Princess Arabia

Somehow I saw this topic going sideways and off left field, didnt know it was going to be you to do it. That's to be added to my LOVE list ❤️

Lol. Do we need a patent.

I used an example just to show how complete regulation of prostitution on a whole is impossible. Yes, there are safer environments like brothels, but some women refuse to work in these environments because they take half of their earnings or close to it. The upside is they don't have to go searching for clients, they come to them, so there's a price to pay for that. I agree, going with some strange person to a dark alley or creepy motel is very unsafe, but it still happens. There was an incident that happened about 10yrs ago close to my area where 4 prostitutes were murdered and laid face down facing east by what they assumed was a serial killer. These girls were street hookers and drug addicts, the killer was never caught, or caught for this case. So I do agree that some aspects are dangerous but these particular girls would have never worked in brothels or do it in an organized way as they were only doing it to support their immediate drug habit. A lot of the stuff i engage in isn't considered sexually unsafe, and as I have stated in my previous posts, I might have had sex 2-4x in the last 5years doing this and that's probably pushing it as I really can't recall the last time and not to seem as if I'm off limits to that, it's just very, very rare. I don't even kiss these clients, only on the cheek but I do give lots of hugs and physical affection if it's appropriate, so I don't have to get tested for anything. I get more concerned with a personal partner when I had them in the past more than I am working because you become a little more laxed under those circumstances, but since I have none at the moment, that's not a concern. Idk about other girls in that department, but you're right about the brothels, they get tested once a week. I would never work in a brothel, as you're expected to do things I wouldn't be comfortable doing, especially on a regular basis. There's but so much my body can take.

Upload your drawing of Leo here. Let's compare. Let's make it fun. This is mine. Just get a piece of paper and find a pic or video of him and start drawing. Doesn't have to be perfect.

Very funny. I'll leave that as that, so I don't create any problems for you to have to listen to.

Men are not designed to do the same things women can.

Where should it be then. This is also the "Off- topic" section.

God never sleeps. God is imagining sleep. There is no "next day". Time and space doesn't exist. God is imagining time and space.

Language is dualistic and in order to make a point I must use it. There is no personal me, so you're right. I am God, only God exists. The personal me is only a character made up of ideas, thoughts and stories. When those dissolve, so does the character.

Regulating prostitution doesn't regulate how people perform their sex acts. You cannot regulate the act itself; and how people perform these acts, depends on their personal choice and safety measures. People cannot regulate what people do behind closed doors. And also, FYI, prostitutes get less STD's than the average person. I have never gotten an STD in the years I've been doing this, even though my risk factor plays a role in how and what I chose to engage in and the frequency. Keep in mind I'm not referring to sex-trafficking, I'm referring to people who willingly engage in this field. Also, if a girl is walking down the street and meets a man who wants to have sex with her and she quotes him a price and they willingly engage, that's prostitution. Whose going to regulate that. Prostitution is everywhere.

Existence is existence, what exists must exist and will always exist. @Someone heredoesn't exists in the Absolute sense. You are confusing your small self as the Absolute. Your small self doesn't exist existentially only the Absolute. You are dreaming up the small self. The "me" you're talking about is the I AM. The me I talk about is the I AM. There is only one I AM. The same I AM. "I AM going to the store", I may say. You also say, "I AM going to the store". It's the same I AM going to different stores. I am you and you are me. There is no individual self. Saying "your mind" is implying you and a mind. Duality. There is only one mind. God's mind. You are inside God's mind. Every manifestation is a manifestation of God's mind. God's will. God is all alone dreaming up all of existence.

Solipsism doesn't mean @Someone hereis alone. It means, you as God is all alone. The same thing looking through your eyes is the same thing looking through mine just from a different perspective.

Yes, but people also get defensive and emotional when discussing politics and religion (not saying this is, but it falls under the same category) , that I wouldn't even use it as a criteria for a successful friendship. A plus, but not necessary. The difference to me is whether they can respect my views on these touchy subjects without letting it affect our friendship. That's where the challenge is for most.

Hmm, careful how you use the word "kinky" with me, I might get excited and chain myself up just to watch that video again. It might teach me how to make myself squirt.?‍?️

There's a friend right now I have who likes when I talk about metaphysics and the Universe to them. The only reason I do, is because they enjoy when I speak about this stuff. They used to be a business Professor, so maybe because of their background, they don't mind learning new stuff. The mind stuff is also interesting to them and they keep telling me how because of my influence, road rage has diminished and how they relate to people has significantly become less stressful to them because they are so much more aware of things they weren't aware of before. He also tells me he likes my voice and how I explain things too, so that plays a factor according to him, plus my accent is intriguing to him, even though it's not as pronounced as when I first immigrated. These are things he tells me, so there are factors at play here. He says he will not look up this stuff on his own, but likes it when we talk about it and he tells me, it is our little secret. Lol. This is how far-fetched some think this stuff is. To me it has become normal and a part of me and I integrate it in most of my everyday life. I think it's OK to bring it up to people, but once you get a hint of resistance, just leave the topic alone. People will feel your energy and sometimes, your way of being is enough to spark curiosity.

I didn't say regulating guns is a bad thing. People will find a way to commit their crime whether the weapon is regulated or not. Guns aren't the problem. People are. But I do see your point. I don't really get into too much political debates because we all have different agendas and have different perspectives and what might be right for one may not be for another and most people have a hard time looking at things from other's POV's. My view on guns, though is I think the cat is already out the bag and way too many people have access to them for it to be regulated at this point.

Sorry my mind doesn't function one way. I tend to see more of the bigger picture.

While we're at it.

It is relevant when you see the correlation, especially in respect to your statement about regulation. We have to broaden our perspectives when we realize there are dots being connected here. A profession is used as a tool to acquire certain things in life. A gun is also a tool used to acquire things. People are using these tools. People have similarities and differences with how they achieve their goals, whatever that is. A prostitute may be selling her body to pay her rent and feed her kids. A hunter may be hunting to pay his rent and feed his kid's. Both have the same agenda using different means in which to achieve their respective goal. The regulation of the different tools we use in our society to survive may or may not result in responsible use as everybody has different agendas. The regulation of marijuana in Colorado didn't result in everybody using it responsibly, there were still horror stories. Now, you'll probably say what does marijuana have to do with this discussion. I'm using examples of how regulating people's means of survival doesn't equate to responsible use, it pretty much only results in the different respective States getting their share of the revenues from the tools people are using to achieve their goals. Bottomline, regulating prostitution will not make for a better environment only making the regulators profit from it.

The psychological damage doesn't come from where they are performing their acts. A prostitute won't become more or less damaged if they work in a less harmful environment. The damage itself would be from the work itself not the environment. If a woman becomes psychologically damaged from having sex with hundreds of men, where she has the sex doesn't matter. What determines a toxic environment VS a non-toxic environment in this case. First you have to determine that. A brothel VS the street?, Better more respectful clientele? Drug dependency? How they view sex? I mean the list goes on as to what is considered a toxic environment. The reason why I made the gun statement was to show that regulating something doesn't necessarily mean people will use it more responsibly. Regulating prostitution only benefits the respective States as far as taxes are concerned.

I agree with this. Only thing is, they can't see how relevant most of the stuff IS relevant to their everyday experience as everything is entangled with everything else.

Take out the "too".

No need to do that, they'll willingly watch that.

I wasn't referring to souls being sold. That's a cliché I will never understand. Souls cannot be sold, Souls are untouched.