Breakingthewall

No, it's the reality of humans. All those ideas about love and than are beautiful and comforting, but my point is more looking directly to the reality. Really do you think that this about slavery, etc, is imaginary? Things are as they are, I didn't say that are bad, I just described some facts. Btw, all those who says: everything is love, evilness is just ignorance, etc, put them in a difficult situation. 99,9% would sell their mother in exchange of survival 1 day more. Imagine what would do to you.

And what's your excuse for using technology made with materials that destroy ecosystems, clothes made by semi-slaves in factories that destroy rivers and forests, and getting around with energy that pollutes the sea and air, killing millions of beings? Besides, you eat those vegetables you're so proud of, grown in fields obtained by devastating forests and transported by ships and trucks. So many dead beings and destroyed ecosystems just so you can feel morally superior, better than others

I guess that it depends of the situation. If I have a choice, much better love, harmony, solidarity among humans, deepening my understanding of reality, enjoying the good things in life

Human history doesn't show that; it shows that efficiency lasts. For example, Western civilization transported 20 million enslaved Africans like cattle to America, and the result was quite good. This doesn't imply that Western civilization is evil, since all other civilizations did the same. Even among Native Americans, 30% were slaves captured from other tribes. What we call evil is the norm, and there's no karma to punish it, only in fairy tales.

The Japanese considered themselves great people, cultivating self-control, order, and sacrifice for the greater good. But in China, they killed 25 million people, did things like gang-raping girls in front of their parents and then burning them alive with gasoline, or holding beheading contests. They are a prime example of absolute evil, yet at the same time, they were noble and devoted to the glory of their country. I would say that when total war breaks out, humans become demons because the situation demands it. It's easy for us to condemn the evilness because no one is trying to kill or enslave us. If that were the case, we would tie Epstein to the torture post and torture him for two days straight in the most horrible ways possible while we danced around thanking the gods for such a gift. Think about the Sioux and those, they were very good people if you are their friend, but if not, they would bury you in an anthill and all kids would be laughing happily watching you being devoured alive.

Fortunately, this is the case. The alternative is that some crazy person like Trump, Hitler, or the ayatollahs would have real power, and that would be catastrophic. Real power is not held by an individual, but by a self-regulating system composed of individuals.

I guess that it depends of the situation, for example, the Americans dropped two rather unloving atomic bombs on Japan, which were quite necessary. After that, they were the best of friends.

If everything is love hate is also love, then you can hate Epstein, even torture him and then do a party and grill him alive and eat it, that's also love. If you don't love hate, then what kind of love is that? If you love hate, then hate.

War is fighting for surviving, and it's the nature of life. Life is war against entropy.

Jesus Christ doesn't say a single word about suicide. It was established that suicide is a mortal sin after Saint Augustine; it was then that Christianity became an ideology of absolute terror, since it established eternal hell and original sin. This happens when Christianity ceases to be a marginal religion and becomes an instrument of power. Instruments of power want to have power over their puppets; these puppets cannot decide about their own life and death because their lives do not belong to them, they belong to the power structure.

Yes but would that benefit China? The US is its main customer; the US and China are partners, not enemies their interdependence is total. Where have you ever seen enemies with such a huge volume of trade?

I don't see why violating children is necessary for the existence of human civilization, but destroying ecosystems to maintain cities is. I don't see anything wrong with raising animals and killing them if their lives are lived decently, with space to roam, access to the outdoors, and generally good conditions. An animal is not the same as a person; a chicken doesn't mind being on a farm if it's comfortable. I personally almost never eat meat, but I do eat eggs and dairy products, supposedly with certain guarantees of animal welfare. Imagine you were a chicken, would you mind being born and dying on a farm where there is space, access to the outdoors, and good food? Why?

