Breakingthewall

@Mellowmarsh You are right, or Newman is right in a sense: There are two ways to perceive the absolute. One is absolute being, the total brilliance of what is, sat chit ananda. The fact of being affirmative, radiant, self-aware, and absolute joy because nothing limits it. Total light, what is called enlightenment. The other is absolute emptiness, which is total potential. You perceive yourself as unlimited emptiness, an absence of limits with nothing to hold onto, no reference point, but the very fact of limitlessness perceives itself as total potential. Absolute nothingness in the sense of being unbounded, formless, but open, potential. But saying: reality is nothing leads to confusion

If you don't understand what I'm pointing it's not my fault. Enlightenment is only one, and it's obvious and understandable.

If it's absolute potential it's something independent of the actualization. Maybe it's not something physical but it is.

You are wrong eh, you are mixing the relative with the absolute, what's the usual mistake in spirituality. You have had a moment of openess and then you interpret if from the relative making it a closure. Very obvious

Yes and hamburger and fucking are also identical. Then let's say only: hamburger, fucking, hamburger...etc. instead of having a coherent conversation

If it's a possibility it's something. Possibility is something. If it's just a mathematical concept, an illusion, and appearance, it's something. Nothing means absolute absence of being. And it's impossible because being is

If it's something and same time nothing, something wins to nothing, because when it's nothing if always is something? In fact it is, that implies everything

You know that you are, then you know everything

Then it's something: absolute potentiality

Meaning is relative, the relative has meaning, a cause is previous than an effect. It's the level of happening. Then there is the level of being , where you just forget any meaning. Both are two faces of the reality, no one is false

If you say so...

Yes agree, magical could fit, but It's not from nothingness, there is not nothingness, it's unlimited. Unlimited means absolute potentiality, it's inevitable.

Are you serious? Then there is an entity, God, that in a giving moment make a decision: create a alter ego to have a life with limits. Look, if God would do that would be because it would be also a process subject to time than project an idea and then creates it for a reason. Then it would be relative. But over all, how do you know? Because you had that intuition?

What means "magical"? You say that because it's the opposite of "normal", but if you always perceive the reality as the flow of what is, it's just the reality

Are you aware of how that sounds? Why that could be the truth? Why would you do that if you are god? That's a fantasy of control. Instead releasing the control, that is what is needed for enlightenment, you say that you have absolute control.

Magic is an adjective that means like not natural, super natural or like that. It's just the reality. It's the fact of existing unfolding itself. If you open yourself to what ultimately is that, what you are, that's the freedom. Then the limits come again, but not so absolute.

Then fly at least a bit. Not a big flight, only a hundred of meters, not very high. That would be enough

How? Realizing that I'm creating the laws of universe? What if I awake to the fact that Putin wants to kill me?

The man is also happening right? You are and you happen. Enlightenment is removing the happening for a while and open yourself to the total being

Then in infinity now you can't fly. But according to you it's because you set that rule for a reason, to have this experience. How do you know that?

Thought are part of the process that we call "I", same as breath. Then in "I", the human procces, there is a center that predicts and decides. This center, the self, is real, it's a process that is happening that have neurological structures created by evolution. That self sees itself as a subject that perceives objects. You could say that all this is a model of the reality created by the brain, but it's also real. Maybe it's been created, but anything else is been created by the relative interactions that finds the way that's possible just because it's possible. The external world is no more real than the mind, both are the reality being created by the relationship between states that overlap in a coherent and stable way, creating increasingly complex patterns. one of them is, for example, a star, another a mind. They are both real. If a subject arises in that mind who can hold his breath or commit suicide, that subject is as real as anything else.

What trick? Do you remember that you create the limits but after you did a trick to forget them in order to have a more interesting experience?

That I would like to fly but I can just walk.

Ultimately reality is being or existing, that manifests as happening. It's irrelevant if you know it or not, reality is.

You are not imagining those laws, they are real, are the equation that rules this universe, they doesn't depends of your imagination