Princess Arabia

When we sleep there's nothing there; that's what NOTHING is like. What appears in our dreams is random, spontaneous, boundless, timeless, limitless, spaceless, not going anywhere, didn't come from anywhere, isn't moving nor is it still, it's real and unreal, nothing to get from a dream only fantastical stories and fantasies, dreams are boundless and description that describes THIS. All there is. If we imagine a night dream and it's components and how it appears, the same applies to appearances here. It seems to happen in the head or within consciousness but it's not, it's not really happening but seems real while we're asleep dreaming. No one says this dream seems real even though it's a dream; it's after one awakens when it's like, holy moly, that nightmare sure felt real or that dream felt do real and sometimes if someone awakens you in the middle of R.E.M sleep where dreams occur, it's feels like a shockwave and we need a few minutes to recover from the shock. Think of all of reality and what appears as if it's a dream that you have claimed to be conscious in and aware of. You're saying that when you sleep at night you're outside looking in at the dream and that you're conscious that you're asleep. That's what's being presumed here when we say we're conscious and aware. That's the 'waking dream". There's no one conscious and aware of anything only seems that way. This is not a dream, you are the dream. The one that claims and relates is the dream and is not separate from. The one that thinks it's experiencing, relating to others, perceiving reality, seeing, tasting, touching, hearing, smelling is the dream. Those things are actually appearing to happen, but to no one, by no one and for or against anyone. We've grabbed a hold of the appearances and labeled it and categorized it and measured it and judged and criticized it to pieces and claimed it to be happening to us when in fact it's happening all by itself just like a nightly dream does. Whew that's enough.

Just random stuff about anything.

Ever seen a mad man or a person that live on the streets picking garbage and eating whatever they can scrimp up from people's remains or those people who are just constantly begging for a dollar by the roadside or the alcoholic you see every year by the same corner. You know those people. You might have even donated a few dollars here and there. Ever seen a few for years maybe 5-10yrs doing the same thing looking the same but maybe a bit older. Never getting fat, never limping and crying out for pain, never walking with a stick, never getting chronically ill, obviously not going to weekly and monthly check-ups or routine doctor visits and even more obvious not at home making green smoothies and eating salads and counting calories and watching their sugar intake. None of that stuff is happening but they are doctor free, medication free, disease free, fat free and walk faster than a church mouse can run and obviously no dimentia or Alzheimer's. They remember the same spot to go and very rarely get hit by cars and are pretty coherent except for the ones that are obviously mad. You get the drift of what I'm saying. I'm sure there are some that have gotten ill and probably passed away or whatever but I've seen some for years who just keep on trucking. While us folks as soon as we slip up here comes the pre-diabetes and the high blood pressure and the stroke and the cancer and the degenerative diseases that's plaguing mankind where we take medications galore and pill pop and have to go for doctor's visits to cure our sleeping problems and high cholesterol and sibo and gall bladder issues and watch for gluten sensitivity and everything else on the planet that the homeless, mad, discombobulated alcoholic and trash-digger are immune to. Another clue how this shit is just going to appear however the fuck it wants. Go ahead and make up stories all you want as to why this is that way and that is this way. What goes for one person doesn't have to go for another and there is really no cause and effect happening here. These are the kinds of things I look at, and observe and notice including how the baby operates, but that's another topic.

Animals aren't suffering. What you see is an animal you relate to as being real like yourself and project that unto the animal and because we feel suffering, we say that animal is suffering. Suffering appears to happen, but it's not claimed by the animal like we claim suffering for ourselves. This isn't saying to ignore an animal that appears to suffer but there's no one to ignore or not ignore anyway and whatever happens happens. It's because we feel a sense of self why suffering is claimed as "my suffering". For the one who doesn't have that sense, it's just suffering but not happening to anyone.

......because there's no one in that body. Both aren't related. There are no real relations. Clues are everywhere. We just make up stories so it makes sense to our continuity storyline like the one Hojo made up. Hi Hojo, nice story. Makes sense. Mine doesn't.

Lol. Now that you put it that way. At least you didn't curse me out for saying that and also made no apologies. We both have a right for feeling the way we do and it's a healthy take when we both can express that. I already puked right after reading it.

I think it's because there's no history and baggage with the random one-night stand and no one to judge their performance and for them to know about it if it wasn't good. So they get in their heads and use the opportunity to unleash their fantasies with her because she's like an empty vessel. Women usually have sex with the person and not the body parts and it's more mental and emotional for them; so that takes some knowing the guy intimately already for the sex to be awesome even though not necessarily.

Lol. Looks like the best and most effective push-up sexercises ever.

The teachings of awareness is only pertinent to what the observer can observe. If you are awareness and awareness suggests what one is aware of, is the individual aware of the inner workings of the body like the vestibular system which is responsible for balance and how the body coordinates it's movements to allow for inner perceptions. Perceptions not perceived by the observer. What's aware of that.