The real question is: what does China gain by invading Taiwan? Absolutely nothing. It's far more useful to threaten to invade Taiwan. Taiwan is very useful as a tool to promote Chinese nationalism, maintain a narrative of injustice, and at the same time showcase pacifism versus the belligerence of the others. Then china can cross other lines that would be forgiven or directly not pointed because they are so offended by the Taiwan issue. Smart tactic. Taiwan will fall to China like ripe fruit at the right time; for now, Taiwan is useful as a symbol. If china attack Taiwan it would be a proof that the Chinese government is emotional and stupid, and seems exactly the opposite.

War is the engine that drives the evolution of life. Without it, there would only be prokaryotes cells floating in the ocean. But this is impossible, due to the very structure of life, which differs from non-living things in that it self-preserves and repairs itself. This always implies war, since it implies will. When two wills clash, there is war. One cell eats another. Several unite, forming a multicellular organism that massacres simpler cells, taking advantage of its superiority and stealing their energy. Until another, more complex structure appears and goes from being hunter to prey. Incessant war at all levels, trillions of acts of violence and murder every microsecond, until something absurdly complex as a human brain appears. Then those human brains joint together forming tribes, then cities, civilizations, empires, always pushed by war. There in only one law: you live, or you die. The question is: can humanity transcend war? In theory, yes, when it transcends death, masters reality, and becomes a kind of intergalactic cyborg, or better yet, when it merges with the primary structures of this dimension of reality, becoming interdimensional intelligent flow. One thing seems clear: there are no absolute limits, or it seems so, so who knows what is possible

The very act of living as a human, eating (whether vegetables or meat), using technology, mining, extracting oil, etc., implies the death of millions of living beings for every single human individual. This includes the destruction of ecosystems, ocean pollution, deforestation, and so on. The case of industrial farming is sad not because of the killing of animals, but because of how those animals live. Any animal that lives eventually dies; there's no problem with that. The problem is living in horrific conditions like those in factory farms. A farm chicken lives well and doesn't suffer when it dies. I wouldn't mind being a farm chicken, but I wouldn't like to be a cow in a factory farm.

If anyone does that means that he's not very smart, or better, not very honest with himself. It's quite obvious what's a mental construction and what's real

Self image is not just an though, It's an incredibly powerful emotional mechanism rooted in the absolute need to belong to the group, clan, mother. Without that, you're dead, and the need to live is absolute. Liberation is rising above that very real conditioning and positioning yourself in a state of existence where life and death touch, where there are no frontiers, where you are not an human anymore but the reality being in a form, absolutely out of the human density. That's where spiritual work is supposed to go, right? Not mild change of position, absolute movement.

What we call ego It is self-image, the need for group belonging, and the perception of our position within it, driven by emotional impulses implanted in our system by evolution, impossible to ignore, that cause the group to operate as an individual. What we call liberation from the ego is the understanding of this dynamic, followed by the alchemy in which the system aligns itself, allowing conditioning to lose its energetic charge, leaving an individual free from their primal impulses, operating directly connected to the flow of existence. How many can even intuit what is the liberation? Few, because when you are in, you are in, you can see only the walls of the box where you live. Mental walls programmed by the evolution of the form. The game is fascinating, seems impossible that something so perfect and complex exist.

The minds of animals are limited to stimulus-response patterns. Social animals like monkeys feel emotions, recognize themselves as individuals, and plan strategies that are, to a certain extent, original, but their degree of freedom is limited. In humans, things change; it's another phase of existence, just as animals with affectivity are different phase from those without, as are animals with brains and those without, multicellular organisms, unicellular organisms, unicellular self preservated and complex molecules self replicated like arn, atoms, vibrations, etc. The human mind can potentially free itself completely from its genetic conditioning and open itself to possibilities unimaginable to other beings, such as understanding the relativity of space-time, the physics of the foundations of reality, and possibilities that we have not yet intuited. The human mind is built upon the matter of an evolving biological organism, but it separates itself from it in the sense that it breaks the bonds of primary conditioning and expands and operates as a living being outside the biological realm. It is not limited; within a single lifetime, it can make an evolutionary leap more radical than biology in tens of thousands of generations exploring unexplored fields and setting basis for the next level. From the Paleolithic era to space travel, there is but a blink of an eye in geological time. The future seems to point toward symbiosis with the machine, the control of genetics, of biology, and who knows, perhaps the mastery of matter, of reality at the level of its fundamental fields, the understanding of the dimensional structures of reality, and perhaps even dominion over them. From what we see of reality, its capacity to structure coherent patterns of increasing complexity is limitless.

