Princess Arabia

Only God is Awake 😜Its just pretending to be asleep.

People are afraid to die and people are afraid to live - Neale Donald Walsch. When we recognize that we are only here for an experience and that people will hurt you regardless of the kind of relationship you have with them in some shape or form; and it is never guaranteed that they will not, you turn within and focus on yourself and make sure you are not neglecting your own self and loving yourself, without the need to have to put up defenses so as not get hurt again, because in doing so you are only setting yourself up to get hurt. It's not about feeling hurt or not feeling hurt but how you respond to those feelings that will determine how quickly you're able to bounce back. When you expect others to make you happy, that is a sure way to feel hurt by others. Notice I say feel because no one can hurt you if you haven't given them permission to. When we can love freely without stipulations and expectations, is when we have become free from the chains and strings that binds us and prevents us from feeling loved.

That's not what she's saying and your comparisons have no merit. Breathing is not the same as doing substances. It is the fundamental essence of what is needed to sustain one's life. Without breath, there is no living while one can live without psychedelics. I'm not saying psychedelics are damaging to the human body or not, because I don't know and is irrelevant to the point I'm making.

I'm not sure which comment you're referring to but i'm happy to hear you found it refreshing, because that's a rear quality to find in people's perspectives these days without saying that mine was especially so, because it depends on who is viewing and interpreting.

Call it what you want. I don't even know what simping is because I don't mimick societal lingo. I create my own and create my own meaning to them. I am my own unique individual who sees things differently and I don't subscribe to labels and use other people's lingo that i see being used on social media to describe the people I relate with either directly or indirectly.. I could turn the word simping and use it to my own benefit if I see fit by creating my own meaning as I don't see that word relevant to use in describing anything in Reality that I find to be of any relevance as far as my abilities to serve human kind or to try to raise the consciousness of myself and others. Those things I consider relevant and the word simping isn't needed to fulfill that role, so it doesn't have any bearing to my ears and just bounced off without adding too much flavor neither negatively or positively because lingos have that essence to them to be used or discarded to be of relevance depending on the person using them.

These aren't stupid stuff in general. They are only irrelevant to people who can't afford them. The right partner that compliments YOU as the individual.

This isn't flirting nor because of some fixation on my part but I think you just have in your mind what an attractive guy is supposed to look like. I think you're extremely physically attractive especially in those photos you have on Instagram. The one in the white shirt and the one with the sunglasses especially, amongst others on there. Have you ever looked at your hands and fingers, they are perfectly designed, ever looked at the shape and structure of your head and how your ears stand out perfectly in conjunction and proportioned with your facial structure. Ever notice how your forehead isn't too big nor too small but is symmetrically aligned with your lips and cheek bones. Ever notice.........i could go on. If that's having a fixation then so be it. You are very photogenic and I think you would kick some ass in looks if you would feel that way about yourself. You don't see it because of your ideas of what you think is physically attractive for a man. You even have the height, which isn't necessary but is usually not a turn off. Plus that hairy chest of yours turns some women on. They like hair on a man's chest so they can braid it up when in bed together. Let me stop before you think it's a fixation.

I don't want to get in a debate with you like we did the other day, but I need to say this. This is exactly why I had no interest in viewing in a post from 3yrs ago that was just filled with concepts and beliefs about relationships. People change their view on things all the time, and it is not wise to listen to these things and accept them as the all be all. Use them as a guideline and take what resonates with you at your stage of development. Trust me, when you turn 50 or 60 years old, you will have a different perspective about women than you do now. It can go both ways whether more positively or more negatively based depending on the experiences you've had with them throughout the years.

Don't be so sure I would've been available for that abuse. You're not sure how far I'm willing to go with that and i cannot be swayed to do anything i don't want to do without my permission when it comes to sexual relations. Don't be so sure that I would have been willing to sleep with you just because of the things I say and my flirtatious attitude when it comes to you. I don't have a fixation with you, and I know how far to take my flirtatious comments of which I don't consider to be fixations. Don't flatter yourself to think that if you were a cult leader you could have abused that with me because I'm not in the business of sleeping around just for the hell of just sleeping around, no matter how attracted I am to a particular person. Take that however you wish.

