Breakingthewall

All of that may be true, but masculinity is the pioneer, the one that breaks down the boundaries of the impossible, the one that conquers reality. What would become of humans without that drive? No one is superior, both are complementary

Bibi's biggest mistake was Operation Epic ridicule. It's true that the destruction of Gaza has generated a growing anti-Israeli sentiment, but even so, many people thought that Israel had the right to defend itself, that its position surrounded by mortal enemies required toughness. Everything's fine until you start the epic ridiculous operation that is going to put all the American public against Israel, because the Americans don't like losers, and they like less being losers. Netanyahu should find a cherry blossom tree, write one last poem, and commit seppuku, with Ben Hvir as his assistant. Then let's see what happens with Israel. The position of Israel now seems worse than ever

All of these are stable processes that occur in reality. The universe is a process; everything is a process. Processes occur because there are no limits, so what is possible appears, combines, stabilizes, and then disappears. Absolute intelligence is the impossibility of incoherence. Reality is absolutely perfect in the sense that what is not perfectly synchronized does not exist. There is no one directing the spectacle; God is not creating; it is creation itself that creates itself, emerging from the source, which is the absence of limits. The absolute is a well of unfathomable depth, which, having no limits, is. And we are that. Being open to it is scary, but when you get used it's absolute freedom

Imagine God appears and gives you a choice: your penis will be sliced thinly with a bologna slicer, then you will eat it, and then you'll be slowly roasted on a grill with your whole family. Or, option B, you can go to the cinema and then have dinner at a nice restaurant. Which option would you choose? If the answer is: "I don't care," then yes, you don't have a self and nothing matters.

If I were you I would let go all those beliefs. Are just walls.

Really you don't realize that all that is absolutely illogical, it's a speech that sounds poetic for you and make you feel like in contact with the divinity, but it's absolutely meaningless. When you say that consciousness is what encompasses all action you are antrophormize the reality. The reality is not consciousness, it's conscious of itself thorough you, and you are the reality happening. You could try to absolutely empty your mind every day, without those ideas about consciousness, then you could do a high dose of psychedelic, when your mind is absolutely empty, not before. If not, you would imagine that those ideas are true just by suggestion.

I'm repeating this to try and make you see that those neo-Advaita ideas are complete nonsense, but it seems impossible since that's your religion, which serves as your emotional regulator and anchor. Even so, I find the conversation interesting because it helps me understand the psychology of spiritual people. At least you don't believe that you are god hidden playing a game

That you realize that you are god, who is bored in eternity and dreamed the human for love? Are you absolutely sure of that right? Because a couple of times you had that intuition. That's good.

Why do you think that anything that can be destroyed is false? That's just a spiritual idea, to emphasize the idea that you are "pure consciousness" that can't be destroyed. It's totally meaningless, just confusing ideas to make people feel that there is a mystery that some choosen people can see.

You also could destroy your eyes and get blind and they are not false. Btw, you never destroy your self image, you transcend it. Or in some cases you could do spiritual bypassing and change your self image for another where you are "pure consciousness". Some people gets happy with this, in some extent.

Duality is the reality being conscious of itself. Without duality the reality is not conscious of itself. The reality is not an individual, don't need to be conscious to be, it's just the ego that needs antrophormize the reality as a god with a will to create things with a purpose. "Consciousness" is just an action, not a foundation. I know that all the non dualistic believe in consciousness. It's better believing in baby Jesus believe me. At least it's a possibility. "Consciousness" that dreams is not, it can be accepted only by people who can't think properly, like the non dualistic neo advaita

Another, simpler version: what we call life is a self-preserving and limited structure of the external world that creates its own internal legal framework without contradicting the laws of the universe. This self-preservation is evolutionary; only that which tends toward self-preservation endures. All life forms are based on this tendency. The ego is a system based on this tendency and on the evolutionary and reproductive drive. The self-image is not false. It is real that there is a body and that it can be destroyed. The ego can be transcended in the sense that the conscious individual becomes aware of their total nature, but without denying their limited nature as a transient form. Why to make mess with consciousness and illusions? That's spirituality don't free anyone, put them inside or a mental frame of confusion believing that they are "pure consciousness" , and as people want to believe that they can't die, they will accept anything.

I understand perfectly consciousness, it's very simple: it's what appears when reality is structured in a dual mode, like life and universe, one but separated. Consciousness is just the perception that the process that we call life develops in its evolution. The point is understanding reality, not consciousness. Consciousness is reality looking itself, nothing else

That's true, the door that closes is the self, with all its emotional density focused on self-image and trauma. Clearing this density is essential to having a life that is something other than constant suffering. Regarding the matter of total openness to what is, I suppose there are degrees. I don't know to what extent it's possible; I'd like to find out.