Enlightenment is what Ramana Maharshi, Basul, and many others spoke of. Sit in meditation and ask: What am I? What is reality? Don't ask with logic, nor answer with logic, but become the question. Be the question that pierces reality. What is reality? Observe, without mind. What is this? No logic will tell you; forget logic, it is irrelevant. Here and now, in absolute silence, what is this? Without fear, without projection, without any desire other than to see, then forget that desire, because desire leads you to the door but you can't pass with it, it's ultimately a door. Feel this moment without borders or bottom, relax all the contraction that defines you as an individual, relax your desire to be you, observe. What is this? Then it opens. You are that. It is unthinkable. Just do it, it's an action that you have to do, not a realization that you have to know. It's the end of the lack.

Ultimate truth is exactly the same than falsehood: reality is. There is no other truth, nothing is a lie. Only your state changes, contracted, a prisoner of your genetic programming, operating in energetic loops that make you dance like a puppet, terrified, lost, alone. But even so, you are, and you know it. Or expanded, aware of your limitlessness, settled in the now that manifests as a living, perfect, brilliant flow, where the monkey impulses are seen for what they are and the mind opens like an infinite kaleidoscope, and death and life blend, being two sides of the same coin, where knowing nothing is equivalent to knowing everything: you are

Because the ego is a trap, a mechanism that makes you run like a hamster on a wheel to contribute to evolutionary movement. It's not inherently bad, but human beings aren't adapted to their environments but rather create it; therefore, the ego is always war, maladjustment, and falsehood, since it needs lies to maintain its equilibrium. In short, suffering. The ego is inevitable, but it's better open it to the unlimited, then it's frequency changes and everything becomes open, beautiful, alive.

A mind is a universe within another universe, capable of creating structured representations called thoughts and thus manipulating both the external universe and itself. A mind is limited but can break it's limits and be one with the unlimited, then a mind is an expression of the unlimited that operates in limited form. The mind is wonderful, it's a supreme expression of reality.

No, Putin is wise because he seeks stability, prosperity, and sovereignty for Russia. The ayatollahs are stupid because they seek the destruction of Israel based on the teachings of a medieval warlord they consider a god. Quite obvious right? Then any war is a genocide? Why do that demagoguery? You know that if Israel wants they would kill 1 million in one week with phosphorus bombs. It's an expulsion, it's bad enough, but it's not a genocide Sure but nobody believes it. In Islam it's legitimate to lie the kafir If Iran would stop burning flags and shouting death America every day in the congress, we would see what happens with integration Yes, Middle west is not stable because America Satan, without the great Satan, Gaddafi, Saddam, the ayatollahs, Al Assad and isis would do party, hugs and dance . Also dance with the ottomans if the British wouldn't displace them. Maybe you don't remember that Middle east except Iran was colonized by the turkish for 5 centuries, when any rebellion was suffocated with iron fist, without mercy. Example destruction of Diriyah Later I will do an analysis of you, if you let me, then you can say if I'm totally wrong

Is expelling people from a city genocide? I wouldn't call it that. The Israelis gave Gaza to the Palestinians; in fact, Gaza was a Palestinian state. The thing is, the Palestinians voted for Hamas, whose essential principle is the destruction of Israel. They dedicated themselves to fueling hatred, teaching martyrdom in schools, and waging intifadas. And finally, on October 8th... what are you supposed to do with a neighbor like that? How do you coexist? By obeying their will and disappearing?