Princess Arabia

Member
  • Content count

    11,939
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Princess Arabia

  1. I think all that is happening here is the misunderstanding of the word "confident"; could be on my end. I don't see confidence in a woman as aggression, masculine, says what they want and being a leader. I see feminine confidence as knowing who she is, embraces her femininity, can attract any or most men she wants because she's confident in how to do that. Shows confidence in the way she walks, talks and communicate. She doesn't compete with other women because she knows she doesn't have to because she's the prize and men compete for her. (Not in a cocky or egotistical or manipulative way, just - confidently). Look at my use of the word prize how you choose but I'm aware of what I mean when I use it and this forum has not shown me otherwise that the woman is the prize. She doesn't try to control men and allows herself to be lead in a way where she's respecting herself and the male counterpart because she's the one who chose to allow him that leadership position and is confident in her choices as the feminine. I could go on, but this is how I see confidence in a woman. What you have described, to me, is confidence in a man. There's a difference. This is just my take and the way I see it.
  2. Protection. The nice guy can't protect from the wolf attacking. They also exude an air of adventure, women love that. Unpredictability. The need to nurture, they feel he needs nurturing and feminine energy to tame him a bit and she's the one to do it. She's the one to tame him and make him settle down. That's the way women passively compete. She can't tame this bad boy, but I will and he'll settle down with me. Things of that nature.
  3. Hey hey Mr always getting on my case, I like what you've said here. I really do. What you've said is actually more effective than more blah blah blahing. The chain reaction that comes from the energetic responses is way more contagious than just people gaining more knowledge in this department. People are responding to their environments, and if more people start to lead with actions and ways of being; it can rub off in an impactful way and others will follow since people love to act like sheep.
  4. I get what you're saying and I'm not denying that. You just said girls love psychopaths and degenerates not that psychopaths and degenerates gets laid the most. There's a difference. Other females who don't just lay up with men that easily could hate psychopaths and degenerates. So, girls who love to lay up, are easily sexed, may love psychopaths and degenerates.
  5. It depends on the man and depends on the woman. Depends on what you're looking for, age, whether you're looking to get married, just a gf or just to get laid. Yes, for men looks are important initially; and the hotter the better but beyond that certain traits are need for the relationship to be sustained and a mature man knows what these are and is attracted to more than just looks. I think you mean smarts and intelligence more than confidence because I've met many men who love a confident woman and who knows what she wants and is comfortable in her own skin; I would categorize that as being confident and secure.
  6. When are you going to stop dissing on women. Why would you say females love psychopaths and degenerates. You must not think too highly of women. There are women out there that don't. That's what you'll think if youre only hooking up with girls and not ladies.
  7. Did you see this movie? How you described it is not how I remember it to be, but maybe that's just your view. Yes, it was based on true events. No need to bash somebody's movie recommendation.
  8. Nothing wrong with people not caring. Not everybody loves dumplings and bananas. I used to be like that till I realized most people don't care. It's just not their time.
  9. Ironically the point of the post.
  10. Didn't know you birthed dogs. That's a first.
  11. I have a cat; and I have all my life had cats. They have taught me so much and I'm grateful to have my current cat as a companion. Finicky beasts they are and very "sometimish", but that's ok because I am too. Hehe. I never had a dog, even though I love them too as with all animals, because they require so much time and care and when I'm away I can leave my cat for a couple days and not worry because cats are independent and don't require to be walked or spoon fed like most dogs do. Your post is on point, though, because dogs, as well as cats, can teach so much about unconditional love and being in the moment.
  12. Setting AI on me, I see. Gave up? Lol
  13. This Forum is a Solipsistic Orgy Lol. All for one, one for all.
  14. This is a good point. I think some people who are not into spirituality, or conscious as you put it, can still enjoy the material for what they are also. There are people like that who don't worship their material gains and see them for what they are.
  15. Never said there was a problem. Just pointing something out.
  16. Desire is not the enemy, we all have it yes. Never said otherwise.
  17. Some places got hit hard and some were spared. Due to the mountains and location of the hurricane, some places didn't get that much damage and all i heard of was one life lost which was still one too many.
  18. If you would like for me to make posts about my life what I'm going through, my problems, my living situation and how my love life is going I can do that too. I don't put myself into a category of non-dualist, Absolutist or Denialist. You have. You are also denying certain aspects too by critiquing what i'm posting. Nothing wrong with that, because I welcome critiques as I myself do engage in that, but not as a way of putting down one's style of communicating spirituality in how they chose. I'm not in denial of anything and like I said I can make posts about my personal life of which I do have other threads about stuff other than spirituality. This is just the section for this stuff. How am I denying anything just from making specific posts. That's not denial. How is my post even non-dual talk. I don't even get that. It's merely stating how spiritual gain and material gain have a similar outcome. If you don't agree, then you don't; no need to call me out on what "ist" you think I am and have categorized me to be.