The0Self

You could say that, if by imagination you mean: all there is, not appearing to anyone separate. So absolute truth in that sense can never ever be known.

But you can't really get back there, because it wasn't real anyway; you already weren't experiencing or believing what's real... Nor was there actually anyone there -- there's only ever simply what appears, with no separation between what appears. There's nothing that is magic, because everything is magic.

Would you undo the falling away of your belief in Santa Claus? If so, why?

I would have never undone my apparent awakening. It was loads of fun. Liberation however cannot be undone because it's the apparent recognition, deeply intuitively and obviously, and by no one, that there never was anyone separate on a path in the first place. It was a dream. It can't be undone because it didn't actually happen.

Razor or scissors. Each tab is often at least 100ug. Cut into quarters and take 1-2 halves of a quarter -- 12.5-25ug if they're 100ug/tab. If they're more than like 110ug, then don't take a whole quarter, take an eighth. Microdose is 10-25ug. Up to 30ug with tolerance.

Very organic song made on the fly by 3 strangers:

Everything is the same no-thing.

Very intense awakening or detachment experience. He comes back and wants to tell other people how to get where he thinks he got. It’s life Sadguru’ing. I don’t know. Nothing wrong or right with it either way.

Yes, this is utterly indescribable. Even going on for 100 years just constantly describing this would never actually resemble what this is. The description itself would also just be this, which has no other.

You could say imagination is all there is -- not imagined (contained) by anyone separate from it.

God did not create Love. Love is already timelessly everything, completely without need or meaning or purpose or direction or goal.

Paradoxically, even though nothing was actually lost, nothing whatsoever was gained. All those experiences never compared to this, because there’s nothing better than this. However at the same time, this is no better than that — the reason they don’t compare is simply because there’s no connection between them. And the reason there is no connection... is that there is no separation. There isn’t anyone separate from what happens. I know you’re saying you are that/this, and yeah this is your true nature, but your true nature is nothing being everything, so yeah it’s basically not worth talking about.

There’s what’s appearing, with no other, which is not a thing. It’s not actually something here, otherwise there’d have to be an other, because if there’s a real here, then there’s a real there. There is neither one nor many. There aren’t two, which is why one can resonate, but it’s just a nice idea. There is no thing, and one implies a thing.

Thanks, I like yours too!

It's all oneness, but there's no separation between them, so there's no connection, and no separate things -- and one implies "I am real" which is a thing. There is only nothing, but it appears to be without limit.

It's just energy. And a total story. Everything said does not refer to anything which is true. There is of course no seeker and there are no others. And no knowing, for that matter. There isn't anything which refers to anything else, in reality. The apparent stage happening there is often called solipsism. Of course there isn't actually someone there. I'm not talking to anything there's just perhaps an illusory sense that appears to be in that, but no one is talking to an actual appearance, there is just words happening and describing nothing for no reason.

Practically all the time, apparently! Seriously though. I don't have a clue about what's ultimately happening, because it's obvious that nothing is happening. It's not describable. It's not even a state that I'm in, either.

That's an apparent stage spiritual seekers can experience. It's called, or at least associated with, solipsism. It's not the truth -- it could be said to apparently be truer than materialism. Though in the end there's nothing truer than anything else, there's only the absolute without opposite or other.

I dig what you're saying, but that's not happening here. I use I as an expression all the time and there is never the thought "I am no one" or such. There's just typing, enjoyment, floors, roads, etc appearing for no reason with nothing behind it and with no reality or unreality seen by anyone as important or meaningful to someone separate from what happens. There's just what appears to be, and nothing else.

Good to see you're back! Sounds great! There is still a fondness here of those wonderful experiments with emptiness. The final and ultimate ungroundedness is never, ever caused. It can apparently be recognized that everything was always equalized. Boundlessness blindly being all there is. The destination never left, because it will never arrive. You know those things you just can't bring yourself to believe but they resonate anyway? How about this: There never was a you, separate from everything, and there isn't one there now. Not saying there isn't an apparent shift that can happen, but I am saying that shift isn't real. It's quite radical, and one thing in particular that's both seen here, and also would've been seen as far too radical to me as a seeker: even looking back in memories, the me simply wasn't ever there.

I did find that the clearest and most effective instructions for me were from https://www.youtube.com/c/SiftingtotheTruth One point of confusion might be when he says "ignore all thought" -- What he actually means, said a different way, is ignore all experienced objects (everything). It's just self inquiry. Energy appearing as self inquiry. But those instructions will likely involve more insights and less confusion than many other instructions. Not saying it's the best possible instruction that is or can be but it's the best I found, apparently. If you don't know how to do it, I'll just say: it's almost always simpler than you think, and takes more effort than you think. In general that's just how I see it, NOT saying it's right or wrong.

You may not need grounding, but the body does. Perhaps let the body function as it does in the way it pleases and in a way that will allow it more well-being. Not that there's anyone to choose, but maybe something will see that the insanity is not yours.

Absolutely. And twisted/crazy/fucked-up... of course (is it any surprise?) is not exempt from the theme of going full circle. (Actually, it is quite a surprise, but perhaps the point was made... but it's impossible to eff the ineffable.) Insanely unspeakable profundity -> absolute profundity -> = absolute simplicity/ordinariness. This is breathtakingly ordinary and simple. It just happens to have no limit, so it can appear as unfathomable complexity -- that's amazing. And of course there's absolutely no intention for this to convince anyone that ordinary is better than extraordinary, because they aren't two anyway, nor is anything really.

While I wouldn't say this is false, it's not strictly true, because the my/I referred to does not have anything (since it is the illusory dream itself), including an imagination. In that sense you could say there is only imagination, but it's not controlled/guided/caused by something separate from it. There's just boundlessness / the infinite / unconditional love being blindly itself, which is and is not.

Consciousness is always evolving... in the dream of the evolution of consciousness. The apparent you (not real you) is consciousness, which is separation... but what you really are is nothing, appearing as everything, with no separation between what appears, and no real play of opposites... which the apparent you seems to live in. There's no separate you conscious of what appears, there is only what appears, to no one. There's a incessant open invitation for what you really are (all there is; what is and is not) to see that all the suffering and the happiness that arises... is not yours... They just are what they are -- which could be (woefully insufficiently) described as emptiness being full, or what appears to be happening, without other... nothing else, including some other happening, or something else which could be known, or something which could know the known or know what's appearing (which is of course appearing for no one separate). There is no space between this body and this screen that's apparently being seen. The screen and the body are not two. There's no real distance at all, there just is what's appearing. It's actually too obvious to get, but "too obvious" in that sense does not mean "it's easy to get and someone still isn't getting it," NO, not at ALL... It's actually TOO obvious to get -- no one CAN get it because there isn't anyone separate to do so!