Princess Arabia

@HojoDon't be fooled. A lot of incels really aren't looking to have sex with women, they're looking not to because they were already angry with women and that's why they're no having it.

Lol. I'm done.

Yes but I could have went into reasons why he might have been a date raper. Wasn't the focus of the discussion that's why I didn't. I didn't mean it spawned from nowhere, but that it wasn't be cause women didn't give it up easily. Lots of men have hard time with sex from women and they don't become date rapers,

I never said it just spawned out of nowhere but you're implying that it's because women don't give up sex easily and it's not. STOP BLAMING WOMEN FOR MEN'S SEXUAL CRIMES or insinuating such.

It's OK. I don't need to reverse anything. They're not that complicated as I'm the one dealing with them, have dealt with them and will deal with them on a sexual level both personally and professionally. I'm not saying I know men what I'm saying is I'm the one dealing with them on an intimate level, unless you're gay, you're not. You can tell me about men but I can tell you what it's like to interract with them. It's like direct experience VS intellectually knowing.

Not all women that want casual sex is looking for serious relationship. Those are two different things for a woman. She can have casual sex too. The player might touch those emotions easier than the more serious type guy for casual sex. That's why they usually get laid more easily. Players are having sex with women who don't care for serious relationships most of the time.

That's when she's looking for marriage or long-term. For interest in casual sex, women aren't thinking that far; all that's needed is for a particular emotion to be felt. Just as music can do that for some, it's the same way. Men's misunderstanding is thinking all women need to feel love or have some logical explanation as to why she should sleep with him. No. It's simpler than that, it's most men don't touch that emotional spot "on the spot" like women do for men with their looks. A man's best bet at getting laid is not to chase women but to attract them.

Men put it as "getting sex"; for women, it's "having sex". Figure out why that difference is there and that'll answer (somewhat) how the sexes view sex.

Nicely put.

If a "date raper" wanted to have sex with me and he didn't want to put in the energy to try, then that's why he used that drug. Another reason maybe he didn't want any resistance. A date raper is just a date raper, nothing to do with women not giving it up easy. If a woman wanted to have sex with a man, and was willing to, and she let him know, there wouldn't be a need for the drug. Women give it up easy all the time. What you're failing to understand is that she wants to have sex with whom she wants to and will give it up easy then. It's not that women don't give it up easy, it's that it's not easy to find a man she wants to give it up to easily. Women are very easy, if they want to be. They're just more pickier in their reasons while with men, it's just who they're physically attracted to. If I'm horny, I have no reason to want to have sex, only if there's a particular someone I want to have sex with.

I didn't say they weren't promiscuous. This is not about promiscuity, it's that for women, most times it's not just I want to have sex and anybody will do, or if they feel horny, they'll go get dressed and go to the club because they are sure to get laid because it's easy for women. Finding somebody to even want to have sex with that night would be the issue. For men, that part is easier. Her looks would be enough. For us it's way more complicated. That's why date drugs were invented and a drunk woman is easier to bed, now all the stuff that gets in the way isn't there. Bottomline is men have way more options with whom they want to have sex with than women do. That's what guys don't understand and it's not that we're holding back it's just the way it is.

Ok but one can feel fucked by losing their job, do they remain jobless because of that.

Are you hurt when yesterday is gone. Is one hurt when the car goes by and is out of sight and is gone. No. The downfall is not that it's gone but that it believes it was there to begin with and happening to a "him".

Why do you want to have sex with women then. Why are you complaining about the fruits of sex and how it's plentiful for women if you feel this way and you hate women. Should be obvious to you then, by this statement, that women's needs isn't having lots of sex with strangers because we would be sexing left and right to get those needs. I Women shouldn't have to think about much and survival because of how they're wired. That's what the masculine is wired for. Go study evolution and you'll understand this dynamic. It's precisely that women are out there thinking and hustling and trying to make ends meet why they've become masculine in their behavior and the man feel emasculated. It's very feminine to want a woman to do and complain about having to think, compete and provide.

Unless a woman is a sex addict, they're not caring about the fruits of sex. A woman likes a man, she feels something for the man, she wants to have sex with the man. A man sees a woman and it's immediate. That's hard to accomplish. He needs to do something to get it. A woman has to feel something. Feeling to have sex with a particular man doesn't come like your attraction to a skirt. It takes time and energy and a bit of reservation and whatever else that goes through her mind. Sorry to tell you this, but most women don't see sex like men do and aren't seeing as lots of sex for me. For us, it's a fucking challenge to even want to have sex with a man. That's why it's easier at drunken parties with booze and drugs where inhibitions are in place and regrets appear in the morning.

Tell him, please.

Yes, the plane of imagination, stories and dreams. It's all empty. I get it, though, seems full on and solid and real. Still empty. Not denying anything, still empty.

Aww. Glad something appeared to help. This is why anything is possible and nothing is trivial.

Nothing is old. Everything is new. Nothing is really being recycled only appears that way. There is really no creation. It's all direct. Creation implies a creator and a creation. That's duality. There's only being. Absolute being everything. Even that thought of recycled thoughts is fresh and new.

Just so you realize, the Absolute can appear as separation and limits or limited. Everything is an appearance but it's not coming out of anything it is nothing appearing. Meaning it is that which appears as separate and limited. There's no separation between the separateness and that which isn't. It's the same.

Yes, I actually loved this question. I see your mind is starting to travel beyond it's usual limits....hehe

Muah! he's also the 🍎. Oh wait!! Apple technology. I just realized the epistemological reference. Hehe. Love it.

Nice "report". I enjoyed reading it; BUT and there's a but (for me), because you KNOW there's 'no sense of separation', there's still a you that knows this and therefore this glimpse cannot be "beyond an experience" as you said it was.

Let's dissect the apple: What is an 🍎. It's right there. Look at it Who's asking the question about the 🍎 What's looking at the 🍎 Where does the 🍎 stops being The 🍎 needs an identifier. The taste, feel, touch of the 🍎 After eating the 🍎 Why you ate the 🍎 The knowledge you acquired about the 🍎 The nature and properties of what makes up you and the eaten 🍎 Now you see the reflection of you even deeper, wider into boundless 🍎 infinity @Davino

Lol. I like that answer. Maybe AI might say something worse, though, like nothing exists. Hehe. Don't mind me.