but then the moment of the duel arrives, and reality imposes itself. Your enemy is there with a big knife, and you feel an overwhelming urge to defecate. The self is the same, it's very real, the point is not knowing that the self doesn't exist, is facing it directly to be able to put it in the background, and be totally open to what is, the living reality, absolute being, the power that underlies everything, the affirmative fact of being, the light that illuminates the depressing black and white 2D film and makes it real and alive, etc. etc. Call it what you want. This is a total absolute change is the experience. Not for a moment, but always. It doesn't happen but step by step, it's a change of phase of existing as a human, a liberation of a prison that all humans build by default

Spirituality is letting go of your mental structures and being open to the actual, to what is, the living reality. It's not about learning a new cosmology, but about breaking down the barriers that prevent you to do this. Spirituality is an action, not a realization, and that action isn't easy because your entire system is oriented in the opposite direction by default.

Ok but also you could assume that they are just relationship, then you don't put a closure in them . Then that closure happens in your mental frame, making it circular, closed. At least it would happen in my mental frame if I would assume that This doesn't mean that Im inventing a mental frame that's open because it's more convenient, it means that if reality is open, a mental frame that's true can't be closed

Doing that mental frame you are creating a separation between you, the observer, and the voice that talks, and there isn't, it's the reality in the form of a thought and you are that. It's irrelevant where that voice comes from, comes from the unlimited line of causality of the reality, same than anything else. It doesn't come from the void, comes from the big bang, and the big bang comes from another cause. If we assume that absolute limits are impossible, a beginning is impossible

Absolute being is not a being that is absolute, but rather the absolute fact of being. A conceptual framework that allows you to open yourself to this reality without restrictions should not describe absolute being, but rather avoid confining you to relative manifestation. "Dream" confines you to the relative because it implies a dreamer, another, more real reality, and implies a relationship between two realities.

I suppose you know that you're frying the emotional circuits of your mind on a thousands-of-watt electric grill, and that there's a tipping point where your system is fried and everything can easily turns let's say horrible

I never would do this and I think it's very dangerous. You don't know how will you react to 5meo . Some people have very strong defenses, it could be a really horrible experience and you could die.

I exist. If you doubt it I challenge you to a trial by combat. The one who lives is who exist. Choose your weapons. Logical weapons if you want

If that's true solipsism is false, and if there are another gods no one is a god because any creation would be limited by the other gods.

Any conceptual description in this context serves the purpose of not acting as a barrier to openness to absolute being. For this to happen, the essential element is the complete absence of contradiction or closure. Every description must be open. For example: reality exists, and what appears is reality existing, a possibility in being. This leaves room for openness in all directions; it is unnecessary to define anything as dream, unreal, or empty. The point is that your conceptual frame let's you to open yourself to the absolute being. This is not a knowledge or a realization, it's a movement that happens now that opens yourself to the absolute dimension of being.

Why? I think things are much simpler. They are what they seem: possibilities unfolding, not dreams. The goal isn't to define experience differently, but rather for experience to be open to its essential nature, not focused entirely on survival conditioning, that includes the social inevitable conditioning

The ego is the absolute appearing as an ego. In meditation you can collapse the selfs structure, it doesn't mean that there isn't a self but that self can exist a while without structure, then the nature of this self is revealed. Then the self sees itself as happening and it's substance as being. So self and no self, a stone for example, are the same substance, even the stone doesn't know that it is and the self does

10 mg is not small, maybe you didn't vaporize all, it's not so easy. When you exhaled, did a large cloud of smoke come out, or at least a clearly visible amount? In theory, a 5-MeO breakthrough is that reality completely breaks down and the sense of centeredness and boundaries disappears. You perceive yourself as nothing definable, but the experience remains, and this lack of structure is perceived as alive, a source, existence. This doesn't imply that reality is that, but rather that when you vape 5-MeO, this experience occurs. For me, the most valuable thing was, first, having the sensation of a diaphanous existence without my ego full of shit filtering it, and then perceiving how the psyche breaks down and reforms itself in seconds. It's like seeing a mechanism that is otherwise impossible to see because you're inside it. 5-MeO places you outside. Yes that's a good point. It's not become more self aware but change of dimension. You could become more and more conscious, like an intergalactic being, a self-aware god creating realities, yet still perceiving yourself in the dimension of form. The point is to shift to the dimension of being. It makes no difference whether you're a god or a fly; there are no levels. What reality is is the affirmative fact of being that arises from limitlessness, or rather, that limitlessness is. If you can set aside the dimension of form for a while, not as nonexistent, but as irrelevant, and open yourself completely to the dimension of being without absolutely any structure, that's it; there is nothing more. "More" is structure in that reality; it neither adds nor subtracts; it is form, and we speak of substance. The problem here is that you reach a point where you are aware of absolute being. That is still structure. "Consciousness" must disappear. Not the fact of being aware of yourself, but being aware that you are aware of yourself. Only being without structure should remain. So what you are is obvious. After that, in a normal state, it's more or less easy to see the true nature of reality in everything. If you're being chased by a pack of killer dogs, it's more difficult at that moment, but without that kind of thing, it's easy. After that opening, if it happens many times, your experience turns like present, not a timeline but like a expanded presence. It's like the fact of being is in the first plane and the fact of what you are in second plane. It's not false or illusion, it's secondary (until the dogs appear). Then you perceive yourself without friction, and you get aware of the depth of this human reality, the perfection of this happening. Not perfection as you like working as slave but the fact of being in this form, the reality brights like something alive.

Who is generating the realities?

Sure but there are still rats with rat consciousness. You could realize that being is unlimited, but this doesn't means that you as a form is the only form that exist.

Yes but you are conscious of being a person, not a rat. Where is the consciousness of being a rat? Out of your consciousness, right? Then there is consciousness out of your field of consciousness

@phillyvx Your life is entirely real, obviously. You are reality unfolding in a form or dimension of enormous complexity and depth. But at the same time, we are default prisoners of the human matrix. We are evolutionarily programmed to be part of the tribal group. This is as important as the fact of living. This group has become a shifting human matrix where relationships aren't deep and true, they're transactional, and the people we interact with live in a world of confusion, seeking balance as best they can. It's a very complex situation that leads to an emotionally unbalanced life. It's essential to delve into your own subconscious and understand what drives you, to confront yourself and free yourself from the chains you've created. These chains are solid; they are based on evolutionary mechanisms of enormous power. It's very difficult to see them because they are part of you. But if you don't, life becomes hell, unless you're foolish enough to numb yourself with what society offers you. About believing people who present a description of how reality is, well.... better thinking that no one is above you, listening as inspiration is good, but believing is a mistake. Means that you are a believer. Why you believe this and not that? Because it resonates with you, but that doesn't mean that it's true. Only you can see the truth, ant the truth is absolutely simple, direct. Then, after that absolute truth that is absolutely simple, we can make opinions and analysis as accurate as we can, but no one is absolutely true, the only absolute truth is that you are. This seems like obvious, but if you open yourself totally to it, you will see that this implies everything.

Your conscious is infinite? I'd say that no, then where are all the other conscious possiblities?