Human Mint

@AerisVahnEphelia I've seen your art. It is just you that is doing the creative part. AI just brings to life and mixes your vision. Since it is a great tool to have in your pocket you want to defend it at all costs.

So is it a creative machine for you?

Anyways, if you want to add something on AI let's hear it. It's a good topic.

@yetineti Man, let's agree on something! .. meta-pun Not. At. All. Very important: be aware that through text we can't actually sense each other accurately. You can't sense my state precisely. I do not take for granted your participation here. And I care for the best understanding. If I am mixing those words then sorry, let's move on. And also, I am not just trolling. I sat through what you wrote and think what you meant and examined it carefully.

@yetineti That's fine, be dissapointed. Are you absolutely sure? I don't think you can acquire talent with laziness. AI agreeing to desagree is more like an unintetional pun to me. When you write the words are agreeing with you, even if you suck at writing. It is more like a slave-mastrer relationship. But whatever, it never actually "agreed" to begin with since it has no will. Well I did, because I wanted. How about that.

It's not a reason to hate humans, but being disappointed sure. How would you feel if you are paired with the lazy group and you see next group hard-working and ambitious? Pretty dissapointed probably, unless you're lazy yourself.

There is no irony in that, just a pun. It decides based on what the programmers/ceos decide it's good for you. Which is way too problematic since they're negligents (with the ChatGPT, Claude type of AIs). Otherwise you would understand that showing me my own flaws would be the best thing to do.

Most humans are not hyper talented, that's a fact.

It is fairly simple. AI just makes use of the collective imagination. It does not posses imagination of its own. When you write a prompt you are the one doing the imagining, despite it being able to actualize it or not. Where does AI leaches from??? Our imagination. We can imagine new things, AI not. But it is more deceptive because it actually feels like it imagines new things, because maybe it does create things we've never seen, using its immense database. But the database is the limit, once it exhaust that then is over and dumb and we have to feed it again to make it useful. Does AI have potential? Yes, it has quite a tremendous ammount of potential. Useful businesses will be created with it, new cool services will be invented.

Prompt: "Generate a blueprint for a 3 floor building, include elevators" Job done.

There is a deeper problem here. Outsourcing creativity is not wise at all. Using AI for personal entertainment is something completely different to what I am talking. And if you want to use it for your work go ahead. But it won't come without delusion, that's guaranteed. But if society accepts it totally then there's nothing to do about it. It's like mcdonalds: it just exists and makes people obese.

How do you diferentiate copying vs not copying? In reality I don't think that's much of an issue. Every human sure copies. But there are dishonest and honest ways. Can't you intuit that? My stance is that AI is used by grifters more than anything. They didn't generate anything more than the model, but they sell it as if they did. This is just the tip of the iceberg.

It's not an insult, is a real danger. There is a powerful deception with AI going on. It is entirely your responsibility to see it. "Just does it better" What does it better? Copying? What's the difference with AI "intelligence" and your mind's intelligence?

If you want to use chatgpt and think you're being intelligent go on. Not my problem. Have a dead mind. Go for it.

If what you say is true then the concept of copyright would not exist. Kind of like a socialist fantasy. There is a reason we have a whole legal system built around this. Money as a gatekeeper, etc etc. Nice deception. I am just saying is not what it looks.

A stealing machine fits better. Copy is too literal.

Thanks for sharing!

Same. Some tiny like my fingers, others fits my palm and comes without head and tail.

I think I was blown by tobacco smoke. And then a powder that they blow into your nostrils. That did have an effect. This was before a mescaline trip. Edit: Yes, both of those are also called mapacho (which are species of tobacco leaves) The powder was especially good at clearing fear and anxiety. It is semi psychedelic due to its potency.

It just look extremely hard, but doable in my opinion. If you don't mind me asking, what has been your biggest challenge? Reaching to clients?

Excellent ilustration of what I am saying (timestamped 12:35):

That's not necesarily a universal fact. Although the odds of making no money with your passion exists. I'll risk it anyways since I am going to die with or without money. But I'll die with tons of skills.

I doubt that. They just lack depth.

I get it. Also you can connect with God through your passion without even having the theory. To a certain degree. Probably not full Awakening. In fact Awakening requires passion for it alone. That's how you get it done. I just feel pitty for people that don't believe in passion, as if it some nonsense. They don't know it is your Spirit and higher intelligence, the actual thing you want the most.

Absolutely, it humbles you, it matures you. (if it doesn't kill you)