DocWatts

Not strong, only aggressive cause the power ain't directed That's why we are subjected to the will of the oppressive Not compassionate, only polite, we well trained Our sincerity's rehearsed in stage, it's just a game We chasing after death just to call ourselves brave

If a person's sense of self worth comes from where they are positioned within a Dominator Hierarchy, of course they're going to be threatened by the intelligence, strength, and independence of whomever it is that society has conditioned them to feel 'superior' to. Thing about Dominator Hierarchies is that in addition to the obvious harm they cause to the people that are being subjugated, they are also detrimental to the people at the top of the hierarchies for the toxic notions of self worth they instill based upon illusory feelings of unearned superiority. So anything that comes along to shatter that illusion is going to be perceived as an attack on one's self worth.

Feminism has had the side effect of emasculating insecure men. Healthy masculinity isn't threatened by gender equality. That has less to do with feminism, and more to due with unhealthy expectations that society places on men .

Let's maybe draw a distinction between wanting Legal Consequences for public figures that spread misinformation and incite political violence, and just wishing that Conservatives would go away somehow. Because that's never going to happen, and phrasing it in the way you did could be perceived as a veiled threat, which needless to say is something we don't want.

For the Republican Party to not die it will either have to moderate its policy platform to appeal to enough people to win elections, or it will have to overthrow Democracy. There's no third option here.

Identifying as an anti-feminist is just as backwards as openly proclaiming that you're anti- Civil Rights. In both cases it makes you look like a dumb and bigoted person not worth listening to or taking seriously. That doesn't mean that excesses in both of these movements don't exist, but building an identity around opposition to feminism is going to make everything you say highly suspect.

Senate Democrats have begun the budget reconciliation process for Covid-19 relief https://www.vox.com/2021/2/3/22263177/senate-democrats-covid-19-relief-budget-reconciliation

Also the aforementioned infamously tone deaf Pepsi ad schemed up by boardroom execs trying to appear 'woke' to the millennials

Good riff by South Park on cringy attempts by Corporations who attempt to use Social Movements as a platform for advertising.

Let's not forget the most important lesson that Rudolph has to teach us

I'm assuming you mean most Adults don't develop further than the center of gravity for their Culture (or whatever subculture Culture was most prevalent in the circumstances they grew up in)? That's not surprising really, since it's kind of where most people will land at by default, and going beyond that requires actual effort on that Individual's part.

That is cool. Love how effectively minimalist design is used here.

Same here. In a different world They Live would be a fun kitshy 80s movie along the lines of something like Running Man or Total Recall, but such is the insanity of the times we live in that you can draw a direct line between the Paranoia represented in something like They Live and fascists storming the capitol. Or the thousands of preventable Covid deaths directly linked to Conspiratorial Delusions.

Yeah the depiction of Conspiracy Theories in popular culture doesn't feel as benign as it did back during the era of X-Files and Twin Peaks. Up until five or ten years ago it was a lot easier to just kind of laugh off Conspiracy Theories, since most people didn't take them seriously. It becomes a much more frightening idea when Conspiracy Nutjobs begin amassing political power, and a direct line can be drawn between Conspiracy Beliefs and political radicalization. Feels cringe AF these days when Conspiracy Nutjobs are getting elected to High Office, and Conspiracy Theories are fueling political violence and causing thousands of preventable deaths during a pandemic.

In the short term it remains to be seen, but in the long run demographic changes will make them non viable as a national party unless they make significant inroads with non-rich, non-white Voters by moderating thier policy platform. Of course they could just continue down the road of trying to maintain power by eroding Democracy, but their prospects of success with that strategy are dubious. I could see two realistic paths for the GOP: (1) They moderate thier economic platform to be inclusive of working and middle class interests (rather than just the rich), while maintaining thier ties to cultural conservatives (2) They reign in thier Conservative cultural beliefs and become more inclusive of non whites and LGBT communities, while continuing to push for economic policies favoring the wealthy

Great news; apparently the $15 minimum wage legislation that Democrats introduced to Congress includes a mechanism to Index the Minimum Wage to the Median Wage of the country. Which would mean that it would be updated to account for inflation, and this same battle won't have to be fought again in ten to fifteen years. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/26/democrats-reintroduce-15-minimum-wage-bill-with-unified-control-of-congress.html

The filibuster needs to be nuked from orbit by the Democrats, using any avenue that presents itself. While in theory it presents a check on the power of the majority, in practice it basically holds all national legislation hostage to obstructionism by Bad Faith Actors representing a minority of Americans as well as the financial incentives of Special Interests.

Marxists that rigidly cling to 19th century economic theory, despite the massive changes that have taken place over the last 150 years, will then wonder why there isn't a shared class consciousness between someone making minimum wage working at Wal-Mart and living off from food stamps, and someone making $65,000 a year as a software engineer at Microsoft. On a qualitative level there's a world of difference between these two examples, and to reduce everything down to an owner and a worker class is to miss huge and important distinctions in the lived experiences of people. I swear, people who cling rigidly to Marxist economic theory are the mirror reflection of Libertarian Free Market evangelists.

