Breakingthewall

You mean that he was seductive, like you feel a holy aura looking and at him or listening him? maybe it doesn't mean what you think.

A living being is not matter and energy, but rather the pattern that distributes matter and energy with absolute precision. This pattern is not located anywhere, nor can it be detected, it's just happening. But every quantum vibration of your body is in an exact location. The complexity of this goes beyond what our minds can conceive. Life is not something that appears in the universe; it is a way in which the universe organizes itself. A living being is not a localized object, but a non-local, dynamic coherence that organizes matter and energy in time. Its reality is not substantial, but relational: it exists as a pattern, not as a thing. It's absolutely coherent with the whole and perfect, like anything else that exists

There is no illusion or deception in what appears. Perceived forms exist. A nighttime dream is not the same as waking perception. The mind creates images from perceived images. There is internal and external reality. All this does not imply that limits are absolute; they are relative to another form, but they exist. To say that they are illusions is meaningless; it is not a correct definition; it leads not to understanding but to confusion. Limits are relative, not illusory. There is not a center creating illusions, there are infinite centers flowing in synchronicity.

What he tried to convey? For example?

I don't understand what you mean. When it's said that you're imagining reality, that's exactly what it means: that a nighttime dream and waking reality are the same. That there's no difference between perception and dream creation.

It sounds good, but is it really like that? For example, Ramana explained how he realized he couldn't die, in an experience he had when he was very young, but did he explain why he knew about reincarnation? Anyway, a sardine He has no self-referential thought, and according to those who believe in reincarnation, it is an inferior state, which still has countless reincarnations left.

One should always be skeptical. Just because someone seems serene and without desires doesn't mean they're at peace with themselves or maybe they have a system that works at low intensity. It doesn't imply a deep understanding of the structure of reality. For example, how does he know there's a cycle of reincarnation that ends with enlightenment? It's an acquired idea.

It's important to remember that Ramana Maharshi was revered for his mystical "aura," not for what he said. Some people seek genuine mysticism, finding someone who conveys a sense of serenity, holiness ,and this implies that the person is enlightened, whatever that may mean, someone who knows the truth. Let's see, Ramana spoke of the cycle of reincarnation and said that his mother performed Mashamadi, then she ended the reincarnation well and a cow achieved enlightenment through transmission by him. Just a couple of examples.

What I said before needs clarification, since Nisgardatta, when he says "illusion," surely means "not ultimate." In that case, he's right, and he's one of the few mystics who makes that leap, not considering consciousness as the ultimate substance. The problem is the word "illusion," which implies falsehood. It would be much better to use the terms "relative" vs. "absolute," instead of "illusion" vs. "real." Nothing is false or illusory. Forms are real, but they are relational in form, absolute in essence.

The feeling of "I am" exists in contrast to an external world. Without an external world, there is no "I am" because there is no consciousness. The fact is that reality will always reflect itself in some way, and in doing so, it will realize what it is, which is true. Therefore, what Nisgardatta says is false if we want to be precise. "Illusion" is a misleading word; nothing is an illusion, but rather different perspectives. To say that I am is an illusion is like saying that consciousness is an illusion, or that form is an illusion. glorifying emptiness and denying wholeness, depressed neo-Advaida defining enlightenment as nothing

Yeah but one alone is not the absolute truth , is ego inflation. The ego must explode and disappear, then there is not one nor loneliness

I've had that experience many times with psychedelics, especially with 5-MeO-DMT. It's absolutely horrible. You're alone, you are reality, there's nowhere to go, no time. You are eternal, reality is an eternal prison. You've always been here, alone, in eternity. There is no escape. I've even vomited, gone out into the street in a state of extreme high to avoid seeing that horror, drunk 4 beers in a row at a bar afterward to forget it, etc. But my feeling was: you have to hit that spot. You have to enter that state of absolute solitude until it becomes normal. It's almost impossible because it's horrible. Then one day I did 5-MeO-DMT, and... the usual, cosmic loneliness, a gong that resonates and is absolute horror. I thought, okay, this is what I was meant to see today....again. After a few seconds I thought: no, I'm not going to settle for this shit. I put a double or triple amount of 5-MeO in the pipe without weighing it and thought: show me the truth or kill me. Reality shattered. There was no loneliness because there were no limits. It was everything, unlimited, total. It wasn't defined, closed, drawn, confined to a form, it was the unlimited, it wasn't someone, it was the boundless ocean. Nothing could be better, "better" wasn't a possibility, it, or i, was total, period. "Alone" means nothing, because it's total, alone is absolutely meaningless, because alone is closed and you are open. Alone means a circle. Everything mean no lines, no definition. There is not one. Not numbers. One means nothing. If one means something, you are closed.

