Breakingthewall

I used the translator, sometimes I write by myself and others when the topic is complex I use the Google translator, anyway I improved a lot in English those years There is one awakening, the breaking of the barriers and the openess to your unlimited nature. But are degrees of dissolution of the barriers, you can't live all time without any structure

I believe the matter of consciousness can be cleanly defined. Consciousness is reality structured in a specific way, a structure that reality takes on when life occurs. Life is essentially a self-preserving process that carves out its own rules by building a buffer against the "external" universe. When biological complexity crosses a certain threshold, an interface emerges. This interface acts as a dynamic model of information exchange between the organism and its environment. Within that model, an unchanging reference point appears, the witness, flanked by memory and prediction. This entire cloud of integrated processes is what we call consciousness. Its ultimate nature is still reality, but operating in a specialized mode: reality experiencing itself through the prism of a relative subject.

The truth is absolutely simple: you are the reality. That's it, there is no further truth to know. Not "all" of reality, or "part" of reality. You are reality, period. What is not so simple is opening yourself up to what you are; that is quite difficult, because by default you are closed. Your system is designed to focus on survival, social interaction, validation, projection, and the compartmentalization of reality into categories. That is how the human mind works, so to open yourself up to your total nature, you must deactivate all that programming at will. Every line of that program carries an energetic charge; that emotional charge is what makes the programming functional and real. You have to be capable of making a structural movement in which all that charge is nullified or greatly diminished. To do this, you must have looked directly at that entire emotional fortress and merged with it: the essential fear of disappearing, of not being yourself, of being rejected by others, of suffering and death. You have to open yourself up to the absolute nihilism of death, and by doing so, life will open up within you. Then there will no longer be death, because you are life. You are not someone who lives, but rather life appearing as someone, and your depth and extension are total, you have no limits, and your nature is absolute potentiality, which is to say, life, absolute being.

Why? Who says that, or who knows that and in basis of what? Trees are there and that's it, who cares if they are in the category "hallucination" or "real"? Where is the difference? Only inside of your valorative scale. Why? Who generates them for that reason? Thoughts are an expression of the reality and that's it. Who has to watch them and drop them? Anyone separated from the thoughts? Thoughts are the expression of what you are, of your energetic structure. You can't ignore the thoughts because what you are is vibrating in the form of those thoughs, you are the thoughts, you can't ignore yourself, you can't split yourself in two. The only real thing you could do is see yourself without filter, see your emotional structure and be it, see your inner fear and your inner closure and open it. When you open yourself to the unlimited again and again, in some point you are open to the unlimited most of time and the frequency of your thoughts changes We are still human, I don't want to be abused, being sick or enclosed alone in a room for years, I prefer a than b, and suffering is always a possibility, that's human nature. You could see that what you ultimately are is the unlimited that is everything, but I prefer a life aligned with my human programming, with freedom, love, connection, than being a slave for example.

Thoughts are the consequence of your structure, you can't change your structure changing your thoughts, or at least for me doesn't work

Just because I read part this book and others and I only got confusion. In my opinion if anyone want to talk about spirituality, they should be absolutely true without the slightest deviation, absolutely straight to the point without a single word that points to any mistake. If not they are introducing in the people's mind barriers.

Yeah because reading them you could see what is inside them. But if I could choose to know any teacher in deep, I would choose sadhguru without doubt. I bet that he's a real evil narcissist, but sometimes listening him seems that he's a kinda of genius, or really enlightened. He's an enigma that id like to solve.

And why they are here and what anything means? Ultimately there is no reason, no meaning, any reason or meaning are relative. That's the problem of ACIM, that reveals knowledge like that you are here for experiencing love or anything, when you are here because you are, and this form is a possibility that is possible now. Real enlightenment is being open to what you ultimately are, to the unlimited that is. If you create a structure in your mind that is: I'm loved and I'm here for x, you are creating a closure. No structure is the only way to let the absolute shinning in the now. Any structure is a door, no door is small, any door closes, openess means total absence of closure. You could say that this is humility, since you have to abandon any belief, any hope, to open the door of your mind to the unlimited vastness that is.

Unlimited means without dimensions, it's not something that you can imagine or remember, it is what reality is, you can be open to it or not. About god, if you reach god consciousness, this consciousness would be a mode of the reality right? A frequency that this experience takes. How could you differerence from an hallucination?

