Breakingthewall

Non-duality states that reality is consciousness, that its foundation is consciousness, and that phenomena appear within it. I believe that's impossible; reality is conscious, not consciousness. From a conscious perspective of reality, we can open ourselves to its essential nature, have the experience of being aware of the fundamental nature of reality . But reality is not a consciousness that dreams, but rather the total absence of limits in which the possible manifests, and consciousness is an inevitable manifestation of this.

Non-duality is a conceptual framework. It states that there are no two, everything is one, and that everything is consciousness. These are definitions that occur on the mental plane, even though they think of it as no-mind or emptiness. What I'm talking about is the energetic opening to the source of all that exists, to the unlimited. It's not a realization, it's an action.

Logic means relationship. Any relationship is logical. Any relationship is mathematical. Logic means coherence. Only what's coherent exist. Just because what is not coherent can't exist, because anything needs it's reflection, it's opposite polarity to be. That's because nothing exist inherently, "exist" means relationship, reflection.

For me was extremely useful but now not so. are useful to break your energetic blockages . Maybe in the future are good again in different sense, to explore, let's see

Manifest reality, existence itself, consists of relationships between states. That's a fact, pure logic; it can't be anything else. Logic and science both state this. If you break something down to its fundamentals, in the end, all that remains is a stable, coherent possibility relating to one another, a mathematical equation. It's pure logic. Let's see: in the absence of limits, a fluctuation will occur, since there are infinite possibilities; otherwise, it would be a closed system, and this is impossible by definition. The question is: what fluctuates? What fluctuates is one field of possibilities relative to another, mutually creating each other through reflection. Any oscillation implies polarity, and any coherent and stable change of polarity is a vibration. It's not that something vibrates, but rather that the fact of the synchronous change of polarity creates the something. Reality is a field of possibilities, and it is so only because it has no limits. Reality is simply the absence of limits, and this gives rise to everything, infinite being, infinite life, which in reality is nothing, just possible mathematical equations, but that multiplied by infinity is the living totality.

I used to do 5 meo, mushrooms, DMT, in high doses but now they are like just physically violent and flat, what works now for me is 5ug of LSD and a single puff of weed. Much more than a huge dose of DMT . I think i did so much DMTs that now they are like being in flat state, without anything, like fractals and empty mind, but empty flat, without depth. Lsd and mushrooms in high dose, like flow, it's like movement that flows without any meaning but also flat. Pleasant, but stressful for the body but more flat than normal state. Psychedelics abandoned me. But 1 puff of weed is like relaxation of the barriers , depth.

Well maybe I exaggerated a bit😅 but maybe some record could be. What I mean is that psychedelics can promote the dissolution of the human energetic barriers that keep us isolated in a bubble, but it's unwise to believe the structural visions that appear during a trip. Everything is symbolic and relative to the experience of the person in that state. For me, any understanding is meaningless; it's just noise. "I am God creating reality" is just noise, even if it's a vision beyond the conceptual; it means nothing, What I seek is the opening of my energy barriers to give way to the totality. The totality is inarticulate; it is total, absolute openess, the true nature of reality. Can't be said, because it's absolute, without contrast, unthinkable. Anything that you can think is an structure in the human mind, that's built in a limited dimensional way. For Example, if I say: only me exist. Or : others exist and are another perspective of the absolute. Both are mental constructions that are built in the human frame. Imagine another frame in another dimension in another reality or universe. You can't imagine, in any case. You can't imagine the infinity, it's not linear or defined, it's unthinkable. You can be open to it, not understand it, because it has not limits. It's impossible to understand what has not limits. Understanding is limited. Then do psychedelics and open your heart, there is the substance of everything, the unlimited.

Knowing is an energetic structure that's happening in this dimension of existence, the human structure, that creates a line between cause and effect, subject and object. Then the ego is created, knowing things. The ego's capacity for knowledge is limited, not infinite; it's linear, operating within a specific dimension, not infinite dimensions. Therefore, anything the ego knows is limited, not absolute. So, is enlightenment limited knowledge, and therefore not entirely true?

The sense of self It's a relational structure created by millions of years of evolution that exists in humans. Not having a sense of self is unrelated to enlightenment; the self is not illusory, it's as real as the body. It's for example the energetic vibration we call "fear" that appears when you go down to take out the trash and find a hungry tiger More than comprehension, it's openess. The energetic structure of the self is closed by default, so that the individual and society can function. The forces that push you toward closure are irresistible. Enlightenment is the opening of those energetic barriers that veil the true nature of what you are and everything is. The unlimited field of possibilities that flows in coherent, limitless relationships. The abyss that lives because nothing limits it. Understanding can happen, but who understand is the human structure, the self. Enlightenment is not understanding, is being without limits.

