Breakingthewall

If a Muslim government collaborates with the West, as Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, and Morocco do, it's not so dramatic, is it? What is the need for people like Saddam, the ayatollahs, or Gaddafi to constantly challenge power? Perhaps they seek the freedom of their people against the evil aggressor? Or could it be that they can't sleep thinking about the Palestinians they are expelling from their lands? Perhaps, but it seems more like something else. Since they are dictators who have seized power by force and subjugate their people by carrying out massacres at the slightest sign of political opposition, anti-American rhetoric makes them appear as noble Davids facing the avaricious, hook-nosed Goliath, and thus their people, who have the mental development of an 11-year-old, love them and see them as legitimate. Sure, Gaddafi was in his right trying do displace the us dollar creating the dirham gold. And maybe Saddam was right launching scuds to Israel and invading Kuwait, but the point is that you frontally challenge the power, then what do you expect? Hugs? Or maybe that they say: oh well, it's their right, we are evil Jews and we should let them displace the dollar, because it's fair and our hearts are pure and noble, so justice is first, or interest is second, we are the Knights of the Round Table defending orphans. Well, it seems the world doesn't work that way. Knowing it, declaring that Israel must disappear of the map and burning American flags every day seems good to fool fools, but bad for feed your people

Why would do it? To laugh while petting cats? In other hand, it seems very convenient for the Iranians to show the evilness of the demons. A school of little girls. Sure. Well, not sure, just 99% sure

Who believes that nonsense about the girls? The Iranians say that to smear the Israelis, and the newspapers repeat it like parrots because that's what people want to hear.

Tell a 15 year old guy with brain cancer what God can and cannot do in the Middle East. Life is dance of Kali and we should open our hearts to destruction, because it's glorious, same than creation.

I think It's not a good idea because the word "God" evokes a creator. In the absence of limits, there can be no creator; there is only flow. A creator would be an absolute limit. The idea is dissolving the limits, not creating them. Without limits there is no center, not agency, just reality. Then you could say what I am is the reality.

Listening is interesting; it's about understanding from where the other person is expressing. They usually speak from a place of affirmation of identity, which is extremely boring, since conversation becomes a feedback loop. If you're not playing that game, it becomes flat. There are other people who speak from their own truth, but to do so, they need to be in touch with it and not be like a constructing device identity. Usually humans use a huge part of their processing capacity to build identity, then the most usual is finding people that apparently are talking to you but really are talking with themselves

Don't forget that the holy ayatollah, in addition to resisting the evil Jews, also massacred Sunnis in Syria to spread Shiism, and promoted violence in all middle east against sunnis The problem with your Fremen is that they need the Harkonnens, and if there aren't any, they'll find them. Violence is their basis of legitimacy. What is Iran's regime without their mortal enemies? They need them, because without them, they are dispensable, unnecessary. They fuel hate rhetoric to perpetuate their power, because it's their identity. The problem is that then this happens, and everything are complains and victimhood. Why if they would focused in the prosperity of their nation instead of feeding hate? But that's a mess, so difficult. Much more easy yelling america Satan and do nothing productive

The point is that whoever takes power shouldn't be an absolute enemy of the US and Israel, as Iran has been for 47 years. I don't think Trump decided this; he knows nothing about politics. The real power in the US decides, and he obeys. If Iran is achieved that is not hostile to the US, even subservient behind the scenes, the benefit for the US would be enormous: control of oil. China is unstoppable, and no one doubts it, but the US wants to prolong its hegemony as much as possible, which translates into wealth, and they know that China will have to swallow this pill because China is playing a game of patience in which balance is essential.

You're not being ironic? 😅 I'm glad it resonates. I try to remove the personal or emotional aspect from the equation to understand as clearly as possible how politics works, which is an expression of how human beings work. It's fascinating to see how highly functional, complex structures form using individuals driven by basic passions as their raw material; how these individuals connect like processors to energize the political entity, how the entity provides them with the identity they need, and how the entities relate to one another. All these related entities create the necessary tension for the system to be dynamic and progress exponentially toward brutal levels of complexity. It's the same as the evolution of biological life on another scale; reality seeking coherent patterns of complexity as far as possible.

