Princess Arabia

Delusion all the way. For you and for everyone else that is using Spirituality to end suffering. To think suffering is proof of anything, is utter neurosis and to say you're not handling things right is pure narcissism at its best. I really feel bad for all these egos who are trying their best but my dear lovely one, you will be eating you tail forever and going around in loops if this is what you're trying to do. Everyday you will wake up and maybe ease the pain a little bit from your neurotic mind but it will be right back there in the morning after next with another neurotic problem to fix and you will feel better again by doing your sadhana or vipanana or your pannini or whatever it is that you do and be right back to suffering that neurotic mind of yours again in no time until the day you WAKE UP out of your narcissistic neurosis and realize there's nothing to fix and no one to do anything to stop suffering because suffering is not happening to anyone its just the egos neurosis and sense of importance that thinks its suffering and all this is happening out in thin fucking air. Woo woo, hee, hee haw haw

This makes zero sense. Please explain as I don't want to put words in your mouth, but it just doesn't make any sense to me at all. I couldn't even come up with anything to collaborate what this statement means. What does the lack of feeling fulfilled and having a lack of a sense of completion have to do with posting on a forum and joining a community. Seems you have turned life's experience into this big meaningful epic and just simply can't see how people can just do things they enjoy doing without it being a sense of lack and not feeling fulfilled. Seems you've put your own meaning unto what it means to post on this forum and are now projecting that unto others. Ill agree that most humans feel a sense of lack and aren't fulfilled, thats just pretty much Universal and really need not be said. May I ask what would a person, in your opinion, who doesn't feel a sense of lack or feels fulfilled what would they be doing more of. This statement to me just screams self-judgement and self-criticism and how you feel about yourself and what you think is your own reasons for being here. Now you assume others are the same. It's the only thing i can think of as this activity is just that, an activity for the mind to engage in. Life is filled with meaningless activities and the only one in my opinion that is meaningful is to become familiar with your true nature. Anything else is just entertainment for the mind and distractions from nothing because they are forever changing and puts people into neurosis and emotional flux. So anything we do, I don't care what it is, if its not becoming familiar with the true nature of your being is just entertainment or survival.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C_pyJ5CvgbD/?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet&igsh=ZDNlZDc0MzIxNw== Lentil and Quinoa bread made easy.

Now Trump is talking about the government recognizing only male and female genders. He says God created only two genders. He hasn't even been sworn in yet but already trying to dictate. Umph....

Sometimes a team may win a competition not because they're so great but because the other team screwed up.

Most times this is what happens. The current President takes credit or gets blamed for the previous one that was in office. People don't realize this and they think it's the current President's work.

This is why; your belief system. I've never seen such baloney told about women and break-ups. The part about men having a harder time might be true but the reason you gave about men waiting for them to get single is just not the case. It doesn't even make a lot of sense if you really think about it. You're also underestimating a female's ability to choose her men wisely. Even if there are a lot of single men, what makes you think she's willing to jump and just date any ole male. I'm tired of explaining how women are also having a hard time finding relationships; but guys keep insisting that we have it easy just because men are always hitting on women, So, that doesn't mean anything here. We're not looking at tits and ass like men are, we have to literally feel something first and that doesn't just come by looking. Also saying men are very loyal, is like speaking Chinese to my ear. You might be, but that's not usually a trait that most men have. If that was the case, so many women wouldn't be able to make a living in the adult industry. Every time I turn around there's another man willing to or is talking about cheating on his gf, even on this forum and I can make plenty of references and quotes from within threads if you'd like; might take some time and energy but they're there.

No, an identity is structured around thoughts, beliefs, assumptions and conceptual ideas. She helped him to build the structure, her herself is not a part of the structure. If she leaves the structure still remains. Think of the egoic mind identity. Look how hard it is to deconstruct. Something outside of you is not considered a construct. A construct is embedded deep within the mind's psyche. Think of her as a construction worker and him being the building. If the construction worker leaves the building still remains. Memories can be erased or replaced or forgotten an identity remains because that's what you are identified with and the power of the I AM is stronger than any memory. I am confident, I am able to get any girls I want, if he believes these things with conviction and strong emotions, they are more apt to be his experience. His memories are just that, memories and have no power - only if you keep remembering them by putting your awareness there. Just because he says what he says about her being perfect now, doesn't mean he cannot or will not find a replacement. I already explained the role she played in building his identity structure. He can forget about her while the structure still remains. Doesn't matter what he says, it's the identity structure that matters. These words could mean Jack shit for all you and i know. He might just have been saying that and even if he believes that to be true, that didn't make up his structural identity, so it doesn't matter. He's not just feeding an urge; he's maintaining an identity he created. He has to now keep that identity alive or it will die. This is the power of an identity change. It is now who you have become. Would you like to die. You eat food and do all sorts of things to keep yourself alive. Well, it's the same thing here. Don't think there's a person underneath there that's trying to survive that identity. It's mind. The belief structure is now embedded in the mind and it is what's making the decisions to cheat, not him. The identity is, literally. It's a living thing. This is what there's no free will really means. Every action, thought and belief system is being run by this energy and that's what's really making the decisions. If his identity now is one of, ilm confident, I can get lots of women etcetc, the identity is what's taking over not him. There's no him. When you hear me say there's no one, this is what I actually mean. All I'm saying here to you is what there's noone means. It's all energy and energetic structures at play. This is why we become addicted, make poor choices, do things we say we wouldn't do but do them anyway, there's literally no control. The identity structure is what's doing it run by the one Universal energy of intelligence. He can't help but think this way now because it's a part of his identity structure and he wants to keep that alive.

