Princess Arabia

Reality is not imaginary. You are. There just can't be a real entity that can realize an imaginary reality.

Correct. There's no one to know anything.

That's not what was said in this post. There's also a part that says awareness sees itself everywhere. You say it is one. How can something that's one sees another thing even if it's itself.

Another got no where post. Not many will attempt these notions because it imply no one there that's seeing anything and the senses are imaginary and perception is an illusion so is perspectives, consciousness and awareness. These are, don't get me wrong but they are for no one. No one owns anything. No one owns eyes. Those eyes are decorations , they see nothing. Seeing is just happening. I'm still waiting for an explanation to change my illusory perspective. No explanation in this thread explained how seeing the same things is possible from different bodies without splitting reality into pieces.

There's no awareness in me. Ideas are not in me. "Ideas in me that is awareness" can't be because awareness is supposed to be aware of ideas. You say we all see the same things but I guess except for the blind. Their shit's out of luck. You say boundless awareness then say they don't exist outside of awareness. Doesn't exist inside either if it's boundless because there is no outside or inside boundlessness. "Within boundless awareness" is a contradiction. Awareness cannot be infinitely boundless and also BE AWARE OF anything....that's not infinite. Awareness cannot be everything and also be AWARE OF ANYTHING. It also cannot be one with because that's separation that became one. ONE WITH implies two. Your whole narrative is flawed but it's OK, it's this awareness thing that gets people. No such thing.

Ok, i think we jumped the gun a bit. I get that but what about you and i in the same room seeing the same thing with different sets of eyes. Forget about the experience of it, just the direct seeing of it, how can we both see the same thing with different eyes i'm asking.

You and i are standing in the wind. We both feel it. No issue there. According to you, it is my perception that feels the wind and your perception that feels the same wind but at the same time we can have different perceptions on how the wind is experienced. You can say the wind feels annoying because it gets in your eyes and I can say I love the feel of the wind because without it it feels hot.

Something like that. Not necessarily understood but seen as the same underlying thing but through different lenses from different bodies. Not necessarily going back and forth as in the yellow picture but anything "outside". If you turn those two heads towards a bird chirping across the way, both will see the bird but from different eyes and different heads.

So how come everything else can be based off of seeing the same thing. I get what you're saying. The mistake I think you're making, though, is assuming others are actually seeing anything. I can't see what others are seeing but a whole conversation can be based off of us apparently seeing the same thing. Youre speaking of maybe perceptions. I don't see the correlation with the topic, though.

Ok. So they're not your eyes or your nose or mouth then right. I agree with you now you put it that way. Would you agree then, that those eyes aren't seeing shit.

Looks two lop-sided dresses with no bust line and no waist. Seriously how does this picture explain you being able to see with your eyes what i'm seeing over here.

Didn't you see my post. I saw it. I saw your comment. What does existentially speaking have to do with this.

Also, when the natural wind of nature blows, you and i can feel it at the same time. It's direct contact. Why can't you feel a fan if a fan is blowing on me and not you while in the same room or house. We can only feel the forces of nature together but not from a machine. I thought nothing was separate. Do you see what i'm saying. These sensations are conditional and are dependent on different scenarios. You and i can feel the wind at the same time but you and i can't feel the fan at the same time.

No, that's different. Your example is akin to how does one house accommodate many people. That's not the same as how can a supposed separate body share same sense perceptions as another.

People are sticking to their human identity and defending it while trying to get enlightened at the same time. Can't you all see this madness. Am I the mad one. Maybe.

Speak English please. I'm expecting some weirded out explanations but not this weirded out. What does this have to do with how you can see this response I'm making with a different set of eyes over there in Germany or wherever the hell you at.

We keep talking about the "witness of". Who is witnessing the cells in the body, the chromosomes, the heart beating, the shopkeeper across the street that you can't see right now, Trump jerking off. Can you witness that. Can you witness the back of your head without a mirror. Can you witness your butthole. Can you witness your liver, spleen, the vitamins that you eat. Why is it only thoughts, the body and mind that we can witness. Get the f outta here with all that spiritual mumbo jumbo and understand what you're talking about first even if it ain't so. I can respect someone writing a book on their own understandings than a spiritual spitter of garbage they're repeating from another spiritual spitter. I repeat stuff also, but I understand the shit outta what I'm saying even if it's not the case. It's my understanding of or experience of it. I can hear something that rings a bell and aha moments come along, or I can experience shit and so on and so forth. It's all illusory but still if I'm writing about it, it's through clarity and understanding. I can be wrong, nothing wrong with that. So what, anybody can be wrong. It's the just spitting and rapping about stuff one heard and cannot even come back with a true rebuttal when challenged.

Lol.

People will sit there and justify their arguments with "ifs". "If" is not reality. If you get hit by a stone upside your head, we'll see if you don't suffer. I'm suffering now just listening to you talk. Most people are suffering their "ifs" more than the actual circumstance. We "what if" life to death then call that what's happening and try to solve a "what if" problem. What if, what if, what if. What if Rolling was a Stone.

Cannot integrate something that's not really happening. The self is already not there; never has been, never will be. Like your name suggests, it's just in your mind and also another illusion.

It's the same thing already. What people are after is a better experience/feeling. There's no difference between spiritual gain and material gain but only in context/content. I made a thread about this a while back:

Men are from Mars. Women are from Disneyland. We want our Prince Frog to take us to Mars. Silly me. I can see where this journal is going.

How can something that doesn't exist die. These are real realizations only misinterpreted. It's showing you, you don't exist to die.

Razaard will cool me down in the morning, haha. Wait for it.....🥳

Infinity isn't big, that's a measurement and infinity cannot be categorized as a measurement.