The Comedy just writes itself... GOP Congresswoman blamed deadly forest fire on Jewish space laser https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.jpost.com/american-politics/marjorie-taylor-greene-blamed-deadly-forest-fire-on-rothschild-inc-657130/amp?fbclid=IwAR3jJS1-JJncNOuz6WiW9aeTU0nE640uRaYpbUmYOg_FJUZPNkh2H22iIZA

In practice, anyone complaining about reverse racism directed at whites is almost certainly harboring implicitly racist attitudes and beliefs, or at the very least using it as a smokescreen to push for an ethnocentric worldview. Some things are ridiculous enough that it's okay to dismiss them out of hand...

@SOUL I suppose my point is that politicians and legislators don't operate in a vacuum, there's a larger cultural context that politicians have to work within. How the Left, in a broader cultural context, conducts itself matters. If the Left is seen by the rest of the Culture as being unreasonable, it's going to make it harder for Progressives to get elected, and to be effective once in office. The only way that social change is going to happen is to build a broad base of support for the policy platform we would like to see enacted. That's exactly how things like marijuana legalization and gay marriage came to be accepted; the Left was successful in making itself seem reasonable to the rest of the Culture, to the point where these issues are no longer controversial to most people. If we want things like Police Reform to happen, it has to be pitched in a way that's not scary to people in middle America. People like Bernie realize this, but not everyone ln the Left does. Your point about algorithm bubbles that lead to echo chambers is of course true, but how these bubbles interact with the rest of the culture matters. If the rest of the country associates Leftists with its most radical and extreme elements, then the social policies that the Left advocates for are going to be significantly hindered. The easier it is for people to make a caricature of you, the harder time you're going to have selling them on your ideas. So, Pragmatic Idealism ftw.

The negativity of which I was referring to was directed at people outside of the political apparatus, with unreasonable expectations for what someone working within our political system should be able to accomplish. The catalyst for my earlier thought was seeing people complain that legislation mandating that a $15 minimum be phased in over four years, rather than going in to effect immediately; while also ignoring that the Bill would also eliminate the sub-minimum wage for tipped workers and disabled people. Yeah that's not ideal, but it goes a long way in fixing a serious problem. Contrast that attitude with that of actual policy makers themselves, who know that they have to work with moderates in order to have any chance at getting legislation passed. I'd argue that Bernie has been using this in a highly effective way to move the policy platform of the Democratic Party to the Left. Would he be in the position of considerable influence he's in now if he'd burned all his bridges by obstinately refusing to work with people that didn't share his democratic socialist ideals? Think of it another way; if Moderates in the Democratic Party get shit on by the Left no matter what they do, what motivation is for them to put any effort in to be better? By all means criticize when it's warranted, but also give due credit when appropriate as well. Game Denial, or demanding purity within a corrupt political system, is a good way to build up unrealistic expectations while getting nothing accomplished. When what we should be working on is changing the Rules of the Game. I'm fully behind organizations like Wolf-PAC which are looking to do just that, but in the mean time we'll be far better off doing the best we can with the system that's in place.

It's not about being 'nice' for its own sake, it's about not alienating people who might otherwise be sympathetic towards the types of policies and reforms we would like to see enacted. You're right that Progressive Policy proposals tend to be broadly popular, but if politics were just a matter of having better policy positions, the Republican Party would have gone the way of the Whigs and the US wouldn't be the only industrialized Democracy without a Universal Healthcare system. Let's also make sure to differentiate between Individuals that support egalitarian policy but in a more cautious way, and Institutional Obstructionism due to conflicts of interest. It would behoove us to be more understanding and patient with the former, while continuing to Call out the latter.

I can't be the only one who feels bad for these people, when it's so evident how blatantly they've been emotionally manipulated by Bad Actors that couldn't give two shits about them.

Which is why it's not worth engaging Bad Faith Actors on the Right, for the reasons you outline; if someone has no interest in solving any of the issues that we care about, then yeah, it's a waste of time. The problem is when you begin drawing false equivalencies between Centrists or Liberals and the Right, for the reason that the former (Centrists and Liberals) tend to be much more amenable to making progress on things like wealth inequality, climate change, racial inequities, etc. What we should realistically be shooting for is to move the Overton Window to the Left, and make it so that Progressive Ideas become more and more acceptable in main stream political discussions. The way this is done is by making a compelling case that our ideas are reasonable, and by being willing to work with others within the system. Why do you think Bernie Sanders has been so successful? Do you think he'd be one of the most powerful people in the US Senate right now if he'd run as an Independent, and made a point of alienating the very people he'd need to work with in order to get anything accomplished? Or is it that he had enough Wisdom to know that the path of least Resistance for effecting change is to work within the system in order to change the rules of the Game.