Says the student when the teacher asks "What will you like to be when you grow up". It sounded like an occupation.

A man doesn't have a downfall or some kind of backlash to worry about after he gets successful with the help of a woman. Only the woman does. That success will stay will him (as long as he's still successful) while she gets none of the credit. Meaning, no one will give a woman credit for a man's success if they don't know. They will look at him and just say he's a successful man. His made up story about a woman's helping him doesn't need to linger on and is of no value to him, so if that story goes, no problem. It doesn't matter if the entire thing collapses because he can rebuild because he now has the built-in tools to do so of which she was helpful. What he spoke about was an identity change and she cannot take that back from him and any collapse you're talking about can only bring about a new success story because that's what success is built on - do you identify as someone capable to be successful, and are you a changed man. His answers to both those questions will be yes. He has become the success so it doesn't matter if he loses some material possession. He will gain that back in no time.

I suffered through reading that. Lol

Even when your thread is in the Political sub-forum, it's still about the same man/woman issues you have. Shows how obsessed you have become with this issue. It's pretty sad to see how neurotic you're getting about it and how you have allowed this issue to hijack your awareness when it could be placed somewhere that is more to your liking. It has turned you into a victim and a slave to the very thing you're fighting against.

This doesn't even make sense because I never mentioned the word rude. Only time I did was when you called my comments rude and i was responding to that. I think it's best for me to exist this conversation because all youre doing is showing how your mental state is one that is incapable of teaching what your book is about I don't want to let you dig a deeper hole for yourself than you have already and by just being triggered by the word rude is an example that you're not in a mental state to be teaching how to live life wisely and how to master emotional states as your book suggests along with other topics on a similiar scale. Why don't we just end this right here because I'm not here to trigger you nor to stop you from trying to achieve your goals and I wish you all the best with your book. I'll wrap it up here and will only respond to you on any future threads you start, but not on this book issue. Thanks.

Please quote something that i've said to you or even to someone else concerning any of your threads in the last day or so that was rude. It has to be my exact words and not what your mind thought I was saying or meant to say. Please do.

Nothing in either of my comments to you in this thread or any other thread to you have I ever demonstrated those things you mentioned. You have accused me of being rude to you, but I bet you if I asked you to please quote verbatim (word for word) where I was rude to you, you wouldn't be able to do that accurately. It would only be what you thought was being rude and not me actually being rude. In fact, you just said people in your past have treated you in those ways you mentioned which has nothing whatsoever to do with my communication to and with you. That shows you are bringing up traumatic events into the current circumstances and are getting triggered by things that I'm not doing. Maybe take your own book's advice and learn how to do the things yourself that you've mentioned the book is about in the AI generated overview.

This is not true. Doctors are not going around treating patients because they have personally had those issues. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to envision what it's like to have sleep issues. Not only that, one can have enough knowledge on the biological nature of sleep, what causes sleep deprivation or inconsistent sleeping habits or just overall sleeping problems to be able to conjure up an intelligent thesis on what sleep issues entail. IOW, one doesn't have to have experienced sleep issues to know about it.

Using an analogy to make a point you're trying to communicate is not referring to anyone in particular outside of that analogy. In this case, I wasn't associating you with a murderer; I used that analogy to show that any action can be taken but not considered to be good one. He said you took action and that's good, so my point was a murderer also takes action. Wasn't associating you with a murderer. Also, to write a book of that caliber and to be showing the wisest ways on how to deal with adversities and whatever else your overview said, you sure are not demonstrating your own wisdom; and just from this alone, I would not find you credible enough to produce insights and critical thinking to give those types of advice to anyone on your own. Telling someone who gave their opinion on a previous comment made about it being AI generated (the overview, that is), to "better mind their language" and to tone down the way in which they communicate their opinions - which you call rudeness, is not, imo, the best way to respond to someone who you think barely knows your situation to be able to make assessments like I did. I'm sorry, but the more you talk, is the more you seem incaple of writing such a book on your own or even to come up with the type of insights to tell anyone how to live life wisely. This is not meant to be an insult, just an observation, but your grammar is also very poor and your writing is of a very low quality all in comparison to such a book title. One should have at least the basics down to be able to write a book all on their own about how to live the wisest life. You don't even know the meaning of the word rude.

Not reliable to put you under a drugged up state maybe. You say that from ignorance. Not in a bad sense, but from not knowing and the power they have. How come I don't have sleep issues, matter of fact very minimum health issues overall. It's because I've trained the body to heal itself by using things that it was designed to recognize. It's OK though because both our programmings are different and you will have to train yourself to have a belief that mother nature is medicinal.