I already watched this video when you initially posted it. To be honest, this guy is good at what he does and he's a professional therapist which makes it a plus. Why I wouldn't consider much of what he says to be valuable information is because he was extremely hurt before and I can tell he still carries some of that emotional baggage into his way of seeing things. A lot of this stuff has to be personalized; and if you're going to give professional dating advice you need to be unbiased in this domain and not basing it off of just what you've experienced. So far, the only dating coach I'd take any dating advice from as far as from a male's perspective is John Gray.

I don't think so. That's just me. Yes, I'm aware of that. That maybe so, but if most men went for women regardless of their looks and didn't need them to be attractive, that wouldn't be such a problem. I would like you even if you were Hitler. Hehe. Joke of the day. That's because of their strict policy on only one child per household. (don't quote me on that as I'm not sure what the policy is; but I'm sure you're aware there is one of such nature). Well, you're making my point even more in respect to getting laid. Most men are seeking hot women and that's probably why they struggle to get laid. They probably wouldn't prefer to lay up with Susan with the rotten teeth and no ass. So getting laid is not so much the problem but who you want to lay up with.

There's no one to become enlightened. Existence just is.

Get a unique domain name and you won't have that problem. The more common the name, the more chances for knock-offs.

Women dating for survival purposes has nothing to do with how attractive a man is. People don't treat people badly just because they're attractive. They usually treat people badly because they've been treated badly themselves or have been hurt. If Russell Brand had no money or wasn't famous, he wouldn't even be considered that attractive. When speaking about how women are only dating high-value men, that only refers to certain types of women. You guys keep saying all these things but when you look around in society a lot of men aren't high-value, a lot of men aren't that attractive, a lot of men don't even possess those qualities you're mentioning but they are still getting girlfriends, still getting laid, still starting families and still getting married. The only reason men are considered high-value is because they stand out from the rest. If everybody had the same qualities that are considered high-value, they wouldn't even be considered high value. If the majority of people were attractive, attractive people wouldn't even stand out to be noticed. You guys are for the most part only referring to the types of women that YOU want, the types of women who YOU would like to sleep with. As far as women being attracted to bad boys, that is partially true but bad boys can still be physically unattractive and low-value but still has a way with women. We don't have an "under-populated" problem. We don't have people in poor countries or underdeveloped countries who are having problems getting laid. Look around in India and China where they have billions of people running around like ants, are those people that attractive or are considered high-value by your standards. Probably not. I just mentioned those countries but there are tons of countries where over-population maybe considered a problem. It didn't get that way because people are having problems getting laid. But I don't have to specify particular countries because i'm not aware of any country where the population is not growing; and for that to happen, for the most part sex is in the equation. You're wanting hot women; and for the most part, not all, but most are able to be picky, and are requiring men to be of high-value to be able to sleep with her. Guys usually go for looks in a woman, but that is relative. There's no denying that most very physically attractive people would be considered physically attractive by most. Most guys would consider a man physically attractive by HIS standards not by women's. They assess most men by their standards thinking that's what women would consider to be good-looking, sometimes it's the case, but most times it's not. Women's attractor-factor is very broad range and usually depends on her particular needs or what she personally considers to be attractive at that time in her life and if she's into certain physical features as in beards, mustaches, height, complexion etc and not just because a guy might be attractive just in general. Not all women prefer taller men. Most Chinese men are short and so are Mexicans. There is no under-population in those countries and many other countries where short men are abundant. Yes, you have all made some good points, but it is too generalized. The hotter the women is the more she's going to be "stricter" in her choice of men because she would be in high-demand and most know this, so why settle. Males are the ones that have made this possible because of how they love to fuck hot women - can't blame the women for that. As far as men goes, the more money you have that's usually a criteria to be able to get whatever woman you want - can't blame the men for that. That's for subconscious survival reasons because women like to feel secure. Even men loving hot women is based on survival, whatever they are identified as, and how they maintain those identities. So, when you're making these observations and assessments you're not speaking for most, either way. People are mating all around, there is no shortage of pussy or dick, if you know where to look in your respective areas and depending on your standards. Most guys are wanting hot women and when they see how hard it can be to rope those women in, they start to assesses all women and claiming that most women are like how they perceive these hot women to be. Of course, there are always exceptions to every rule and I could be off on some things i've said as they are only my opinions and based off of assumptions and or what I've observed, but so are yours. The bottom-line is, most guys are seeing how hard it can be to be able to screw the women of their dreams and now you're judging all women because of how you see how some of the most attractive women can be and require in a man. Go around and observe "normal' average people who are fairly mentally healthy and blend into society and are just working and paying bills and paying taxes and are just living normally, go see how many of them are in relationships, married and having kids and getting laid. You'll find a lot of them are. These are just my opinions and observations. They are not facts, so if you're coming at me, please bear that in mind as I am no relationship expert and I do live in a bubble and have only experienced what i've experienced and have observed what I've observed and have not done any surveys or polls as most of you are seeming to have done to come up with your assessments of the sexes.

