Breakingthewall

@Vladimir You've understood it perfectly. I completely identify with your initial post; I've been through that fun process of being in hell. The difference is contraction versus openness. You usually enter a contracted state out of fear: abuse in the family, rejection, hostile environments, lack of love at a crucial moment. You unconsciously shut down as a form of protection, and this leads you straight to hell: OCD, isolation, addiction, and self-hatred. The positive thing is that you realize it (if you don't end up addicted to fentanyl, of course) and begin the process of opening up, and in that process, you realize that total openness is enlightenment: the total absence of contraction. Then the real work is identifying any contraction and open it, until your reality is open, unlimited. Then you are one with the unlimited, you are exactly that.

Good point, but this doesn't mean that what appears in your pow is your creation and has not reality out of you as perceiver. This seem bit egomaniac don't you think?

Seems interesting but honestly, I'm lazy to listen 40 min. Maybe you could write here the main points that he exposed

The absence of change is equivalent to no experience because experience is the awareness of change. Manifest reality is constant change on all levels; nothing is static. Static is equivalent to non-existence; reality is never static. If you expand anything, you will reach endless vibrations. Even absolute emptiness is full of quantum fluctuations. Static doesn't exist; it's the non-existent interval between two fluctuations. Maybe you could think that if you are in deep meditation there is no change and there is experience, but there are billions of fluctuations creating that experience.

It's not constructed only by social conditioning but by biological structure. The knower exist since there is consciousness. You could say that you have transcended the social ego, but you still exist as conscious being, and this implies knowing. You know that you are.

I mean the apparently absolute duality between a self preserved system and the exterior. Two different realities in relationship. Not the relative differences inside of a system that are happening without pause If the perceived change is zero, the experience is zero. If you are totally private of senses there is still constant movement creating the sensation of being you, the movement of time. If they disappear, experience disappear , like anesthesia. If you open your heart to absolute absence of consciousness, death, seeing it as real and true and alive as consciousness you can open yourself to the unlimited If you need consciousness as fundamental, you are closing yourself in it, needing control, not capable of total abandoning. Very common in spirituality, because consciousness can't conceive absence of consciousness as real.

Yes, I explained it, and it's also closely related to enlightenment. I'll do it again from a different angle. Let's see, "subjective experience" means that I have sensations, I am having an experience. First, we need an "I." An "I" is a self-preserving and self-repairing system. This creates a seemingly absolute separation between the inside and the outside. A closed system arises within another open system, the universe, and even though it is part of it, it operates as separate. The necessarily controlled and selective exchange of information between the two is what creates consciousness. Consciousness is reality in a concrete dimension: that of being aware of oneself, perceiving oneself, knowing oneself. Reality doesn't need to know itself to exist, but it inevitably does so because it is limitless. In the absence of limits, sufficiently complex, self-preserving relative systems will emerge infinitely. Why? Because without limits, the change of relative state is inevitable, and the grouping of fluctuations into complex patterns, like a brain, is also inevitable. Regarding enlightenment, consciousness is made of the same "material" as reality itself; it is reality itself. Your consciousness is the totality in a form. Therefore, make the relational transparent, and the absolute will open up. It is both simple and difficult.

Did you read what I wrote? Try, it's not so difficult. If you don't understand any point just ask

Its so simple that nobody is going to give any nobel prize, look: Let's see, consciousness, like anything else, is a manifestation of reality, right? That is, it's reality in a specific manifestation. The question is: what's the difference between consciousness and the absence of consciousness? Duality, temporal awareness, and proprioception. If you eliminate these three variables, there's no longer any awareness of change; therefore, there's only absolute homogeneity, which is no different than nothing, according a subjective experience. That's clear, isn't it? So, what makes duality, etc., possible? Life. Without life, there is no duality. Life is a structure that appears in the universe, self-preserving and self-repairing. It's nothing special or miraculous; it's simply another phase leap in complexity after complex molecules like RNA. Life is a universe with its own laws within another universe (or if you prefer a system within another system) whose laws it doesn't violate, with an incessant flow of information occurring between them (the universe is made of information, which, as we all know, is equivalent to relationship). This duality between outside and inside increases in complexity if nothing limits it, as we see inevitably happening in the universe, leading to complex organisms that interact with the primary universe through an interface that creates a model in which both external and internal reality appear. This interface is a stable, dynamic quantum cloud, which is another universe within the secondary universe called life. At a certain point, this interface ceases to be purely sensory and becomes symbolic, taking another phase leap, and we have the human mind, interconnected with other minds. And this is consciousness. Pretty simple, isn't it? Then you could ask: but why all those structures appears? Who is creating them? Nobody is creating them and the explanation of how they appear is same simple than the one about consciousness, maybe more.

No no, it's that you didn't understood Well, let's try a simpler language: man, it's pure consciousness, pure love, and it's so so wonderful. You are god man, and those scientist are dumb and we are elite. Did you get it? Maybe resonates more. The point is touching the fiber of each person.

Well, you have a phone in your hands instead a stone, it's not small difference

I didn't change the story. A brain scanner will show you the activity of the brain. That activity is the structure that the reality is talking in a given moment, in a given dimension. What we call human consciousness is the reality taking a determinate structure, and we can see that structure in a brain. A brain in a quantum universe of unimaginable complexity and synchronicity that is happening in a given moment. It's made of relationship, same than any other manifestation.

Yes but truly breaking the self is a matter of deep meditation, being absolutely in the moment and observing the closure.

True, poor scientist, so dumb formulating theories like relativity or quantum physics. Fortunately here we are, the geniuses of actualized that we know we are god imagining the reality because it's bored.

