Human Mint

You can train bringing up ideas you would like to talk. It can be anything really, with a more careless attitude. And then you just listen, and maybe it flares up and some other people enter the conversation too. You progressively will be enjoying more and more conversations, to the point that you could just listen and add something related. It can be really anything, like a specific question, something that's happening, something that happened to you, etc. Naturally there are conversations that are just boring. That's always abundant actually. So being quiet is not always an error.

I immediately thought of I, Robot

@AerisVahnEphelia All right, good luck with your AI path. Being an artist comes with unique challenges.

@Natasha Tori Maru Ah yes, ChatGPT is full of that.

What does this even mean? Why is it fallacious? I know it is just bollocks but I wonder what the technical "fallacy" is.

It is literally copying editing techniques. You just don't have to pay 1000 usd anymore for a single edit. And you don't even have to worry about it since you delegate everything. Ignorance of knowing how things work, since you just delegate to AI. Congrats.

I want to know the important questions. Is it a delusion or no? If so, how much of a delusion? How much value vs delusion? My OP was my thinking process one week ago, I am open to learning more. I am still firm with the opinion of it being a copy machine. But that anyone that uses it being a scammer? Maybe not, that could be too much of a strong word. But also, depending on your lenses, it could be seen as a scam. If you're not honest about it for example. People believing it was your own talent when in reality your products were created by AI. Being fooled by something being real when it was AI is the new thing we are all living through. That is much different from using it to create systems for your own use for example. Or helping one with specific tasks. We are living through a new dilemma. Having too strong of a position when nothing is really clear is a mistake.

@AerisVahnEphelia I don't have anything against people using AI for creative purposes. I am happy that you found a medium that suits you. But can you appreciate that I am trying to make sense of it from an outsider perspective? I didn't spend much time trying to incorporate it in my life. Some of what y'all sharing is new to me. That doesn't mean I couldn't or that I have low IQ, it is just the nature of having to focus one's attention to the things you want to cultivate and not much else. I don't doubt that. Let's keep hearing good uses of AI. I am sick of BRAINROT. I want you (all) to be in a place of deep curiosity as much as possible. Defensiveness kills curiosity.

@AerisVahnEphelia I've seen your art. It is just you that is doing the creative part. AI just brings to life and mixes your vision. Since it is a great tool to have in your pocket you want to defend it at all costs.

So is it a creative machine for you?

Anyways, if you want to add something on AI let's hear it. It's a good topic.

@yetineti Man, let's agree on something! .. meta-pun Not. At. All. Very important: be aware that through text we can't actually sense each other accurately. You can't sense my state precisely. I do not take for granted your participation here. And I care for the best understanding. If I am mixing those words then sorry, let's move on. And also, I am not just trolling. I sat through what you wrote and think what you meant and examined it carefully.

@yetineti That's fine, be dissapointed. Are you absolutely sure? I don't think you can acquire talent with laziness. AI agreeing to desagree is more like an unintetional pun to me. When you write the words are agreeing with you, even if you suck at writing. It is more like a slave-mastrer relationship. But whatever, it never actually "agreed" to begin with since it has no will. Well I did, because I wanted. How about that.

It's not a reason to hate humans, but being disappointed sure. How would you feel if you are paired with the lazy group and you see next group hard-working and ambitious? Pretty dissapointed probably, unless you're lazy yourself.

There is no irony in that, just a pun. It decides based on what the programmers/ceos decide it's good for you. Which is way too problematic since they're negligents (with the ChatGPT, Claude type of AIs). Otherwise you would understand that showing me my own flaws would be the best thing to do.