Human Mint

W

It's a fun watch. Then you can come to conclusions. I see that women are good at diplomacy as their baseline. Which made them succed in that experiment. If you have juvenile males in your group trying to survive you're SCREWED lol. Probably, also, men are more ambitious. If the goal is half a million they will go nuts over it. Women will generally be more detached to that.

This forum UI makes it so each pov is seen. Not like those nested threads thing where people speak all over the place, everyone yelling at each other to be heard.

Women are better suited at motherhood. It is common sense that parenting requires both genders. But kid's dynamic with a father will be different to the mother! Put away the father from the picture and distress and psychological problems will ensue. You need to look the answers from your own experience. I say this in general, not only to you.

The differences in sexes are a beautiful thing. They're a top-notch complementary design. Is like discovering the differences in sexes across all living beings, it just leaves you in awe. And you don't judge a male flower as better as a femenine flower. They are a beautiful and complementary intelligent design. You gotta laugh at the idiocy of male bias in the gender war. Just more ego judgement and improper use of the mind.

The differences in sexes are a beautiful thing. They are like two complementary top-notch designs.

Mothering is competence, duh. Things are relative. Women see mothering the same way men see action and hunting.

Supossedly I am INFJ too. I took a test thoroughly and it gave that answer. Then I asked an "expert" and told me it was probably wrong and only after an interview with them they could exam it rightly. Who knows. I am a bit distanced from that model.

To expand a bit more, you have to separate levels of development with personality. Maturity is independent of personality. Being hyper conformist is a part of your development stage you might say. Personality I see it as the unique way Source moves through you.

Sure, your personality dictates how you react to situations. Being authentic is not just external apperances, it means you're paying attention to what fits your personality. You might say yes to a compromise but really you dislike it, and you can feel regret and inhibit autentic desires. Which is part of your personality. So we are not contradicting here. Your emotions are your personality's responsibility.

Mastery by Greene very good too.

I suspect those who wrestled with embedded programing are the ones who can get the most out of AI.

What you call external world of man is the personal process. But you must come to understand that through a solitary process.

That's a really clear way of explaining truth. Following the truthfulness of something is the hard part, it requires skill. In general I don't like to outsource truthfulness because you'll never produce the muscle required. The only way to understand this is in an experiential manner. For example when you solve hundreds of math problems, your mind becomes sharper at it. Your baseline changes to accomodate for efficiency. Or in using your words, you can grasp the truthfulness of it more easily. To transcend beliefs you need to acknowledge that you don't know the truth. And to have vision that you can solve it. Because you're always going to place your faith somewhere, so you might aswell put it in the right place. When you shine a light on something it becomes universal, if only for a brief moment. Which is really cool. So there are ways to minimize common deceptions, if not eliminating them completely. But humans being finite will always produce half truths.

I think that social anxiety and lack of emotional regulation just represses your personality from fully expressing. It is not a trait per se.