Going crazy is basically lying to yourself to adapt reality to your emotional needs. At a high degree, you're schizophrenic; at a lower degree, you're like most people. Sanity is eliminating your emotional need of the equation, which clouds your vision, thus restoring clarity.

The US and Israel have recognized this moment as their last chance to neutralize Iran, as its alliance with China and Russia grows increasingly solid and open. If they don't attack now, in a few years Iran will be far better armed, Russia might be in a position to provide direct support, unlike now, when it's preoccupied with Ukraine, and China could supply state-of-the-art weaponry and satellite support. Israel cannot allow this; it's an existential threat, and the US would be severely harmed by a strong Iran dominating the Middle East. It's now or never for both, and they won't stop until the Iranian regime falls. Is it fair or unfair? That's irrelevant; it's strategic. We'll see what Iran's capacity to respond is, but knowing that the US and Israel are gambling with their future, the outcome is inevitable. Iran can block the Strait of Hormuz, but by doing so, it will harm China, its essential ally, the most. China will be harmed if the Iranian regime falls, but it will be harmed even more if there is a long war and economic collapse, since China doesn't want power but economic development. The fall of the ayatollahs will only be a minor setback, insignificant in their 40-year plans; therefore, logically, China would want a quick end to the conflict. It will protest vehemently and do nothing. We'll see what Iran can do. Perhaps more than it seems, perhaps it is much weaker than we think. The best thing for the world is for it to fall as soon as possible.

It's simple. There are people who are left-wing and anti-American, so for them, the US and Israel are always evil incarnate, no matter what. Then there are other people who are right-wing, and for them, Muslims are evil demons and the US and Israel are the forces of good, no matter what. It's like in Lord of the Rings: Sauron is bad, Gandalf is good. It's simple! They are simple people and they like everything to be simple; that's how they feel safe. In this forum, they lean more to the left because spiritual people tend to be more left-wing, so they support the Palestinians against Israel. It's like supporting a football team, a matter of identity. It's funny because they think they're analyzing reality when what they're really doing is trying to reinforce their identity, but they can't see it because are emotional, that's why they need to reinforce their identity. Its like a circle of, let's say, not objectivity, to be kind

That's true, but it's funny the fact that no one mentions Chinese oppression of the Uyghurs, who number 30 million and have been Muslim since the 16th century. China is systematically erasing their identity following a clear and well-defined program, and is declaring Islam a mental illness. The entire Islamic world hates Jews for the abuses they have committed again Palestinian, but no one in the Muslim world says anything about China, which is erasing a Muslim nation from the history. Isn't that interesting?

Yes, People turn to spirituality because things have been difficult for them; they haven't been able to adapt, succeed in relationships and careers, they're depressed, and they see spirituality and enlightenment as a way to overcome all that with an affordable work. Then they convince themselves that they are consciousness ,enlightened, whatever that implies "better than the normies", and thus their ego is at ease.

Agree with that. To begin serious spiritual work, you need to be consistent, focused, and have great clarity in your worldly life. But usually, the opposite happens: since your worldly life is a mess, you throw yourself into spirituality, and then, well, you know how it goes.

The war was decided before negotiations even began, before the protests in Iran started. The question here is what China will do. Most likely, it won't do anything; nobody wants a large-scale conflict. There's much more to lose than to gain. If I had to bet, I'd say the Iranian regime will collapse soon, but who knows, maybe things will turn out differently.

Maybe that idea about reincarnation is true, but maybe it isn't. We don't know the structure of reality.

Many millions people suffer, live in misery, are condemned to prisons, suffer terrible diseases, see their children die, are raped in childhood, enslaved, etc., ever since humankind has existed, and it doesn't seem that leads them to any liberation

It's not easy, the self is not an illusion, it's a construction that happens, a structure that the reality takes, then it wont disappear at will. What would happen is that it will take another form, like I'm consciousness, god, anything.

Man, no one on this world can be so elevated, sumple and pure as you, be kind with those boys, as Buddha of Jesus, they try their best, in his low level, don't be so hard oh master😂

Anyway,.islam has great mystics. The best in my opinion is al hallah, I am the truth. True, he was tortured and executed by the Muslims, but same time they kept his words without apparently distortion. Christianity after Saint Augustine wouldn't have done it; they would have erased the words of a heretic. Christianity, after the Council of Hippo, became the most terrifying system of thought in history, when they include original sin and eternal hell.

