Breakingthewall

No, there are two triangles formed by 3 pack man and 3 v.

It depends of the use. For me, they were fundamental at a time when I was dealing with deep emotional blockages that were impossible for me to understand or dismantle on my own. Without 5-MeO-DMT, LSD, thc and mushrooms, I wouldn't have been able to grasp what those blockages were or how they were keeping me trapped. I don't use any psychedelics now. Well sometimes a single puff of weed or 5ug of LSD

It’s the same thing the Apaches and those used to be. if you perceive other tribes as an existential threat, you take pleasure in torturing them. they might have been excellent fathers and all that, but when it came to the Sioux, they were murderous psychopaths, because the tribes were at war. They perceived that only one can survive.

What does "being aware" mean? What does "I" mean? The fact of being aware is not "someone"; it is a self-reflective structure that occurs within the flow of forms. Ultimately, the one who is aware is reality itself, and it is aware of reality itself. The specific local structure is transient, but the fact that a self-reflective structure is possible is permanent. That possibility will always exist. You, I, a rat, or your cats are different configurations of the fact of self-reflection. The self created within those structures has various possible configurations, yet it remains an seemingly unchanging subject that registers a changing process of becoming. Subject and object are the same reality; it is the structure that creates consciousness. Yet this does not mean it is not real; the fact of being aware of being does occur. Who is aware and the object of awareness are the same: the absolute fact of being manifested as the fact of being aware of itself.

The idea of yesterday is real, as an idea. It's a cloud of processes that is happening now. Yesterday happened or not? It's irrelevant, now the idea of yesterday is happening, and it's real. Absolute being means that being is absolute, not that there is a being who is absolute. Then, choose, relative perspective or absolute? Relative: yesterday happened, and now I'm remembering it. Is it an hallucination that any god is inventing? I don't think so, but even it is, there was a previous cause, a "yesterday", so there is causality and past. Absolute: the idea of yesterday is. Hallucination or reality is meaningless, the content is irrelevant, now the reality is, and that's everything. Remove all form, open yourself to the fact of being, then you will see your true face.

Good image, expresses the intention of scam very naive people introducing into their minds ideas that will make their life a disaster, leading them down the path of narcissism. I mean, manifestation is real in a sense: if you create the most favorable internal and external conditions for what you desire to come about, the odds increase exponentially. But that isn't going to happen just by visualizing a million dollars and thinking as if you already have it, the way the book says 😅. If you do that, you’ll turn into a narcissist incapable of seeing and clearing real obstacles, because taking the spiritual bypass is far more comfortable. I’d bet the author knows this perfectly well and writes with the conscious intent to scam people for money, like a psychopath. The spiritual world is teeming with top-tier psychopaths.

Another major problem with ACIM is that it introduces a notion of sanctity, forgiveness, and goodness derived from Christianity. This idea is extremely seductive: the benevolent Father who loves and forgives you, while you in turn forgive, act with goodness, and are blessed. But forgive what? Reality simply is, period. All that talk of forgiveness consists of relative, human, localized ideas. From a total perspective, Absolute Being manifests in potential possibilities, and within them lies the totality. *Sat-Chit-Ananda* could be accurate. Being that recognizes and expresses itself in the utter joy of absolute freedom of limitlessness. Forgiveness? There is no forgiveness, nor is there sin. There is existence.

This exact moment is the absolute. It should be obvious right? Absolute implies that there can't be anything out of it, then this is the absolute because can't be anything else. You could say: there is not absolute, everything is relative. Sure, as form, but what ultimately is that relative form? What is the source of every form? Why there are forms? What is your explanation? Try it.

What is the difference between appears or really is?

5-MeO can shatter the centrality of the self. The first time it happens, it feels like an extremely traumatic, bizarre event, like blasting something solid apart with dynamite. In my opinion, repeatedly shattering the self with 5-MeO tends to soften it. The problem arises if you introduce mystical interpretations; essentially, it is simply breaking the centrality of the self, which then reconstructs itself. By observing this process over time, the self gradually becomes more flexible. However, the goal is to achieve this without 5-MeO, because the substance involves a significant element of violence, of something forced, and a large part of the self defends itself by concocting stories.

I didn't read, just a resume of the ideas that it exposes, but seems the definition of spiritual narcissism

That’s just my opinion. I read it five years ago when I first got seriously interested in spirituality; it’s very engrossing and gives the impression of "revealed truth," yet it leaves you with a strange feeling, something I couldn't quite define at the time. Now I see it clearly. The book frames reality based on an "error", the emergence of form, suggesting something like "the Son" straying from the formless perfection of the Father and suffering because, unconsciously, he wants to return to it. All of this is a total fantasy, a fabrication that is also completely impossible. Within infinite, formless totality, "the Son" cannot simply emerge at a specific moment. If form is possible, there is no perfect, formless "before"; there is simply form, period. Form is the inevitable manifestation of limitless Being; it has no beginning because there is no "before form", and furthermore, it says that this "fallen" never happened, that it's an illusion, it's not happening. that would introduce an impossible, absolute limit into reality: formless and form, real and illusion. And therein lies the problem with ACIM: it introduces an absolute limit into your mind, trapping you in an unbridgeable duality disguised as non-duality. It prevents true openness because it doesn't view form for what it is, manifested totality, but rather as something that must undergo some kind of change to return to the Father. It’s a psychotic mental mess and, to me, toxic on a level-10 scale, in the sense that prevents the real dissolution of the limits and the openess to the absolute, something that could happen right now because what we are is the absolute in a form, it's extremely simple.