Consciousness is simply the reality appearing in a dual structure that register time and differentiate the self and the other. Why it's a problem? It's very obvious

It's in the brain, as everyone knows. It can be located by a brain scanner, it's quite simple. Read this to understand what the self is and maybe you could abandon that obscurantist neo advaita ideas invented by some people What we call the “self” is not a fixed entity or an independent essence. It is a dynamic construction of the brain, a model that emerges from the interaction of multiple neural systems whose primary function is to ensure survival, coherence, and social integration. At its core, the brain is a prediction machine. It continuously builds models of the world, and of the organism itself, in order to guide action. The “self” is one of those models: a functional representation that organizes perception, memory, and behavior around the idea of “me.” A key component of the self is the narrative layer, largely associated with the Default Mode Network (DMN), including regions such as the medial prefrontal cortex and posterior cingulate cortex. This system constructs personal stories (“I am this kind of person”) links past experiences with future expectations maintains continuity over time It creates the sense of a stable identity, even though that identity is constantly updated and reconstructed. Also it is the Emotional Core (Limbic System) The limbic system, especially structures like the amygdala, adds emotional weight to the self. It tags experiences as threatening or safe, links identity to feelings such as shame, pride, fear, or belonging. This is why beliefs about the self are not neutral. They are charged with emotion, and therefore strongly defended. A threat to identity is experienced as a threat to survival. Also it is the Body-Based Self (Proprioception and Interoception) The sense of being “someone” is also grounded in the body. Proprioception gives awareness of body position and movement Interoception provides internal signals (heartbeat, breathing, tension) Together, they create a felt sense of presence, the immediate experience of “I am here.” This layer is pre-conceptual and continuous, forming the foundation upon which more abstract aspects of the self are built. Also memory and Coherence (Hippocampus) Memory systems integrate experiences into a coherent timeline. events are stored and linked patterns are extracted identity becomes a story over time Without memory, the continuity of the self collapses. The brain constantly reconstructs identity by selecting and organizing past experiences into a consistent narrative. And no less important, tribal and Social Identity. Humans are deeply social organisms. A large part of the self is shaped by tribal belonging. The brain encodes group membership (“us vs. them”), social status, shared values and narratives. This creates a powerful mechanism: identity is stabilized through alignment with a group As a result beliefs are reinforced social and deviations from the group are felt as threats. individuals may distort reality to preserve belonging. This is why identity is often defended collectively, not just individually. And the most delusional, the defense of the Self, so common in spirituality. Once established, the self-model is actively protected. The brain filters information that contradicts identity reinterprets events to maintain coherence, externalizes blame when necessary. This is not a conscious strategy but an automatic process: the system prioritizes stability over truth. Changing the self-model requires destabilizing these mechanisms, which can trigger anxiety, confusion, and loss of orientation. Ultimately, the self is not a thing but a process, a constantly updated model shaped by memory, emotion, body, and social context, maintained through ongoing neural activity It feels solid because it is continuously reconstructed. But look, you could say the same about the body .

Those are convoluted ideas from mystics that, given their era, lacked scientific foundation. From a current perspective, things are much simpler: I am a relative expression of reality and, at the same time, total reality itself. My form is real as a relative form, and my total essence is the essence of everything. The total always manifests as relative because manifestation and relative are synonymous. I can shift between perceiving myself as limitless, as a totality, or as limited, as a form. Form is absolutely coherent with the totality, and perceiving it in all its perfection is as "divine" as opening yourself to the totality.

The ego has many layers: social identity, identification with the body, and so on. But when all these layers fall away, the last and most difficult one remains: the feeling of centrality, of being a point that receives experience. This last layer is a fortified door; behind it lies the open totality. When centrality falls, duality disappears, and the total manifests. But if, instead of breaking down this last wall, you elevate it to the status of a dream-creating god, all you will achieve is psychosis.

This is exactly the opposite of enlightenment

Nobody is imagining nothing, there is not an entity making anything. That would be a center. Just a magnification of the ego. It's very obvious, if you think: wow, the others doesn't exist! First you have to make a map of the "others", then a compasión between existing or not existing, then a map about what means that you are creating them, then a duality between you as creator and the creation, etc etc. All this is just ego, you could believe in orus if you want, would be the same, just mental structure, no relationship with enlightenment

The Iranian regime can accept a high level of destruction, but they cannot be defeated by force. The US can cause chaos and famine among the civilian population, thus legitimizing the regime forever. Then, why saying that stupidities so ashaming like a civilization is going to be terminated tonight? Trump and hegset are so ashaming and retarded that seems impossible that anything successful or positive for west can happen in this war

There is separation as an actual structure, it's how the reality is manifesting itself now. Denying it as an illusion is a closure. Spiritual narcissism. If you fall in that, you are closed. If you go to the sea and put some of the water into a glass, would you say that the water in the glass is not separate from the sea, that it is an illusion? Why would you need the idea "illusion" to point something that is happening?

Its not illusory, it's real, but you can dissolve the separation expanding your mind without limits then being limitless. If your mind is limitless is one with what is, there is no difference. But same time, you are a separate individual . So you could say that doing it the reality perceives itself from the dual structure of a living organism, that is an universe that operates in another universe, separate from it but same time being part of it. There is nothing mysterious or mystic, it's just the reality unfolding

I break down the separation between the perceiving center and what is perceived, the capsule of the self, the subject-object duality, the limitation and the foundation of the self, as often as I can precisely to maintain sanity. If too much time passes in contraction, madness lurks.

Sure , keep watching videos, everything is going to be ok Sure . The op explained a personal history, quite interesting btw. Why a genius like you need to try to humiliate him?