Young girls like 14, no kids like 9. Julius Caesar or even Genghis Khan, a great fucker, didn't have sex with kids, they had with young girls, no kids. 9 is a kid, Aisha played with puppets , it's written. No, it wasn't. Having sex with 9 years old kids wasn't common, it's something special. Btw, in Irak the Parliament approved a law that allows marriages with 9 years old girls , in 2025. They do because Muhammad did, and Muhammad is perfect according islam, then if he did, it's good Then as he said that, it's good to do it? The Aztecs ripped hearts to avoid the sun devour earth, and that doesn't mean that we should do it now. Agree, in that time was progress, nowadays is regression I never did that. What I said is that if you put yourself in the Israeli mind,and you are surrounded of enemies who wants your destruction, and they do the massacre of October, you have to answer very strongly or disappear. If I were Israeli, I would emigrate and never return to that place of hate. But you can't assume that all the israelíes will do the same, you have to understand that some will choose to fight

@Schahin you are so emotional, with so strong adjectives. I didn't support any genocide, as I told you it tried to put myself in the Palestinian pov, then in the israeli pov. When I talked with Palestinian supporters I talked as Israeli supporter, when I talked with Israeli supporter I talked as Palestinian. Just to try to make a perspective about that difficult matter. Anyway, I exposed some points about Islam. Are they lies? Do you support that the prophet had sex with a 9 years old girl when he was 54 and he had another 3 wifes, for example? Or that making design of human or animal figures will send you to hell. Just those examples.

Because in a framework, or better a no framework, without limits, possible fluctuations or changes of state overlap and remain stable if they are absolutely coherent with each other, and if they are not, they do not occur. For example, an atom fluctuates at the electromagnetic level 10 rised to 15 times per second, at the nuclear level 10 rised to 20 times, and at the (hypothetical) level of the quantum vacuum 10 rised to 43 times every second. A proton, for example, is stable (it is assumed) for 10 rised to 31 years. Seems a very perfect design furthermore, considering the possible combinations of these elementary particles. In physics, exist=interact. Something that doesn't interact with something else doesn't exist, it's just a possibility that is not. Then, anything that is not coherent with anything else, is not. You could say thay the universe could be completely chaotic, but it could be said that it was absolutely chaotic at the moment of the Big Bang, and it automatically finds the most coherent possibilities for relative limits to exist without absolute closure, since absolute closure would be ontologically impossible given an unlimited essence. A kind of self-selection of the most coherent by overcoming the less coherent

What you're talking about is a moment of opening to the total. The total is nothing defined, it's not form, but it encompasses everything. The point is, first, to understand what this experience entails, and second, to be able to access it in your ordinary life, so that, third, you can see the total in all forms. This is what they call enlightenment. First, when you say that you realized that reality is infinite consciousness, this is a mistake. The words "consciousness" and "infinite" are superfluous. What happened is that all form dissolved, and the conscious being that you are became aware of what it is, of its essence or substance. What you are is unlimited being. Being is not the same as consciousness, and unlimited is not the same as infinite. Numbers are infinite; they continue infinitely and never end. Unlimited is without dimension. It is neither large nor small; large, small, and infinite, are facets that can occur within it. It is not consciousness itself, but rather consciousness can occur within it when it splits in two, as is the case with your perceiving. You are an expression of being made form that perceives being made form, and that can dissolve all form until you are being reflected in being. Absolute or unlimited being has a positive, or rather, affirmative quality: it is. What is has no opposite, and it has no limits. It is equivalent to the absence of limits inherent in reality, which, being unlimited, simply is. Being expresses itself in unlimited forms, unlimited dimensions, and coherent possibilities that link together and, to put it poetically, dance with each other in the dance of relationships, since every form is relative to another, is in contrast to another form. It is possible to access the totality, as in your dream, in your daily life. The totality erases the psychological, since your psyche shifts from operating within a closed, self-reflective framework to doing so within an open one. Your inner landscape transforms from opposing forms to a living, bottomless depth. Living because it is. Then you recognize yourself as what is, and form becomes secondary, an expression of your nature. You see that death is the end of form, and the continuity of the self is irrelevant since the self is irrelevant. Being is, and form is its expression now. The ego dissolves, and total vastness manifests and remains as the perceived substance of what you are.