Princess Arabia

Arugula/Pineapple/Mango/Red Apple/Avocado/Red Onion/Cucumber/ Grilled Molasses Chicken. Italian Vinegarette. Yum, Yum.

What's my real name? Turn into a frog in 5mins, since you're all potential.

I'm over 40 and still going strong.

Lol. The disease is getting younger. Lol

You cannot live forever as something you're not. You believe you're a human that is suffering. God did not invent suffering. Do you see a rainbow in the sky forever. Do you see a cloud holding it's same shape forever. Do you see any form maintaining it's shape forever. Anything in form is mortal. We suffer because of our misunderstanding of who we think we are. Suffering is a part of separation. It goes hand in hand. Sever your limb and you feel pain and suffering. That's analogous to us separating ourselves on the mental plane from reality. This is why suffering is a mental activity. Take away what you know and you cannot suffer. If you lived in the woods all by yourself with food and water to sustain your life and you know nothing else, you would not suffer. Suffer from what. It is because of what we think we know why we suffer. A death in the family is just that, apparent death. What you think you know about death is why you might suffer that person's death. You mourn their loss because you know them. Do you suffer the death of someone you don't know. That's just an example. If you suffer because you are poor, you suffer the thought of not being rich. If you knew nothing about being rich, you would not suffer being poor. If you're in pain because of an accident, that's pain and that is biological. Also mental, but biologically induced and not because of thought. No one gets out alive precisely because no one is alive. What you are looking at is mechanical and biological and mental programming. It's the body that is alive and because it's in a form, it has to die eventually. There's no one inside that body, it's just information being transmitted through energetic intelligence. There's wiring and static and negative and positive charges just like an electrical equipment. The form came from the formless and has to go back from whence it came. Ice goes back to being water. The wave goes back to the ocean.

We cannot give a tree a car and tell it to drive it. It is not equipped to do so and is not meant to drive a car for obvious reasons. We cannot teach people anything and have them learn anything if that learning capability wasn't already inherent. It's because it's already pre-programmed within you from the intelligent source to be able to learn. We cannot drink gasoline to nourish ourselves because it wasn't meant to go in the body and we cannot fly because we aren't equipped with wings to do so, that's why we invented airplanes. Do you get the drift. As far as enlightenment and awakening goes, you cannot enlighten or awaken if it was not already an inherent thing within you to be able to do so. You cannot awaken a tree or a bird or an apple, can you. They are living things even an apple is a living food, but they are not equipped to be able to awaken. You are pursuing something that you are capable of doing because it's already within you. You cannot awaken if you are not already awake. It's impossible. All the dead sources you are using to awaken yourselves has no power. All the inanimate and non-sentient things you are programming yourselves with to awaken has no power in of themselves to awaken you. The awakened being that you are is what gives them the power; is what's charging them with the electric current of energy that you are. You cannot awaken yourselves if that capacity isn't already inherent. You cannot throw awakening down your throat and eat it to become awakened. We water a rose bush and give it the right conditions to grow and mature into full blown roses, not apples. It is impossible to turn a rose bush into an apple tree the same way it's impossible to awaken into a conscious more enlightened being if you are an elephant. Whether or not I believe in enlightenment and awakening is not the issue here. Understand than. I'm not arguing for their validities. I'm simply saying it's impossible to awaken or become enlightened if you are not already that inherently. Acting that way or feeling that way is besides the point of my post. Those are outer manifestations of the cause. What you are really pursuing is to be able to embody, feel and express your already enlightened and awakened self, to charge it, to shock the psyche into being that, If there's already such a thing; and like I said, my post is not about whether there's such a thing or not but to show you how it's not possible if you were not already that. So, when I say, you are already awakened or enlightened that's what I'm pointing to. I'm not saying one is acting or being awakened. That's on the individual to recognize it within themselves to notice the difference. We cannot do that for them. We can activate our already awakened selves into being not become enlightened out of thin air. That's all.

