Princess Arabia

Why bother!!

This speaks for itself. There's no time, so "going" is not Reality. The Reality of that is only in the reading of the word "going", which will be a memory after I stop looking at it.

There's no one to die, because there's noone . These bodies are empty shells. The end.

God IS the Silence speaking through us. That's the dream.

There's no way to tell a person's "body count" (gosh, I hate that term), other than what they tell you, so all the emotional baggage is futile. This is all just fantasy. Protect yourself, yes; everything else is just ideas about the person.

This explanation does explain how the I AM was borne, the contracted energy.

ok, I understand what you're saying here.

Somehow I don't get this. If the ego is illusory, how does that affect Reality. Won't what you're saying only be a dream.

There are no paths and there are no "ultimate" *traps* only seemingly so. There is no time, there is no space, a path requires both, but we can imagine we're on a path, but its illusory. There is just this.

Errrk, errk, wrong. Which you have interpretations of.

There are no masses. So, it's like saying, no one needs to be saved. I think that's what it's saying. There's only the all.

Love this. Looks like my experience the other day. Subtle version of this though, much more subtle. If I saw this exact same thing I would have thought who the hell is throwing silent fireworks this time of year. It's like it was an intro for "here I am".

Everything falls inline without the who. Take the person and their fucked up line of reasoning, and illusions and dreams and perspectives and thoughts and ideas about reality, and things will start to line up. But its still a mystery and e can go but so far as we are it.

Thats because there's no who.

I said that because somebody in my " Oh My God..." thread posted a blog post that Leo made describing the real meaning of what Consciousness is that changed my whole perspective of what consciousness is. This post would have been inline with how i saw what consciousness was, but now it doesn't; and falls inline with everything else. Consciousness is not something we have but is a function of truth. We don't need consciousness to be conscious of something. Consciousness is emitting through us.

I'm happy to make posts like these and be wrong about the intricacies. This is how it has potential to bring about clarity. A chain reaction kind of thing. Things get indirectly revealed if we have the eyes to see them along with a genuine child-like curiosity about nature, without the sense of having or needing to know.

this is why I made the thread saying consciousness ultimately doesn't exist. Not by this definition but by the regular definition of consciousness.

No words can be too harsh for me. I'm not in the business to be pampered. I like it raw and uncensored which sometimes gets me in hot water. So say it out loud, that's the beauty of fucking raw.

To tell you the truth @Bobby_2021I don't like to be chased. Especially by guys I'm not interested in. Didn't say I don't like to be admired. Difference there. so keep all the you should be lucky somebody chasing yo ass comments to the side. Doesn't feel good to be chased by the unwanted. If I like a guy, I will give signals and leave it to him to acknowledge them. If not....next. Do you see how many guys that will sleep with any available pussy. There would be a lot worse than me-too movements and feminist groups and child-support problems going on in society if women were approaching men left and right it if that was the norm. Guys would be like sure, sure, sure, sure, yes, yes, yes, yes, let's go, lets go, lets go, lets go. The world would be in crises with all the angry and bitter women who would be bred from this sort of dynamic.

Yes, it's logically illogical.

If's aren't Realities. I can see there's no point here if were going down the if's route.

This isn't a problem because it really doesn't matter in the big picture, but you have to stop thinking about these things logically to even start to come close in understanding the nature of how these things really work in the "real" world. This sentence is a math equation. You yourself said you're a bit weirded out when women are interested in you, but you're here making comments saying women should do more approaching. What that sneaky little mind of yours is doing is thinking its special and its the only one that's disinterested in women who shows interest but the rest of men aren't the same way, I'm special. When 95% of men are like this. Women approaching men is a bad idea. (on a general scale).

Highs breeds lows. No one wants you to get high so you get bored easily and go chase the next high. You're making my point even more. Men chasing women shouldn't be a high but a natural way to be, how nature intended. There's a reason for it and you're trying to go against it by your logical reasonings and understanding it from your logical mind. You're speaking from both sides if your ass cheeks.

If "being a devil" and "acting good" are relative it cannot be measured. So saying "they would still know how to act bad" is arbitrary.

This right here is exactly what I'm talking about in my comment. Perfect example how we mentally disconnect from the Absolute and then try to solve something that they say is too metaphysical because we're dealing with worldly affairs, when the worldly affairs stem from the Absolute.