Princess Arabia

A little overdoing it there. Maybe you'll also be energized when you're dead. Maybe while you were in the womb and maybe it was your energizer that energized your mom and dad to have sex.😜I'm gonna call you the energizer bunny from now on.🦫

Ok, fine. I get this. I don't get up everyday saying oh well there's no one in this body or life is a dream or this is Maya or this is an illusion and I'm not the body/mind. Life goes on. There's a resonance with what I said and it can be recognized, realized or intuited but its energetic. Certain things can fall away to reveal certain things as never was. The Absolute cannot be realized, as that realization would also be the Absolute. Anyway, these are just words and words cannot point to the Absolute since they are also the Absolute. So, anything you or I can say about it is also it. Life goes on. I'm here, you're there and even with all this illusion talk, shit feels real and it's undeniable and the show continues until it doesn't.

That was a very interesting video. I really enjoyed watching it - the one about the enlightened brain. The content was very enlightening. So I guess it must be so because it surely enlightened my brain just by watching it. Seems like what he's explaining is a trained form of enlightenment. An informed one. One where you're consciously doing things to achieve this state. It still seems to be a learnt process and can be helpful to the human brain; but I wouldn't call that enlightenment as how we tend to think of what enlightenment is. Sadness, unhappiness etc, are learnt; so of course happiness and joy can also be learnt. It seems though, that one would have to put in tremendous effort to sustain this state because of the body's nervous system and how much of this energy is sustainable at all times. This is probably how these practices that we do on the spiritual level are able to produce these results because they expand the body's capacity to hold these states permanently.

"Nothing to do about nothing". That is not even a grammatically correct statement - much less an accurate interpretation. Two negatives in a sentence cancels each other out and is redundant. Not calling you out on the grammar, as we've all blundered in that department, and this is not English class; but at least try to interpret in a way that is interpretable(sic).Yes, I know that's not grammatically correct either; but I was only trying to balance out my interpretation of your mis-interpretation. Lol. Doesn't matter either way because there's nothing you or I can say that can change what is. To sum up what I've been saying is this: There's no one in these bodies. They are just bodies operating mechanically. There are no choices being made. Choices are just happening, but by no one. Existence/Life, Reality/The Absolute, whatever you want to call it, is all there is. It's alive and conscious. There's no one that's conscious in the Absolute sense because that's duality which doesn't exist in the Absolute sense. The Absolute is conscious of itself so if a human is also conscious of itself that's separation, which ultimately isn't the case in existence - it's all ONE, or not two which is just another term for non-duality, which also doesn't exist in the Absolute sense because that implies duality of which there's ultimately none. If this is the case, where is the "I" that's doing anything but only within it's dream. This is why we say life is a dream. It never really happened but only appears so. Appearances are not actual and the only thing real is the Emptiness from which everything appears. Maya is the illusion of life which isn't really an illusion; because for an illusion to occur, time and space is needed which are also illusions. That's the paradox. Everything that arises from the "I" energy has within it an appearance that seems real. That's it's nature. So, if there's an "I", there has to be space for that "I" to appear that is separate from an object of awareness. Both consciousness and awareness are illusions also because they both require for there to be objects of consciousness and awareness/to be conscious and aware of. That's the dream. There's nothing one can do to get out of this conscious/awareness state because that implies a self doing that. It just falls away naturally and reveals there was noone there in the first place.

You interpret what I've said in the past as me saying "nothing to do about nothing". If I was to ask you to reference words that were said by me where I've said verbatim " there's nothing to do about nothing", you couldn't. What you have said is also a learnt and conditioned response. Nothing wrong with it, but it's just thought about another thought. It's all learning and conditioning. The nothing to do about nothing interpretation that you've given what I've said in the past is just that - an interpretation; which can be interpreted in many different ways depending on the filter being used to interpret it. It's all interpretation.

Says who, the "I"? Is it the I that created this "point of it all"?

What/Who noticed/experienced this.

Then what do you think the partner is then if everything is mind. You have fallen into the mind trap. The mind is what's saying this, and the mind is what confirmed. It's all mind, remember. This is utter self-deception at it's core.

There is such a thing called tact. There's such a thing called a process and there's such a thing called respect. Neither suggests that the lack thereof is manipulation. Most guys who aim to sleep with a female also have the aim to talk with her first and get to know her even if it's just for a bit. Women know already if they're willing to sleep with you when they meet you. All most guys have done that succeeded is to not have screwed that up.

You must be pretty young and inexperienced. That's just my assessment from reading your post and the kind of advice you seek. Why don't you try a bit of spontaneity. When it comes to these things, no amount of planning out and speculating will work. Talk to her. Find out about her from her. No one here can advise on what to text someone they know nothing about. The reason you're asking is also because you know nothing about her other than where she's from. You avoided her call because you were busy, and now you're asking for advice on what to say. You weren't busy when you made this post. You have to go into this head-on and stop using your mind to try and figure this out. If she speaks or write enough English for a balanced communication, I would suggest you go talk to her directly and let the conversation flow on it's own instead of trying to figure out something that hasn't even started yet.

Nothing I said turned this into a spiritual discussion; you did.

This is an assumption and not based off of anything concrete. The reason you are a self is because you're conscious of that self.

As "me".

Yes.

To be in a state of not imagining division anymore requires thought. It's thought that says it needs to be in that state. That's why people meditate. It's a battle between thoughts. The mediator of thoughts. That's why some get headaches and heart palpitations from meditation. Not saying don't meditate, just saying it's still a thoughts battling thoughts.

It's delusion. Delusions fall away. There's nothing to get rid of in this respect. It's energetic and when it's not being powered, it simply falls away. The reason the self was borne is because of the knowledge it acquired. That's why baby's don't have a sense of self until a certain age. Neither do most animals. The ones that do are the ones with high intelligence like dolphins and elephants. You don't see them trying to get rid of it, though because they haven't acquired that type of knowledge only humans. It's a self-defeating task as the self isn't there in the first place. Our intelligence is our greatest tragedy, all it does is enables us to acquire more knowledge which is the reason for the seeming separation.

The self you're trying to get rid of doesn't exist. The very demand to rid yourself of the self is the thing that keeps that energy alive.

How can there be a dissolution of something that isn't there in the first place? That's why.

Ok. Nice perspective.

Yes, he sounds real.

❤️

Funny, because I have attraction to both genders but only romantic attraction towards men. Funny how attraction works. I don't even consider myself bi even though I've been with women. I don't even label myself as straight just sexual. Words that come before sexual are just labels we place upon ourselves.

Oh my. His life if filled with so many controversies even the Jamaica models couldn't catch a break. This is like 8yrs ago.

I went to this Modelling School in Ja. I entered Miss Jamaica Fashion Model contest and out of thousands I came in the top 50 and did the final show. I didn't win but the show was fun. This was a long time ago. Now, they have expanded a lot.

Jamaican are everywhere. Even in Antartica.