Princess Arabia

Why all this fear mongering. If you want to fight, fight for what you are for and not for what you are against.

@TenebrosoI have seen from you time and time again from your comments that there is something inside of you that subconsciously don't want to be in a relationship with women. There's something there, and I can sense it. This didn't come from one or two or even three comments you've made, but overall. You show no signs of trying to change your belief systems and are intent in carrying them on to show your points. You speak with such conviction and without proof of the majority of the people in existence; mostly about what you've seen on social media and maybe what you've seen in your own experience. I've said to you before that you will constantly see circumstances that matches your beliefs as that's how the Universe and the brain's RAS system works. I can come on here and rant about beliefs that i have about men in general and how men are this and how the majority of men do this and that and how they are and blah blah blah, but I don't because I'm aware they are my own beliefs; and they are not true. All beliefs are false and it's up to us to start believing things that will serve us in order for us to start to see Reality bend in a way to suit those belief systems. Carrying on about what I don't like about men and blah blah, will only cause me to see more men with those behaviors end up in my experiences. Not to say, they won't pop in; but they will be quickly eliminated just from the fact that our frequencies doesn't match. It's the same as how people find this forum because it's frequential. Gravitational pull at work. You constantly say the same kind of things but yet, nothing in reality stays the same. It's forever changing. Only thing seems to be the same in your experiences is your beliefs about how you feel about men/women relationships. It's been like that for quite some time. That shows me, you need to get into that subconscious mind of yours and change the programming.

Yes, yes, yes, yes. All others too, but these are the ones I relate with 100%. I will say though, that it all depends on the approach. I can tell the ones that approach multiple women just for the sake of approaching or if they are approaching me because they really are into what they see. Personality usually comes later as no one really knows what you're like until they've at least gotten to know you a bit. What I can sense, though, is if a guy has gotten to know you a bit first on a platonic level (without coming on to you sexually or even being too aggressively flirtatious in the beginning) and then asks you out. Shows he's not just about sex and wants to get to know you more. I ignore just about every guy that cat calls, have pick-up lines, especially if they are corny and generic, and the ones that asks me if I have a boyfriend or if i'm married first thing out of his mouth. I also ignore guys when the first thing out of his mouth is of a sexual nature.

Lol. I just developed it a few days ago. I was fine before. Never underestimate the power of the mind and brain images. Someone constantly instilling in the brain that you have trauma, may cause one to develop trauma from that alone. Now, I have trauma from being constantly told I have trauma. Now I need someone to constantly tell me I'm rich. Lol

Brrrrruggggshhish, that name. Don't mention it to me if you don't have to, please. And, no, he's nothing like him.

It's not about being insecure; but coming from you, that question you asked me could have been a trick question and I wanted to tread lightly. Never know with you; you're a piece of work - in a good way, though.

Everything exists.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C-JDxH5oylD/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

This made me chuckle. Great post. You actually came across my mind a few days ago, btw. Happens all the time when people disappear for awhile then reappear. Seems like I sense them coming.

No, I was simply stating what OP stated about the victims.

Excuse me. Look at the heading of your post. You also created devilry by suggesting it in your heading.

👍

If somebody burns his house down and leaves him homeless, they are eternally innocent and not the bad guy. He's the one to be blamed for allowing that to happen and needs to shape up and love himself more. How about that, forget his kid being bullied.

I was pointing to the fact that there's no such thing as eternally innocent. That was my point. Maybe I wasn't clear enough.

This makes no sense. Eternally innocent leaves room for eternally guilty. The ego doesn't need to be dissolved, it needs to be recognized as being non-existent.

@Javfly33A bully only bullies because he/she doesn't love themselves and they are weak and looking for love. It's not about being bad, but ignorant of the law - the law of one. In the big scheme of things the bully and the victim are one, so saying God created individuality is a sham and spews from ignorance. The victim is there to help that bully recognize who they are, and in the relative world he will go through circumstances that will bring him back to that recognition; and it will be strings of incidences that, if traced back, will lead that bully right back to it's victim which is actually himself. These are the types of things God puts itself through so it can live through experiences to bring itself back to itself. Every challenge we go through in life, we put them there just so we don't become too complacent and coast through life and that victim is one of them.

Love it. The devil at it's tricks.

Lol. I wasn't focused on the paycheck part, all I saw was "I DEMAND YOU NOW TO PLEASE MY EGO. lol.

For me, it's not "finally, there is Spirituality". Spirituality is all there is and everything else is a by product. I'm not saying I'm obsessed with it, because I'm not. I incorporate it into most things I do. Most of it is just knowledge and information that isn't really relevant to who you truly are anyway because the Self already is that. All that needs to be done is to remember who you truly are and to abide in that place. The rest are just practices to help you to do that. I can be walking down the street and hold that space. Washing the dishes, talking to a friend. When I feel myself getting impatient with something, I go within and say to myself, it's OK, everything will turn out ok, and it usually does. It's all mind stuff for me, which doesn't require for me to drop anything I'm doing because the mind is always with me. I practice in everyday life. I observe my thoughts and try not to get caught up in them. It's not a "I don't have any time for, or I need to balance", for me because it's not a chore, a duty or an obligation. It's a way of life. It doesn't require any effort once you see it as who you are not something you want to become. If i want to dance the night away in a club or have drinks with friends, it doesn't mean i'm being "unspiritual" or if I'm reading a book on Spirituality, watching a video, doing spontaneous devotion or watching my breath and thoughts, it doesn't mean I'm being Spiritual. Either one of those things is just what's happening and i can return to that Eternal space where the light emanates from at any time. I try not to look at it as something I do, but a way of being. The ego is not who I am, I am the light of Awareness and the more I can concentrate on that and remember that, it doesn't matter what I'm doing Spiritually because all that is still the ego trying to achieve something that is impermanent and none of it is everlasting or eternal.

No, you're not entitled. If you already put money down on the course because that's what was required; and there was a release date set prior, then yes; other than that no. He also has the right to cancel the course entirely if he wishes. Do you go around asking whatever phone company you support by buying their phones when is the new update, style or new model coming out, or inform them that you are entitled to know because you support them, no. Or any company you buy anything from in the manufacturing space.

I understand where you're coming from with this. Maybe it's the way in which it was said, that seemed inappropriate especially when addressing what someone else deemed to be a major accomplishment that they showe vulnerability by sharing. I thought your comment was a bit crude too: but one should be open for constructive criticism if they are looking for possibilities of improvement. Treading on someone's accomplishment, though, should be approached with caution.

Leo's Meta upon Leo's Meta pointing to Leo's Meta.

Yes, I'm aware of that, we all are. So am I on your pov's. So it's pov's upon pov's pointing to pov's.😜

Sure, when it is done and he releases it. Nobody here, except for Leo, will know the answer to this. I'm surprised you even expect anyone to even know the answer to this. Leo himself probably doesn't even know the answer to this question as of yet.