Gesundheit

Profundity is a state of consciousness. If you're at that frequency, the sight of a dumb rock would floor you to the ground. But unless you're there, you're not going to see profundity in anything, no matter what it is. P.S. It's not a better state per se. I like to think of it as a more of a gullible/naive state.

Two more warning points to go. We'll see.

Can someone be spiritual without being needy? I don't think so. The whole concept of a supreme God is grounded in neediness. God is always god of the gaps. He is there to fill in the blanks. Whatever you lack, by definition, is God.

That, first, does not answer the initial questions. And second, it begs another question; why am I imagining anything in the first place?

We could very easily solve this problem by assuming an external God that is not the same thing as existence. And then by assuming that existence is God's creation, not God himself. Yep, an external God could do anything. He does not need to explain anything or tell us how he does his stuff though.

I seriously literally want to murder some people right now.

A clear-cut case of a delusional self-biased human who refuses to admit that he is deluded.

It's always good to stay off drugs.

You trying to figure out this Karma thing is itself part of Karma.

That's total BS. You aren't any more advanced than a rock. You just think you are.

The more appropriate questioning, I think, should be directed towards them. Why are you asking us to prove/disprove psychics? Ask them to prove themselves to you by explaining their knowledge in detail. What you're doing here is called the burden of proof fallacy. We're not obliged to provide anything about them. They're obliged to provide proof for their claims. A few coincidences here and there do not suffice in empirical research, especially that they're not double-blinded or even held by any scientific standards. And on top of that, they are very susceptible to self-deceptions caused by self-biases. But you know, you're free to believe whatever you want.

Hi! What are some practical ways for reaching and maintaining fearlessness/peace of mind in day to day life? I've reached a point where I don't see life worth living except from that particular state. It really feels stupid to settle for anything less than that. Why live in fear when you don't have to? Right? The thing is that the ego is standing in the way, and it's creating fear and therefore not allowing fearlessness. A lot of people have multiple facets and components to their egos, like greed, pride, fear, anger, etc... I think I do too. Although, I think my ego is mostly made out fear and attachment. I've noticed that when I dissolve the ego, I reach the state of not-knowing/fearlessness/peace of mind. But that's only easy when I isolate myself from people. However, as soon as I return to the ordinary life, I start losing awareness and my ego gets reborn. I've noticed that it starts with conscious fear, which im time turns into unconscious attachment, and then it turns into unconscious fear, which then will needs deconstructing to be let go of. So how can I reach that state and maintain it for good? Is that realistic?

I know psychics and witches that died from mortar bombs. How could they not see it coming?

I don't need stupid advice from stupid hippies. They're already number one on my murder list.

Touché! It's just ideology at the end of the day, not different from any other ideology. My ancestors have been living with that kind of thinking regarding marriage for hundreds of years. It's only now that women are getting upset about it because they're being exposed to western ideologies. Not that any ideology is better than the other in my opinion, that's another issue. The issue here is that most feminists invent their own suffering just because they don't realize their ideology and self-bias. A lot of people confuse equality for truth, when in fact they're two different things. And before someone comes here and attacks me; I am a feminist and I support equality. But that doesn't prevent me from seeing my own biases and acknowledging them, and it most definitely does not make me confuse my agendas for reality.

Look, lady. Just because it's your thread, doesn't mean we can't have tangent discussions. I asked a question for something entirely unrelated to you or your thread, but somewhat a tangent of it. I meant to ask it for my own self. What if my self-expression is toxic to the collective? I am asking this because I experience criminal thoughts sometimes. Just relax a little bit, okay? No one is targeting you.

The strange-loop you missed, though.

As I said above, the roles are interchangeable for the sake of thrill. A dominant man can enjoy cunniligus when it makes the woman under his control. He dominates her with pleasure.

It's made of neurons.

What if self-expression is toxic to the collective?

Well, that's what I'm doing. I'm compromising my true authentic self for preserving some attachments.

No, it's not that simple. That's like saying most women love cupcakes so they love shoving them inside their vaginas! It's that simple. Why would a woman want to put a penis in her mouth when it obviously belongs in her vagina? See, that is simple. It only becomes complicated when you start desiring reality in some way it doesn't have to be. Not saying that oral sex is wrong or bad or anything. Just saying that it's not 100% authentic.

@Someone here God is that which obeys no rules.

Lol exactly! Oral sex/blowjob is a woman's way of showing her man affection by taking the submissive obedient role. Because she wants to please her man. The same thing goes for cunniligus. Sub-dom sex is most of the times interchangeable. It's about the fun and thrill. No specific role is obligatory. Anal sex is different because it can be painful and not many women prefer it.