Letting go, accepting and surrendering are nothing but spiritual jargon and mumbo jumbo. Just another to-do list for the sense of separation. Those words indicates separation and a separate person that can do those things by choice. It's a dream. No reality on its own. The individual lives in its own reality and cannot let go, accept or surrender to what is. Life is not personal and sees no one, it doesn't even see itself its so immediate. Knowing, understanding and clarity are also illusions. Can't know, understand or clarify what's not separate. All that's happening is nothing appearing as all those things and isn't separate from that. So it doesn't know, understand or can clarify what is already because that implies continuity which is also illusory where there is no time and space. Welcome to the dream where no one is dreaming and is the dream itself. Now let's carry on with knowing, understanding and clarifying, accepting, surrendering and letting go as that's life and we don't want death, do we. We have to stay alive. When the dream ends we're dead. This is already absence and that's why we seek. Seeking for what's not there. We have to know and the only way to know is by being separate. The knowing energy seeks to know but what it doesn't know is that it cannot know itself, so it keeps on seeking until it collapses and we call that death.

Sounds good.

The alternative is what is happening.

That's the past. Today is a new day. Do you stay the same everyday. Lots of stories in your head. Respond to what's happening, not what you think will happen.

Take a chill pill. All I said was it seemed like AI also and was responding to inlytened comment which wasn't offensive either just a remark he made. It's either it is or it isn't. All the other stuff you're creating about the remarks is your doing. Who's ganging up. Seems a bit extreme. Unrelated to the discussion???, hmm I wonder how. It is related. Anyway, I'm through with all these hostile responses from a mere "seems like it is" comment I made. Maybe unleash some of that hostility where it belongs and the unnecessary attacks. Where is the disrespect in me saying it seems like AI, especially that it even is. Ugh, thank God for paper trails because all that anger for someone who just said "seems like it is" is definitely uncalled for and its not like anyone was accusing you of any wrong doing, and using the term gaslighting is just convenient for justifying your unnecessary anger. I could have easily try to turn this into an issue by saying AI generated responses are supposed to be marked as such and stated to be the case as it's forum policy. I didn't then, but I'm doing it now. Goodbye.

Where do you see disagreement on my part with you?

Go ahead and accept what already is. Accepting is like saying I don't like what is but I'll accept it even though I have no choice to deny it as it already happened. Accepting is just another form of control for the illusory ego which makes Accepting illusory as well.

@Rishabh RNice to see you're showing yourself some love. Long way from focusing on the hurt like you're used to doing in the past and now moving on to see how you can turn the tables from feeling victimized to empowerment.

Did you ask him first if he wanted sex. If that's why he's interested. There are some that don't care about that and some that likes to do it with someone special and maybe that someone special takes time and in the meantime enjoying a woman's company is satisfying for now to them until maybe it leads to something special or not. I'm not saying this is the case with op but you just automatically assumed that's what he was chasing..,,,,,,maybe because it's all you chase but not every man chases random sex. Your comment almost made me puke.

@NilsiAll I said was seems like it and you jumped on me like a raging bull dog. You even admitted you did. Seems like it is not a judgement or criticism. Seems like it can be interpreted in many ways and you seemed to choose to interpret it as I was attacking you or saying you shouldn't have used it. There was no need to come off like that. But you did, and its OK too I'm just responding to the tone in your voice. Doesn't matter either way, I'm only expressing how I feel about your very angry response. I won't tell you how I think you should have responded as that's not my place, but I can say I think your response was a bit harsh to a "seems like it" remark.

Have a nice day.

I don't know who's more deluded, you or me.🥰😜❤️😏

Seems like it.

Close your eyes. Where did the sense of sight go. It's not like you turned blind or you went through an operation that turned out wrong. All that happened was eyes closed and all of a sudden one cannot see; open eyes, see again. So I guess sense of sight is only partially working and is contingent on eyes being opened. Is the sense of smell, if working properly, only smells certain things; does it say I don't feel like smelling that. Thing is, cover the nose or stop the breadth the sense of smell doesn't work. That's the same as shutting the eyes and seeing stops. Weird isn't it. If there are senses at play how are we controlling the senses with a call to action. By doing something. I can let the sense of sight go away just by closing my eyes. That's some powerful shit. What if I kept my eyes closed for a year straight. Does the Guiness Book of Records acknowledges someone who can make the sense of sight disappear for a year. Is that sense there at all times or only when eyes are open. Dunno

Why does it seem like thoughts are only a bother when there's someone there listening to them, claiming them, paying attention to them, engaging with them. They are also noticed more when there are no distractions; like sitting in a quiet room or even driving a familiar route. Thoughts seem rampant then. Walking down the street. They're usually more rampant when alone but as soon as someone appears and says something, the thought that was maybe going to appear right at that exact moment ceases to be. I mean thoughts were coming and going every 1/10th of a sec before Suzie came into the room, but Suzie's appearance for one minute slowed down the thoughts. Or was it Suzie's appearance. Maybe for a quick second the me disappeared or there was no observer at all not even for Suzie. Maybe no one on both sides was there listening and talking just for a millisecond and thoughts stopped appearing to the or for the one that believed the thoughts were his to begin with, now for a quick sec that self disappeared. Thoughts were there, always there and at the same frequency, but no one acknowledged them in that millisecond, then it came back again and here comes a thought and Susie's appearance seems morbid and mundane now so the thoughts start to speed back up again. What if those thoughts never lost momentum, it was you that did. You went in and out of existence not the thoughts. Maybe when one experiences thoughts slowing down, maybe it isn't the thoughts that got slower but the individual or observer collapsed in those moments. Food for thought.

Nice @Joshethat whole take is gold.