ACIM is an absolutely toxic book. Its author, the psychologist Helen Schucman, suffered from severe depression and anxiety. The book is supposedly a channeling of Jesus Christ through her. Upon reading it, you realize that the entire work is a form of escapism, fleeing reality for a better one. The problem is that it sounds appealing. It offers siren songs that trap you in a fabricated duality between the divine and the human, the Father and the Son. Schucman remained unhappy until her death from cancer; she never resolved her depression nor did she manage to perform a single miracle.

The only limitation that you need to break is the shell of the self, not the limitation of getting in a box full of rats.

It's very difficult because all the spiritual teacher explains it wrongly, with essential flaws. In fact, they can't even explain what enlightenment is , because all of them are limited by the traditions that they studied.

I'm wise enough to avoid a box full of rats

Yes the body expires , the day also, the summer is ending and the year not far. Reality manifest into change, because absence of change is not a manifestation. You as a human can perceive your unlimited nature. It doesn't mean that you as a human with your memory and that are unlimited, but that what you ultimately are is. When you die, there is not "after", or maybe yes but probably not, but it's exactly the same, the reality is and you are that.

This idea is too complicated for you but let's try. The reality isn't a lot of things, it's the unlimited being that manifest itself into forms. Any form is the same than another, all are the same unlimited being, it's the reality. Then if the unlimited being sees itself, doesn't mean that it sees all the possible forms, that is irrelevant, are just forms. It's like saying that you can't see yourself in the mirror because you are not working of repeating thousands times that the self doesn't exist or killing an old woman to steal her bag, then you are not seeing yourself in the mirror, you should do all the things that you could do and see them .

The experience subjective is the reality appearing as an experience subjective. In other words, at a certain point, due to the existence of a biological organism, shaped by evolution, that distinguishes between "inside" and "outside" and preserves itself, a model of the inside/outside interaction is created. This model functions ceaselessly, processing information from the external world while simultaneously recalling the past and predicting future possibilities. This is the mind, and within that mind emerges the "self",.the center or subject that receives experience. This self remains constant while experience changes; thus, a timeline is created through contrast. This is not an illusion; it is a real structure. It does not happen merely to a few humans prone to illusions, but to 100% of humanity. Through meditation, you reach a state of detachment where the only solid elements remaining are the subject-object structure. You dwell there for a while, and at a certain moment, the subject and object lose their boundaries; it is no longer "experience" or "consciousness", it is simply the reality. There is no sensation of being conscious, the concept of "being conscious" loses all meaning, there is only reality. (Obviously, the underlying structure is still there, but its boundaries have dissolved phenomenologically. It is as if there were no structure at all. If literally no structure remained, there would be nothing capable of registering the experience, and you could never remember it afterward.) There is no timeline or succession of events. Well, technically there is, but mentally you have detached from it; everything merges, and no structure remains. Reality becomes absolute, a boundless state of pure existence, period. At that point, the Absolute recognizes itself through the reflective structure that constitutes the self. This is a relatively normal occurrence, something you can achieve daily with training. What is far more extraordinary is the so-called "mystical experience" that have to happen before that the dissolution become let's say normal: a moment when reality detonates like a nuclear bomb, vaporizing your mind's entire circuitry. Only total light remains; in that instant, your heart opens, your chains shatter, tears fall and you surrender your ego completely. I suppose this is a sort of function of the human operating system that occurs when openness to the limitless happens repeatedly but not totally , meets with resistance; at a certain point, the resistance crosses a threshold, and in doing so, the system that is the mind recalibrates itself instantly and permanently. After that there is not more "divine mystical glorious light of God blah blah", there is the unlimited and you are that, and divine and mundane are exactly the same. This now is the unlimited happening, and it's power is total, it's perfection absolute, and this is totally normal, is what reality is.

Yes, the reality as is appearing now implies that living in a box full of rats matters.

Well, what if you go to live in a box on 1 M3 full of rats in the darkness, will it really matter?

It's totally possible because you are not in it, you are it. being human makes is possible because the human mind has a margin of freedom from the genetical impulse, you can do this margin total for some moments. The idea "illusion" about this topic is totally mistaken because implies that in the level of form there is an illusion that can be transcended to arrive to a truth. Wrong, you have to do a step above from the level of the form, where illusion or truth have meaning, and open yourself to the level of the formless, where there are not limits, so "illusion" and "truth" would be two poles with a limit between them, not possible in the level of openess where the only that is is absence of limits.

The only form of manifestation that actually works is an obsessive, sustained focus, one that methodically breaks down every aspect of the desired goal, constantly refining the details, looking past the obvious, and burrowing into the deepest layers of the matter like a termite digging ceaselessly. It operates like an unstoppable, inevitable mechanism that cannot halt until every facet of the objective has been clarified, every test conducted, and every lesson from trial and error noted. That is simply how life works. if you think you can manifest wealth, or anything else, by merely thinking spiritually about it, you are so mentally retarded and naive that I would give you a hug and pat you on the back many times, the way people do at funerals. Because your life will be a funeral.

It’s very simple: this is reality. There isn’t a physical plane and a spiritual one or a divine god mode; there is just reality. The ego is reality, everything that exists is reality. The point is to stop being trapped in form and to open yourself to the formless, which is the essence of form. It makes no difference whether it is spiritual, material, or anything else; the Absolute underlies everything, you may perceive it or not. You are the Absolute appearing as a self; therefore, if you are wise, you will be able to break through.

Reality is absolutely simple and can be explained in words with absolute precision. There is no paradox or mystery, only inevitable self-evident truths. It is as simple as this: the absence of limits exists because nothing limits it. What is manifests itself, because the absence of manifestation is not. What appears is a possibility taking place, because it is possible. All manifestation is in constant change, because what is static is the no space time between two changes, that is not . And that's it, then just open yourself to the absolute being now.