Princess Arabia

Happy Birthday!!! We Love You. ❤️❤️

May I ask you something. Is there anything in your life that you had huge expectations for, in whatever way and it gave you lasting satisfaction. Just asking. If so, could you briefly describe.

Never approach a woman and say you're attracted to her. She will immediately put up slight resistance, even if she says thank you, smiles or blushes. Going up to her is enough for her to read between the lines. Main reason is, it signals sex and you don't want to put her on guard silently scoping you out to see if she feels the same. You approaching her doesn't mean she will be also attracted to you immediately but maybe throughout your interaction she may develop that attraction without feeling pressured to feel the same way you felt initially. Not saying it verbally to her allows for room to wonder on her part, even if it's evident. This is because of the reason I stated above. You have internally set a bar for yourself and now you're nervous she won't feel the same way. It's OK that you don't know, that's a part of the game; but not telling her you're attracted to her leaves room for you to not have to try and impress, convert her if she doesn't seem to be and allows for a more comfortable approach. Most people have a cell phone which has the time displayed and asking where the nearest Cafe is just sounds like you're asking for an impromptu date. This one doesn't even sound plausible. Working on? I'm not even sure what you mean by this. Telling someone you're attracted to them on an initial approach is not non-romantic. A simple hi how are you, what's your name? Is suffice. Are you from here? I was walking by and saw you were alone, would you like some company is a bit of a stretch, but still better than most. It all depends on the situation.

Nice one!

It is stupid to call someone who is not at an appropriate age to decipher maturely, circumstances that are for the mature, stupid.

Be careful of commenting in ALL caps. It's been known to be a reason for warnings. Some caps is fine, I guess, but not all. Looks like shouting.

All you spoke about are mental. I didn't see any mentioning of what will physically happen.

It's not about making me happy. I can't resonate with happiness anymore. It's a fleeting state. One that comes and goes. So is sadness, joy, etc. It's about what is. It happened and it cannot be denied. There's no teaching, nothing to learn, nothing to hope for and nothing to seek. It is a message that requires no doing; and more doing only enriches the seeking energy that seeks for something it will never find. What everybody is missing (apparently, because nothing is missing), is that this is already whole and complete. It doesn't mean anything has to stop because there's no one that chooses to stop or start. Sadness, happiness, joy, misery, suffering may still arise but it's happening to no one and it's only the individual that thinks it's separate from the whole that claims these to be happening to them. The body feels pain, but that's just a sensation that arises in the body. These sensations can lessen as a result of the contracted energy loosening but it can only happen on its own because nobody is doing it.

I was merely responding to what you said initially. There's no denial of anything here. I can only deny what seems to appear and the future is not appearing so it can never be denied. 'It will not exist' doesn't exist. We don't have to continue this. I was merely suggesting to you that there is no trap to be lost in because the Absolute is everything and nothing simultaneously. So the trap is also the "no trap. You can't lose. There's nothing to lose and nothing to gain in what's Absolutely complete and whole. Only apparently in the dream of separation which really isn't happening to begin with.

Consciousness is a dream. Separation. Requires a someone to be conscious of something. The Absolute is all there is. With that reasoning you might as well not pay your bills or mortage, if there is no future nothing Will happen right? The paying of bills happens in the present. Nothing cannot stop happening because nothing is happening to begin with only apparently so. There is only Aliveness, every moment is a new moment and that's even saying too much.

I used to watch Jim a while back, few years back then I stopped. No particular reason as I like to spread my wings. Tony, I've only seen one or two of his videos, but I'm not a fan. Anna yes, I love her and have been watching her for a while. I watched a lot of stuff. Now after my confusion crises seemed to happen and I accidentally stumbled across Emerson non-duality and started watching him a lot, something happened as described in my "Oh My God, this is it" thread and ever since then a lot of the contraction seems to apparently fell away from the body allowing for more clarity, even though that's still only apparent since there's no one that gains more clarity. It's more of a losing. Then i've been watching a lot of Jim lately. The funny thing is I was already familiar with Jim but it was never as clear as it seems to be happening now. A lot of the stuff he says seems so obvious now and has broken away a lot of the confusion that seemed to be happening. It's the only message that totally resonates with something inside the body and is loosening the contraction a bit. No one is doing it, it's just seeming to happen. It's not a doing but more of an undoing, if you may. Everything now is less tension and the seeking energy is dieing. There's still remnants of an individual here and I'm not claiming to be awakened or anything like that. I'm not even saying there's not a me or that there's a me, it's just what seems to arise in the talking but is not being claimed as a me doing it. Its hard to speak without saying I or me but it doesn't matter.

