Jacob Morres

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    2,262

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jacob Morres

  3. Posted · Edited by Jacob Morres

    5 hours ago, mud said:

    Like heroin addiction?

    Thats tough. Maybe you can search for books and material of successful heroin recoveries and share that info with them. And also provide them options for recovery like centers/therapy etc.

    Ultimately they need to go through the therapy themselves but providing the infrastructure in a low resistance way can help them go through it 

    Theres prob also books on how to help someone with heroin addiction that u can pull insight from

     

  4. Posted · Edited by Jacob Morres

    12 hours ago, PenguinPablo said:

    If they were so undeveloped they fell for Trump, you won't be able to make any meaningful changes.

    You'd be surprised. I've had some conversations where I helped move the needle with some people. Usually their ideology is really baked and there is like 50 philosophies that their ideology is based on but you can probably help with a couple here or there 

  5. Posted · Edited by Jacob Morres

    1 hour ago, BlessedLion said:

    Along with this Beta video, I’m still unsure- what’s the solution here? Be average? Plug into a social structure that keeps people miserable, drained, and lonely? 

    .

    dr k has a lot of good wisdom though i've learned a lot. prob just take what you like and discard what you dont imo. 

  6. Posted · Edited by Jacob Morres

    20 hours ago, Emerald said:

    It seems like most of the guys on this forum hit a bottle neck with their personal development path because they keep trying to be coca-cola and appeal to the lowest common denominator of attractiveness to women.

    It's both imo, you go for the mass appeal (in my perspective (money+looks+game) because most girls like this. 

    And then you niche down with your own unique flair and pick the girls that you like 

    If you don't got the former you can barely even do the latter 

  7. Posted · Edited by Jacob Morres

    5 hours ago, Emerald said:

    That's the entire point I've been making.

    Women respond the most to who they have chemistry with... which is usually with regular average guys that they encounter in their daily lives.

    Honestly, if there isn't a significant amount of human-to-human chemistry, I wouldn't feel compelled towards anything sexual. And I think most women are the exact same way.. 

    I agree. But in my experience human connection alone doesnt get you far. You will get a near 0 connections on dating apps (💀) and girls won't look at you

    It's almost impossible just to rely on human connection alone. I think red pill has a lot of truth as well, maxing that stuff really does give you way more opportunity 

  13. Posted · Edited by Jacob Morres

    So the 5'4 skinny no clout minimum wage softbois are the real alphas. Damn what am I doing 

    i think the pov of a conventionally unmasculine guy is missing here. A lot of guys go into that stuff bc they dont get girls. Now ppl are saying that is enough to get girls

  15. Posted · Edited by Jacob Morres

    @zazen  it definitely could be partially merit based versus being race based. But for some studies like for guaging differences in callback rates with similar variables (like same resume, same companies, similar application timing with only the name changed), it seems pretty clear (like the previous study i linked)

    Another one like this:

    "The ethnic name groups were less likely to receive follow up questions or invitations to meet as compared to the white name group."

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.abc.net.au/article/104583246

    Knowledge is "woke" lol. 

    eb47fa143e7f3979a0801c6f85066173.jpeg

  17. Posted

    2 hours ago, Jacob Morres said:

    You could have white & male privelege, and also be developmentally & socieconomically unpriveleged, which leads you to work in mcdonalds 

    White privelege in the job market specifically would be like: Like less barriers in top levels in companies, more likely to get a call back due to your name, people will assume you are a 'cultural fit' much more easily, better access to networks of white people (due to in-group preferences). That being said, being white won't get you to the top automatically, but there are subtle priveleges that you do get. If you work at mcd while older, there is socieconomic and maybe IQ/developmental challenges at play.

    The privelege isnt white = automatically rich lol. That is way too reductive 

    Applies to men, and straight ppl too

    Im not criticizing you tbh, just pointing out some blindspots 

    Did you read this @SwiftQuill?

    It addresses most of your latest comment 

  21. Posted · Edited by Jacob Morres

    1 hour ago, SwiftQuill said:

    I wish those woke retards would reincarnate in a next life, as a minimum wage McDonald's worker. And gaslit by woke scholars about their supposed "cis white male privilege".

    You could have white & male privelege, and also be developmentally & socieconomically unpriveleged, which leads you to work in mcdonalds 

    White privelege in the job market specifically would be like: Like less barriers in top levels in companies, more likely to get a call back due to your name, people will assume you are a 'cultural fit' much more easily, better access to networks of white people (due to in-group preferences). That being said, being white won't get you to the top automatically, but there are subtle priveleges that you do get. If you work at mcd while older, there is socieconomic and maybe IQ/developmental challenges at play.

    The privelege isnt white = automatically rich lol. That is way too reductive 

    Applies to men, and straight ppl too

    Im not criticizing you tbh, just pointing out some blindspots 

  22. Posted · Edited by Jacob Morres

     

    @SwiftQuill

    Ignoring data is a huge mistake. They're not perfect, but they include a lot of valuable info 

    At the end of the day, you need data for your "white males are the real ones oppressed". Is your data for this claim even higher quality than what comes from scientific studies? 

    Id recommend that you steelman science and have a high quality opinion of it instead of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Your opinion leans way more emotional than truth and quality based 

  23. Posted · Edited by Jacob Morres

    @SwiftQuill

    You never responded to my comment from before, that showed 25% of top companies discriminate against black people with statistical significance 

    Whats your thoughts on that, and how much action should be taken on that, if any? 

    I noticed you quite passionate about being anti-dei, because of discrimination. I wonder if it stops there however, when it's non white people affected? 

     

    My 2nd question is, if your pursuit to destroy wokeness is wise, considering battling racism is not on the right wings agenda? 

    If there is no left wing, and right wings purpose is to destroy the left... coupled with the fact of little to no concern for racism on the right -> do you think racism gets better or worse? 

  24. Posted · Edited by Jacob Morres

    12 hours ago, SwiftQuill said:

    The job market already lacks meritocracy as is. We don't need to make it even more competitive and unfair.

     

    I get you bro fr. Did you see this study?: https://bfi.uchicago.edu/working-paper/systemic-discrimination-among-large-u-s-employers/

    "Contact gaps are highly concentrated in particular companies, with firms in the top quintile of racial discrimination responsible for nearly half of lost contacts to Black applicants in the experiment. Controlling false discovery rates to the 5% level, 23 [of the largest 108 companies] individual companies are found to discriminate against Black applicants. Our findings establish that systemic illegal discrimination is concentrated among a select set of large employers, many of which can be identified with high confidence using large scale inference methods." 

     

    did you see this shit?? are you ready to fight with me?! 

    12 hours ago, SwiftQuill said:

    If the system is broken, do something to fix it. Don't make it even more broken and unfair.

    are we still on the same page??

    no? not anymore??