That's the typical Buddhist paradigm. They consider attachment and desire an illusion, therefore they work hundreds or thousands of hours erasing attachment and desire. In this way, they achieve a tranquil state. And they call that enlightenment. Well, it isn't. Enlightenment is opening to the living source, not the quiet peace of a 78-year-old retiree. Quiet peace is better than having OCD, but it's not enlightenment. Consider desire and attachment an illusion is just a human idea, like consider sex impure or poverty a shit. Enlightenment is not about those preferences. You could say that a quiet mind can be a previous condition for enlightenment, but not that a quiet mind is enlightenment . Also it's possible a mind with desire and attachment that is open in some moments and circumstances to the absolute. And very possible a quiet mind that never can be open to the source

If God is infinite it has no preference because it's precisely everything right? Then it's not creating anything with an intention because any intention would imply preference. Then this god wouldn't be an entity with a will, but the unlimited that is and being it's manifested in unlimited possibilities happening. Then , the unlimited that is is not "one", it's unlimited. That's why they call non duality instead oneness, because it's not two, but neither one, it's unlimited

What you are saying is absolutely wrong, it's a delusional view that is very common, I also had it many times with psychedelics. It's a stage in the dissolution of the density of the self. It has a name in meditation, Im going to search any link. This one for example. Look, what you are talking about is a creation of the mind. Don't get stuck in it

This is as far of real enlightenment as can be. It's just a belief that you get by watching gurus and that now you really believe that it's the truth. It's very obvious reading you that your ego is very dense. It's not that you still have work to do, it's that you haven't started yet

Yes I'm talking about myself, but what I am is not a mind, it's the absolute unlimited expressed now as a human I didn't create nothing, existence arises in the unlimited because it's unlimited, and what I am now is a local process that expresses the unlimited now, but I'm not the only local process because what I am, the unlimited, is expressed in unlimited forms. They also use to ask money, and some times that you suck his dick. It's up to you to accept it or not

Seems absolutely sure that there are always form, because the lapse between 2 forms in not a lapse, doesn't exist. existing means form, and form means process, relative change. What you could ask is: is the unlimited the same unlimited without existing? Is the nothing same absolute than the something? I'd say yes. The unlimited is absolute depth, and manifestation is just inevitable consequence of the fact of limitlessness

It's you, the human, who is an expression of the unlimited, who recognizes itself as the unlimited expressed in a local process. But this doesn't mean that in one side is the unlimited and in other the human seeing it, both are one.

Human mind can become unlimited and then be one with the unlimited. Then the unlimited recognizes itself, it's precisely you, but without limits

Reality is not a mind, if it were a mind then if would be alone, because a mind implies a center that elaborates. Reality is unlimited. Reality and unlimited are synonyms.

That seem a total dissolution. Could you explain how was more deeply? For me not so. The barriers are very subtle. Maybe a barrier could be implying some things about the reality due other trips or realizations that are accepted by the unconscious as ontological Truth. For me totally dissolving the mind make me see how the mental structures close and how difficult is being totally free of them . Im achieving little by little that my mind be a hole, without psyche. Just openess. It's not repressing the psyche but dissolving it. Sometimes the psyche arises of course, but not like something that drag me totally in the need of belonging, bonds, success, "glory", and over all trauma, as was the usual. Now my mind is empty, I can do any psychedelic and trauma doesn't arises even a bit. 2 years ago mind was still full of hate. Real hate for some parts of my family, in a level that I was worried about getting sick. I honestly thought that would be impossible to be free of that, and I am totally free of that, it's absolutely deactivated. Maybe it's possible to be totally free and open now, totally aligned and transparent. I don't know what is possible. I agree that it's essential to be as free as it's possible when death arrives. Not only for the suffering but let's say, for respect to myself and life as an expression of the reality that has this possiblity I think that it's a matter of lets say energetic alignment. Purifying your psychological structure until it's totally transparent, without density. It's not a matter of be good or puritan, but about your inner structures that creates a self image that need belonging, acceptation, permanece, and fear annihilation and lack of control. This seems very obvious but it's difficult, those structures are deep and strong

The main factor that makes real meditation impossible is the need for self-definition, for identification. This need is inherent to the human being; it is a mechanism of social cohesion that allows the group to function as a single entity. Real meditation is not achieved through techniques, but through stepping out of the psychological matrix of identity. The real work is not in the practice of meditation, but in self-exposure, coherence, and integrity. Loyalty to yourself as absolute value. When the psychological axis shifts from the need for self-definition and validation to integrity and transparency, the mind becomes silent. Only then does meditation make sense, as one gains access to the primordial layers of the psyche: the drive for permanence, the fear of harm and disappearance, the need for control and other bases of the human psyche Directly perceiving these underlying patterns is what eventually allows the psyche to open. “Openness” means the absence of limits. Limits define, and create a sense of control and security. The absence of limits is initially terrifying, unsustainable for more than a few seconds. The system automatically contracts again. Anyone seeking liberation must seek this rupture. At some point, it becomes more tolerable, until it is perceived as freedom. Identity is then replaced by effortless openness, as it is revealed to be a mental process. not false, but not fundamental, not absolute. Openness is not an “open mind,” but the fact of being perceiving itself without mental limitations. It is something simple and, at the same time, complete. Not definable because there are not limits. This is the state where life becomes beauty, perception becomes deep and the heart becomes open.