Princess Arabia

Yeah, you were lying to yourself, but I saw through all that, that's why I wasn't too hard on you when you were talking all that jazz. You get to a point when you can see through some of human's bullshit, especially when one has dealt with men through all these years. All the crying and bickering and hollering and hating and bitching and moaning from men about women and all that you seen them carry on with is just them really saying how much they love women but have seemingly lost control in their relations with them or lack thereof; and if it's not that, it's something close to that dynamic. I'm in no position to say exactly what that is but I know that people don't get emotionally charged over something they couldn't care less about. Nobody craves sex just for sex's sake. Sex is no different than eating chocolate and when one craves chocolate it's because the body is lacking in certain nutrients. Same goes for just about every craving. There's something lacking in either one's psyche or mental state or physical body. Notice I said crave, so please no moral police please about my saying sex is just like eating chocolate. People seem to like to think of certain things as special over the next thing when all that is, is a bias and a survival agenda strategy. Existentially, nothing is more important than the next; it's all neutral.

It's OK. You're "The God". You're allowed to be human.

I like this. Made me chuckle.

Ok, you explained your stance perfectly. You said both are imaginary distinctions, so that's clear enough that it's coming from the standpoint of the dream and not what is. Fair enough.

It's in the Females Are Very Cringe About Age thread by StarStruck started on April 2. I'm not sure how to copy and paste comments so here goes, verbatim. "You're making assumptions. I understand myself and I know that I want sex.with women. Which is why I'm fucking prostitutes. There is no value that a women can bring into my life other than just sex. The only women that brings a lot of value into my life is my mother, she's my besty". Another quote "Nonsense, it has everything to do with sex. When I was a kid I didn't look at girls and didn't even know why they existed. I need sex to fulfill my sexual needs". And another. "I value and respect women same as I respect my mother. I don't think that their value is defined by their ability to satisfy someone's sex needs. Their value is independence. What I meant is I NEED NOTHING BUT SEX FROM THEM. (bolded by me for emphasis). I can provide myself with everything without needing to depend on anyone, except for sex". This is what you said verbatim. So getting passed off at me, is like getting passed off at your own words. Thank God for the fact these aren't deleted right away and can be referenced to back up certain claims one make about another because of words coming from their own mouth. I will leave you alone now as I don't want you to get pissed off from your own words and as I unintentionally tend to do with some here by speaking my truth.

Don't say stuff on here then that you don't want repeated. I could go do a search but I don't feel like it. You said you only use women for sex and that your mama is the only female you......(not sure the word you used here). Remember?

This doesn't apply to him because he's using them for their bodies. No difference. No marriage proposals no love here. Nothing wrong with it if they do. Fair game. Do you want bitter women running around. At least they'll walk away with something and both will be happy. Men use women all the time, no shame if women do the same if it's mutual. He sees hookers all the time so he doesn't care.

He's cool. It's the females that are young and silly. He's training them, though. They'll get to a certain age and recognize what's up. At least he's being upfront.

Least we agree on something. To be clear, though, they aren't sluts and whores. They just get tired of being labelled as such. The one's who care anyway and take that shit personally. When you're more experienced and recognize why the term is used, you recognize it for what it is. Nothing!

Women are from Earth men are from Venus. Hehe - John Gray's Revision Edition.

Lol. Differences of opinions. Doesn't mean I'm wrong and you're right, neither or not both. No need to judge and criticize my pov's. I'm just simply pointing out how I feel. In fact, the more deluded one is in this field, the better up the other sex makes out from the game perspective so you should be glad i'm speaking from delusion and not what's actual. P.S. Your word "delirium" seemed more fancy than mine. Take the "dis' off of mine, they become ordinary words - yours on the other hand.....hmmm.... delirium....sounds like a biology lab equipment used to put out propane gas.

This is the biggest LIE in the dating world that gets men hurt, confused and hating women. Don't be fooled. Women are so tired of being labeled sluts and whores for loving sex, so they've come up with strategies to not seem as such. It's a clever design. Nothing is as it seems. More smart to play the opposites game. Whatever it appears to be, think the opposite.

The more you approach, the more "rejection" is imminent. The more rejected one feels, the more dissatisfied with their approach. The more dissatisfaction, the more disassociation, the more disassociation, the more desensitized.

You have said nothing ambiguous here. You said the women wanted to feel special and they succeeded. You're assuming these women wanted love and a husband and kids and a fantasy life. You said they wanted to feel special and your so-called player friend did that. You don't know if these women were also screwing 10 different men the same day. Thats not manipulation that's low self-esteem and low-confidence when he has to manipulate his way into having sex while the women are still walking around feeling special and didn't have to manipulate their way into getting laid.

Yea, the game of approaching. Which can lead or don't lead to anywhere. Approaching doesn't require much skill. The reason for the approach is where the true success lies if you succeed at that. You will say the more you approach the better your success, but the more you approach the quicker the burn out and the less quality of a conversation you'll have and your game will seem robotic.

It's a numbers game. No quality women will respond to a numbers game and even if she does, she'll quickly sense that she was just a dice that was thrown and her number got picked.

