peachboy

I regard this more of a sovereignty test more than a not-eating test. Anyone can discover their own divinity, but if you haven't done the necessary groundwork concerning your own sovereignty, then that's the moment you get dragged to the asylum. Divinity with sovereignty = Enlightenment. Divinity without sovereignty = Hell. I wish the brother all the love the universe has to give.

Imagine a big building with many rooms, and every time you walk into a new room you forget everything about every other room and all you know is the room you’re standing in. You’d always be asking: “Where the hell am I?” ...until you walk out of the room into the corridor and you remember where you are again. And then you enter a new room and it’s:- “Where the hell am I? How did I get here?” ...until you walk out of the room into the corridor and you remember where you are again. And then you enter a new room and it’s:- “Where the hell am I? How did I get here?” ...until you walk out of the room into the corridor and you remember where you are again. And then you enter a new room and it’s:- “Where the hell am I? How did I get here?” And so forth….

You asked the question, "Why are you, you?". If you were some other person do you not realise you'd be asking the same question? There is no human that wouldn't ask the same question. To an extent though, it's an illusion. You are all the others, it's just that our egos take the form of non-omniscience, so we end up all asking the same question at the same time. If you were someone other than yourself you'd inevitably ask "Why am I me?" simply because you've known no other. If you were to experience all the people at all the all same time then it wouldn't be a genuine human experience, but rather something akin to a hivemind. And as long at it was a non-omniscient hivemind no doubt you'd be asking "Why this hivemind and not some other?"

If it's consensual and pertains to common sense morality then there's no problem. Sex and sexuality is really no different from any other art-form. It is meaningful yet meaningless at the same time.

Imagine listening to every single piece of music ever created all at the same time. Try this experiment:- Pretend that you really wanted to understand music - you downloaded every song from the Spotify library, but seeing as listening to each one consecutively would take centuries, instead you chose to save time, stack them all up on top of each other and listen to everything at the same time. What do you hear? Is it not just noise? Are the intricacies and melodies still discernable or is it a wild mess of chaos? In order for the creator to experience something, it first has to remove itself from everything.

@Leo Gura Thankyou so much for your latest video. I have a quick question about something you mentioned and a paradox that I myself have been struggling with. Within the context of the analogy of the vase and our perfect omniscient infinite singularity being at the center of a field, with the non-omniscient aspects being around the periphery.... does this imply that in all aspects (both omniscient and non-omniscient) we are subject to some degree of geo-spatiality? I'm familiar with the concept of Dimension Zero as a good way to reference non-duality, but how would that fit into a dimensional model with a center and a periphery? Or is this just a limitation of the analogy? Another thing I've struggled with is a similar paradox of the omniscient infinite God seemingly existing under the authority of a time dimension. For example, we know that infinite consciousness is timeless consciousness, yet the process of moving between the various states of non-omniscience up into the unified non-dualistic state would imply a certain animation. Assuming God cycles between omniscience and non-omniscience as a kinda of eternal game, how does God do this without being under the authority of some kind of higher time dimension? (i.e Does God get bored of infinity and occasionally go on vacation into duality? If so, how long does it take for God to get bored?) Aside that I've recently joined the forum and am really enjoying it. Thanks.

What is loneliness in regard to ego? What is loneliness in regard to the Divine? What is fear of loneliness as distinct from loneliness itself? Is it rational or irrational? As a society we seem to be very aware that loneliness is harmful, yet we seem to be completely unaware that fear of loneliness might be just as harmful. Is the cure for loneliness the same as the cure for the fear of loneliness? (i.e we cure loneliness by surrounding ourself with others. How do we cure the fear?) Thanks.