Spirituality isn't needed, the same as reading a cooking book isn't needed, but we do it anyway. Nothing is needed, because we are everything. Sounds cliché i know but it is the case. Oh, but I need air to breathe, says who. The one that wants to survive.

Sounds like the sum of 8billion egos😅Luckily you have that much. Don't have to deal with one after the other after the other. Face them all at one time by turning away from the mirror. Don't look into the mirror, see the one looking at the person looking in the mirror.

Awww, got stuck. That's what every piece of equipment will get you - stuck. There's no end to existence. So there can't be a point to get to. I'm always playing, that's my problem😜

Yes, brilliant, as Gettoefl said. I need to change my signature so I don't get ridiculed. Then again, in the end, it said investigate ourselves to find out what we ourselves actually are. I guess investigate thyself is more appropriate according to your piece of summary.

Did you even ask if I meditate. The very notion that you assumed I don't without asking me, I can't take you seriously.

is that the best you can come up with. According to you, that meditation and psychedelic is also imaginary - according to you. You guys should really get to understand what you're talking about so as to not contradict yourselves. If something gets pointed out to me that I can acknowledge is contradictory, I will examine it and go right back to understanding again. If I can't understand it, I leave it alone until I can. I'm not immune either. But you evaded my response by telling me to go use an imaginary substance according to you its all imaginary. Make sense to me and i will listen and or change my mind.

I can see a tree and a bird right now as I type this from my bedroom window. Am I imagining that. No. If I walk in the kitchen and start to tell the story about how I saw a tree and a bird, THAT'S IMAGINATION. Now, the bird and the tree is imaginary.

Are you imagining that statement?

I've never been in a physical state unless it was mental before hand. I have pain in my hand because my sense of touch or whatever sense I used to feel the pain. I'm not saying there's nothing appearing out there, it's only appearing. That pain is being felt on the outside of your body. Take the pain and carry it to the doctor and leave your hand behind. Can't be done, therefore the pain is mental. You see that tree with your eyes, sense of sight, walk away and there's no tree to use that mental sense of sight to see. It's all mental. Saying I can't see the tree but I know it's there is still using memory or some sort of mental capacity, in this case it's thought, still mental.

You are missing the point of what a mental universe means. Cannot neglect anything you know physically. Where's the neglect. Not neglect in the sense of ignoring, neglect in the sense of not knowing it's there. How do you know it's there, by using your senses, can you grab a hold of your senses physically, no you experience them on the mental plane. You cannot know something physically unless you use a mental sense perception.

Perfect example: You know the experience of seeing that question. You could never responded like you did if you didn't know that you experienced him asking you that question. No matter what the response said. You still know you experienced the question being asked. Not saying you know the answer, but just the experience of the question. Alright that's enough.😅

This is not a Self-Inquiry class. 😅😅It's an experience class.🤣

And you're experiencing that you know you don't understand.🤣🤣

No doesn't matter if you've heard about it before. You know it now regardless if you've ever heard of it before. You might not know what it is exactly, but that's not what I'm saying. Say you experience tyjnft (that's not a typo, btw) what is that, if you say you don't know then you didn't experience it. If you say well I did experience it, well you just don't know the name of what you experienced but you still know it.

You cannot even know something you do not know. Everything known is known. If you want to know what something is like that's a different thing from experiencing it. Cannot experience it unless you now know it. Maybe that's a better way of saying it.

You will still know space. You will know about space before hand and not know it; but in order to EXPERIENCE it is known then. Get it.

I go to Spain for the first time in an airplane in a blue dress and got off the plane and took a taxi to the hotel room. WHAT PART OF THOSE INDIVIDUAL THINGS ARENT KNOWN. If you say the whole entire experience.....well you know a plane a dress a taxi and what a hotel room is even after experiencing it for the first time. Cannot experience anything not known.

How do you know you're having a new experience. It's because you know its new. To know it's new, you would have to have something known to compare it to. Cannot experience the unknown. Thats why we don't experience death or sleep.

Lol