Breakingthewall

I am the body, I can point it. That's just a facet of you, necessary for survival No, the controlling self is absolutely necessary. Nowadays society if protective, but even so, you need control, visión, understanding and projection in order to not having a life that is horrible, like being a homeless rotten by rats in winter without no one who matters if you are alive or dead. I choose to avoid it

All non-dualistic spirituality is a farce and worthless; it doesn't liberate, it closes you off, it's better to forget it totally. True spirituality is an act of surrendering the self to the totality, an act of opening the heart to immensity that includes accepting destruction and suffering. This is an act of total humility, and it is precisely the opposite of what non-duality preaches: nothing is real, only you, consciousness, is real and can't be touched. It is absolute narcissism, anti-spirituality. Non duality say: the reality is a duality between the consciousness, that is the truth, and the form, that is falsehood, maya. You, the consciousness, are dreaming it, it is not real. This is the definition of narcissism.

There is no god and reality is not a dream. If you move your sight a millimeter, this movement must be coherent with the whole of the form, and it's the result of the synchronicity of the whole of the form. What you can do as a self is move yourself towards the openess, and believing that reality is a dream and you are creating it is a closure

No, there is true spirituality, the movement that you can do to opening yourself to your unlimited nature. It's a movement that implies the dissolution of the limits of the mind and the openess of your heart, that is closed by our inevitable bias through self preservation. But non duality is nothing of this, it's just a mental shift to scape from reality

What we call "you" is the body mind structure. There is a part of that you, the self, that is created by multiple neurological paths by evolution, that is a center that decides and wants, that appears as the center of the experience, in order to create more complex structures, that's what reality does when it's possible

Obviously, and denying it is absurd. Spirituality consists of opening yourself to your total nature from the relative form that is happening now, which is biased by the need for self-preservation, not in denying the existence of that form. This is merely a mental shift that doesn't lead to true openness.

You are so profound and your advices are so generous There is a thing, the form, and is caught in the desire of preservation that is inherent to the form autopreserved that we call life. You could say that this is nothing to feel profound, but still it is

If the container is limitlessness it's not a container, container implies a limit. Then why do you want that they collapse into union if they doesn't exist? Why are you telling me that I'm trapped if there are no distinctions between anything? So, if anyone says anything, you arrive fast without any nuance saying that he's wrong and trapped because he's making distinctions and awakening is unity. Then you make the distinction between being awake or bounded. Can you understand that that's irritating to read again and again?

Then there is something, a limit, that contains the structure. So the container is different than the structure?

Then there is a distinction between being bound up and free?

Where is the distinction that makes you think that all is within? Maybe could be outside? Outside of what? Inside of what? Inside implies outside. Notice that everything that you are saying are mental structures, and for you they are enlightenment

Then why do you said that I'm trapped? Where is the distinction between being trapped and free?

Im making a distinction between false spirituality, that affirm that reality is one but there are falsehood and truth, and distinctions are false while they make distinction between those false distinction and the truth, producing individuals with a flat mind who convince themselves about the falsehood of the reality, placing themselves in a superior position repressing themselves like mormons

Dry, flat and lifeless, exactly like non dualistic spirituality

Yes, you are superior. It's what matters right? That's the real goal of your spirituality. You are a wonderful example of what the op wanted to point. A narcissist. That is what non duality creates

How could be an illusion if there is only unity?

What mind, if there is only unity?

It's very obvious reading you what is your game. I shouldn't answer anymore, it's humiliating to participate

Sure deep sleep is the truth and being awake is falsehood. Go to sleep in the truth then , and stop to repeat non dualistic slogan for escapists

Sorry, now I took my dose of diazepam and I can read you. Lets start again. Tell me , o wise.

Sorry for being rude, you are my non dualistic friend, like a pet who repeat the same lesson, and I love you a lot pet. Don't get angry

Non-dualistic spirituality is simply escapism. It tells you that your human reality is an illusion and that what you are is consciousness; in other words, it tells you that you must create a new mental map and that this is enlightenment. For this, the main tool is Vipassana-style meditation, where you must observe your thoughts, which are maya, and thus identify with the observer, which is empty consciousness, what you truly are. All of this is a mess that only creates spiritual narcissists who are impossible to deal with. It's better to have a drug addict or a workoholic friend than a non-dualist; they are more authentic.

Probably this is the other side of the absolute, the purest, the unlimited without quality. For me it's always with quality, like the unlimited means all the qualities merged, the fact of being is affirmative, it's like brilliant, expansion, glory of being. But probably this could have a part of projection

I believe it's not necessary to break down physically; it's enough to do it mentally. To truly live as if death or catastrophe (for example, a serious illness) could happen in a minute. Which is absolutely true. I didn't, I read some about Ramakrishna time ago and I didn't get it a lot but now thinking about it seems that he's the mystic that really understood the creative power, the positive affirmation that being implies, and the absolute beauty of the form. About Kali, destruction has something like erotic, but I'm the sense of totally giving yourself, like from destruction the new emerges, the pure being in a clean form forged in the pain and fight. Kali steps Shiva because from the absolute, the dance of form always arises, creation without limit, absolutely wild, without control, unfathomable depth from the unlimited vitality of the unlimited abyss manifest itself. Kali is the absolute mystery taking forms, dancing with itself staring you with the face of a demon that hides a god.

To break the shell of the ego, you need, let's say, a special configuration: a tendency toward openness, a desire for surrender, for dissolution, for being one with reality. Even so, it's difficult because the desire to be an individual is always strong. It's very difficult to stop being an individual and become the limitless because you are an individual who wants to be an individual.