Nothing here claimed to be or awake. No one awakens because there's no one asleep, there's no actual person inside these bodies to awaken and there's nothing actually happening to cause an awakening. That's a dream. James's apparent denial is you making sense of what seemed to happen. Evidence cannot be found in Aliveness and what is seemingly appearing because the evidence would also be aliveness and what is seemingly appearing. There are no others and there's no others to be aware of anything going on because what's going on is also what's appearing to be others not aware of what's going on. It's only an appearance. Everything is not one because one suggests there's an opposite. Infinite is more appropriate. Everything you've described in the latter part of this phrase is a call to action of a doer. There is no doer. Only thing that can seem to happen is the individual can lose it's sense of self and apparently recognize there was no self to begin with and there was never a personal identity. There's Noone speaking as they do. Speaking is just simply happening. I don't know why you speak as you do because there is no one here to know. Being trapped in a bias is illusory. There's just simply responding. There's a response that seems to happen due to the contracted energy in the body that comes with it a knowing that someone typed and then a response becomes imminent. It's just what happens. "This means" is you giving meaning to what happened and means nothing. It only means something to the one putting meaning behind it. "Lying to yourself" is suggesting there is a self and that that self can lie to itself. There is no self. There is no Reality, it's just what is and what is, is nothing appearing as something. There is no such thing as direct experience, only seemingly so, because it requires an experiencer to have an experience and there is no one that experiences. That's the dream. "Felt" is only apparent because there is no one to feel anything, the energy of feeling arises and the dreamer claims it as theirs. One cannot be actually lost because there's nothing to be found. All there is, is wholeness and whatever seems to be lost is also wholeness and completion. The Absolute appearing as someone that seems to be lost. All you're describing in the latter are just stories. Stories about separation, what courage seems to look like, what fear seems to appear as. No connection has been actually lost even if it appears that way so there's nothing to do as far as that goes. Going back and embracing doesn't make sense since there is no going back or moving forward in what is; that would only be what is (The Absolute), appearing as going back and embracing. How can there be a discovery of what is happening. That would also be The Absolute appearing as a discovery of what already is.

Just about everything, every word here Implies a doing, a future and something hoping and wishing for. Would you say there's no past and no future. What do you think that means. If you say there's a past and a future can you point me to it please. Either way, both cannot be found, so good luck.

That suffocation automatically comes with a sense of "I". A "Me". Always. Period. End of Story. It's just how strong of a suffocation that contracted energy feels like in the dream, because it's not really happening. Only seems and appears to happen.

I never said that this is going to speak and make sense at all times. Most of what you said I agree with, not all but most. Doesn't negate the fact that what is, is, and that there's Noone that actually does anything because there's no one.

True

Ok.

If I wanted to know what it was like to have a discussion with @DreamCryX, the best way to find out is to have a discussion with you. Next best is to ask someone who has already had a discussion with you. The Professor is the one that gave the Grade A student the grade, so he is highly qualified because he is the judge, so to speak.

I guess getting better means no one dies.

Every time I interact with you, you keep telling me what Leo says. Is Leo married or has a long-time gf? Nothing much to say to you if you can't think for yourself. What others wrote is irrelevant to what I wrote.

There's no evidence needed. Dating coaches aren't learning from wolves, they're learning about women from interacting with women.

Go ask a baby what does the word "means" mean. Good luck. Ask an adult they will tell you what they learnt what "means" mean. It's learnt. Doesn't mean anything. Go ask a tiger, ask a giraffe, ask a man who cannot read or write. It only has meaning to someone who has made an interpretation of the word. An interpretation is not actual.

Exactly why women are the best teachers for how to reach other women because the same men that are teaching you how, learnt it from interactions with women. There's a middle man involved there. Women are the direct source.

If you're trying to have more money, the best thing would be for money to have a conference on the best way to obtain it. Since money cannot talk, the next best thing is to ask someone who has already achieved having money and learn from them. Well, women can talk. Women haven't gone through the learning process of being a man that is trying to attract women but women have been the best teachers for the men teaching men how to attract women. Why not go directly to the source of the same kind.