Maybe you are right, but I can't see how anything could be higher than unlimited

By absolute emptiness I do not mean nothingness, but rather the point where structures lose their power. This means that boundaries disappear, there is no differentiation, and this exact moment reveals itself as total reality. When barriers vanish, what is revealed is not emptiness, but the absolute power of limitless potential. Here, there is nothing left to explore or know because it is already the totality; it is completely obvious, and any "more" would just be a boundary. For example, understanding how or why reality is created would mean stepping back into structured reality. Relative reality appears because it is possible; any other explanation is secondary, structural, and contingent. The matter of enlightenment is opening yourself up to your absolute nature, it is not something you can advance further in; it is either total, or it is not.

There are two different paths: one is construction, the other is destruction. The first one never ends, you can keep elaborating and structuring to infinity; the second one does have an end, which is absolute emptiness. When we say emptiness, we mean empty of structure, not empty of existence, since that doesn't exist. If you reach total emptiness of structure, you will reach total openness. In total openness you will be one with the limitless; you will be the limitless knowing that it is. Not as a metaphor or something that is intuited, but completely, absolutely clear. And there is no more, because "more" makes no sense if there are no limits. That's it, game over, any "more" will always be "less," in the sense that it will be a structure appearing within the limitless, and it makes no difference whether it's an intergalactic god or a piece of shit in your mouth; they are structures, period. From an ontological perspective there is no evolution or levels; there is the totality, and the relative, period.

Is there a process or not? Nobody is processing because you are the process. The knower is a process, there is no difference between the Knower or the process that implies knowing. Look, what is happening is a process, same than anything that happens, and that happening is the self. It's not an illusion, it's just the reality happening in self mode. Denying it is a closure, and the real point is openess to the unlimited, because ultimately you are that.

I read let's say 1/4 of the book when I started to be interested in spirituality, I got impressed, very profound and that, but always that feeling of closure, I didn't know why, but now I know, it's because it's paradigm is dividing the reality between true and false. That's a mistake, nothing is false, what happens is closure, it's very different. You inflict misery to yourself in the same way that you inflict pain to yourself if you are burned. It's how you are built. There is not wrong in suffering, suffering is human, is part of our nature. What is extremely alien and sad is being closed to the source, to the unlimited, but that happens due fear and in great stent due stupidity, because you choose closure again and again in order to fit in society. You do that because you can't understand what you are doing, because you are.... stupid. All us are in greater or lesser extent. Some keep a spark of understanding, others nothing, they are blind. You don't need to choose love and all that, you have to choose openess, giving yourself to the reality, breaking the separation. It's extremely simple, you don't need 1000 pages to understand it, you have to do it. Well, just my vision

The matter of being seems banal, but it is not; being emptied of everything is one facet, the reality is and is not. What is not, does not exist, yet it is nonetheless real. It is absolute potential, and being open to it is not about knowing that absolute potential exists, but about perceiving living reality, your ultimate nature. They called it tao, seems a good term.

Reality manifests as existence, and existence is relative and dynamic. What exists does so in relation to another. But reality is not existence; rather, existence is how reality appears. Reality is something else, it is a step back from existence, you could say that it is limitlessness. One could say that limitlessness and being are synonymous, because the limitless is, since nothing restricts it, but they are two different aspects. Being is affirmative, immutable, brilliant. Reality is profound, in fact it is unfathomable depth. Opening yourself up to the unfathomable is terrifying because it is confused with death and emptiness, but it is the source of life. In the unfathomable lies what lives, or rather, the unfathomable lives, and when life opens up to itself, that is when the prodigal son returns after his pilgrimage through the dead desert. Clean, pure, brilliant being, Sat-Chit-Ananda, is still closed, since it is only a verb, an action, the fact of being. Beyond being, the unfathomable emptiness opens up; it is the essence, the totality, life. Every human has access within themselves to the living source, indescribable. Totally impossible to put into words. Being can be spoken of, structured, understood. The source cannot, you can be open to it. that means don't blocking it, don't blocking the total perception of yourself.

Maybe someone read what i wrote and think: wtf, it's absolutely obvious, how could I ve been lost in those bullshit when here and now the absolute is being in all it's depth and life, and it's meaningless because "meaning" is just a form that appears, forms that flow in the fluid dance of forms. now I feel it's vitality, it's power, it brilliance, my mind and my heart are totally open to this unfathomable depth that lives, I'm one with it, in fact I am that. Who needs to read invented histories and believe them? That's crazy, the absolute is, that's all

The truth is the truth. There is no relative truth, it's absolute. All the histories are just histories, confusion. Spread that confusion an making people lost in them is just shit, in my humble opinion.

