And you believe this is true of all libertarians? That seems to be a very narrow take on an entire movement.
Many libertarians, such as myself, hold the view that it is simply wrong to initiate violence against peaceful people whether it be to further an economic or social agenda. The problems of society must be solved peacefully, not through the violence police powers of the state.
There is no objectively legitimate source of authority for one person to rule over another and hold a monopoly on justice. You've argued that libertarians "believe" that there is some universal source of right and wrong, which is a misguided view of what we hold as the source of rights. I'd love to see you argue for the right to rule as being anything other than some "universal source of right and wrong."
I conclude that your statism is a religion, and that you fundamentally believe that libertarians are the heretics and blasphemers who refuse to prostate themselves before that altar. You aren't any more "actualized" than a Born-Again Christian as you still proselytize for an authoritarian body to punish the wicked and reward the righteous and be the source of salvation for mankind.