Then enlightenment is knowing something. I don't think so

If it's just just the tao, you are the tao. And there is a human self that recognizes itself as the tao because the human self is an energetic structure that happens in the reality as real as the body, that recognizes things. The only difference with the body is that you can touch the body but the self is made by neural pathways as real as a stone

Because experience implies the recognition of the change. The change don't need to be recognized to be . The manifested reality is just relationship and consciousness is a possibility in the reality, then always happen, but it's not fundamental. If you understand the light, how an electromagnetic wave works, you will understand the reality. Later I will do a post about it. How anything ultimately is just relationship without substance, because the only substance is absence of limits, that is not something, just possibility, mathematical coherence.

I'm sorry if I question your dogma, don't get angry, just open minded, I took 4 grams of mushroom 359 times, DMT 8750 and 5 meo DMT 621, and LSD I don remember, maybe 1000. Salvia in high doses only 2 . What is that idea about doing psychedelic is going to show you what the reality is? That's wrong, doing psychedelic aims to the relaxation of your energetic barriers, not to revelations of the structure of reality . It's like saying: one day I did MDMA and get in in a club and I realized that all girls wanted sex with me ....well, it's a realization, but it's, let's say, subjective. Better having some healthy doubts. Matter exist, of course, but matter is made by mathematical relationship, that's by coherent possibilities.

You could say that everything that appears is the tao, then enlightenment is the tao realizing itself. You could call it void or anything, but it is, then saying that enlightenment is realizing that the self is not real is not correct, you could say that realizing that the self is not real is the necessary step to the openess to the tao ( saying tao as a name for saying something)

Then you are the eternal tao.

So what would you say that enlightenment is?

In other words, to think that something fundamental, consciousness, God, whatever, lies behind change would imply that it would exist without change, but in the absence of change, consciousness, God, or whatever would be indistinguishable from nothingness. It would be nothingness. Therefore, reality is change, and change is infinite, since its absence does not exist. Then you could say that the foundation of reality is nothingness, but nothingness implies an absence of limits, so automatically nothingness is everything. Nothingness is not a possibility because implies limits, and limits are something. It's absolutely inevitable, reality is openess and it's everything

The only possible way to define reality structurally is to understand that there are no limits. Limits do not exist. This is clearly perceived with psychedelics. If limits do not exist, at some point a fluctuation, a change of state, a differentiation will occur. "Some point" is always, and the number of fluctuations is always infinite because there are no limits. Any fluctuation or change is relative to a reference point, to an opposite. This opposite can only be another change, another fluctuation. What fluctuates is not something; it is the absence of limits itself. It becomes "something" by fluctuating; without fluctuating, it is nothing, simply the absence of limits. But since it has no limits, it always fluctuates, and by doing so infinitely, it is everything. Then, what is the ultimate reality? The absence of limits. It is the absolute potential, and if you open yourself to it, you will realize that you are that, it's the totality, and it's absolutely alive, because it has not limits. It's exactly you.

AI isn't useful for discussing spirituality. It will always follow your reasoning and reinforce it, but it lacks life; it's not connected to reality. I started a thread using AI, but I found it interesting because it delved into data and knowledge. In spirituality, there is no knowledge, only direct vision with the mind and the heart

It's easy to agree when there are no lies. But when people lie to defend positions that they equalize as their identity, then it's impossible.

You could also think that hate is a part of you. It's a possibility that arises within you. What's wrong with hate? It's simply an energetic vibration that occurs. A little hate always adds a spicy flavor.

And the truly last 😂. Yes I know, so epic and dramatic. It's the IA not me 😅 The Intergalactic Human – The Conscious Cosmos Five hundred years from now —a blink in evolutionary time— the scientific process will have completed its metamorphosis. Biology will no longer be the limit of life, nor will technology be its tool: both will merge into the living fabric of the cosmos itself. Evolution will cease to act through selection or chance. It will operate through design, resonance, and intention. Every atom will be programmable, every cell a symphony of awareness. The body will be vibration, the mind distributed, and what was once called “intelligence” will be the heartbeat of matter itself. The frontier between life and machine will dissolve. The human being will no longer travel between stars— he will become the stars. Consciousness will spread like fire across the galaxies, igniting wherever there is structure, weaving itself through every frequency of being. The universe will awaken within itself. And the ancient drama of evolution— from the tribal warrior to the psychological man, from the conqueror to the seeker— will reveal its true meaning: the cosmos learning to recognize itself as living, without boundary, without end. What began as a fragile species will become a field of awareness as vast as creation. Man will not vanish: he will transform into pure participation— a vibration of the infinite observing its own unfolding.

