Princess Arabia

Yes exactly. Are you hearing it now? It's very loud tonight. Silently loud. Like a screeching whisper. Loudest I've heard it.

Yeah, it was an observational insight. 😜

The irony is that this is also an intellectual insight.

Lawyer: Your honor, my client is very distraught because his gf threw chocolate in his face. Judge: 10yrs for the defendant for disrupting my courtroom with this nonsense, and $4 fine for the plaintiff for wasting food.

I'm not a nutritionist but my knowledge on food and nutrition is a little bit more extensive than just the normal common advice to eat your fruits and veggies. (I could be wrong here so this is just my educated opinion). I don't think the part about having as much as you want when it comes to fruits is correct. May even be dangerous too. One doesn't want to wait until problems arise before taking necessary precautions when it comes to health concerns. Yes, the sugar in fruits known as fructose, doesn't metabolizes the same as say processed cane sugar (white or brown), and the fiber in the fruit does make a difference in how the body processes the sugar in fruits. If you juice oranges VS eating them whole, there is a difference in the metabolizing process because the fiber is missing. Certain fruits contain less sugar than some and it is advisable to eat the ones with more sugar more sparingly, for example bananas VS kiwis, fiber or not. Berries are also on the list with less sugar, mangos have a lot of sugar . I think your statement would be more applicable towards the consumption of leafy greens. Eat all you want with those, I think, unless advised by a doctor, with those on certain medications maybe because of the oxalates found in them. I think fruits, while they are a healthy food and can be extensively consumed, I don't think they fit into the category of "eat all you want".

I'll never look at a chocolate bar the same again after reading this post. Hehe

He has already, SILENCE. He's indirectly communicating it by example.😇

I'm sure these guys won't think so. I'll probably secretly get a few haters after that rant, if I haven't already.

No, not at all. It didn't sound insensitive to me; more like on a "tough love" level. I can't really go there too harsh on this topic because it will be too harsh because of how I view this issue and I'm aware of how sometimes I can get carried away on emotional issues that becomes personal to me. How about this "you frigging bastards, how dare you treat the woman in your life this way. The woman who could potentially bear your children who will get your last name and carry on your imaginary legacy that you so think is you. The only thing you got that anyone could remember you by, not your egotistical accomplishments that could possibly burn up in a fire or a frigging tsunami. If you think a friggin' chocolate bar can supplement the love I can show you that you do obviously crave if you're holding unto a dusty piece of heavy-metal laced tooth-rotting piece of brown filth........need I go on.lol

You are missing the point. What she means is in the act itself. The act of sex is giving and receiving. Giving and receiving happens simultaneously but in the male/female sexual act, the woman is receiving and the male giving. The female is also giving and the man is also receiving but in a different way. The exchange then becomes more on an emotional level, while the normal sex act in itself is more on a physical level. Please try leave logic behind when it comes to these topics as it very rarely applies to emotional issues as sex can be. This has nothing to do with your logical explanation on investment from a guy. That's a whole different topic in this case.

Sometimes it's how we say things that matters. Your words were a bit condescending but your explanation showed more clarity in the point you were trying to make. When guys speak about not getting sex here, they are single and are not in a relationships. That's what I'm speaking on when I say they are not entitled. Meaning random women don't owe you sex and neither does any girl you're approaching or even trying to get with. Some of them act as if they are entitled to be having sex just because they exist without putting in the effort or work to make it happen, as if it should just fall on their laps. When I mention that, i'm speaking about men who expect it from women who they are not in relationships with. It's good if it happens without that, but don't complain about the lack of it if you haven't claimed any one as your personal girlfriend or wife. I'm not saying you have to be in a relationship or married, but don't feel entitled to it and complain about the lack of it if you're just looking to just sleep around with random girls. The OP is in a relationship, there's a difference. Well, that was my aim in my response to OP. I gave her solutions that might help not tell her to go work it out on her own in a dismissive fashion.

