Breakingthewall

It's extremely simple: being is absolute. The absolute being is, that's everything. Right not what is, is. Anything else are just structures that this fact takes, but ultimately, being is, that's everything, and if you are open to it, your psyche is burned and only the unlimited remains . Just dare to look directly to the abyss.

Yeah they think that this is not the reality, the real reality would be more lightly , pure, real, not this one that is not real, and it will happen after this false reality. This happens because they are closed, they can't see that here and now the absolute is.

The thinker is created by duality that implies this structure of reality that we are living now. But the thought and the thinker are just an structure, a reflection of the reality in itself. If that structure is dissolved for a moment, only the reality remains. Then the structure comes back but always it's very clear that the perceptor and the perception are one: what is.

Then there is something out of the reality, creating it. But then, this creator would be the reality. But that creator, to choose creating a) instead to b) would take a decision based in many factors. What those factors are? Another reality behind this second reality? And those factors would exist due some causes. Where are those causes? Another reality? If you follow the thread you will realize that ultimately, what is is openess, absence of limits, and this is the reality. Do you get it? Maybe yes, then you will see the absolute. It's here and now. You are that. If you see it you will say: yes. And you will open your being to the totality now and you will be it. Simple and direct, without any other possibility and without the slightest doubt.

The ultimate truth is that you are. You are X would be secondary truth. Then, knowing the ultimate truth seems like not so special right?

What is "where"? What is "space"? Don't say any simplicity like "you are imagining the space", think really about it . For example, according the last physics, space is what is created by the multiple chains of cause effect. If there are many chains of cause effect time and space appears, then space would be the separation between those chains

Why of non duality? If the realization is that you are god creating the reality, seems that are two, you as a god in one side, the dream in other. The intention of creating and hiding that fact in the middle What is the ultimate truth?

The power of god is zero, it cannot not exist, it exist without choice, then it has to create everything without choice, because it's a bomb without any control, since if has to expand to infinity. Then if God can't choose, god has no power, and if god has no power, it's just the reality, without control. Maybe for the ego this sounds bad and those histories about god creating things for a reason sounds much more controlled and beautiful, but are just tales of ego inflation

God feels sat chit Ananda. The absolute fact of being that knows itself as absolute being, and being unlimited is an absolute light of glory. The absolute unlimited is wild, is open, and it's light is total. It's like a smile that says : yes. yes. yes, absolutely open, absolutely unlimited.

All that stuff you say about "clean" seduction is all well and good, but let's be honest with ourselves. We go around with our dicks in our hand pointing north, and when we're dealing with a girl, the idea is to get her on the bed and fuck her until she begs for mercy, and then her friends, and her mother, and her sisters. And right after we're done, we go home to masturbate while chatting on Tinder with another girl about sex or watching porn. So, this whole "clean" seduction thing is relative. If we could, we'd do what gay guys do: fuck 750 people a year. Then, facing this uncontrolled, blind, stupid, inevitable, and uncontrollable torrent, we have the other side of the coin: women, who have a completely different sexual energy. The opposite, even. And things happen like if you show too much interest she automatically sees you as a moron, if you slap her face with your dick and then leave without saying goodbye she sees you as a god, and if you give her flowers she sees her as a miserable piece of shit lying on the ground. It's not what I like, it's what happens. So if you don't learn how it works, you will eat loads of shit that would make your life miserable. The difference between being aligned with sex or being let's say, lost in the fantasy, is absolute. Being a man requires understanding the game, because the fucking game is a trick of nature to make the genetic stronger, not something "clean" to makes you happy

True but in that time politics wasn't focused in prosperity but in domination. The great powers now, west and china, are absolutely totally obsessively focused in progress. Their people don't want war in any case. And also there is the issue of the nukes. If the fight is real, destruction is total. Bye bye civilization. Who would want that?

That's the Buddhist paradigm, and it's very logical. It implies that by extinguishing desires and attachments, you dissolve the separation between the self and reality, opening the self completely to the totality and being one with it at all times. But I see that there's another way, which would be more of a "middle path." It's achieving states of total openness without letting go of attachments and desires, but rather being able, in meditation, also with psychedelic, to place yourself in a position where you completely release them. That is, at that moment you truly deactivate desire and attachment entirely. This is achieved through a deep understanding of that attachment, especially the attachment to being yourself, observing it directly, without a mental filter. Then, these everyday states of openness become usual and gradually reconfigure those desires and attachments, aligning them more and more with the flow of reality. You're not an Arahat completely free of desire, but you have a great "libido," not only in the sexual sense but in a vital one: a desire to live, to connect, to expand your sphere of influence, to create. Total openness does not exclude desire because desire exists; it is the raw material of life, same than creation.