ACIM seems to me like the biggest bullshit in all of spirituality. It's a text aimed at the subconscious mind that is desperate for security, for a higher power that loves it and takes care of it like a mother cares for a child, and also for a mission, a purpose for reality, which is "bad" right now but will be "good" later. It’s an all-out assault on the waterline of the human psyche that feels loneliness, isolation, and fear. Zero enlightenment, totally a scam. Enlightenment is total openness to the now, and there aren't a thousand pages of made-up stories or exercises for the naive; there is the total now, and period! No fathers, sons, and the fucking Holy Spirit!!!! Are we out of our minds? It's a psychotic, paranoid book, like all religions. They are psychotic episodes put into writing. Human beings love psychosis. Being enlightened is absolute emptiness regarding story, and total fullness regarding life. Forget that nonsense for the mentally ill and open your mind and your heart to this moment. Period, nothing more.

Yes for me it's like a mission, if I can't show him his mistake my others interdimensional self are going to get non dualistic robots repeating that the self in a illusion for all the eternity, it's essential to succeed, but seems impossible

Well, who knows, perhaps right now we are living in a multidimensional reality, in exactly 723 simultaneous dimensions, and in 200 of them right now you are getting hit on the penis with a hammer every time you say "nothing matters" in the current dimension. An interdimensional demon is giving it to you and right after says to you: "It doesn't matter, right? Well, let me give you another hammer blow." All your others interdimensional self are just now screaming: stop! Everything matters! Pleas!!! But you can't listen them because your mind is absolutely trapped about that invented paradigm that you chose to feel emotionaly stable. Poor interdimensional selfs, I'm trying to help them but it's useless.

It's quite easy to explain reality through basic logic. First, existence does not arise; it exists. Arising implies a timeline and causality, and both are possibilities of existence, not higher parameters to which existence is subject. The only thing you can say about existence is that it exists or that it's limitless, both are synonyms; anything else is an aspect of reality, not its foundation. The only cause that can be inferred to explain the absolute fact of being is the absence of limits, and this is not something, but the lack of something. Any possible limit would exist, so it would be something inside existence, not outside. Nothing is external to the absolute fact of being, since non-being is not. Regarding whether existence is valuable, "valuable" is an evaluation that occurs within existence, so it cannot define the absolute, it is completely meaningless at that level. This entire logical system is essential to avoid trapping the mind in local paradigms that would prevent true openness to the absolute.

McKenna is absolutely wrong, enlightenment is not knowing that everything is an illusion, is being open to the absolute light of the limitlessness, it's a reality not a realization, is being what you ultimately are, what reality ultimately is, and it's power and it's life is total. The fact of being is absolutely affirmative, just because it is, and that implies everything. McKenna said that was so surprised about the absence of the philosophers, the teachers, the world. He can't see that the philosophers or a "mystical" state are the same, the absolute fact of being happening, and knowing that worths zero, being open to it worths everything, it's the absolute alive and you are that. He believes that knowing reality is an illusion removes him from the shell of the ego, but the category of illusion is a categorization of the ego. Enlightenment is being open to the total light that implies the absence of limits, to the source from which universes and dimensions emanate, which dances in the creation of forms because it has no limits and there is no alternative: it is, and being implies appearing. And that being has no restriction; it is absolute power, life, the perfectly synchronous relationship that creates dimensions, creation and death. A entire universe is the same than a thought, both are the absolute, both are unfathomable and alive. McKenna is closed to the life because he's prisoner of the categorization.

The ego is a structure that exists, and it's foundation are billions of years of evolution. Spirituality denie the reality of the ego and doing so closes the door. Any need of validation comes from the absolute need of acceptance in the herd, built in billions of generations. If you don't understand the strengtht of this structure, you are trapped. Nothing is false from a broad perspective, everything that exists is absolutely true by the fact of existing. Could be a closure but not a falsehood. The fear of being not enough is absolutely real, it's programmed by life from when we were rats. Spirituality would tell you: what the ego says is false, the truth is that you are loved and accepted. Then you are in a tribe and your ego screams: be worthy or you will be expelled to the darkness, the cold and lonely death. Then any non dualistic comes and says that this is an illusion, that there is no death, you are imagining everything. If you think about it closely, it's so absurd that's funny.

Imo it's better forget if things are good or bad and fight with everything. This game is not a joke, there is no place for too many mistakes, there is only one wise direction and is the one of openess, anything else is madness. Human mind is a dense labyrinth of molasses. If your actions and your focus do not constantly tend toward clarity, you will end up like a fly in honey, trapping yourself further while believing you are freeing yourself.