When someone says that reality is love, they reveal their attachment to the concept and definition since love is a subjective human valuation. First, what does love mean? Titanic-style love, or more like your grandmother's, or perhaps the way you love your cat? Protection? Care? Positive evaluation? Successful identification? Erect penis? Torturing children in your garage? 1 kg of cocaine ? It's complicated, since it means something different to each person. You could say that reality is relationship without denial, expansion without limits or synchronicity that emerges from the absence of boundaries. This means something concrete. But love doesn't mean anything, it's like saying: reality is beauty, or reality is wonderful, or reality is cool. Yes of course, you could say: I don't mean human love but mystical love. Then how do you know what's mystical love? You have an experience and it's written: mystical love? Or the word mystical love comes to your mind in that moment?

You mean here that others experiences could happen but not simultaneously. You say this because you're positioning the self, the center that perceives or receives experience, as the sole subject that has experiences. But this is precisely where the error lies. There isn't a subject that receives experience; the subject is experience. I don't have an experience; I am that experience, and without experience there is no self, no perceiving center. "I" can't have other experiences because if there are others experiences, as they are, they are not me. Not me as a self, as an observer. The absolute is not an observer, is what allows the observation. All this idea of creation, God, solipsism, stems from confusing the relative self with the absolute being. The absolute being is not someone, not a center; it is the fact of being that derives from total openness. It's not consciousness, consciousness is a form that happens. Is the reality reflecting in itself. Now you could say: everything is consciousness because without consciousness you aren't, then nothing is. Here is the problem: you as absolute are not a point of view, a perceptor, an observer. You are the totality where observation is possible. The difference is total. No, it's accurate for me.

Yes. It's mathematically impossible that there are not others experiences if we admit that reality has not absolute limits. The other possibility would be that the only experience in the totality of reality is that of a person who is currently writing on a phone and who lives in Spain, etc., etc. Since this is impossible, it is absolutely certain that in the totality of unlimited reality, other experiences will eventually occur. These experiences are not temporally linked, they are not successive, since temporality is something internal to this experience, not something absolute. Therefore, right now there are infinite experiences. It's absolutely sure, you don't need to have those experiences, same than you don't need to go to Jupiter to know absolutely sure that it exists. The logical mind is a perception tool as accurate or more than the qualia.

You're talking about a subjective assessment while high. I say assessment, not experience, because experience would be, for example, an experience of openness, expansion, fluidity, contraction, horror, glory, terror, etc. But knowing that you are God dreaming reality, which emanates from you and has no reality of its own outside of you, is an assessment. Psychedelic makes your mind have hallucinations, then it's better don't believe in them as they were more real than sober state. Are good to dissolve energetic barriers, but not to make a map about how reality is

Then it's your experience that you are god dreaming the reality?

I can absolutely prove that other experiences exist besides my own; it's very simple. My experience is limited, but reality cannot be limited, therefore there are other experiences, infinite ones. It's very simple: your experience is concrete, defined. It is absolutely certain that in eternity and infinity there will be other, completely different experiences. Then, your experience is not the only

What we are in form cannot die. It is absolute being. It is outside of time and outside of becoming. It cannot be grasped by the mind, since the mind occurs within it. It is total limitlessness, and limitlessness is, because it has no limits, and you are exactly that. It is total, and it is what we are in this very instant. Form is simply the inevitable consequence of limitlessness. There is always form changing , but the essence is always the same: you. You simply have to open yourself to it.

Well you could go further and understand that others have a real experience. Or maybe I could think that in eternity only the human that I am writing in a phone now is the only experience that happened and is going to happen? If other experiences are possible, where are them? In the future? In the past? Then infinity is a timeline?

I would say that death is the disintegration of this form, period. You might think: and then another form appears. But there is no "after." "After" is in this form. Reality simply continues being, in infinite forms. The form that you are integrates into the totality; there is no self that perceives it because self and perception are attributes of this form. Perhaps, or probably, another form with a similar energetic configuration, with a pattern that takes the current one as its basis, will begin, but "you" will not be there. You are a construct of this form, an apparent center that registers and identifies itself as disappearing into the total abyss. Hallelujah for that, right? Absolute freedom

Existence is relative movement, becoming. In absence of limitations there is not real movement, nothing arrives anywhere, then all movement is cyclical, ends in the start.

Sure, You might perceive a guy as very noble and then he turns out to be a professional con artist, but there's a guy with his own reality. The spirituality that says reality is a dream means that there isn't a guy; you're imagining him, he doesn't really exist, just like when you dream while you're sleeping

If you identify with everything, as you've said, what's the difference between me being tortured and you being tortured? It seems different, then. Aren't you equally identified with your limited human reality than with the totality of existence? Perhaps it's just a mind game that works until the guy with the red-hot irons arrives. Why to deny what's obvious? Same than affirm that you can realize that you are creating the reality as god but you can't change it

Then for you is the same if you are imprisoned for life or if someone in Iran is imprisoned for life?