Princess Arabia

Why conflate the two issues. I don't see a correlation between sex work and intimacy. How can two people that don't know each other or only know each other on the level of sex work be intimate in the true sense of the word. Sex work wasn't designed to be intimate, genuine intimacy, that is. Yes, it can be paid for but that's not true intimacy and is on the level of transactional. The problem arises when the one that pays expects otherwise. I find that a lot of men can conveniently separate this dynamic in their personal lives but when it comes to a sex worker, they expect her to be more "into it/him" I guess because he's paying for it. They can conveniently have sex with a regular female without feelings or love and it be purely physical but expects the sex worker to have feelings and do it with compassion and love. How can she when she doesn't know you. True Intimacy, sex and sex work doesn't go hand in hand. There's not even a close connection. Guys will get upset when this isn't the case, because they can have sex without true intimacy or feelings but expect the woman to. They'll get upset and say she's only in it for the money when they're only in it for the sex or whatever it is they paid for. It gets me sometimes that men can (some men) expect a female to want to have sex with a man they don't know or even like. They can and do it on a regular basis. Pick up is hard for the reason that women usually need to have a certain emotion 'touched' before they want to have sex while a man can just see a woman he's attracted to to want to have sex with her and without knowing her or even care to. He can pretend to want to get to know her just for the sake of wanting sex from her and women can feel that and that's why they can get so cold. As a sex worker, it baffles me how men can think the woman is turned on just because he is. Most will ask me what I like and want to do, if I asked them the same. I want to go home and eat ice-cream I'm thinking. Why would I WANT to do anything sexual with you, i don't know you, I'm thinking. I'm only doing it because I'm being compensated and because I can separate the two. Pick up guys will get offended by this while they're out there chasing strange pussy from women they don't even know or like or don't even really want to know. I'll be looked down upon for what I do while men will go out see big boobs, a nice ass, a pretty face and want to stick their dick in that strangers pussy for self-gratification; but when I say I'm only doing it because I'm compensated and it's a willing choice, I'll get looked down upon. Men will chase pussy and i will chase money. What's the difference. I'm making a living while they're trying to cum. Which one is more meaningful. Depends on whose looking, I've become numb to all the naysers because I've seen enough to realize that men are more impersonal than women when it comes to sex and they can freely and happily with a proud face spread their dicks around to strangers and strange women who are willing, while for me it's usually on the level of knowing, liking and respecting the guy to want to even have sex with him and after he's earnt his way to receive the love I have in store even if it's just for a brief moment. A guy wants your heart without earning it, but if I earned my way to his wallet, I'm looked down upon. At least I'm not looking to get it for nothing when I'm working. Most men are looking for sex without even trying to earn it. Yes, it's earnt, you're not entitled to a woman's body just because you exist. Do you go about life feeling entitled to other products you purchase, no. Only to a woman because you feel it should be that way. No it shouldn't. Everything in life is earnt, including sex. Doesn't mean monetarily, just earnt in some type of way. Sex work is a different category all by itself.

Lol.

Reality is not personal. It doesn't see a person going through rough times and circumstances. It's just free flowing. Energy in constant motion. The person is who takes it personally because of the presumed senses and sense of self. There's no one in these bodies. If humans didn't have a sense of self and life was just as it is, there wouldn't be a world. Life, yes, but not a world. Things would still be as it is but without you there. You're what makes the world. There really is no world, just things happening all by itself. When the you disappears, the world disappears. For the mad man there is no world. For those where the sense of sense has collapsed, there is no world. For you, there is and that's why you think there are people having crappy lives. The mad man doesn't think his life is crappy, because he doesn't see himself with a life; the collapsed sense of self doesn't see crappy life's because it doesn't see itself or others with a life, it just sees life. Go and look at and observe a mad man, perfect example of no self. You might think I'm talking a bunch of nonsense, but if you really inspect this further it'll answer a lot of your questions even though they won't make sense to you. It doesn't make sense to me. The senses are there for you to make sense of the world, the imagined world you're in. The senses are not real and neither are you, they go hand in hand and without them, you're a nobody which you are already.

Not sure, good question. Maybe if it's practiced enough.

Stevie Wonder isn't blind and you do not see.

The Absolute is very child-like in nature. It borns itself just as it is and then blossoms and blooms into all there is.

Freedom is searching for freedom. What a joke.

Tons of songs have clues in them. This is one. The Absolute speaks through music, as music, for music.

This is pure magic. Magic surrounds us everyday. We've just gotten used to it. Imagine seeing the same trick for 20-80years. Not magical, but pure raw magic. It's all magic. It's fucking magic. Magic, magic, magic. Nothing but magic.

I love this emoji. Never know what it's thinking.

Because feminine energy energizes male energy. Gives it a sense of purpose and meaning. Without it, they feel lonely and weak. Plus pussy is good, let's be real here. Hehe. Meow!

Happiness is a state. States don't last forever. No one is happy all the time. Content and at peace, maybe, but not happy. Do you chase sadness, no. That's why it finds you. Get the drift?