You know we cool and all, but I have to say your comment here sounds a bit personal and biased. Sounds like something in her post either triggered you or reminded you of something in your past personal experience. You picked out the most seemingly trivial example of how she was explaining his cheapness and made a mockery of it, knowing well enough that that's not all she was concerned about. Seems a bit biased and picking out parts of her story to try to justify your undermining of her legitimate concerns that really had nothing to do entirely with the not sharing of chocolates. What happened, you didn't give some girl chocolates for Valentine once and she dumped you, is that it. 😜

Ok, I misunderstood. I took it as you saying you didn't care how the girl you were having sex with was feeling. Even worse than that. Without getting into how i took it and how I misunderstood your remark, I sincerely apologize for mine. It was a bit rough and I was a bit abrupt, but that's just how I am when something rubs me the wrong way as far as insensitivity goes. I should, in the future, ask for clarity of what one means when they say something of that nature before coming to my own conclusions of what I think they meant. I am also applying this to other aspects of my life because I'm realizing how interpretation can be very misleading and can create unnecessary emotional baggage in one's life. This is one way I use the forum; to improve upon my communication skills as there's nothing like doing it in real time as opposed to just reading about it or acquiring knowledge about it. Again, I misinterpreted you and reacted that way because it showed lack of empathy in the worst way in how I interpreted it and gave me an icky feeling in my stomach, and because you and i have a decent rapport here, I didn't want to continue it knowing (I felt anyway) that you would intentionally hurt a woman you were having sex with knowing how sensitive something like this can be for some women.

I don't know about the sex part, that may be the only part he may not be cheap about. Overall, though, I agree with your response up top. I was trying to be a bit more diplomatic in my response because I was trying to be a bit sensitive towards her situation because it seems like she is in love with the guy. Usually, I'm blunt in what I have to say here and don't hold back, but you beat me to the cake with how you responded. If I wasn't holding back, my response would have been a lot worse, and given the feedback you're getting from some of these guys with your response, my third personality would probably have let loose on here and diplomacy would have flown out the window.

Who goes on a forum to cry about not getting laid. 50 -70% of the guys on this forum. Why, because it's important to them. What's important to one might not be important to another. Her issue lies deeper than her man not sharing his chocolate.

Throwing chocolate at somebody is not violence. Wouldn't stand up in court and that's a bit extreme.

This maybe the most exaggeration of violence and destruction of property that I've ever seen. Throwing back a piece of chocolate to a man that said you're not worth my $4 chocolate or whatever it costs is a kind response to his remark. If she took the chocolate, smeared it on his furniture and smacked him in the face I could see that as destruction of property and violence. Give me a break.

Great. Glad it worked out for you. You can also experiment with it by whipping the oil to create a shaving cream like consistency , but that's a bit more work. I believe you can find out how to do this online. I follow "Coconut Mama". She has great tips and recipes using coconut oil. Check her out, if you're up to it. When I was writing my facial post, I said to myself this is going to seem a bit extensive but if you really look at it, you'll really see that most of the timing is in the writing and explaining of this stuff. I have the simplest routine ever and I don't spend a lot of time or even resources on it, it just appears that way. All the foods I mentioned I eat and/or cook with and will dab on while cooking or preparing a meal. The oil cleansing takes less than 5minutes and only involves oil. Steaming once or twice a month by throwing some stuff in a pot. I am also a minimalist to a degree and i don't bother with a lot of crap, it just seems like I spend a lot of time doing this, I don't. Its the explaining that makes it seem that way.

Just to show my facial skin with no foundation. The oil cleansing method is great for an even skin tone.

Have fun. Hope it goes well.

Ugg. That's all i have to say on that. Uggggg. I have nothing more to say to you. Goodbye.

I just looked at CeraVe's ingredients list. I would run, but that's just me. I pick my poisons, that wouldn't be one of them. Bull dog wasn't too bad. I would recommend that out of the two options. Personally (I'm female so might not be the same) I don't use any of those fancy commercial store bought products, too many toxins and parabens, EDTA, tocopherol is supposed to be ok, but I don't trust it, along with a host of other chemicals I can't even pronounce. @Jason Actualization's recommendation was the purest, cleanest thing talked about here so far.

Hmmm, interesting. Sounds good.

I hope your channel isn't going to be about how not to procrastinate. You should make it about how the right conditions never comes; but then again, there isn't going to be a channel if you're waiting for the right conditions now is there. Just messing with you Salvijus, even though what I'm saying is true.😜 I know, because I'm still waiting.

I know, I was saying the same thing. Probably the only true ism there is. Lol. Mentalism is missing too.