I don't think so, because everyone is seeing that big conflicts are impossible nowadays. The cost is too high, the benefits too low. And over all, the powers nowadays are more a marriage than enemies. They need each other, divorce is impossible, even the love is let's say, not very clear, the dependence is absolute

@Cathal you sound very clear, without nonsense, congratulations. About mysticism, have you achieved states of total openness? What's called enlightenment, the complete dissolution of the boundary between you and the totality, which gradually erases the psyche and replaces it with the living flow of reality. Well, that's just my definition , could you explain what is enlightenment according with those monks? Is the monastery environment conducive to open states? One might say that order, the constant company of people, closes you off. But perhaps that's not the case.

Who knows, maybe that utopia is going to arrive. Really it could be possible, world nowadays is an utopia if we compared with any other time, when people dies for any bacteria and subjugation by violence was the norm everywhere, so seems very possible that world in few decades will be very different But if this were a movie, just after this conversation an apocalyptic scenario would appear. I think it wont be the case, everything point to the fact that cooperation is the only way to win, all others are loss for everyone

The total cannot be alone because "alone" implies a limit. It implies that there could be another, but there isn't; therefore, it implies that infinity is an entity, which implies that it is something defined, which implies limits. The total is total; it is not alone, nor is it love, nor is it anything except total, unlimited. The total does not do things to achieve an end; the total is. Unlimited and being are synonyms. Then, are you dreaming the others? What you? You are, period, and anything that happens is just a possibility taking place. Nothing else needs to be known from an absolute perspective, that's everything. But from a relative perspective, you can't create the others from nothing because "nothing" never was the case, since there is not origin as an absolute limit, everything that exists as form does relatively to another form, so the others are forms, same than you. What is absolute is the totality, the absolute being, not you as a form, as an experience or consciousness. That's just a form

It depends. In tribal societies, the rape of women from another tribe is considered acceptable. Ulysses raided villages and kidnapped women to rape or sell them; this was completely accepted and a source of pride. In ancient Rome, you bought slaves and did whatever you wanted with them. The Quran explains how to have sex with slaves legally (obviously, their consent isn't considered). In US you could rape black slaves without any problem one century ago, in Africa or asia now you can fuck 11 years old girl paying to her parents or owner, and millions of westerns are doing it now. In other words, in human society, rape was wrong if you raped someone who belonged to someone who could cut off your testicles; otherwise, it was acceptable, just because you have the power to do it.

You're not imagining others, because if you were, you would be the absolute limit of the unlimited, which is impossible, and the other limit would be others, your dream. This conception is limited; it's the typical insight that occurs with psychedelics when you're not even remotely prepared to open yourself to the totality. It's so basic that it shouldn't be up for discussion. I always thought people here were saying it metaphorically or something, but it seems they're serious.

You are not inside of the dynamic structure that is happening, you are that. And the self is the fact of knowing that you are that. Nothing mysterious, just the obvious. There is observation and experience. Not an individual observing but observation creating individuality . The control is happening due the synchrony of the whole of the form. "Meat" is just your idea, what's happening is an hyper complex stable procces interconnected with the totality of the form that implies known of being

Exactly, or said from another perspective, stepping outside of your separate self and opening yourself to the totality of being. The problem is when you're being chased by a pack of rabid dogs while you check your WhatsApp and see that that bitch left you on read 8 hours ago and that you owe money to the mafia.

Right now, at this very moment, I am fully aware that I am infinite as existence, as being, and finite as form. To be fully aware of your finitude as form is not to know it intellectually; it is to understand and perceive it directly and to be completely open to the fact that you could disappear right now. It's not as simple as: "Oh, sure, we all know we're going to die." It's about embodying it, facing it head-on, and opening yourself to it. It is then that your infinity as being becomes clear, obvious, because your absolute attachment to form has dissolved. Because you, and anyone else, even if you don't think so, are currently completely attached to form; you are embedded, identified with, mixed in with, stuck to form. Then you cannot comprehend the openness of absolute being; it's impossible. You cannot peer into the abyss if you are buried in the ground; you have to dig yourself out and look.

So, according to you, you are not a mortal organism that interacts with the outside world and seeks the best possible options, and to do so creates a model of reality in which it records and predicts events and forms a network of relative relationships in which it operates in a coordinated way with other individuals?

The self, the stable process that sees itself as an individual and generates unpleasant emotions we call suffering, and that tries to minimize those vibrations and maximize others it calls "happiness." According to you, it's imaginary, but even being imaginary, it does all those things and much more.

Yeah normies are not so special as you, poor normies, so low, not like you, so high 🤣

The self is an structure that the reality takes that implies being aware of itself splitting into two. The self is not someone or something, it's a self reflexive form that happens. There is not a mysterious seer, it's just the fact os seeing that happens when a process that we call life interact with what is external to it with enough complexity to create a model that acts as interface between the external and the internal. It's absolutely obvious, read again and if you get it, your self will loose it's limits