Princess Arabia

@EmotionalmosquitoToo many rebuttals. I can't handle. I tried.

Guys, my heart is open again for a relationship and you're not helping. Hehe. Don't need the help anyway, cause I'm my own person.

Well, if peace in a relationship is boring, give me boring please. I've had exciting relationships without the drama before. It's because people don't know how to be exciting with each other, so they feel bored if they aren't arguing. The point of the thread though, is the constant putting down of each of the sexes by the opposite sex. Not necessarily in relationships. Like the different pills and sits and isms.

Ok. I understand, maybe that's why I'm single. I don't want to be battling with my loved one. I was in both and the loving one felt much less stressful. I'm not really referring to normal day-to-day disagreements that couples have; every couple has challenges, I'm more referring to the differences we have that are not accepted by either sex or the slurs we use for them as in women are shallow and men are pigs. Amongst others.

Bottomline, YOU CANNOT WALK DOWN THE STREET STARING AT PEOPLES CROTCH without expecting negative feedback. The End.

Scary and creepy could mean two different things. Scary as in a man in the elevator looking all serious with a briefcase in his hand wearing a fur coat and people saying hi to him and he doesn't respond. That's scary. A guy in the elevator sticking his tongue out at me and grabbing his crotch, that's creepy. I'm sure those people you're talking about that you say they say when someone is black, they're scary surely not talking about Oprah or Denzel or Obama.

You know this is not what he meant. It's so obvious. Why would it be bad to look at someone's crotch you're about to sleep with or in a bedroom with. Your arguments are so way off.

Are you calling black people creeps. Seems like it; to associate calling someone a creep is like saying the N-word. Black people call each other the N-word all the time.

Why do you like to pick the pieces out that serves your agenda. I wrote a response with about 3 paragraphs making suggestions. It is more common for kisses and hugs to be a request than for family pictures and pictures of inside your home. As long as you're not forceful. Since all my years of living, I've never been asked for those kinds of pics from a man, but i've had countless requests for kisses and hugs, and i'm sure that's the case with most women. I also said the least she could say is no. I'm not going to argue with you anymore in this thread - I did enough of that already here, I just wanted to point something out to you.

This is why you have no merit. I went back through this thread and saw multiple responses suggesting what to do instead, including my own. I stopped at the second or third page. I saw enough. 'Also except for a video entitled creep, I didn't see where he was either called a creep or was demonized.

LOOKS ARE IMPORTANT. Let's get that out the way. But.....drum roll please.....women view looks differently than men do. Both equate to how that look makes them feel. Men see physical beauty in a woman, they like the hair, the body, the facial structure, whatever physical attributes you like, men see that first and that still equates to how that makes them feel. The rest comes later. Women, on the other hand, sees looks as how can this guy with his kind of look make me feel. They look for looks alright, but it's with an internal radar. A radar that can tell what kind of look comes with a particular personality and how that fits into what she's looking for at that time in her life. That's why, for a woman, her "looks preference" changes depending on what she is (LOOK)ING for. If she's just looking for a good time, then she (look)s for the type of guy with that particular look and scans him with her built in 'look's radar'. That's what's physically attractive to her in the moment. Player, player. If she's looking to settle down and for a long-term relationship, same thing; her attractor radar scans for the type of guy she THINKS is ready for that. If she's looking for marriage same thing, fat or not, short or not skinny or muscular or not. These play a minor role so I won't entirely dismiss it, but its not the major thing. If she's looking to be pampered and treated like a queen or spoilt, then she scans for that target. That will be the simple-looking guy who just wears simple but expensive clothes that doesn't stand out, maybe an expensive watch or shoes but still not flashy, the simplier the better without looking cheap. If her subconscious seeks out patterns from her childhood that makes her gravitate towards toxic men who will abuse her (she's unaware of this), she will scan for those by their looks and believe me she can tell just by his looks, but of course it's not all. If she seeks someone she can mother around or try to dominate or boss around, then, guess what, the type of guy with muscles and 6'6 ain't gonna be her type, no matter how gorgeous he is. He won't be attractive to her, You get the drift. So when you see attractive girls with average looking guys it's because of this reason. How does that type of guy fits into her agenda and views and also the stage she's at in life and how he makes her feel. Women don't usually go for men because they just want to get laid, they go for what type of feeling they want to feel; and even if they do just want to get laid, it's because she thinks she'll feel a certain way by doing it that has nothing to do with his dick, and whatever guy that can satisfy that feeling is who will score with her. Not just how physically attractive he is by societal standards, but by her standards. That's why it can baffle men so much when they see certain types of men with certain types of women. THIS IS WHY. Every circumstance, situation and person can be excluded with this dynamic and it is just a generalization and there are exceptions to every rule, but this is a pretty much accurate description of what looks look like to most women. It's internal, that's why we're so emotional and intuitive. All your trying to look attractive on the outside isn't doing anything much if she's not attracted to your inside, whatever that may be, and is not subjected to anything in particular and also includes toxicity. This is why your ugly buddy get's laid more than you do. Or the chump that's 5'5.