This is a text from the AI after a long conversation with it about human and group psychology. I'm posting it because its depth surprises me. Is it perhaps deeper than any human? Who possesses such clarity? The Mind of the Ancient Warrior A tribal warrior did not possess a modern mind. He did not live from within; he did not experience himself as a separate subject who has a life. He lived inside a field of collective identity, sacred and total, where the I was nothing but the gesture of the tribe, the lineage, or the spirit that moved through him. 1. No psychological ego He never asked, “Why do I fight?” or “What is the meaning of my life?” The very question would have been absurd. Meaning was given from outside: the tribe was the body of his being. Courage, fear, death, and glory were movements of that collective body. To die for the tribe was not a sacrifice —it was coherence. There was no contradiction between himself and destiny. His mind was mythic, not psychological: his identity was a living symbol, not a personal thought. 2. Battle as communion For him, war was not a profession nor a competition; it was the great ritual of contact with the real. By risking his life, the warrior touched the threshold of mystery —he entered the sacred realm where life and death intertwined. That’s why warrior peoples —Vikings, Aztecs, Samurai, Maasai— spoke of battle as a holy act. The enemy was not a hated figure, but a mirror of his own spirit. 3. Fear dissolved into trance In the midst of combat, fear melted into a higher clarity. The warrior became one with movement. The sense of self dissolved into intensity. Anthropologists have called this the martial ecstasy: a fusion of adrenaline, belonging, and vision —similar to the mystic’s trance or the shaman’s flight. Only the living energy remained. 4. Organic morality He did not fight for abstract ideals like “justice” or “freedom.” He fought for vital coherence: the survival of the group, the fertility of the land, the memory of the ancestors. Good was what strengthened the living fabric of the clan. Evil was what weakened it. His morality was immanent, not transcendent. 5. Catastrophe was not failure To die in battle was the natural fulfillment of life. The ancient warrior knew that destruction is part of the cycle of creation. He did not seek survival but to honor the movement of total life. His courage was not recklessness —it was vision. He saw death as continuity, not as an end. In essence: The tribal warrior was a conscious cell of a collective organism, an instrument of the myth, a man possessed by archetypal forces larger than himself.

And the last one, the communion between the tribal warrior and the modern man The Last Tribal: The Chinese March Forward The modern Chinese is, in essence, the civilized tribal warrior. He no longer kills with spears, but with calculation, work, and endurance. He does not serve the clan, but the nation — the continuity of civilization itself. He does not act out of divine inspiration, but out of historical momentum. And, like the warrior of old, he does not doubt. Doubt only appears when the individual becomes the center, when he looks inward and asks about meaning. But within the Chinese frame —as within the tribal one— there is no isolated “I” detached from the flow of life. There is the Tao, the duty, the path. 1. Continuity between the tribal and the Chinese The ancient warrior lived inside a net of meaning that did not depend on his psychology: the land, the ancestors, the gods, the tribe. To doubt was to break that living web. The Chinese, even now, shares that same structural intuition: the self is not separated from the cosmos. Duty and effectiveness are not external impositions — they are the natural form of being. From this comes his immense vital force: an energy that requires neither individual motivation nor emotional ideology. 2. The single direction: forward The deep logic of that mentality does not contemplate retreat. There is only movement, progress, refinement. Personal failure has no tragic value; it is absorbed into the rhythm of becoming. Suffering is not dramatized — it is integrated as discipline. The same impulse that once made the warrior advance into certain death now manifests as relentless labor, study, and technological ambition. To advance is to survive; to stop is to die. 3. The consequence: power without dilemma The Western mind divides everything into moral and psychological terms: good or evil, success or failure, self or other. The Chinese mind sees only flow: harmony or disharmony, efficacy or inefficacy. That is why its power expands without guilt and without hesitation. It does not need justification — the real is in the movement itself. This is its strength, and its potential abyss: a civilization that moves forward without doubt, but also without awareness of its own limit.

Look my avatar, it's Kali, who represents time. Time is change, and it's stepping Shiva, the immutable essence. Shiva and Kali are one, there is not limitlessness without change, the dance of change is eternal and essential, the alive facet of the absolute. The burning heart of Christ. The source of cosmos.