Breakingthewall

The reality is the absence of limits that is, because nothing limits it. The fact of being manifest as relative change or becoming because the absence of becoming is not. So the becoming is, and this becoming is this, now. Totally direct without boss who organizes. It's you existing interconnected with all the possibilities that are possible. But beyond the form you are the fact of being, that's unlimited. You can open yourself to this alive reality now. In fact it's quite simple, but it's bad explained.

The inevitable flow of reality manifested in endless change is enough to actualize any possibility that is possible. The creation and the creator are the same, it's just the reality happening.

If that possibility wants to come to existence there is not a god deciding if it should be or not, if always that god loves any possibility that is possible, then that god is not necessary, all the possibilities possible will be, then there is not God creating them, just possibilities happening because are possible

Why God would do that? Because he is good? Sounds bit strange, like a god who has good feelings, like a person, and has plans. Plans for what? He already did infinite plans right?

@Ziran It seems you don't understand that a god who creates finite beings would have to do so from within himself. Therefore, it would already have those beings within himself and would have no reason to create them. Furthermore, being infinite, he would have already done so an infinite number of times, and nothing would compel him to take any action because he would already be complete within himself. The god you imagine is not a god; it is reality itself, and it lacks intention. It simply is and manifests itself in possibilities. There is no one behind the scenes; this, now, is reality, and it flows upon itself because it's inevitable, and possibilities arises because are possible.

That would mean that finite beings are created by God will but acts against god will

Yes, for example, how would you understand evilness and God will? Then for you God is an entity that posseses finite properties. Any entity is defined, then finite by definition

Could be but any understanding belongs to the level of the understanding, or the mind that creates maps. The point of meditation is being able to break all the frontiers and being without any separation. That's not the same than knowing, because it requires the dissolution of many layers of separation that are inherent to the human nature . It's alive, what you really are without barriers.

Exactly again, then, with this conceptual framework that has no contradiction or closure, what would be the real step a human mind can take to open itself to its absolute nature? Well, I'll answer myself. It's extremely simple, without any mystery. It's about taking a step beyond the human conceptual level based on the opposition between opposites and situating oneself in the absolute fact of being, without any anchor of grip. This isn't an idea or something you know; it's an action. In it, you are without limit or definition, and in doing so, you are one with reality; you are reality. Then your support for existing ceases to be the learned conceptual framework and becomes the direct fact of being. Seems banal but it's very difficult releasing all the grips. Absolutely all.

If God is infinite as you said it's will would be also infinite, then for it would be the same clarity or raping kids, then you can't talk about a will. A will is exclusive by definition, and exclusive is finite by definition

It happens when you take a high dose of psychedelic, it's a common phenomena. You usually perceive your experience as limited, then you take the drug x and for a moment you perceive yourself without limits, that's extremely strange, so your mental processes restructure for a while creating the certainly of that you are creating the reality with your mind, and being unlimited, obviously the others only exist as images because if they have their own experiences, it would be a limit between you and them, and this is impossible from your actual perception. Imo it's just a mistake that happens when you confuse your unlimited nature with your limited form.

I think that there could be a recipe, the question is avoiding the mistakes. Those Buddhist created their ideas thousands years ago, and they were geniuses for the level of knowledge that was possible in that time. Imo all their paradigm aims to free the mind, but the problem is that those ideas have many blind points and contradictions that make the seeker stuck, closed in ideas like void, no self, etc. that's why Buddhism split in many contradiction branches. It's possible a perfect formulation, the key is avoiding what's wrong.

depends on what "matters" means to you. If "matters" means emotional concern about what happens, then nothing matters for you if you are dead(obviously) but this is a view from within your current human emotional paradigm. If we broaden our perspective, that emotional concern about what happens would be the vector of the cause-and-effect flow of reality pointing in a certain direction. Then you could say that for reality, it "matters" that x happens instead of y, simply because it points to x. You could also say that it makes no difference to you personally whether x or y happens, but reality is pointing to x. Why? Because the unfolding of causality and form has created patterns that have a directional vector that we call "matters." Therefore, at that local point in reality, that x happens instead of y "matters." For a cell, not dying matters, simply because it aims to not die. It makes no difference to you personally? Great,.then at the local point in reality called veganawake, nothing matters. But in other points matters. Matters is just preference, and in reality preference arises.

