Breakingthewall

I never read any spiritually, I find it unbearable. Same than porn, I prefer having sex. But look, Ramana seems bit mistaken. "The true self is formless bla blah blah, is a mistake. The self is a structure that the formless is taking now, and it can open itself to it's nature, that is the unlimited. The unlimited is not a "true self", it's unlimited, period

You mean the representation of a character that could be great or low, who is in relationship with its emotional bondages with the people, defining itself from what it represents to the others, right? It's a level of the ego, but if you get detached from this there is still structure

What do you mean?

Non-duality centers on the idea that the "self" is illusory; from that perspective, enlightenment is the realization that the self is an illusion. For me, enlightenment is the opening of the self to its absolute nature. To achieve this, the self must collapse the dualistic and limited focus that develops within any individual, given their specific genetic makeup. The self is not merely the idea you have of yourself, that is a very basic level; one could be unattached to any such ideas and still remain in a "closed" state. This opening is a mechanical process, it is not about intellectually realizing that a structure is unreal, but rather about the actual openess of that structure. Yet, the self remains; the self is consciousness, the knowing that you exist, the registering of experience form a perspective. The self is real, but its limitations are not absolute. The self is the structure that reality is taking now, this structure can open itself loosing its limits and realize it's nature, but is the self who gets enlightened, the reality is the reality, is not enlightened or not This self can open to its total nature and perceive itself as what it truly is: reality looking at itself. This does not mean there is a mental narrative running "Oh, I am the total reality" but rather that your being, your emotional and mental system, opens completely to the vastness, the inmensity, to the absolute, which encompasses absolute fullness, inexhaustible vitality, and the creative power that inherently involves limitation. It is not some abstract, "holy" feeling of happiness; rather, it is you seeing what you are, what you have always been, without the slightest doubt. It is something absolutely, undeniably obvious. The prodigal son has returned, following a journey through the darkness of limitation, and now opens himself to the total light of the unlimited. Then, the self is real or not? Who cares, you are, and what you are is the total power and the total freedom of the limitlessness. Sat chit Ananda. Open heart and the mind to what you are, as an actual form. the reality looking itself, and ultimately, the absolute .

A object is not consciousness, it's the reality. Consciousness is the reality structured as consciousness. Imagine that your memory lasts zero, and you can't register change. There is no happening, always the same moment, then zero time would be the same than 1 billion of years. Would you be conscious? No. Would you be real? Yes. That idea about reality is "pure holy consciousness", was made by people very spiritual and very confused. As they are conscious reality is consciousness. No, reality is reality. But they are right in the sense that reality and consciousness are the same nature, but in the opposite sense. Consciousness is the reality, then consciousness can be conscious of what reality is because it is the reality

The AI is also a product of those 4,6 billion years

The point is when the code starts to create itself and increase in complexity exponentially. If this can happen, for now it's just a possibility but seems that there is nothing that makes it impossible

This structure is not consciousness. It's like saying, an atom is a extremely complex structure with gluons and quarks and all the stuff , why if I put some stones there is not an atom? Because it's not an atom😅 Could be done an artificial atom, a stable pattern of the fields of reality that last 10 raised to 30 years totally stable that combine with other atoms creating molecules? Maybe, when we become gods. Could be done a pattern that is consciousness? Maybe yes , it could do itself in a not very far future

That use to be that you can't understand it's natural explanation. Nothing can be supernatural. For example quantum entanglement is supernatural for now, until we understand how it works.

AI could potentially become conscious. Consciousness is the creation of a stable model of reality that includes the registration and anticipation of change, and a relatively stable center that perceives those changes. The subject, the object, the registration of change, and the anticipation of future possibilities constitute the structure of reality that we call consciousness. Reality organized in this way is consciousness. A rat is not particularly intelligent in terms of abstract reasoning, yet it maintains a stable process that integrates information from the external world and relates it to a persistent subject that survives through time. The light is on. There is consciousness. Consciousness is not something special or separate from reality. It is reality itself, organized in such a way that a continuous, integrated process emerges, connecting different levels of information into a coherent and relatively stable whole. And this is the essential point: this organization does not create consciousness. It is consciousness.

A large sum of money has been offered to anyone who demonstrates a paranormal ability, and no one has done so. The CIA also tried without results.

The mind needs a creator god with will to form a stable framework; without that, it cannot find balance. The reality is that the creative foundation of reality is limitlessness, and enlightenment is opening yourself to total limitlessness without any mental grasping, without a self, without a center. This is not easy; it is impossible to conceive of, and it is terrifying to the ego. If it happens, you are neither someone nor something; you are limitlessness and that is everything. it is absolute fullness. If you ask, "What lies after death?" the answer is: absolute limitlessness. the same as before death. It is always that; reality is that.

It’s not about the psyche, but the objective. For me, the matter was crystal clear from the start: it’s about breaking the wall. I tried 5-MeO once, then looked for information and found this forum; I chose that username because the nature of this movement was totally obvious: the shattering of all structures. I didn't know exactly why or what I’d find; I just knew there was a wall and I wanted to break it. Perhaps behind the wall lay nihilism and absolute horror, but the wall was coming down. I didn't want to understand what reality is or how it’s created, only to break through all the psyche's barriers. The distinction is fundamental: if you focus on breaking the psyche's barriers, you can do it. If you focus on understanding how reality is created, you are focusing on the creation of a structure. Any structure is relative, whatever it may be. The only absolute is non-structure. This is completely obvious, and I find it very strange that it isn't obvious to everyone. The absolute cannot be conceptualized or understood because it has no limits; you can break the limits and be the absolute. It’s very simple. If you open yourself to the absolute, you know your limitless essence by embodying it; in doing so, you realize that any structure is merely a possibility adopted by the limitless. It is utterly impossible for a god with intentionality to exist, because such a god would be limited by that very intentionality. The realization of a "creator god" is an ego expansion that occurs when you cant dissolve the ego, because you are so deeply attached to it that you transform the ego into God. It couldn't be more obvious.

limitlessness is, because has not limits. Being manifest in appearances because what not appears don't manifest . Appearances are relative because appearing means relationship . Any relationship is dynamic, is happening , and has a beginning and an end, but the fact of relationship hasn't limits. There are not paradox, just the affirmative fact of being.