I am enlightened. Beware.

You're already dead. Were just playing catch up. If this is life then it must be death. Don't listen to me cause I'm a dead girl walking.

It ain't my name. But every name is a stage name. I have no name.

We are here to have experiences. We are already all there is. The ego is an expression of the All. The one true Source. This is why it manifested itself as a human being so it can experience what it's like to be human. Why are we trying to accomplish ego death when, to me, it seems like an impossible task as it is merely a mental construction. Why are we trying to become a "nobody" when that is not the reason for our existence. We as humans are limited but we stem from the unlimited so we can have the experience of what it's like to be limited. This is not our true nature. Most of us recognizes this and as long as we know this to be true and keep that running in the background can't we just allow for the Universe to flow through us and allow it to manifest through us as it pleases instead of trying to become unlimited - we are already inherently unlimited by nature and are just playing roles. Isn't Source seeing it's reflection through us and all we need to do is remove all the faulty and conditioned layers we have constructed for ourselves and work towards seeing ourselves as Source sees itself in order to live a more fulfilling life. That's transformation, not death. Trying to kill the ego is like trying to kill God as God is the Ego because God is everything, Can someone make this make sense to me because I'm not understanding why we are even trying to accomplish this. Why not just aim for it's transformation and transform it into something beautiful.

My real name in Lolita. Now that's the shocker.

Change your story. Change your inner dialogue. Change your beliefs. Change your concept of yourself. Change the way you see yourself and the world around you. Ignore the contents of your life and see yourself where you want to be and stay there. It's the only way. The outside world is just a reflection of your inner state.

Ok so there's a time between dating them and when they cut off. Which is what I'm referring to and as you said you agree with. Everyone is different and there are no rules, only what's right for the individual.

Until you have settled down into an exclusive relationship, nothing wrong with dating multiple people, IMO. How else are you going to be able to find the "right" one for you if your goal is to have a relationship with one partner. Most mature individuals, will be able to understand this and not let it upset them. If two people have not mutually agreed to become exclusive, then that is not a relationship, it's just dating. They don't have to know anything about your personal life with others; and if you're uncomfortable with telling the truth where that's concern, ask yourself why. If you're afraid of telling one date that you're dating others, then maybe you are too attached to what the outcome may bring by revealing that. Remember that sometimes it's just the mind that will conjure up stories about how you think they may act by you revealing this to them and not what is actually happening. Never feel like you're cheating on your dating partners by dating others whether they know or not unless you both have decided to go monogamous and it was a mutually verbal agreement. Don't reveal to them verbally that you're dating others to wait for the right one to come along. No one really wants to hear that, but just say that you're not sure how you feel about monogamy just yet and you're looking to enjoy the times spent with whomever you're currently on a date with and are open to where it leads.

Nice quote.

So I guess by your statement there's a false God. So what do you call life. What is existence.

Hmmm, I see.