Agree, then saying things like: "reality is a dream" , make no sense, reality is the reality. The only thing that you could say about reality is that reality is.

If I'm in the pure present without mind, nothing tells me that the other people are imaginary and I'm creating them in order to have a human experience , but they have not inner experience. How do you know that?

Well maybe not so simple look for example: being, or existing have an opposite, not being, not existing ,but those opposite don't are, then they are absolute in the sense that their opposites are just an idea, not a reality, because the absolute non being is not real. Would be the non existent space between two beings, then absolutely nothing.

According the solipsistic paradigm, they don't exist as minds, only as images that you are seeing. Are illusion without real experiences, because you as God are creating them in order to have a realistic human experience, but you have the power to hide that fact to yourself. Until you awake and you see the trick .

The tiger is a perception that happens, your mind is creating a tiger and a you/center based in a real tiger that is threatening a real body. If you are at home without hungry tigers, you can look inside, focusing in the mind, then perceive a self/center/subject in that mind and a object/perception , and collapse them because both are a creation of the mind. But "creation" doesn't mean "illusion", because that self/center represent a living organism that's real, and the perception represent an universe that also is real, and both are changing information constantly. If that information is the hungry tiger, you won't be able to collapse the duality because your genetic conditioning would prevail. Maybe you could have the feeling before death of: well, let's go to be one again with the whole, let's open our heart and our mind and surrender to the absolute. Bye and alleluia. But the situation wouldn't be an illusion, just the reality, same than your mind, that's the reality expressed as a mind that knows that is, or if you prefer, as the reality looking/knowing itself.

In my perspective there is a phone and a room. Is all that is possible a phone and a room ? Or maybe you would say that no, but the other possibilities are going to happen "after". Then, is the reality a timeline, or maybe the time is an arising that happens in the reality? If the reality is not a timeline, nor an individual or witness, then, where are the other possibilities now? I only see a phone.

You have to complete that proposition: "Now is all that exists and my perspective of that now is the entire now"

People here is saying that. I don't know, I'd say that other mind are real, but that's because I didn't realized the absolute truth, that is that I'm creating the other minds now. I asked to those people who are enlightened that maybe they could do anything simple, for example creating a planet, just a small one, or do a flight like neo. Not a very high one, just 1 or 2 meters over the floor (because it could be dangerous if it's your first time) , but they say that's impossible because they as God have fixed a rule that forbids it.

Exactly, if you take some drugs you would know without any doubt that other minds are unreal and that you are creating them now, and this is an absolute proof about that other minds doesn't exist. It's obvious, and if you have any doubt it's because you are not awake, you are not in the exclusive club of those who have seen . It's a reasoning that any brilliant mind would have to admit, it's more than a reasoning, it's an absolute fact.

It's not trusting it's knowing or understanding. If you go out in the street now and suddenly a hungry tiger appears in front of you, you will know immediately that something extremely serious in happening, even you never would have seen a tiger in your life. The very fact of the situation would trigger atavistic programming that create a concrete mental state with an emission of chemistry in your brain same time than a structure of perception that would be: knowing that death is coming right now. You don't need to think: oh, an animal that seems dangerous, it could damage my body and provoke a collapse of the system that is called dead. You will know being the knowledge. All your structure would be: knowledge of death now.

If you use to sitting everyday to change your mental frequency and getting out of the cloud of procceses that constitutes the egoic mind to be without any support or grip, open to the actual existence now.

Why the contraposition is false?