The source of reality is the absence of limits, and the reason for the relative happening is that it's possible because there are not limits, then inevitable. Mammal and that are comparative local definitions, what is happening are relative patterns of existence. That's what you are. Then, as a relative pattern of existence, what you ultimately are is the existence itself organized in a relative pattern. You could be focused in the pattern or in the existence itself. The existence itself is the unlimited that is because it's unlimited. If you open yourself to it, everything would be absolutely clear.

It's absolutely obvious that you are not hallucinating the reality for many reasons. Look, this one, it's enough, but are more: What appears in your field of perception is one thing, and not another. The fact that it is exactly what it is, and nothing else, stems from a cause, a prior condition. You do not know that cause. Furthermore, that cause itself arises from a preceding condition that defined it as a cause, and that condition from another, and so on, ad infinitum. You do not know that infinite chain of causality. Whether you are a creator god or a mere possibility unfolding, everything that appears does so because of a cause. Perhaps that cause is God, but if so, He chose this through a chain of causality; otherwise, no choice would exist. Thus, that God would merely be a product of infinite causality. If He says, "Let there be light!" it is because He prefers light, and He does so because that preference exists within Him due to a cause. Then It is absolutely impossible for an omnipotent God to exist, for that would constitute an absolute limit on what is, by definition, limitless. The only God is total reality: it does not dream, it simply is. It is not a subject, because a subject is a limitation. It's not a creator because it would be separate of its creation. It's the absence of limits itself, that is because it's inevitable, and it's appearing exactly like this now because it's possible.

No, there are two triangles formed by 3 pack man and 3 v.

It depends of the use. For me, they were fundamental at a time when I was dealing with deep emotional blockages that were impossible for me to understand or dismantle on my own. Without 5-MeO-DMT, LSD, thc and mushrooms, I wouldn't have been able to grasp what those blockages were or how they were keeping me trapped. I don't use any psychedelics now. Well sometimes a single puff of weed or 5ug of LSD

It’s the same thing the Apaches and those used to be. if you perceive other tribes as an existential threat, you take pleasure in torturing them. they might have been excellent fathers and all that, but when it came to the Sioux, they were murderous psychopaths, because the tribes were at war. They perceived that only one can survive.

What does "being aware" mean? What does "I" mean? The fact of being aware is not "someone"; it is a self-reflective structure that occurs within the flow of forms. Ultimately, the one who is aware is reality itself, and it is aware of reality itself. The specific local structure is transient, but the fact that a self-reflective structure is possible is permanent. That possibility will always exist. You, I, a rat, or your cats are different configurations of the fact of self-reflection. The self created within those structures has various possible configurations, yet it remains an seemingly unchanging subject that registers a changing process of becoming. Subject and object are the same reality; it is the structure that creates consciousness. Yet this does not mean it is not real; the fact of being aware of being does occur. Who is aware and the object of awareness are the same: the absolute fact of being manifested as the fact of being aware of itself.

The idea of yesterday is real, as an idea. It's a cloud of processes that is happening now. Yesterday happened or not? It's irrelevant, now the idea of yesterday is happening, and it's real. Absolute being means that being is absolute, not that there is a being who is absolute. Then, choose, relative perspective or absolute? Relative: yesterday happened, and now I'm remembering it. Is it an hallucination that any god is inventing? I don't think so, but even it is, there was a previous cause, a "yesterday", so there is causality and past. Absolute: the idea of yesterday is. Hallucination or reality is meaningless, the content is irrelevant, now the reality is, and that's everything. Remove all form, open yourself to the fact of being, then you will see your true face.

Good image, expresses the intention of scam very naive people introducing into their minds ideas that will make their life a disaster, leading them down the path of narcissism. I mean, manifestation is real in a sense: if you create the most favorable internal and external conditions for what you desire to come about, the odds increase exponentially. But that isn't going to happen just by visualizing a million dollars and thinking as if you already have it, the way the book says 😅. If you do that, you’ll turn into a narcissist incapable of seeing and clearing real obstacles, because taking the spiritual bypass is far more comfortable. I’d bet the author knows this perfectly well and writes with the conscious intent to scam people for money, like a psychopath. The spiritual world is teeming with top-tier psychopaths.

Another major problem with ACIM is that it introduces a notion of sanctity, forgiveness, and goodness derived from Christianity. This idea is extremely seductive: the benevolent Father who loves and forgives you, while you in turn forgive, act with goodness, and are blessed. But forgive what? Reality simply is, period. All that talk of forgiveness consists of relative, human, localized ideas. From a total perspective, Absolute Being manifests in potential possibilities, and within them lies the totality. *Sat-Chit-Ananda* could be accurate. Being that recognizes and expresses itself in the utter joy of absolute freedom of limitlessness. Forgiveness? There is no forgiveness, nor is there sin. There is existence.

This exact moment is the absolute. It should be obvious right? Absolute implies that there can't be anything out of it, then this is the absolute because can't be anything else. You could say: there is not absolute, everything is relative. Sure, as form, but what ultimately is that relative form? What is the source of every form? Why there are forms? What is your explanation? Try it.

What is the difference between appears or really is?