Princess Arabia

Lol. You have gone mad. Lol. Oh I forgot there's no you to go mad.

Looks delish.

Thanks? That's all you can come up with after I've shown you that your arguments are weak, saying there are only two genders. That dude was born with both genitals. When I show you how your gender construct is baloney, you simply dissmis it just to keep your point going. He's not the only one because there are others. Shows you how it's just a matter of biases, because you don't care about the truth.

"This is the most irrational statement I've ever heard". Those were my exact words. If I had said "This is the most unintelligent statement i've ever heard", that will still not have been a defamation of your character. Saying a wall is more intelligent than I am is. I'm only pointing out to you how you're doing the same thing you're accusing people of, because personally I really don't care if you call me unintelligent. It was to make a point.

YOU HAVE JUST DONE WHAT YOU'RE ACCUSING PEOPLE OF. You have attacked my character. Saying your statements are irrational is not the same as you calling me unintelligent - "more intelligent than you", you said. If you noticed, I said your statement was irrational. By me opposing your world view, you have also grown your disdain for me by calling me unintelligent. Using hitler's case is just a matter of different content, but the same outcome, that you yourself perpetrated upon your own fellow forum member. This is what morality does, it turns us into the monsters that we're moralizing against. You will justify this and reason your way out of it but it's no different. You have also separated me and also see me as a lesser human than you for calling me unintelligent - not my position but me as a person. Your words are written uptop.

Why don't you tell that to the lady that goes in the bathroom with her care dog. That's a special species. Oh, I forgot, that's a different scenario and a different case. Ma'am that's a different species, please leave your little cute male chihuahua service dog outside. You see, we could argue until kingdom come with these oppositions because they are just a matter of opinions. Who cares about your personal opinions when it comes to public issues.

It even got more irrational with this statement. Separate people? We're not separating people, and I'm not even saying we should allocate or not allocate separate restrooms, I really don't care either way, but how is that separating people. Your arguments for separation is irrational and makes no sense. How about you go tell your neighbor don't separate yourself from me with your fence. We're all people and we should share the same yard. My dog should poop on your lawn because the land isn't separate. It's all one land. Take your fence down.

Spoken like a true narcissist. Not pointing you out but most humans. We think we know what's going on but at least just sharing our own insights, ideas and opinions on what we believe or think we know to be the case is one thing and what this forum is about, but telling someone that you're giving them a gift and sharing exclusive wisdom about what you've been taught about spirituality is another. Go hide under a rock and hope what you see is a rock because that rock that has been interpreted by your senses and brain is not really a rock only appears to be. Better hope it's not the boogeyman you're hiding under. That's all folks. Now let me go bask in my being and go fall in love some more while you're out here trying to find yours.

This is the most irrational statement I've ever heard.

These arguments about being special is hogwash. I'm not sure what they prefer, but all I know is that there are handicapped-named bathrooms and parking spaces. Do we cry equality then. We will come up with all types of reasonings and logic why this is OK and should be in place. Those are irrelevant to this issue. They are not special people but they have special needs. Saying there are only two genders is also hogwash because there are people born with both genitals. We don't argue for the handicapped because we see them as lesser beings than us. Less privileged and we sympathize. We argue for our own person biases, not what is appropriate or suitable on a whole. Our arguments stem from how we personally feel about the people in question, not what is in the best interest of everyone or most. This is why there are usually conflicting arguments. I don't think they think there special, neither do the handicapped. I know a trans personally and she looks like a female all the way, you couldn't tell and she uses the female restrooms. Nobody knows or cares. As far as assault goes, really, is that such a major concern where this issue is concerned. That's just another made-up reasoning because assaults can happen regardless of gender. There are also unisex bathrooms everywhere, do we complain about them saying that's not appropriate. We've accepted those just as we've accepted just about everything else that's been in place for eons.

Ok, thanks. Noted.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C_pcFH2yfWL/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link Quinoa Chia Bread made easy.

Ok. Whenever. It'll be there. Enjoy your bread.

These types of statements come up when you think you're a human experiencing reality or are separate. This is why I try to keep my true identity running in the background so I don't get too confused as in this statement. You are the thought, you are the perception. Do you think the world will just stop and time and space disappear just because you stopped thinking. Time already doesn't exist. Thought is the time, thought is the space. Thought is you. You are a thought. Talking about ideas.....you are an idea in the mind of consciousness and I'm not referring to the body. When you go to sleep thoughts and time disappear and so do you.

Because that's speaking metaphysically and in the Absolute sense or referring to the true nature of reality. When I do it and refer to things as one or similar, you say we are in the relative and duality and so on and so forth. That's my point. Especially in relation to the threads title.

Hehe. These topics aren't discussed much and i see most of your posts, goes in this direction. I don't know enough about it to discuss or start a thread about, but my instincts tell me you do based on the kinds of posts you make. I think Sacred Geometry is fascinating, but I haven't delved deep enough into it to say much about it. When I look into the woods, though, I can see the patterns. The entanglement of the trees.

The same you explained it to Sugarcoat is what I mean. Of course, I exist. I think these pronouns and implications and what we mean exactly by no one, etc gets misconstrued. The human that i think I am, is not what I really am.

Thanks

I understand. It's just that within the context of his post, I thought it was appropriate to point out to you that he really need the tool he's asking for to help with his articulations and is not so much about being hard to understand. We all make mistakes and typos. It's that his thread is about that. His thread weren't just about typos.

That's only in appearance. I'm not on the street talking about apple trees and birds and the bar across the street where I'll be saying things in a relativistic manner. I'm on a spiritual forum where the topic is about no-self and God. It's appropriate to suggests the oneness of it all in this context. Leo, in this same thread, mentioned how reality is imaginary. Why didn't you say to him then why are you concerned with imaginary politics. You guys only have your rebuttals with the ordinary person. When the gurus say it, it's accepted. Shows the human bias, and how you express your own sovereignty and authorities. You say who says what to you and you listen to who you chose. The signs are everywhere if you know how to spot them.

Humans are the only ones that want to find the path of most resistance. BTW @Xonas PitfallCould you do a thread on Sacred Geometry one day. Would love to hear your ideas on it.

Where did I say this. Please quote in hypotheses verbatim.

Do you consider this formulated well. @SchizophoniaI'm not criticizing. I know you're French, so it can be challenging for you to write English. I'm merely pointing something out to Sugarcoat, but not as a criticism. Maybe being transparent is the way to go here so he can get the help he needs to do the task he wishes.

It goes away on it's own. That's probably where some disappearing I's are - in the mental ward. Not realizing that it never was. Something to that extent. Babies and toddlers don't have a sense of I. The only thing enlightenment does is for the recognition that there was no I to begin with.