Survival is not just about staying alive, eating, paying bills, etc. It's also, for the individual, about surviving an identity. See Leo's survival series, it made me aware of this and I've seen it to be the case all around. If one identifies as a spiritual seeker or it could be anything pertaining to meditation or spirituality, then that's what is being survived, not just the body. This also applies to any identity one has ascribed to. This is why addictions are so hard to quit. A smoker that identifies as a smoker, "I am a smoker", that's an identity and it's the death of the 'entity' if it quits. Understand the nature of things and it becomes evident. I know when I say there's no one in these bodies it sounds woo woo and shit, but it's this that allowed for better understanding of behaviors or things in general.

R.I.P Anne Burrell. I used to watch you back in the day when I was glued to the Food Network Channel. Rachael Ray taught me how to cook delicious recipes just from watching her 30min meals program and I learnt a lot from the network on how to prepare meals especially Mediterranean style cuisine. I would sit there with pen and paper and make notes and write recipes down for future reference and your show was one of them. I enjoyed your show amongst many others of which one was Iron Chef. I remember when you beat Bobby Flay. Loved your hair and style and you were one of the greatest chefs on the Network. I was shocked to see the report of your passing. We surely lost a great chef and cook.

Ok, shorty!!

The sense of a separate identity is so neurotic and unstable, it tries it's best to cope, to become, to not do, not act as. It doesn't realize it's not those things it's avoiding being already and that it's only a felt sense, it thinks it can act it's way into being the Absolute. The Absolute can appear neurotic, looking for the absence of the separate self not realizing it is appearing as a separate self and that the separate self it thinks itself to be isn't really there. It likes to play the game of hide and seek with itself. It can't escape itself because it's everything, but it can surely appear as if it's not. This is me writing as if I'm saying something to an other. Then when other responds, it affirms that other. What if I was to go about life and in a world where no one ever responds to me. I talk to people but they don't acknowledge my presence. Everywhere and everybody. Do you think I'd feel as if I'm alive or here. No I'd go insane or thought I was dead. Well, that's what happens with the sense of a separate self, everybody confirms it but because it's not really there, there tends to be neurosis that arises and a tendency to develop dis-ease and feels traumatized and depressed and anxious. The body senses a person there but gets confused because there's no one really there and it throws it off-balance through the nervous system. Dysfunction galore. Therapy galore. Guru galore. Worshipping galore. Bipolar, Adhd, Ocd, narcissism, psychopath galore, all types of personality disorders can arise from this dis-ease of the body feeling a sense of self. Thus the need for balancing with the aid of teachers, gurus, priests, gods, idols, therapists.....you name it. And the stories continue.......FOREVER because there is no end nor beginning to the Absolute that's being all these 'things'. Oh my!!

Lol. The regulators will start to impose fines and jail time. I say this lightly and as a joke but wouldn't be surprised if it becomes a thing. This world has become ludicrous and insane.

Your comment is too short. 😅

English, please. Lol. OK I hear ya!

Are you guys realizing that forums as this one is the same as shorts to the brain. This is why long comments aren't popular and sometimes spoken against. I've seen some comments criticizing long comments and responses and people sometimes apologize for making long comments. Some even say they don't read them at all. Some even try to shorten their comments on purpose so as not to take away from the 'shorts' perception. No one has ever said, your comment is too short. It's not just YT, IG and TikTok, here too.

I'm just taking in what you're saying. I really have no opinions on it either way. I would say the sun isn't really there or it is there and I'm not. Either way I can't say for sure. When I say I'm not, I mean me as a human seeing things. I'm speaking from a human perspective here and on a subject/object level so this is just perception on that level happening. If I don't intervene then there's more of a flow of just automatic writing happening and no thinking; just thoughts arising and being written; different than thinking.

I'm finding myself not really resonating with anything anymore. Not against, and not for, just neutral. I might speak on things, disagree with things (I'm talking spiritually), but the disagreements are merely just beliefs and perspectives, which aren't real or factual anyway. Just a way of interacting with life and expression. If I see where someone says something on a spiritual level, I see it mostly as words talking. So what, is it true or not; so what, is it false; so what, do I agree; so what. I might respond or I may not. I put up an argument less now because I realize that none of it is true and all of it is true; none and all of it is false in the sense that it's what is. There are different explanations, different, meanings and interpretations, different opinions, ideologies, perspectives, perceptions.....you name it. Which one is true and which false. My thing is it doesn't matter much as it's all nothing BEING IT ALL. Me resonating with any is a position and localized so it has to be false because whatever this is, is not. It's everything so nothing is true or false. On the relative level, yes, but relativity is also the Absolute so that's also a matter of what is. I also feel sometimes I act from the sense of I and also not from the sense of I. Makes no sense, that statement, which means it's not from the sense of I. I wouldn't have said something like that because it definitely doesn't make any sense to say I'm acting from me and acting from not me. That's what I mean. Even though there's no one in this body, I still feel the sense of it but sometimes I also don't feel as if everything done or said is from that sense. There are times when it feels automatic without a conscious being behind it and sometimes it does. It's weird. I'm not saying I feel unconscious or act from a state of low-consciousness, I'm saying sometimes it seems the body is acting on it's own but realized by something other than the sense of a me. Like I'm not seeing the body acting and saying to myself, look at the body move. It's after the fact that I reflected and either said I don't recall a felt sense of presence when that act was being done. Hard to explain.

If everything is, then saying everything is one, is.

Ok

I'm not understanding this part. You're saying when the sun disappears, I disappear too, how's that. Do you mean the me 'inside the body' and just the body is left or that the body disappears?