If he was just a regular guy off the street with that same look, he would have problems. But his status did the trick. There are no mistakes in the Universe. Men are providers. In order to provide you need to have something to provide. In order to be a container for provision, you need incentive. Tadaah! That's where women come in. We provide the incentive for men to go make something of themselves in order to be able to provide and protect their families. So that's why status becomes a value for women, whether they directly benefit from it or not. Our physical appearance is the incentive men need however that looks like to suit his desires.

Lol

Smart. Me too.

Looks like Hunchback of Notre Dame.

I'm sure she wasn't telling you how she manipulated men into having sex with her like yeah I had to use some survival strategy to get laid or yeah I had to trick him into believing it would feel good. I also never said people don't intentionally manipulate others. In fact, I DID SAY THAT IN MY COMMENT. Financial maybe but not sexual, remember...that is saying people do manipulate. If you're going to quote me please quote something I said, not what your mind interpreted.

Didn't expect that ending.

Women don't need manipulation tactics in getting their sexual needs met. That is clear cut and direct. Financial, maybe but not sexual. A simple question or call to action will suffice.

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Is that a part of the undeniably IS or THIS, or All that is. Lol Sure honey, you explained the "IS" perfectly well. No need for more ISSING. Then it'll turn into WAS-SING. Then I'll be asking to define that. So, I'll return to the NOW-ING, and forget about the KNOW-ING, hehe hehe.

You're welcome, I assume you agree or that it peeked some curiosity.

Intuition cannot be scarred by social conditioning. It is inherent. Built in, so-to-speak. Women are highly intuitive by nature.

Doesn't all this fly out the window if it's all imaginary. If the brain is a figment of consciousness then consciousness is beyond the brain. Seems like you're trying to rationalize and reason your way into this phenomenon, but ill leave it up to Razaard to answer you because I know he will. You're making good points but if its a dream then reason and logic won't cut it in everything and there will be glitches.

I wasn't really asking it for a definitive answer. I'm already free, like the thread I posted before. I'm not saying the egoic mind is free but who I inherently am. As everybody else. This talk about what undeniably IS ....what is the IS. Isn't it "IS" that I asked the question, Isn't that what happened. Does this "IS" only refer to the sun, the moon, the birds chirping and the rain falling, or does this "IS" includes my asking the question why is my cat free and I'm not. Is that a part of this undeniably IS. I bet you I will get an answer filled with riddles and metaphors and non-duality speech. Hehe

What about men. Well, I guess they stare at me because of my mind. Because they love the way I think. My intellect and personality. That's what they look at when they call to me and say hi. "Hi I think you're smart would love to get to know that lovely brain of yours, would you go on a date with me?" Me: "Sure, my favorite place to go is the library, can we go there?" "Sure as long as you talk dirty to me in the anatomy section and whisper to me how much your breasts are superficial".