Princess Arabia

Thanks, I took a short one and that's all that was needed. Boom, there it was, right before my eyes. Still is. Beauty is, belief or no belief, it's still the Absolute. Total freedom.

This means nothing. I'm not discrediting the use of psychedelics, nor what you're saying to be the case. But it still means nothing in the Absolute sense. I already realized the no control, no free will, no other and all that. I don't need to go get terrified to understand anything. Not necessary. I can still say what I wanna say and so can you. I can still believe what I wanna believe and so can you. You don't have authority to say what's true for one to not be the case and say they know nothing. You're right because there's nothing to know. It's happening as we speak. No time, so how can anything be known, no one, so whose experiencing. Let's not get into that, and I'm not saying you're wrong or right but I have a different view on things and you have no right to want to change that without being asked and insinuate noone knows anything because no one knows everything. How do you know who hasn't had a mystical experience or not. You make a lot of assumptions in your posts and you tend to think you're above the rest in your knowledge and teachings, and tend to discard others'. I don't think mystical experiences are that big of a deal in the Sbdolute sense. How can it. There's no separation. None of what you say makes sense only intellectually, rationally, logically and to the naked eye will look all mighty and dandy. It is the case what you say but you are missing the piece of Absolutism, no separation, I don't care how you rationalize the oneness aspect by saying whatever you say. How can there be consciousness when consciousness is separation. You speak with clarity and all that and very eloquently and do make sense, but the Absolute is unknowable so all that are concepts and theories and ideas. How can an illusion create non-illusion. Idk, I'm not going to get into this with you, as I respect you and think you're highly advanced and I could be the one talking shit but that's on me and will get to whenever it happens. A lot of what you say I agree with and even say the same thing its just I don't think you understand that this is Absolute Aliveness which I've become aware of so-to-speak, and it gets discredited by you in saying all the time I'm parroting and using words that aren't mine. I even made a post about it but no i have to do psychedelics or I'm not qualified, which is bull. I'm coming from a place of not being exposed to all these fancy teachings and have not been too indoctrinated with all those fancy labels and gurus so for me it's more natural and raw. A lot of repetitious exposure can lead one to see certain things without the use of any chemicals and can happen spontaneously as with me so I don't have to be scared shitless to realize the Absolute. I don't need to see fingers on a wall and elephants under my bed.

Yeah, exactly, except the "and that's now a problem" part. It's not a problem. There are no problems in the Absolute sense.

Forget what I said above; but to answer your original question, watching horror flicks here and there won't affect the subconscious. Maybe the subconscious was already impressed with so-called dark stuff, as you put it, why they are watching dark stuff. Many "dark" people get attracted to Spirituality in the first place because they are seeking the "light", are depressed, suffering, anxiety ridden and lost, so movie preferences won't change because of some Spiritual teaching. It takes at least approximately 90days to impress the subconscious and it takes an identity shift for that to be implemented, but that's if you want to go that route. Another route is to say, it's just a matter of taste and doesn't matter in the Absolute sense and calling something "dark" over "light" is just a duality and there's no difference but only what the individual sees it to be subjectively.

Ok, thanks.

You keep trying to tell someone about themselves rather than trying to understand where one is coming from. There's such a thing called rhetorically. My post isn't dominated with questions even if there seemed to be some. I have already figured out why, and it's for the reasons I stated.

You see, that quote you shared, doesn't resonate fully. Certain parts but not the whole because it still requires a "doing"/"not doing" and for someone to see the message for there to be a difference. I can only resonate now in this context where it wouldn't matter if someone recognizes this or not and that no one is excluded.

Yes, but there's no question so I'm not seeking an answer. I can write here as to why I think there's no becoming anything and why there's actually no creation, but what's the point. It'll just be rebutted and more theories and concepts and stories will take it's place. As I said, I've "recognized" certain things, even that's saying too much as there's really no recognition of anything because what is just is, but without getting into all that and speaking on the relative dualistic level, I cannot relate to processes anymore as there is no time nor space. Even trying to explain to me how that's not in relation to all this, will not resonate. Method=Time. How can that be real. On the human level I don't live my life saying there's no time or space, so I'll just sit still and do nothing.....no, that's foolish, but I understand the difference when it comes to what really makes a difference and what doesn't. Nothing does. If I get to a stage where I see it differently then so be it, but for now, this is what resonates and that's just the case. It doesn't even make it any better that I'm starting to see so much "evidence" of what I'm saying and the apparent obviousness of what is, so if it takes for there to be another apparent shift then so be it. Even your response to me, when you can always seem to explain away so many things in detail at all tines, just didn't resonate. I'm not really looking for answers and if i have to become something that you say I am already then that really doesn't compute.

Leo is probably searching the archives to try to remember what you're referring to; and i also doubt even going that far.

Nice!

Not diminishing your post; but take a look at my latest one, the one about "Why I'm skeptical about Spiritual teachings, and what I can't get pass". I just made it and now reading this is just another example of what I mean. It's like an epidemic of some sorts. Go check it out and let me know what you think. Spirituality section. It doesn't really give any solutions but may bring more clarity, or more confusion, who knows,

The word human is just a word. Don't get caught up in lingo. I'm a cat, how's that. Nothing changed, did it. Now let me go buy some cat food and see how that works for me.😜

Makes sense.

Do you realize you're doing the same thing; it's just you're doing the opposite. Saying you're human VS saying you're not human are both taking stances. A certain vintage point. You're biased about your point and against another's. Saying "I don't like", is a form of trying to control what is. You saying you're human VS someone saying they're not, doesn't change what is.

Ok, thanks.

Yes, I understand that. I'm just saying I don't think calling it source is appropriate since a source also needs a source whether its blankness or not. I guess it's just word games at this point - but for explanatory reasons.

Ok

Knew you'd be back posting more relationship posts. We try to escape ourselves but there's nowhere to go. Post and leave, post and take a break. No need to bash home.

Spirituality attracts the dark. Religion the light. No need to attract what you already possess.

I guess the video left you more indecisive.

Great. Don't need his loving. Stay over there Satan!!!!!!!!!

Hmmm, I wonder why. Lost forever doesn't even make sense. If I got lost coming home, wherever I end up for the next 50yrs I guess I'd still be lost. My old home done changed tennants like 50x but I'm still lost trying to get back there... forever.

Seriously funny.

Lol. Must be, it's quite funny.