Approaching thousands of women can lead to disassociation and desensitization in the dating world. It's no different than what can happen with hookers and porn stars. It becomes obvious with some men that approach me that they do this with lots of women and couldn't care less if I respond or not. It becomes obvious it's a numbers game and because women are graduates and have masters degrees in feelings and have a certain sense about certain things in this department, it can have a negative impact on the men who approach in the thousands and will only attract the same type of woman, the one who is also detached from her feelings and couldn't care less about who you are as a person.

If you notice in my last sentence, I said "including having the belief of meaning and purpose, or not". What is that but conditional love. So, I did include conditional love in the description of unconditional love. "Your entire life is proof that Unconditional love is indeed also conditional", is not what Unconditional love IS, it's only a description of what Unconditional love is, even though it is still paradoxically Unconditionsl love since it is everything. Describing an orange is not the orange. "You would kill yourself and leave forever" is assuming there's a person there that makes that decision". "The proof that you care, is that you are still here", is not proof that there's someone whose still here, as that's also assuming there's "a someone" who is still here and there's no proof that you're actually speaking to a someone and not just typing and reading happening. Also to say "your entire life", is assuming that there's someone here that has a life.

Upsides: *Interaction with different people from all over the world and having an online community where like-minded people gather to discuss similar topics of interests. * Asking/Giving advice that may help to improve one's life. *Able to share and post interesting and/or informative videos as a way of expanding our knowledge base. *Receiving feedback to certain issues we share via comments, posts or videos that may open our minds to see from a different perspective. *A way to perhaps reduce loneliness in some who are introverts and rather not be out and about unnecessarily and would rather engage online. (more about that later). *A way for everybody introverted or extroverted to interact on the spot when the urge arises without going transporting. *Doesn't have to respond to unwanted and unnerving conversations that might otherwise cause conflicts in person. *Share interesting and enlightening insights that could be life-changing in a positive way. *Can remain anonymous while doing all the above. Downsides: *Can become addictive. *Can take away from productivity of one's personal goals and achievements if too much time is spent on there. *Can cause one to not be able to be in the present from having to go back to previous conversations that were otherwise forgotten (not sure about this being a downside or a negative). This one needs to be seen through to be understood with clarity, it's very tricky, *Causes one to neglect human contact because it is enough to interact online without recognizing the pitfalls in just doing so. *One can not care how they come across because of it's anonymous nature and can become rude and obnoxious as a result. *If not careful, can contribute to more loneliness because of it's nature to be impersonal. *Can lead to one being misled from improper guidance or wrong information that was trusted to be correct. (Seek professional advice for serious issues please). ** Please feel free to add your additions to this list and/or state your opinions on the ones given, or say which ones affect you the most if you care to. **

What I meant to say was, I don't care about seeming deluded; coming across as deluded.

Ok, and I'm not asking to be anything other than just curiosity of one's thinking, so take it as such. If consciousness is everything, then how are the descriptions you mentioned above, how come the opposites aren't also consciousness. What makes what you said pure versus its opposite. (if you're not up for this let me know, i just see it as just a conversation, not as rebuttals or trying to challenge you.)

This is what I've done and am getting flack for it, so easier said than done as most will go with the herd without said doing for fear of either not fitting in or seeming delusional. I don't have a problem with seeming delusional as long as it's something I've come to the realization of or have recognized. All of this will be false, anyway, as they are only insights and perspectives which cannot be true since insights and perspectives cannot stand on their own and can only appear within the dream of separation. However, nothing is denied as everything is the Absolute appearing as such. So, what is seemingly false is also true in the Absolute sense, but when an individual is stuck in the dream it will have consequences and will feel as real as the dream and no amount of Absolute this and Absolute that will be of any help to the dreamer. The beauty of all that, though, is it never really happened.

May I ask, what's a pure mind.

Videos like these is what hides the real shit happening. This stuff is obvious. Who would not be traumatized by having sex with hundreds of strange men. I would be too, if I had to get all banged up everyday and at their tender young age. It's not a moral issue but more of a psychological one. That said, you're just naive when you say conscience. If you really knew the stuff you're contributing to just by being a member of society, you would be in awe. So don't just single out the obvious, it's the ones you're oblivious to that you need to go investigate and your smart phone and the clothes you wear are just some of them. Keep "God" out of this because the ignorance of what God is is what perpetrates all the so-called "evil" in the world. Saying one needs God's help is a misnomer.

If language wasn't a thing, there would be no enlightenment. The problem with happiness is the I AM. Separation. I AM something being something else. There is no separation so therefore in essence there is no I AM. The I AM is a dream so therefore it suffers within the dream experience not recognizing it's dreaming. Every experience of the I AM is a dream. It's true nature is not a dream because it's no-thing. The individual is dependent upon a subject-object experience which is illusory, and as a result everything experienced seems real because it is unaware that there is no individual. The bi-product of the I AM is separation and automatic suffering because separation and apparent suffering are synonymous. It is unaware that what it's seeking is the end of seeking; and fulfillment cannot be lasting where there is seeking of something it will never find because there was never an individual to begin with. There's only enlightenment within the dream of the I AM, which doesn't exist without relations to an object. Knowledge also implies separation. Someone that knows something. The Absolute cannot be known so everything known are just stories within the Absolute and also the Absolute. Enlightenment is the Absolute "enlightenment-ing" and since nothing is separate there's only the Absolute, everything is enlightenment or no-thing is enlightenment.